Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)
The ANGWATT X1 2.0 edges out the DRAGON Predator overall: it delivers very similar real-world speed, punchy dual-motor performance and strong brakes, but does it with slightly better value on the battery side and a more modern cockpit, without feeling any heavier or more cumbersome.
The DRAGON Predator still makes sense if you prioritise plusher suspension, more polished out-of-the-box refinement and prefer a better-known brand with a stronger presence in Australia and decent community infrastructure.
If you are a tinkering enthusiast wanting maximum performance-per-Euro and don't mind living with some direct-to-China quirks, the ANGWATT is the more compelling package; if you want something that feels more "finished" and a bit more SUV-like in ride, the Predator remains tempting.
Now let's dive in properly - because on paper these two look similar, but on the road the differences start to matter.
High-power dual-motor scooters used to be exotic toys for the few; now they're barrelling into the mid-price segment at a rate that makes even veteran testers like me reach for the helmet a little tighter. The DRAGON Predator and the ANGWATT X1 2.0 are perfect examples: both promise near-motorcycle pace, big-battery range and "all-terrain" bravado for well under the cost of a mediocre second-hand car.
I've spent time on both: city commutes, late-night blasts, badly paved bike paths and the odd "shortcut" that mysteriously turned into an off-road test. They share a lot on paper - dual motors, 60 V batteries, hydraulic brakes, hefty weight - but they approach the same brief with slightly different personalities and some very real trade-offs.
The Predator feels like a plush, overbuilt trail bruiser trying to play daily commuter; the X1 2.0 feels like a hot-rod chassis with techy toys bolted on, doing its best impression of a grown-up vehicle. Both are fast, both can be fun - and both cut a few corners if you look closely. Keep reading and we'll sort out which compromises make sense for you.
Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?
These two live in the same ecosystem: mid-priced, high-power, dual-motor "super commuters" for riders who've long outgrown rental scooters and flimsy budget toys. Price-wise they sit comfortably below the premium European and big-brand Korean stuff, but a clear step above disposable AliExpress specials.
They target riders who:
- Want to ride at traffic speed, not hide in the gutter
- Regularly deal with hills, rough paths or longer commutes
- Weigh more than the dainty figures manufacturers secretly test with
- Are willing to live with 36 kg of scooter and everything that entails
They compete directly because they're offering very similar promises: dual motors, roughly "decent-moped" top speeds, long claimed ranges, hydraulic brakes and big, tubeless tyres - for within a few dozen Euro of each other. On paper, choosing between them looks simple; in practice, it isn't.
Design & Build Quality
Park them side by side and the difference in design language hits you immediately. The DRAGON Predator looks like it rolled straight out of a tactical gear catalogue: matte finishes, angular frame, thick stem clamp and an overall vibe of "I'll survive the apocalypse, but I might scuff your hallway walls doing it." The aviation-grade alloy chassis feels solid in the hand, with a particularly reassuring stem lock that clamps down hard and almost completely kills play at the hinge.
The ANGWATT X1 2.0 leans into an industrial, open-metal look. The forged swing arms are the star of the show - chunky, purposeful pieces that instantly suggest the chassis won't fold in half the first time you hit an unseen pothole at speed. Some of the hardware and small fittings feel a bit more "parts bin" if you look closely, but core structural bits are commendably stout. There's a bit less of that factory-polished vibe you get from DRAGON; this feels more like a very competent DIY build that's been productised.
In the cockpit, the roles reverse. The X1 2.0's central NFC display looks and feels modern: big, car-like, with all key info in one place and keyless start built in. It's not perfect - in bright Mediterranean sun you'll occasionally be squinting at it - but it absolutely makes the Predator's more conventional display look dated. DRAGON answers with better cable routing and a slightly tidier control layout, even if the overall aesthetic is older-school.
Day to day, the Predator feels marginally more "finished" out of the box: fewer rough edges, better-managed cabling and plastics that, while not premium, at least look intentionally designed. The ANGWATT feels sturdier in a few key areas (those arms, the deck, the stem clamp), but you're more aware that this is a cost-optimised machine: fantastic hardware where it counts, and the occasional "that'll do" on visible details like switchgear and fenders.
Ride Comfort & Handling
This is where the two start to diverge in character. The DRAGON Predator, with its oil-damped suspension, rides like someone tried to shrink a soft-roader SUV into scooter form. On broken tarmac, cobbles and gravel lanes, it takes the sharp bite out of impacts better than you'd expect at this price. You still feel the road, but it's muted; after a long ride over patchy bike paths, your knees and feet complain less than they have any right to.
The ANGWATT X1 2.0 uses a twin-shock setup that's more old-school spring than high-end damper. It's effective, and once dialled in for your weight, it keeps the chassis composed over the same terrain - but there's a bit more pogo and a bit less silk. You're more connected to what's happening under the tyres; some will like that, others will call it fatigue. Hit a sequence of expansion joints at speed and you can feel the scooter working a bit harder than the Predator to settle itself down again.
Through corners, both are reassuring once you've adjusted to the weight and power. The Predator feels slightly more relaxed and confidence-inspiring at mid speeds thanks to that plush suspension and wide all-terrain tyres. The X1, with its forged arms and firmer springs, feels more eager to change direction and a touch more "sporty", but it can get busier over really nasty surfaces if you're pushing on. Both benefit massively from the wide decks: you can adopt a proper staggered stance, lean the scooter in, and let it carve rather than tiptoe.
If you're planning to spend your life on dodgy suburban asphalt and broken cycle paths, the DRAGON has the edge in comfort. If you like a slightly more direct, connected feel - and you're willing to tweak pressures and suspension a bit - the ANGWATT is the livelier handler, but also the one that asks a little more of you.
Performance
Let's be honest: nobody buys either of these to trundle at rental-scooter speeds.
The DRAGON Predator's dual motors and sine-wave controllers serve up a wonderfully civilised kind of brutality. In the softer modes it eases you in gently; roll on from a standstill and it pulls cleanly without trying to launch you into next week. Flick it into full-fat mode, lean on the rear kickplate and actually pin the throttle, and it shoves hard enough to make you instinctively check how much road you've got left. It's fast enough that most people will run out of courage before it runs out of motor.
The ANGWATT X1 2.0 is a touch less refined but no less quick. The dual motors and beefy controllers give you that same "this really shouldn't be this fast" sensation. Low-speed behaviour is better than many older hot rods, but in the highest sport setting the throttle still has a hint of on/off eagerness. Once rolling, it rockets up to traffic pace and beyond with the kind of insistence that makes cars suddenly very small in your rear-view mirror. On hills - the enemy of commuter scooters - both machines shrug and carry on, but the ANGWATT's higher motor rating combined with its generous load ceiling mean heavier riders feel slightly less punished on steeper climbs.
Braking performance on both is leagues ahead of anything with cable brakes. The Predator's hydraulics have a nicely progressive feel; you get plenty of warning before you're at the limit, and emergency stops feel controlled rather than panicked. The X1's DYISLAND setup leans a little more towards "grabby", helped (and sometimes over-helped) by the electronic motor braking. You quickly learn to modulate with one finger and trust that if you really need to haul it down, the stopping power is there in abundance.
Top-speed wise, you're into "silly for a scooter" territory on either. The Predator feels slightly calmer up near its ceiling thanks to its softer ride and very solid stem. The ANGWATT is impressively stable in a straight line, especially for something clearly sold on price; bolt on a steering damper (the frame is ready for it) and it becomes much more comfortable to hold higher speeds for longer stretches.
Battery & Range
Both scooters run 60 V systems, but the DRAGON Predator carries a noticeably larger "fuel tank" than the ANGWATT X1 2.0. On paper that means more headline range; in the real world, it means you can ride like you actually want to ride - dual motors, healthy cruising speeds - and still get genuinely useful distances without having to baby the throttle.
Ridden briskly in mixed conditions, the Predator will get most people through multiple commutes before the charger becomes urgent. You still have to respect physics: heavy rider, full power, lots of hills, and you'll see that battery gauge move faster than marketing suggests. But the underlying efficiency of those sine-wave controllers helps; it hangs onto its punch reasonably well until you're well into the pack.
The ANGWATT's slightly smaller pack, combined with its hungry motors, means you feel the compromise sooner if you're a heavy-handed rider. Kept in a sensible mode and cruising at more legal speeds, you can absolutely hit respectable ranges. Start treating every traffic light like a drag strip and you'll be shopping for chargers sooner than the spec sheet implies. Voltage sag towards the last chunk of the battery is a bit more noticeable too; it still moves, but you're reminded that the tank is low.
Both offer dual charging ports. The Predator, with its fatter battery, really is an "overnight and forget" proposition with a single charger; adding a second one helps, but you're still planning charging around your life, not the other way round. The ANGWATT claws back some practicality here: with two chargers it can realistically go from low to high over a working day, which is handy if your office doesn't mind a 36 kg animal quietly slurping electrons in the corner.
Portability & Practicality
Here's the reality check: both of these weigh in the region of a medium-sized dog that's swallowed a toolbox. If your mental picture of an e-scooter involves casually one-handing it up three flights of stairs, you're looking at the wrong category.
The DRAGON Predator folds into a reasonably compact shape for its class and the stem locking hardware feels bombproof when upright. Carrying it, however, is still an exercise in "I hope my chiropractor is on speed dial". It's fine for rolling into lifts, across station platforms or into a garage; anything involving more than a couple of steps becomes a workout. Storage-wise, it will fit into most car boots if you're willing to rearrange the weekly shop.
The ANGWATT X1 2.0 is, functionally, in the same boat: heavy, long, and clearly designed as something you park, not something you shoulder. Its folded footprint is similar to the Predator, and the quick-fold mechanism is straightforward enough. The kickstand is decent, if a bit marginal on softer ground, so at least you're not performing circus acts to park it. Both scooters are best treated as "electric motorbikes without the seat" rather than collapsible gadgets.
In daily use as a car replacement, both shine. You've got the load capacity for backpack, groceries and then some; you've got the speed to mix with traffic without feeling hunted; and you've got enough range that you're not constantly doing mental battery maths. For mixed-mode commuting with public transport, both are overkill in all the wrong ways.
Safety
Safety on a scooter that can out-drag inattentive hatchbacks is not optional. On braking and core stability, both machines are genuinely reassuring - assuming the rider is sensible.
The DRAGON Predator's fully hydraulic setup paired with wide, tubeless all-terrain tyres delivers confident stopping and a very planted feel under hard braking. The chassis doesn't pitch or twist in ways that make your brain unhappy. Lighting is a strong point: the twin CREE headlights actually illuminate the road at realistic speeds, and the side lighting gives decent presence in urban traffic. Add the motorcycle-grade horn and you have a fighting chance of being noticed by that driver busy arguing with their infotainment system.
The ANGWATT counters with equally serious hydraulic stoppers and that electronic braking assist, which cuts motor power and adds regenerative drag as soon as you touch the levers. Done badly, this sort of thing feels like throwing an anchor out; here, it complements the mechanical brakes reasonably well once you're used to it. Visibility is also decent: you get a proper headlight, turn signals and a clear brake light, so you're not reduced to frantic hand-waving in the dark.
Structurally, the Predator's stem clamp and generally overbuilt frame inspire confidence, though minor bits like fenders can feel like an afterthought. The ANGWATT's forged swing arms and rigid chassis speak the right language at speed, but some of the controls and switches don't quite match the promise of the metalwork. Both scooters benefit from regular bolt checks - these are big, fast machines; treating them like maintenance-free toys is asking for trouble.
Community Feedback
| DRAGON Predator | ANGWATT X1 2.0 |
|---|---|
What riders love
|
What riders love
|
What riders complain about
|
What riders complain about
|
Price & Value
Both scooters live in that uncomfortable space where they're "cheap for what they are" but still not exactly pocket money. The DRAGON Predator comes in slightly above many no-name dual-motor machines, but with a bigger battery, nicer suspension and a brand that at least claims a proper design and testing cycle rather than a catalogue raid. You are paying for a chunk of that comfort and refinement - and for many riders, that's worth more on a daily basis than a slightly lower headline price.
The ANGWATT X1 2.0 undercuts a lot of high-profile rivals with similar specs. Look purely at motors, voltage, claimed range and features like NFC start and hydraulic brakes, and it's excellent value. The cost-saving shows up more in the "soft" areas: documentation, some plastics, and the degree of dealer backup you can expect locally. If you're a confident owner who doesn't mind getting hands dirty, that trade-off is easy to live with. If the idea of ever touching an Allen key gives you hives, paying a bit more for a local shop and a more established brand starts to look sensible.
Service & Parts Availability
This is where heritage and geography start to matter. DRAGON has made a point of building a presence, particularly in Australia, with at least some semblance of parts supply and formal support. Feedback suggests they're not miracle workers - response times can stretch in busy periods - but there are actual service channels, official spares and a community that's grown around the brand. If you like the idea of ring-fencing some responsibility back to the manufacturer, the Predator has the upper hand.
ANGWATT operates more firmly in the direct-to-consumer, import-it-and-hope world. They do ship parts, and they do respond, but often across time zones and language barriers. You're leaning on online groups, YouTube and your own mechanical sympathy more. The upside is cheaper hardware; the downside is you're your own service centre unless you're lucky enough to have an independent shop willing to work on it.
Pros & Cons Summary
| DRAGON Predator | ANGWATT X1 2.0 |
|---|---|
Pros
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
Cons
|
Parameters Comparison
| Parameter | DRAGON Predator | ANGWATT X1 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Motor power (rated / peak) | Dual 1.100 W / ca. 3.600-4.200 W | Dual 1.800 W peak (ca. 3.600 W total) |
| Top speed (claimed, off-road) | ca. 70 km/h | ca. 60-70 km/h |
| Battery | 60 V 27 Ah (1.620 Wh) | 60 V 22,5 Ah (ca. 1.350 Wh) |
| Range (claimed / real-world est.) | 80 km / ca. 50-60 km | 65-85 km / ca. 45-55 km |
| Weight | 36 kg | 36 kg |
| Max load | 150 kg | 200 kg |
| Brakes | Dual fully hydraulic | Dual hydraulic + E-ABS |
| Suspension | Front & rear oil-damped | Front & rear spring shocks |
| Tyres | 10-inch tubeless all-terrain | 10-inch tubeless hybrid |
| Water resistance | IPX4 | Approx. IPX3-IPX4 class |
| Charging time | ca. 10-12 h (1 charger) | ca. 10-11 h (1 charger), 5-6 h (2) |
| Security/features | NFC + PIN, lighting, horn | NFC start, central display, indicators |
| Approx. price | 1.415 € | 1.380 € |
Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?
Both the DRAGON Predator and the ANGWATT X1 2.0 are unapologetically serious machines masquerading as "scooters". They share huge overlap in weight, speed and intent, but lean in different directions once you ride them back-to-back.
If your priority is comfort and confidence over dodgy surfaces, you value a more mature-feeling suspension, and you like the idea of a brand with some existing support structure and community backing, the DRAGON Predator is the more relaxing partner. Its bigger battery gives more margin for heavy, fast riders, and the ride quality is easier on the body if your local municipality considers road maintenance an optional hobby.
If you're chasing maximum performance-per-Euro, enjoy modern gadgets, and don't mind living with the occasional rough edge in documentation and after-sales polish, the ANGWATT X1 2.0 is the more compelling tool. It hits just as hard in a straight line, carries big riders with authority, and the dual-charging plus high-tech cockpit convenience are genuinely useful day to day rather than just marketing fluff.
For most experienced enthusiasts who are comfortable doing a bit of their own fettling, the ANGWATT X1 2.0 comes out ahead as the better overall deal. For riders who want a slightly softer, more forgiving ride and a brand that at least tries to behave like a traditional manufacturer, the DRAGON Predator still earns its place - as long as you go in with open eyes about the weight and the maintenance expectations.
Numbers Freaks Corner
| Metric | DRAGON Predator | ANGWATT X1 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Price per Wh (€/Wh) | ✅ 0,87 €/Wh | ❌ 1,02 €/Wh |
| Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) | ❌ 20,21 €/km/h | ✅ 19,71 €/km/h |
| Weight per Wh (g/Wh) | ✅ 22,22 g/Wh | ❌ 26,67 g/Wh |
| Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) | ✅ 0,51 kg/km/h | ✅ 0,51 kg/km/h |
| Price per km of real-world range (€/km) | ✅ 25,73 €/km | ❌ 27,60 €/km |
| Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) | ✅ 0,65 kg/km | ❌ 0,72 kg/km |
| Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) | ❌ 29,45 Wh/km | ✅ 27,00 Wh/km |
| Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) | ✅ 51,43 W/km/h | ✅ 51,43 W/km/h |
| Weight to power ratio (kg/W) | ✅ 0,01 kg/W | ✅ 0,01 kg/W |
| Average charging speed (W) | ✅ 147,27 W | ❌ 128,57 W |
These metrics strip the romance away and look purely at maths: how much battery you get for your money (price per Wh), how heavy the scooter is for each unit of energy or speed (weight per Wh, per km/h), how costly and heavy each kilometre of real-world range is, how efficiently the scooters turn energy into distance (Wh per km), and how their power and charging muscle compare to top speed and pack size. They're not the whole story, but they show where each machine is objectively more or less efficient on paper.
Author's Category Battle
| Category | DRAGON Predator | ANGWATT X1 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | ❌ Same heavy class | ❌ Same heavy class |
| Range | ✅ Larger pack, more margin | ❌ Slightly shorter real range |
| Max Speed | ✅ Feels calmer flat-out | ❌ Stable but busier |
| Power | ❌ Strong, but softer hit | ✅ More aggressive shove |
| Battery Size | ✅ Bigger "tank" | ❌ Smaller capacity |
| Suspension | ✅ Plusher oil damping | ❌ Harsher spring feel |
| Design | ✅ Rugged, cohesive aesthetic | ❌ Industrial but less refined |
| Safety | ✅ Strong brakes, great lights | ❌ Good, but less polished |
| Practicality | ✅ Bigger range for commuting | ❌ More charge stops needed |
| Comfort | ✅ Softer, less fatigue | ❌ Firmer, more feedback |
| Features | ❌ Older-style display | ✅ NFC screen, indicators |
| Serviceability | ✅ Better brand infrastructure | ❌ More DIY, online parts |
| Customer Support | ✅ Clearer support channels | ❌ Slower, remote handling |
| Fun Factor | ❌ Fast, but more grown-up | ✅ Wilder, more playful |
| Build Quality | ✅ More cohesive overall | ❌ Strong core, rough edges |
| Component Quality | ✅ Suspension, frame, brakes solid | ❌ Mixed: great + cheap bits |
| Brand Name | ✅ Better-known in community | ❌ Newer, less established |
| Community | ✅ Larger, more resources | ❌ Growing, but smaller |
| Lights (visibility) | ✅ Strong 360° presence | ❌ Good, slightly behind |
| Lights (illumination) | ✅ Brighter, longer reach | ❌ Adequate, less punch |
| Acceleration | ❌ Smooth but less savage | ✅ Stronger, more urgent |
| Arrive with smile factor | ❌ Calm grin | ✅ Big stupid grin |
| Arrive relaxed factor | ✅ Softer, less tense | ❌ Firmer, more alert |
| Charging speed | ❌ Slower, even with ports | ✅ Dual chargers practical |
| Reliability | ✅ Better-proven platform | ❌ Still earning its stripes |
| Folded practicality | ✅ Slightly tidier package | ❌ Similar size, no edge |
| Ease of transport | ❌ Heavy, awkward | ❌ Heavy, awkward |
| Handling | ✅ Softer, forgiving manners | ❌ Sharper, more demanding |
| Braking performance | ✅ Strong, predictable feel | ❌ Very strong, more grabby |
| Riding position | ✅ Natural, upright stance | ❌ Similar, but less polished |
| Handlebar quality | ✅ Feels more refined | ❌ Functional, but cheaper |
| Throttle response | ✅ Smooth, controllable | ❌ Snappier, needs care |
| Dashboard/Display | ❌ Simple, dated look | ✅ Modern central screen |
| Security (locking) | ✅ NFC + PIN solid | ✅ NFC start also solid |
| Weather protection | ✅ Slightly better fenders | ❌ More splash complaints |
| Resale value | ✅ Stronger brand helps | ❌ Harder to shift |
| Tuning potential | ✅ Popular base for mods | ✅ Open, enthusiast-friendly |
| Ease of maintenance | ✅ More documented procedures | ❌ Manuals, guidance weaker |
| Value for Money | ❌ Great, but less techy | ✅ Hardware, speed, features |
Overall Winner Declaration
In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the DRAGON Predator scores 8 points against the ANGWATT X1 20's 5. In the Author's Category Battle, the DRAGON Predator gets 29 ✅ versus 10 ✅ for ANGWATT X1 20.
Totals: DRAGON Predator scores 37, ANGWATT X1 20 scores 15.
Based on the scoring, the DRAGON Predator is our overall winner. Between these two brutes, the ANGWATT X1 2.0 ultimately lands as the scooter I'd be more tempted to live with: it feels more exciting, more modern, and delivers that slightly unhinged dual-motor thrill without demanding a premium price tag. The DRAGON Predator answers with a calmer, more comfortable and more "grown-up" ride that plenty of riders will prefer, but the X1 2.0 simply feels like the more complete thrill machine for the money - as long as you're willing to meet it halfway with a bit of mechanical sympathy and common sense.
That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.

