Fast Answer for Busy Riders β‘ (TL;DR)
The AUSOM F1 Max comes out as the more rounded, confidence-inspiring scooter for most riders: it rides smoother, feels more sorted as a package, and undercuts its rival on price while still delivering serious dual-motor performance. The ANGWATT X1 2.0 hits harder on paper with a slightly bigger battery and punchy motors, but it feels more like a raw, bargain performance experiment than a polished daily machine.
Pick the AUSOM if you want a fast, comfortable "SUV scooter" that just works day after day, especially for mixed city and rough-road riding. Pick the ANGWATT X1 2.0 if you're an enthusiast who prioritises maximum shove per euro, doesn't mind fettling, and cares more about thrills than refinement. If you want to know which one will still feel like a good idea after a long winter of commuting, keep reading - that's where the differences really show.
Stick around for the full breakdown; the spec sheets don't tell the whole story, but thousands of kilometres on these scooters do.
There's no shortage of "mid-range beasts" promising motorcycle-like thrills without the motorcycle licence, and both the AUSOM F1 Max and ANGWATT X1 2.0 sit firmly in that camp. Dual motors, big batteries, hydraulic brakes and enough speed to make your local bike lane feel very small, very quickly.
On one side, the AUSOM F1 Max: a chunky, quad-suspended bruiser that feels like someone actually thought about rider comfort and day-to-day life, not just headline numbers. It's for riders who want a fast scooter that behaves like a sensible vehicle when it needs to. On the other, the ANGWATT X1 2.0: a forged-arm, bare-metal hooligan aimed at enthusiasts who love torque, tuning, and don't mind a bit of rough around the edges.
On paper they look almost interchangeable. On the road, they're surprisingly different characters. Let's dig into where each one shines, where they stumble, and which is genuinely worth your money.
Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?
Both scooters live in that spicy territory above your average commuter but below the 40-plus-kg hyper-scooter monsters. They're built for riders who've blown past rental Lime speeds, discovered hills, and realised that 25 km/h and a toy drum brake are not the answer.
The AUSOM F1 Max targets the "serious but sane" rider: someone who wants car-like commuting capability, proper suspension, real brakes, and doesn't want to refit half the scooter out of the box. Think daily city and suburban riders, heavier users, or anyone with a mixture of tarmac, cobbles and the odd gravel shortcut.
The ANGWATT X1 2.0 aims more squarely at the performance-hungry crowd. It borrows the spirit of old Zero 10X-style machines: lots of power, lots of voltage, industrial looks, and a clear "you'll probably want to tweak me" subtext. It's for riders who like fiddling with P-settings and don't flinch at the phrase "check every bolt after unboxing".
Price-wise they sit close enough to be direct rivals. They're both too heavy for casual last-mile duty but light enough to be foldable vehicles rather than garage statues. If you're shopping one, you will absolutely be eyeing the other.
Design & Build Quality
In the flesh, the AUSOM F1 Max looks like an e-scooter SUV: thick 6061 aluminium frame, broad deck, loud grey-and-yellow highlights and that over-engineered dual-locking stem. Pick it up (briefly - your back will complain) and it feels dense, solid, very much "single piece of metal" rather than a parts-bin assembly. The folding joint, in particular, locks up with satisfying certainty; once you're riding, there's almost no hint of flex.
The ANGWATT X1 2.0 takes a different aesthetic route: less "finished product", more "prototype that escaped the lab". The forged swing arms are genuinely impressive from an engineering point of view, and the exposed metal look will appeal if you like your machines honest and a bit aggressive. Construction is iron plus aluminium alloy, and the whole thing feels brutally strong - though the finishing touches (switchgear, fenders, manual) don't exactly scream premium.
Ergonomically, AUSOM has the more considered cockpit. The large central display is simple but clear, the controls are reasonably placed, and little touches like the hidden AirTag slot and NFC lock suggest someone has actually commuted on this thing. On the ANGWATT, the NFC display looks fancy, but the buttons and plastics around it feel cheaper, and reading it in bright sun requires some squinting and neck gymnastics.
Overall, both are structurally solid, but the F1 Max feels like a mature, refined design, whereas the X1 2.0 feels like a strong chassis wearing slightly budget boots and jacket. If you like polish and coherence, AUSOM pulls ahead; if you just want beefy metal and don't care what the buttons feel like, ANGWATT will do the job.
Ride Comfort & Handling
Ride both back-to-back over broken city asphalt and the difference is immediate. The AUSOM's quad-spring suspension has a very "sorted" feel: it soaks up potholes, expansion joints and cobbles with a soft first touch and decent support deeper in the stroke. Combined with the fat tubeless tyres and wide deck, it glides over surfaces that make cheaper scooters rattle their bolts loose. After a long urban loop, your knees and lower back still feel like they belong to the same human.
The ANGWATT's dual spring suspension is competent but less sophisticated. It takes the sting out of bumps and copes with rough bike paths, but it transmits more of the hit to your legs. At higher speeds you're more aware of what the road is doing under you, which is great for sporty riding, less great when your commute includes a stretch of neglected cobblestone. It's "good budget performance suspension" rather than "wow, this is plush".
In terms of handling, both have enough bar width and wheelbase to feel stable, but the AUSOM again feels more planted. Mid-corner, it tracks a line with less drama; the chassis doesn't argue with you when you ask for quick direction changes, and high-speed wobbles are impressively muted for this class. The ANGWATT holds speed well and the forged arms keep the wheels under control, but the front end can feel a bit livelier and benefits from a firm, experienced hand - exactly why there's provision for a steering damper.
If your daily route includes bumpy paths, kerb drops and the occasional dirt trail, the F1 Max's "hover-craft" impression is hard to ignore. The X1 2.0 is comfortable enough, but it always reminds you you're on a sport-tuned scooter, not a magic carpet.
Performance
Both scooters are well into the "this really should come with motorcycle gear" zone. The AUSOM's dual motors deliver brutal but controllable shove; in dual-motor mode it lunges away from lights and has no issue embarrassing cars over the first few dozen metres. The torque comes in strong yet, once you've dialled into the throttle's slight dead zone, reasonably predictable. Top-end speed is more than enough for any sane urban environment, with plenty of power in reserve for overtakes.
The ANGWATT X1 2.0 is the more aggressive sprinter of the two. With its dual motors driven by beefy controllers, the initial hit when you crack open the throttle - especially in the sportier modes - feels a bit more dramatic. It's the kind of response that will make experienced riders grin and newcomers slightly terrified. Once rolling, both machines sit comfortably at traffic-matching velocities, but the ANGWATT feels like it's always egging you on to go just a little bit faster.
Hill-climbing is frankly a non-issue for either. Steep city climbs that turn rental scooters into sad, wheezing appliances are dispatched with speed to spare. Heavier riders are well served by both platforms, though the AUSOM's slightly more composed chassis under load gives it the edge when you're charging uphill over patchy surfaces.
Braking performance is strong on both, thanks to proper hydraulic systems plus electronic braking. The AUSOM's setup feels a touch more refined: lever feel is firmer, modulation is easier, and emergency stops inspire more confidence, especially on less-than-perfect tarmac. The ANGWATT's DYISLAND brakes have all the power you need, but the overall feel is a bit more "grabby sport" than "silky progressive", which some will love and others will need to adapt to.
In short: ANGWATT delivers the slightly more dramatic hit, AUSOM delivers the more usable, confidence-building performance envelope. One is the show-off sprinter, the other is the fast all-rounder you're happier to ride every day.
Battery & Range
Both scooters run high-voltage systems with substantial packs, and both quote ranges that belong in marketing brochures, not real life. Out in the real world, ridden by actual humans who use dual motors and live with hills and headwinds, they sit in a similar "proper medium-to-long commute" band.
The AUSOM's pack offers very healthy capacity and, more importantly, delivers its power evenly. You don't feel the scooter going half-asleep the moment the battery icon dips; it keeps a decent turn of speed almost to the end of the charge. Riding with a mix of modes and speeds, you can comfortably cover a full day's worth of city duties without nervously eyeing the voltage read-out every five minutes.
The ANGWATT's slightly larger battery does give it a modest theoretical edge. But that's offset somewhat by its more eager power delivery and the temptation to ride harder. Push it in sport mode and the range melts away faster than the spec sheet suggests. It also exhibits more noticeable performance drop-off as you get into the lower third of the pack - it'll still get you home, but the urgency fades.
Both support dual charging, which is a lifesaver with packs this size. With two chargers plugged in, either scooter can go from empty to full in about the time of a work shift; on a single charger, you're looking at "overnight and then some". AUSOM's messaging around charging and battery protection feels slightly more conservative and reassuring; ANGWATT leans harder on big numbers and less on long-term nuance.
If you ride sensibly, both will comfortably cover medium and even longer commutes. If you ride like your hair's on fire, neither will deliver its brochure range - but the AUSOM tends to feel less punitive when you do.
Portability & Practicality
Let's be honest: both of these are heavy. We're in "carry once, regret for hours" territory. If stairs are part of your daily routine, neither is ideal, but some compromises are more bearable than others.
The AUSOM F1 Max, while no featherweight, has a folding system that feels reassuringly straightforward and secure. The stem locks down solidly to the deck, making it just about manageable to dead-lift into a car boot or shuffle into a hallway. The overall package is long but not absurdly so, and the rectangular folded shape is predictable to handle. Still, this is a scooter best kept on the ground floor or in an elevator building.
The ANGWATT X1 2.0 folds down to a similar footprint, but the combination of iron components and industrial hardware doesn't exactly make it feel lighter in the hand. The quick-fold mechanism is functional, yet it's more of a "collapse for car transport or storage" system than something you'll want to operate several times daily around public transport. Hauling it onto a train during rush hour is a good way to make new enemies.
In day-to-day use, AUSOM's extra touches - easier-read display, more mature controls, NFC and passcode, better-thought-out ergonomics - nudge it ahead in practicality. The X1 2.0 absolutely works as a car replacement for many commutes, but it demands a bit more tolerance for quirks and a more forgiving environment (think garage or secure courtyard, not a cramped flat with narrow landings).
Safety
When you're doing city speeds on 10-inch wheels, safety is less about spec lines and more about how the scooter behaves when things go wrong. Here, both scooters tick the big boxes - but one feels more like it's actively on your side.
The AUSOM's combination of hydraulic brakes with electronic assistance, stable frame, and quad-spring suspension gives it a very reassuring demeanour under hard braking and emergency manoeuvres. The comprehensive lighting package - bright headlight, brake light, turn signals, and side illumination from the deck - makes you visible from multiple angles. Most importantly, the chassis resists the kind of twitchy wobble that can turn a small mistake into a big crash at speed.
The ANGWATT also brings serious braking hardware and a full lighting setup, including turn signals. Its chassis is stiff, and the forged swing arms certainly don't hurt stability. But the overall tuning is more "sporty and direct", and in sketchy conditions you notice that. Without a steering damper fitted, hitting a high-speed bump mid-corner doesn't feel quite as drama-free as on the AUSOM. It's not unsafe if ridden with respect, but it's far less forgiving of sloppy inputs.
Lighting quality is broadly comparable; both are miles ahead of the token LEDs on cheaper scooters. The AUSOM's deck lighting gives it the visibility edge from the side, which is very handy in urban traffic. On the ANGWATT, the headlight and turn signals do their job, but it feels more like function bolted on after the performance brief than an integrated safety concept.
If you ride hard, both demand proper protective gear. But if you're thinking about wet roads, inattentive drivers and the occasional panic grab of the lever, the AUSOM inspires a little more trust.
Community Feedback
| AUSOM F1 Max | ANGWATT X1 2.0 |
|---|---|
What riders love
|
What riders love
|
What riders complain about
|
What riders complain about
|
Price & Value
On raw sticker price, the AUSOM F1 Max is the cheaper scooter by a noticeable margin. Given that it still brings dual motors, a big battery, hydraulic brakes and serious suspension to the table, that alone makes it compelling. You're getting a full-fat performance platform at what used to be "upper mid-range commuter" money.
The ANGWATT X1 2.0 sits higher, and while it does give you a bit more battery capacity and slightly stronger peak output, those gains are incremental in the real world. You're paying extra for a bit more punch and an enthusiast-oriented spec sheet, but you're also inheriting more of the typical direct-from-China rough edges in documentation, finishing and support.
If your only metric is "how much acceleration can I buy per euro", the ANGWATT remains competitive. But value isn't just about watts; it's about the whole ownership experience. Factor in day-to-day comfort, refinement, and how much you'll need to tweak or fix yourself, and the AUSOM quietly comes out looking like the wiser investment for most riders.
Service & Parts Availability
Neither of these brands has the brick-and-mortar presence of big European or mainstream bike names, so you're relying heavily on online support and community resources. That said, there are degrees of pain.
AUSOM has built a reasonably strong reputation for responsive customer service, especially within Europe. Riders report that issues are generally acknowledged and parts shipped without endless drama. The F1 Max shares a lot of DNA with popular platforms like the Mukuta line, which means many wear parts are easy to source if you look beyond the brand label.
ANGWATT, on the other hand, leans even more into the direct-to-consumer approach. Community stories suggest that they do send replacement parts when pushed, but you're more likely to hit language and time-zone friction, and you'll be leaning harder on forums, Telegram groups and YouTube tutorials to get things dialled. The upside is that the scooter uses fairly standard components for brakes and tyres; the downside is that you're very much your own mechanic.
If you want a scooter you can keep running with minimal drama - and you're not looking for a new hobby in late-night troubleshooting - the AUSOM ecosystem feels a bit more reassuring.
Pros & Cons Summary
| AUSOM F1 Max | ANGWATT X1 2.0 |
|---|---|
Pros
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
Cons
|
Parameters Comparison
| Parameter | AUSOM F1 Max | ANGWATT X1 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Motor power (nominal) | 2 x 1.400 W | 2 x 1.800 W (peak) |
| Top speed (claimed) | ca. 72 km/h | ca. 60-70 km/h |
| Maximum range (claimed) | ca. 100 km | ca. 65-85 km |
| Real-world range (est.) | ca. 55-70 km | ca. 45-55 km |
| Battery | 60 V 20,8 Ah (1.248 Wh) | 60 V 22,5 Ah (ca. 1.350 Wh) |
| Weight | 36 kg | 36 kg |
| Brakes | Hydraulic discs + E-ABS | Hydraulic DYISLAND + E-ABS |
| Suspension | Quad-spring swingarm system | Front & rear spring shocks |
| Tyres | 10 x 3 Zoll tubeless | 10 Zoll tubeless hybrid |
| Max load | 150 kg | 200 kg |
| Water protection | IP54 (Akku IPX5) | ca. IPX3 (angabeΓ€hnlich) |
| Charging time | ca. 6-12 h (1-2 Lader) | ca. 5-11 h (1-2 Lader) |
| Price | ca. 1.151 β¬ | ca. 1.380 β¬ |
Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?
Both the AUSOM F1 Max and ANGWATT X1 2.0 are unapologetically serious machines. They're fast, heavy, and demand respect. But they aim at slightly different hearts.
If your priority is a scooter that behaves like a well-rounded vehicle - one you can ride daily, in mixed conditions, without constantly second-guessing its manners - the AUSOM F1 Max is the smarter choice. It's more comfortable, more forgiving, better thought out in the small details, and easier to live with over the long haul. It might not win every pub argument on pure wattage, but it wins the "do I actually look forward to riding this to work tomorrow?" test.
The ANGWATT X1 2.0 is for riders who already know what they're getting into and actively want the slightly rawer, more DIY experience. If you're the kind of person who enjoys tweaking settings, doesn't mind making up for the manual's shortcomings with forum deep dives, and simply wants maximum punch per euro, it will absolutely put a grin on your face.
For most people stepping up into the serious dual-motor class, though, the AUSOM F1 Max is the more convincing package. It might not be perfect, but it feels more like a finished product than a project - and that's exactly what you want when your commute involves real traffic, real roads, and real consequences.
Numbers Freaks Corner
| Metric | AUSOM F1 Max | ANGWATT X1 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Price per Wh (β¬/Wh) | β 0,92 β¬/Wh | β 1,02 β¬/Wh |
| Price per km/h of top speed (β¬/km/h) | β 15,99 β¬/km/h | β 19,71 β¬/km/h |
| Weight per Wh (g/Wh) | β 28,85 g/Wh | β 26,67 g/Wh |
| Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) | β 0,50 kg/km/h | β 0,51 kg/km/h |
| Price per km of real-world range (β¬/km) | β 18,42 β¬/km | β 27,60 β¬/km |
| Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) | β 0,58 kg/km | β 0,72 kg/km |
| Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) | β 19,97 Wh/km | β 27,00 Wh/km |
| Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) | β 38,89 W/km/h | β 51,43 W/km/h |
| Weight to power ratio (kg/W) | β 0,0129 kg/W | β 0,0100 kg/W |
| Average charging speed (W) | β 208,0 W | β 270,0 W |
These metrics give a cold, numerical look at efficiency and value: how much battery and speed you get for your money, how heavy each scooter is relative to its performance, and how quickly you can refill the tank. AUSOM clearly wins on cost per Wh, cost per kilometre and energy efficiency, while ANGWATT edges ahead on raw power density and charging speed. Neither story is "better" on maths alone, but it shows where each brand chose to spend its engineering budget.
Author's Category Battle
| Category | AUSOM F1 Max | ANGWATT X1 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | β Same, but better balance | β Same, feels more cumbersome |
| Range | β More usable real range | β Slightly less in practice |
| Max Speed | β Higher claimed top end | β Slightly lower realistic peak |
| Power | β Less motor headroom | β Stronger peak output |
| Battery Size | β Slightly smaller pack | β A bit more capacity |
| Suspension | β Plusher quad-spring feel | β Harsher over rough stuff |
| Design | β More cohesive, refined look | β Industrial, rougher aesthetics |
| Safety | β More stable, better tuned | β Needs more rider finesse |
| Practicality | β Easier daily liveability | β More compromises, quirks |
| Comfort | β Noticeably smoother ride | β Sporty, more tiring |
| Features | β Security, lighting, AirTag slot | β Fewer thoughtful touches |
| Serviceability | β Common parts, clearer support | β DIY heavy, more hunting |
| Customer Support | β Better reputation in Europe | β Slower, language friction |
| Fun Factor | β Fast yet confidence-boosting | β Fun but more stressful |
| Build Quality | β Feels more "finished" | β Strong but less refined |
| Component Quality | β Better integration overall | β Some cheap-feeling parts |
| Brand Name | β Growing positive reputation | β Less established, niche |
| Community | β Active, positive owner base | β Smaller, more fragmented |
| Lights (visibility) | β Strong, with deck ambience | β Adequate but less visible |
| Lights (illumination) | β Very usable for night | β Functional, nothing special |
| Acceleration | β Slightly softer hit | β More explosive punch |
| Arrive with smile factor | β Fast, comfy, less drama | β Fun but a bit tense |
| Arrive relaxed factor | β Much less fatigue | β Harsher, more tiring |
| Charging speed | β Slower even dual-charging | β Faster turnaround time |
| Reliability | β Feels more sorted overall | β More dependent on tinkering |
| Folded practicality | β Neater, more manageable | β Bulky, awkward feel |
| Ease of transport | β Slightly easier to handle | β Feels like dead weight |
| Handling | β Planted, predictable steering | β Livelier, needs damper |
| Braking performance | β Strong, more progressive feel | β Powerful but more grabby |
| Riding position | β Comfortable, natural stance | β Fine, but less refined |
| Handlebar quality | β Solid, confidence-inspiring | β Functional, more basic |
| Throttle response | β Predictable once learned | β Snatchy in sport modes |
| Dashboard/Display | β Clearer, simpler information | β Fancy but less legible |
| Security (locking) | β NFC + AirTag friendliness | β NFC only, fewer options |
| Weather protection | β Better rated, better sealed | β More cautious in wet |
| Resale value | β Likely easier to resell | β Niche, smaller buyer pool |
| Tuning potential | β Less mod-oriented culture | β Enthusiast mod-friendly |
| Ease of maintenance | β Better docs, common platform | β Manual weak, more guesswork |
| Value for Money | β Stronger all-round package | β Great power, weaker polish |
Overall Winner Declaration
In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the AUSOM F1 Max scores 6 points against the ANGWATT X1 20's 4. In the Author's Category Battle, the AUSOM F1 Max gets 34 β versus 5 β for ANGWATT X1 20.
Totals: AUSOM F1 Max scores 40, ANGWATT X1 20 scores 9.
Based on the scoring, the AUSOM F1 Max is our overall winner. In the end, the AUSOM F1 Max simply feels like the more complete, grown-up scooter. It may not shout the loudest on specs, but on the road it rides calmer, feels more cohesive, and makes day-to-day life easier rather than more complicated. The ANGWATT X1 2.0 is undeniably a blast when you open it up, but its rougher edges and more demanding nature mean it suits enthusiasts more than everyday riders. If you want a machine that thrills without constantly asking for compromises, the AUSOM is the one that will keep you smiling long after the novelty of sheer power wears off.
That's our verdict when we try to stay objective β but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.

