Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)
The Xiaomi Electric Scooter 4 Pro 2nd Gen edges out the Acer ES Series 5 Select as the stronger all-round commuter: it pulls harder on hills, feels more planted at speed, and benefits from Xiaomi's huge ecosystem of parts, guides and service options. It rides like a slightly overbuilt workhorse that you can more or less forget about and just use.
The Acer fights back with rear suspension and puncture-proof tyres, making it kinder to your joints and lonelier for your tyre pump, and it usually undercuts the Xiaomi on price. If your commute is mostly flat, you hate punctures more than you love torque, and you appreciate a softer ride, the Acer is a perfectly serviceable choice.
If you want the more confidence-inspiring, future-proof platform, Xiaomi wins. If you're value-driven, range-focused and ride on average city surfaces, Acer stays in the conversation.
Now let's dig into where each scooter quietly shines - and where they annoy you.
Electric scooters have grown up. These two are firmly in the "serious commuter" camp: no stunt nonsense, no 60 km/h ego trips, just solid mid-range machines built to replace your bus pass and some of your car trips. I've put plenty of kilometres on both, through wet mornings, rough bike lanes and the usual daily abuse that spec sheets never talk about.
On one side, Acer's ES Series 5 Select: a tech-brand debutante trying hard to prove it's more than a laptop company on wheels. On the other, Xiaomi's Electric Scooter 4 Pro 2nd Gen: the latest iteration of the most copied scooter silhouette on the planet, now with more muscle and a better brain.
The Acer is for the commuter who wants comfort, simplicity and range per euro. The Xiaomi is for the rider who wants punchier power, better road feel and to plug into a huge community and parts ecosystem. Both have strengths; neither is perfect. Let's see which compromises fit your life better.
Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?
These two live in the same slice of the market: mid-priced, single-motor commuters aimed at adults who actually have somewhere to be, not kids doing laps in the cul-de-sac. They sit comfortably above the rental-style toys but far below the monster dual-motor rigs that turn every ride into a physics experiment.
Price-wise, they're neighbours: the Acer usually comes in a bit cheaper, the Xiaomi asks for a little more in exchange for brand clout and stronger performance. Both promise enough range for multi-day commuting, top speeds aligned with European regulation, and a weight you can wrestle into a car boot or up a short flight of stairs without needing paramedics.
They compete for the same rider: someone doing a few to a dozen kilometres each way, mostly on roads and bike lanes, perhaps with the occasional badly laid paving stone to keep life interesting. You're choosing between two different philosophies of "sensible commuter": Acer's comfort-and-features approach versus Xiaomi's power-and-robustness approach.
Design & Build Quality
Pick up the Acer and it feels like what it is: a nicely finished, mid-tier commuter with a bit of "consumer electronics" polish. Matte black, some subtle green accents, clean internal cabling - it would look perfectly at home parked next to height-adjustable desks and standing coffee meetings. The aluminium frame keeps things reasonably light while feeling decently rigid, and the folding joint doesn't scream "rental scooter after a hard weekend."
The Xiaomi, by contrast, feels like someone built a small bridge and then put wheels on it. The carbon-steel frame is stiffer, heavier and more "industrial". There's essentially no perceptible flex in the stem when you heave on the bars, and the folding clamp locates with that reassuring mechanical "clunk" that says: you can lean on me in a corner and I will not embarrass you.
Both hide their cables well, but Xiaomi's execution is a bit more refined - you see decades of mass-production experience in the details. The dashboard integration is slick on both, though Xiaomi's screen covering tends to scratch if you look at it with the wrong cleaning cloth. Acer's cockpit feels more "gadgety", Xiaomi's more "tool-like". Neither feels cheap, but the Xiaomi does come across as the slightly more serious piece of hardware.
Ride Comfort & Handling
This is where their design philosophies really part ways. Acer goes for rear suspension plus largely maintenance-free tyres. Xiaomi says "no moving bits, just proper tyres and a solid chassis."
On the Acer, that rear shock absolutely earns its keep. On patchy urban tarmac, expansion joints and the odd stretch of cobbles, you feel the edge taken off nicely. The solid or foam-filled tyres would normally be a dentist's worst nightmare, but the suspension and larger wheel diameter rescue the experience. After a five-kilometre slog over broken pavements, my knees were still talking to me in polite tones - which is not always the case on solid-tyre machines.
The Xiaomi, without suspension, relies entirely on its fat, high-volume, tubeless tyres. On smooth or moderately rough asphalt, it actually feels more "planted" and composed than the Acer - no bouncing, no spongy rear end, just a direct, slightly sporty feel. You read the road more, but in a good way. Hit sharp edges or nastier cobbles, though, and you're reminded very quickly there's no spring between you and physics; the scooter stays controlled, but your ankles start filing complaints.
In corners, Xiaomi's wider bars, rear-wheel drive and wider tyres make it feel more confident. You can lean a bit and it tracks a clean arc. The Acer is perfectly fine around town, but with the front hub motor tugging and the slightly softer rear, it feels more like a calm commuter than something you'd carve a bike lane with.
Performance
Both are legally tamed to civilised speeds, but how they get there - and how they deal with hills - is very different.
The Acer's front motor delivers what I'd call "polite urgency". From a traffic light, it builds speed smoothly and predictably. You won't be embarrassing cyclists with carbon frames, but you're not holding anyone up either. For flat-city commuting, it does exactly what it should: enough shove to feel zippy without ever surprising a new rider. On steeper ramps, though, especially with a heavier rider, you feel it lose enthusiasm. It will get you there, just with a little more patience and a bit less pride.
The Xiaomi is a different story. The higher-voltage system and beefier peak output mean that when you thumb the throttle in Sport mode, it hustles. You feel that extra torque in the first few metres - it lunges in a controlled, confident way that makes merging into faster bike traffic far less stressful. On hills the difference is night and day: where the Acer starts to puff, the Xiaomi just digs in and keeps pushing. Even with a big backpack and a heavy rider, it holds a respectable clip on inclines that make "normal" scooters wheeze.
Top speed is broadly similar in real-world use due to legal limits, and both keep their pace fairly consistently as the battery drains. But the Xiaomi gives you more of that "there's still power in reserve" feeling, whereas the Acer feels tuned to use what it has carefully, not enthusiastically.
Braking is solid on both, but with a different character. Acer's disc plus e-brake combo has a bit more initial bite and feels familiar to anyone used to bicycle discs, though it does mean occasional adjustment and cleaning. Xiaomi's drum plus e-ABS setup is more progressive and wonderfully low-maintenance. In the wet, I slightly prefer the Xiaomi's sealed drum; in the dry, the Acer's rear disc gives you a bit more "grab" if you really haul on the lever.
Battery & Range
On paper, Acer throws the bigger battery at you, and you do feel that in day-to-day use. Its real-world range sits comfortably in that sweet spot where most people can do two, sometimes three, commuter days without reaching for the charger, even riding fairly briskly. If your route is mostly flat and you're not trying to set a Strava time, this scooter is very easy to live with. Range anxiety simply doesn't feature much unless you're doing genuinely long detours.
The Xiaomi's pack is a bit smaller, but the more efficient 48 V system claws some of that back. In practice, both scooters land in a very similar "usable" window: roughly a good solid day of mixed commuting with headroom, or two lighter days if you're not a Sport-mode addict. Push either hard in cold weather and you'll be hunting a socket sooner, but that's just lithium chemistry reminding you who's in charge.
Charging times are... unexciting. Both are very much "overnight" devices, not "grab a coffee and get half a battery back" machines. Xiaomi's magnetic charging connector is nicer to live with than Acer's more traditional port, but we're talking convenience points, not deal-breakers. For most owners the pattern will be the same: ride a day or two, plug in before bed, forget about it.
Portability & Practicality
Neither of these is a featherweight. If your daily routine involves multiple flights of stairs, your quads will develop opinions about both scooters in short order.
The Acer is marginally lighter and feels just a touch less awkward when carried by the stem. It folds quickly and the latch to hook the stem to the rear fender is easy enough to find without a lot of fiddling. For short carries - into a boot, up a single stair run, onto a train - it's within the "I can live with this" zone. Do that several times a day and you'll start looking longingly at lighter models.
The Xiaomi adds about another half-kilo and a slightly bulkier presence. It's still manageable, but you really notice the mass when you're swinging it into a narrow car boot or trying not to brain someone on a crowded staircase. The folding mechanism is rock-solid, but the scooter's overall size makes it feel more like carrying a compact e-bike than a "little scooter". Once folded, though, both park neatly under desks or in hallways without dominating the space.
For rolling practicality - pushing them in pedestrian mode, navigating tight lift doors, wedging into busy bike racks - they're very similar. If you absolutely must haul your scooter up three or four floors every single day, I'd say: pick the Acer if you must choose between these two... and maybe also reconsider this entire weight class.
Safety
Both scooters tick the important boxes: dual braking systems, decent lights, reflectors, and - crucially - proper indicators. That last bit matters far more than spec sheets make it seem; being able to signal a turn without letting go of the bars is a big step up in real-world safety.
Acer's safety story leans on its large wheels, conservative power delivery and that planted, slightly soft rear end. It feels stable for new riders, and the combination of electronic and mechanical braking gives you redundancy. The headlight is placed sensibly high, though I'd still call it "fine for city lit streets, not my first choice for unlit country lanes." The IP rating is also slightly kinder, so if you get surprised by a downpour, you're less likely to be nursing water-damage anxiety all the way home.
Xiaomi takes a more tech-forward approach: rear-wheel drive for better traction under acceleration, traction control to tame slippery surfaces, automatic lights that just come on when they should, and that sealed front drum brake that doesn't care if you've just rolled through road spray. At speed, its stiffer chassis and wider tyres feel a touch more secure, especially in sweeping turns. The downside is that with no suspension, it will happily transmit every sharp hit to your hands and knees - which is a safety issue in its own way if you're tense and bracing for bumps.
In bad weather or on sketchy surfaces, I trust the Xiaomi's tyre and brake setup a little more; for nervous beginners on mostly decent roads, the Acer's softer, more docile feel is very forgiving.
Community Feedback
| Acer ES Series 5 Select | Xiaomi Electric Scooter 4 Pro 2nd Gen |
|---|---|
What riders love
|
What riders love
|
What riders complain about
|
What riders complain about
|
Price & Value
The Acer undercuts the Xiaomi by a modest but noticeable margin, while offering a bigger battery and rear suspension. On a pure "specs per euro" level, it looks attractive: more watt-hours, a nicer ride over rough surfaces, and puncture-proof tyres mean less ongoing faff.
The Xiaomi, though, gives you more performance headroom, better hill competence, and a build that feels tuned for long-term abuse. You also buy into a gigantic ecosystem: spares are easy to find, any half-decent shop has seen one before, and there's an army of YouTube guides for every tiny quirk.
If you're counting every euro and your riding is mostly flat urban commuting, the Acer's value is hard to argue with. If you think you'll keep the scooter several years, want better support and parts availability, and maybe weigh a bit more or have hills in your life, the Xiaomi justifies its higher ticket fairly well.
Service & Parts Availability
This is the Xiaomi's home turf. It's the de facto standard in many markets; tubes, tyres, brake parts, dashboards - they're all just "a thing shops stock". Even where official Xiaomi service is slow or bureaucratic, independent repair places know these scooters inside out.
Acer, as a scooter brand, is the newer kid. The company itself is huge and has European service centres, which is good news for warranty claims. But the third-party ecosystem is much thinner. You won't struggle to get basic consumables, but don't expect a wall of Acer-specific upgrades and spares in every corner shop any time soon.
If you're the sort who never touches a spanner and is happy to rely on official channels, Acer is fine. If you like knowing that every component has half a dozen clones on AliExpress and that there's a forum thread for your exact problem already, Xiaomi is way ahead.
Pros & Cons Summary
| Acer ES Series 5 Select | Xiaomi Electric Scooter 4 Pro 2nd Gen |
|---|---|
Pros
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
Cons
|
Parameters Comparison
| Parameter | Acer ES Series 5 Select | Xiaomi Electric Scooter 4 Pro 2nd Gen |
|---|---|---|
| Motor power (rated) | 350 W front hub | 400 W rear hub |
| Motor power (peak) | ~700 W (approx., not stated) | 1.000 W |
| Top speed (software limited) | 20-25 km/h (up to ~30 km/h where legal) | 25 km/h |
| Battery capacity | 36 V, 15 Ah ≈ 540 Wh | 48 V, 10 Ah = 468 Wh |
| Claimed range | Up to 60 km | 60 km |
| Real-world range (approx.) | ~40-45 km | ~35-45 km |
| Weight | 18,5 kg | 19 kg |
| Brakes | Front electronic + rear disc | Front drum + rear E-ABS |
| Suspension | Rear shock | None |
| Tyres | 10" puncture-proof (foam/solid) | 10" tubeless, 60 mm wide |
| Max load | 100-120 kg (model dependent) | 120 kg |
| Water resistance | IPX5 | IPX4 |
| Charging time | ≈ 8 h | ≈ 9 h |
| Typical street price | ≈ 478 € | ≈ 526 € |
Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?
If I had to sum up the difference in one line: the Acer is the more comfortable spreadsheet, the Xiaomi is the more confident scooter.
Choose the Acer ES Series 5 Select if your commute is mostly flat, your roads are mediocre rather than terrible, and you value comfort, range and low day-to-day hassle over outright grunt. The rear suspension and puncture-proof tyres make it a very easy machine to live with, particularly if you really, really don't ever want to fix a puncture on a cold Tuesday evening. It gives you a lot of scooter for the money, even if nothing about it feels truly exciting.
Choose the Xiaomi Electric Scooter 4 Pro 2nd Gen if hills, heavier loads, or just wanting a stronger "push" are part of your life. It feels more stable at speed, copes with gradients far better, and slots into a support ecosystem that Acer simply doesn't have yet. You do give up mechanical suspension, and your spine will occasionally remind you of that, but for many riders the extra performance and robustness are worth the trade.
If I were picking one as a long-term daily workhorse in a mixed European city with real hills and real winters, I'd lean towards the Xiaomi. If my riding were flatter, my budget tighter, and my top priorities were "no flats, decent comfort, and just get me there," the Acer would be a perfectly rational, if slightly unexciting, choice.
Numbers Freaks Corner
| Metric | Acer ES Series 5 Select | Xiaomi Electric Scooter 4 Pro 2nd Gen |
|---|---|---|
| Price per Wh (€/Wh) | ✅ 0,89 €/Wh | ❌ 1,12 €/Wh |
| Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) | ✅ 19,12 €/km/h | ❌ 21,04 €/km/h |
| Weight per Wh (g/Wh) | ✅ 34,26 g/Wh | ❌ 40,60 g/Wh |
| Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) | ✅ 0,74 kg/km/h | ❌ 0,76 kg/km/h |
| Price per km of real-world range (€/km) | ✅ 11,25 €/km | ❌ 13,15 €/km |
| Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) | ✅ 0,44 kg/km | ❌ 0,48 kg/km |
| Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) | ❌ 12,71 Wh/km | ✅ 11,70 Wh/km |
| Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) | ❌ 14,00 W/km/h | ✅ 16,00 W/km/h |
| Weight to power ratio (kg/W) | ❌ 0,0529 kg/W | ✅ 0,0475 kg/W |
| Average charging speed (W) | ✅ 67,50 W | ❌ 52,00 W |
These metrics let you see how "dense" and cost-effective each scooter is in hard numbers: how much you pay and carry for each unit of energy, speed and range, how efficiently they use their battery, how much motor you get per unit of speed, and how fast they refill their packs. They don't say anything about comfort or feel, but they're handy if you like to quantify exactly what your money and muscles are doing.
Author's Category Battle
| Category | Acer ES Series 5 Select | Xiaomi Electric Scooter 4 Pro 2nd Gen |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | ✅ Slightly lighter to haul | ❌ A bit heavier lump |
| Range | ✅ Bigger pack, similar range | ❌ Slightly less energy onboard |
| Max Speed | ✅ Slightly more unlockable headroom | ❌ Hard-locked legal limit |
| Power | ❌ Adequate but modest | ✅ Noticeably stronger shove |
| Battery Size | ✅ Larger capacity overall | ❌ Smaller but efficient |
| Suspension | ✅ Rear shock saves knees | ❌ No mechanical suspension |
| Design | ❌ Nice, but a bit generic | ✅ Iconic, very refined look |
| Safety | ❌ Good, but more basic | ✅ Stronger traction, lighting |
| Practicality | ✅ Slightly easier to carry | ❌ Bulkier for tight spaces |
| Comfort | ✅ Suspension plus no-flat tyres | ❌ Tyres only, harsher hits |
| Features | ✅ Suspension, indicators, app | ✅ Traction control, auto lights |
| Serviceability | ❌ Fewer third-party options | ✅ Shops know it already |
| Customer Support | ✅ Big IT brand backing | ✅ Big mobility brand backing |
| Fun Factor | ❌ Sensible, not exactly thrilling | ✅ Punchier, more engaging ride |
| Build Quality | ❌ Good mid-tier feel | ✅ Feels properly overbuilt |
| Component Quality | ❌ Decent but unremarkable | ✅ Brakes, tyres, frame shine |
| Brand Name | ❌ New to scooters | ✅ Established scooter leader |
| Community | ❌ Small, fewer mods | ✅ Huge, very active |
| Lights (visibility) | ❌ Fine but nothing special | ✅ Brighter, auto-on system |
| Lights (illumination) | ❌ Adequate only on dark paths | ✅ Better throw and spread |
| Acceleration | ❌ Smooth but modest | ✅ Noticeably quicker off line |
| Arrive with smile factor | ❌ Gets job done, little flair | ✅ Power and feel more fun |
| Arrive relaxed factor | ✅ Softer, cushier ride | ❌ Harsher over bad surfaces |
| Charging speed | ✅ Faster per Wh | ❌ Slower refill overall |
| Reliability | ❌ Newer platform, fewer miles | ✅ Proven lineage, tanky feel |
| Folded practicality | ✅ Slightly smaller, lighter | ❌ Bulkier folded footprint |
| Ease of transport | ✅ Marginally easier to lug | ❌ Heavier for daily carrying |
| Handling | ❌ Safe but a bit soft | ✅ Stiffer, more precise feel |
| Braking performance | ✅ Strong, familiar disc feel | ❌ Slightly softer, more gradual |
| Riding position | ❌ Good, but less accommodating | ✅ Suits taller, heavier riders |
| Handlebar quality | ❌ Fine, nothing standout | ✅ Wider, more ergonomic |
| Throttle response | ❌ Gentle, slightly bland | ✅ Crisp, stronger response |
| Dashboard/Display | ✅ Clear, bright enough | ❌ Scratches too easily |
| Security (locking) | ❌ Less ecosystem for locks | ✅ More accessories, solutions |
| Weather protection | ✅ Slightly higher IP rating | ❌ A bit less splash-friendly |
| Resale value | ❌ Brand less known used | ✅ Strong second-hand demand |
| Tuning potential | ❌ Limited community, fewer hacks | ✅ Big modding, firmware scene |
| Ease of maintenance | ❌ Fewer guides, more guessing | ✅ Tons of tutorials available |
| Value for Money | ✅ More hardware per euro | ❌ Fair, but pricier overall |
Overall Winner Declaration
In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the ACER ES Series 5 Select scores 7 points against the XIAOMI Electric Scooter 4 Pro 2nd Gen's 3. In the Author's Category Battle, the ACER ES Series 5 Select gets 17 ✅ versus 24 ✅ for XIAOMI Electric Scooter 4 Pro 2nd Gen.
Totals: ACER ES Series 5 Select scores 24, XIAOMI Electric Scooter 4 Pro 2nd Gen scores 27.
Based on the scoring, the XIAOMI Electric Scooter 4 Pro 2nd Gen is our overall winner. For me, the Xiaomi Electric Scooter 4 Pro 2nd Gen is the one that feels more like a long-term companion than just a gadget. Its extra shove, sturdier road manners and mature ecosystem make daily riding feel that bit more confident and less like a science experiment. The Acer ES Series 5 Select absolutely earns its place for riders who value comfort, range and an easier price tag, but the Xiaomi's combination of stability, power and future-proof support makes it the scooter I'd rather step onto on a grey Monday morning when everything else already feels like effort.
That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.

