Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)
The Segway F3 Pro is the stronger overall package: it rides softer, climbs better, feels more planted on bad surfaces, and costs noticeably less, making it the more rational choice for most everyday commuters. The Apollo Air counters with better weather sealing, very refined controls, and a nicer braking setup, but asks a premium for what is, in practice, a similar performance tier.
Pick the Apollo Air if you care a lot about water resistance, app customisation, and a super-slick cockpit, and your rides are mostly on half-decent tarmac. Choose the Segway F3 Pro if your city throws cobblestones, patches of gravel, cheeky hills and wet bike lanes at you on a daily basis, and you want the scooter to absorb the abuse rather than your knees.
Both will do the commute; one just feels more forgiving while being easier on your wallet. Read on for the nuances, the trade-offs, and which compromises will annoy you less six months down the line.
Electric scooters in this class all claim to be "the perfect commuter", which usually means "good enough if you don't ask too many questions". The Apollo Air and Segway F3 Pro sit exactly in that zone: not toys, not beasts, just sensible mid-range commuters trying to feel a bit more grown-up than the discount-rack clones.
I've put real kilometres into both: wet November mornings, cracked bike lanes, rushed after-work dashes when the battery is already grumbling. They're closer in capability than the marketing would like you to believe, but they go about the job with very different priorities.
If you want to know which one will actually make your commute less annoying, not just look pretty on a spec sheet, keep going - this is where the differences really matter.
Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?
Both scooters live in the mid-range commuter bracket: single motor, sensible speeds, batteries big enough for a genuine daily commute but not a weekend touring epic. They're for riders who are done with rental fleets and supermarket specials, yet not ready to lug around a 30 kg monster with motorcycle tyres.
The Apollo Air sits slightly higher on the price ladder, positioning itself as an "entry-level premium" machine: strong focus on refinement, safety certification, a polished app, and weather resistance. Think: the person who wants a scooter that feels like a real transport appliance and is willing to pay a bit extra for that peace of mind.
The Segway F3 Pro, on the other hand, leans heavily on value: more comfort hardware, more climbing ability, and clever electronics (traction control, tracking, good lights) for noticeably less money. It's aimed squarely at the practical commuter who wants a cushy ride and doesn't mind a slightly utilitarian feel if it does the job well.
They're natural rivals because, on paper, they promise the same thing: a solid, adult scooter you can actually live with. In practice, their compromises land in different places.
Design & Build Quality
Pick both up, poke a few welds, and you can tell neither is a cheap catalogue frame with stickers slapped on.
The Apollo Air goes for a unibody-style aluminium frame with clean lines and internal cabling. In the flesh it does look quite polished - the integrated stem display and tidy cockpit scream "designed as a whole", not "assembled from whatever was in stock". The folding latch feels solid, and once locked, the stem is impressively wobble-free. It has that "block of metal" sensation that inspires confidence... if not quite luxury.
The Segway F3 Pro uses a magnesium alloy chassis, which helps keep weight reasonable despite the extra suspension hardware. The impression is slightly more industrial: everything is tight and rattle-free, but there's a fleet-scooter DNA there - in a dependable way, not a glamorous one. Welds are clean, panels line up, and the folding joint is one of the better executed on the market, with a reassuring mechanical clunk when closed.
Where the Segway pulls ahead is in the details you notice over time: the TFT dashboard that remains legible in harsh sunlight, the integrated lock point on the front frame, the thought-through cable routing that doesn't collect every bit of road spray. The Apollo's cockpit is visually cleaner and more minimal, but its display is more "does the job" than "nice to use".
Neither feels cheap. The Apollo looks a bit more premium; the Segway feels a bit more engineered.
Ride Comfort & Handling
This is where the F3 Pro starts playing a different game.
The Apollo Air relies on a front fork suspension combined with big, tubeless air tyres. On decent tarmac and mild imperfections, it glides along nicely; most day-to-day commuting bumps are smoothed into a soft thud rather than a jolt. Hit a series of sharper edges or rough cobbles and you're reminded there's no rear suspension - the front floats, the back still talks to your ankles. It's not punishing, but you do learn to pick your line.
The Segway F3 Pro adds rear suspension to the party - hydraulic up front, spring/elastomer at the back - and the difference on bad surfaces is obvious. Over cobblestones, the Apollo Air has that "I should probably slow down" chatter. The F3 Pro just... keeps going. Your knees and wrists are still alive after a few kilometres of broken pavement, and the rear stays planted instead of skipping sideways over cracks.
In terms of handling, both use 10-inch tyres and feel stable at their intended speeds. The Apollo's wide bars and relatively high stem give a confident, almost "mini scooter" stance. Steering is calm, maybe even a bit muted - good for beginners, a touch dull for experienced riders. The Segway's steering feels a tad more direct, helped by the longer wheelbase and rear motor weight: it tracks predictably through bends and doesn't develop the nervous shimmy some lighter commuters do when pushed towards their top speed.
If your city is mostly smooth bike lanes with occasional rough patches, the Air is perfectly adequate and comfortable. If "rough patches" is just your normal road surface, the F3 Pro is the clear winner for comfort and composure.
Performance
On paper, the numbers don't look wildly different; on the road, the F3 Pro feels like it has slightly more muscle in reserve.
The Apollo Air's rear motor gives brisk, controlled acceleration. From a traffic light, it leaves rental scooters behind without drama, and the throttle mapping is one of its nicest traits - no jerky surges, no dead zone. It pulls steadily up to its top speed and then politely sits there. For flat-city commuting, it's absolutely enough; you're not going to be wishing for much more in a bike lane.
Point it at a steeper hill, though, and you can feel the limits. With an average-weight rider, it'll climb most urban gradients, but steeper ramps turn into a "please don't slow down any more" situation. It rarely totally gives up, but you won't be overtaking anyone either.
The Segway F3 Pro, with its punchier peak output, feels more eager. Off the line it has that extra shove that gets you to cruising pace quicker - not aggressive, but clearly stronger. On the same hill where the Air starts to labour, the F3 Pro digs in and keeps a more respectable speed. Heavier riders will especially notice the difference: the Segway feels like it still has a little breath left when the Apollo is already wheezing.
Top speeds are similar, both hovering in that "sensible but not dull" range if de-restricted where legal. Stability at those speeds is fine on both, but the F3 Pro's suspension and weight distribution make it feel calmer when the surface isn't perfect - less twitchy over ripples, less tendency to bounce off line if you hit a patch of rough tarmac mid-bend.
Braking is another point of contrast. The Apollo's combination of front drum and a dedicated regen lever at the rear is genuinely pleasant to use. Most of the time you can ride using regen only: smooth, predictable, and friction-free for your components. The drum then steps in for emergency bite. The Segway pairs a front disc with rear electronic braking; stopping power is solid and modulation good, but it's more conventional and needs a bit more regular adjustment to keep the disc feeling crisp.
Battery & Range
Both scooters sit in that middle ground where you can realistically commute across a city and back without recharging, but not go on multi-hour joyrides without thinking about it.
The Apollo Air carries a slightly larger battery and, in gentle Eco use, can stretch surprisingly far. In real-world mixed riding - meaning some sportier bursts, a few hills, lots of stop-start traffic - expect something in the low-to-mid double-digit kilometre range before you start eyeing the gauge. That's enough for most people's two-way commute with some errands, but if you routinely push near the limit, you'll feel the mental pressure by the end of the day.
The Segway F3 Pro's pack is a bit smaller on paper yet reasonably efficient. In the real world, its range lands not far from the Apollo's - often slightly longer when ridden sensibly, occasionally slightly shorter if you abuse the stronger motor up every hill. In normal commuting use I found both land in roughly the same "you're fine, but don't be stupid" territory. The F3 Pro's published maximum is optimistic; take those claims with a fistful of salt.
Charging is another small difference. The Apollo goes from empty to full overnight in a working-day sized window; the Segway is a bit slower and really is an "plug it in before bed and forget it" device. Neither offers fast charging magic in this class. The Air wins slightly on time efficiency; the F3 Pro counters by starting from a lower purchase price, so the cost of the electricity will be the least of your concerns.
Range anxiety? If your daily commuting total is comfortably below the realistic figures, both are fine. If you're closer to the edge, the Apollo's tiny range advantage helps, but the Segway's efficiency isn't shabby either. It's more a question of how often you're willing to charge than which goes dramatically further.
Portability & Practicality
On the scales, both are in that "you can carry it, but you'll complain about it" bracket.
The Apollo Air is a touch lighter. Carrying it up a single flight of stairs or popping it into a car boot is very manageable. Try several floors, and you'll start considering whether you really need that gym membership. The folding mechanism is secure but slightly more fiddly than Segway's at first; once you've developed the muscle memory it's fine, but not the fastest on-and-off the train trick.
The Segway F3 Pro, with its dual suspension hardware, tips just over the Apollo. You feel that extra bit when you dead-lift it by the stem. It's still reasonable to haul for short distances - across platforms, into an elevator - but anyone with long staircases in their life is going to notice. The flip side is that its folding action is quick and confidence-inspiring: latch, drop, hook the stem, done. It's easier to handle when folded and feels less awkward as a package.
Storage-wise, both have non-folding bars, so they're not ultra-slim, but they'll slide under desks and into corners. The Apollo's bars are a bit wider, which helps stability but can be annoying in crowded bike rooms. The Segway is slightly more compact overall and easier to manoeuvre in a tight hallway.
Practical commuting details: the Apollo scores with its higher water resistance rating and those self-healing tubeless tyres - punctures are rare, and riding in heavy rain doesn't feel like tempting fate. The Segway counters with the integrated lock point, Apple Find My support, and electronic wheel lock. In day-to-day use, I'd say the Apollo is the better "all-weather mule", while the Segway is the better "leave-it-outside-with-some-confidence" machine.
Safety
Both brands clearly thought about safety beyond just "it has a brake, good luck".
The Apollo Air's jewel is that dedicated regen lever. It gives you a second braking control that's intuitive and progressive, and because it lives under your thumb, you end up modulating speed very finely without touching the mechanical drum until you really need to. Combined with the large tyres and low battery placement in the deck, the scooter feels planted and predictable when you have to scrub speed quickly.
Lighting on the Air is adequate for being seen and for lit urban routes. The high-mounted front light helps visibility, and the handlebar-end indicators are a genuine upgrade over deck-level blinkers: car drivers actually notice them. For unlit paths, though, the stock headlight is a bit weak - I found myself supplementing it with a separate bar light to truly see the road ahead.
The Segway F3 Pro piles on more tech. The front disc plus rear electronic braking gives strong, confident deceleration, and the lever feel is progressive enough not to punish panic squeezes. But the real party trick is traction control. On wet paint, damp leaves or gritty corners, you can feel the scooter quietly sorting things out in the background when the rear starts to slip. It's subtle but very welcome the first time you accelerate over a slick zebra crossing and the wheel doesn't suddenly spin out.
The F3 Pro's headlight is noticeably brighter and throws a more useful beam, so if you do a lot of night riding on darker routes, it's the safer tool out of the box. It also has handlebar indicators and solid overall visibility. Water resistance is a notch below the Apollo's on paper but still very respectable; riding in hefty rain is not an issue, as long as you ride like it's wet.
Both are safe machines for their speed class, but they prioritise different scenarios: Apollo leans into weather sealing and braking finesse, Segway leans into active safety tech, lighting and traction.
Community Feedback
| Apollo Air | Segway F3 Pro |
|---|---|
What riders love
|
What riders love
|
What riders complain about
|
What riders complain about
|
Price & Value
This is where the F3 Pro quietly pulls the rug.
The Apollo Air sits clearly above the Segway in price. For that extra money you do get a slightly larger battery, better water sealing, a more upmarket aesthetic and a particularly nice control feel. If you value those niceties and you're already invested in Apollo's ecosystem, the uplift is not outrageous - but you're definitely paying for polish, not raw capability.
The Segway F3 Pro gives you dual suspension, stronger climbing, very good lighting, traction control, tracking, and a reputable brand name at a significantly lower ticket. It doesn't feel cheap - it just feels less "designed to impress" and more "designed to work". When you step back and look at what you actually get for each euro, the F3 Pro simply offers more functional hardware and features for less money.
In value terms, unless you specifically need the Apollo's weatherproofing or really love its design language, the Segway is the better deal - not by a small margin, either.
Service & Parts Availability
Apollo has grown a lot, and its support reputation has improved with each generation. Parts for the Air are reasonably easy to source through Apollo and resellers, and there's a strong English-speaking community around their scooters. That said, in some European countries you may still find yourself waiting a bit for specific components to cross oceans, and warranty processes can feel slightly centralised and slow.
Segway is... Segway. Between official channels, third-party shops, and the massive base of compatible parts from previous F-series models, finding what you need in Europe is typically straightforward. Every second generic scooter repair shop has seen a Segway before. Documentation and tutorials are plentiful, and even if official support can be bureaucratic, the sheer scale of the ecosystem makes living with the F3 Pro easier.
For long-term parts and service convenience in Europe, the F3 Pro has the upper hand.
Pros & Cons Summary
| Apollo Air | Segway F3 Pro |
|---|---|
Pros
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
Cons
|
Parameters Comparison
| Parameter | Apollo Air | Segway F3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Motor power (rated) | 500 W rear | 550 W rear |
| Motor power (peak) | 800 W | 1.200 W |
| Top speed (hardware capability) | ca. 34 km/h | ca. 32 km/h |
| Claimed range | 54 km | 70 km |
| Real-world range (mixed use) | 30-35 km | 40-50 km |
| Battery capacity | 540 Wh | 477 Wh |
| Weight | 18,6 kg | 19,3 kg |
| Brakes | Front drum + rear regen | Front disc + rear electronic |
| Suspension | Front fork only | Front hydraulic + rear elastomer |
| Tyres | 10" tubeless pneumatic, self-healing | 10" tubeless pneumatic, self-sealing |
| Max rider load | 100 kg (conservative) | 120 kg |
| Water resistance | IP66 | IPX6 |
| Charging time | 5-7 h | 8 h |
| Approx. price | 679 € | 432 € |
Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?
Both the Apollo Air and the Segway F3 Pro are competent commuters, but they each bring different strengths to the daily grind.
If you ride mostly on decent tarmac, value a very tidy design, appreciate a beautifully tuned throttle and regen brake, and absolutely want top-tier water resistance, the Apollo Air will not disappoint. It feels mature, stable and reassuring - just be prepared to pay for that feeling and accept that the rear end is still a bit honest over sharp bumps.
If your reality is more brutal - cobbles, potholes, cheeky little hills, wet mornings - the Segway F3 Pro simply copes better. The dual suspension, extra torque, brighter lighting and traction control combine into a scooter that feels more forgiving and more capable, especially for heavier riders. Add in the lower price and strong ecosystem, and it comes out as the more sensible choice for the majority of riders.
In short: the Apollo Air is the nicer object; the Segway F3 Pro is the better tool. For most real-world commuters, the F3 Pro is the one that makes the daily ride less of a chore.
Numbers Freaks Corner
| Metric | Apollo Air | Segway F3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Price per Wh (€/Wh) | ❌ 1,26 €/Wh | ✅ 0,91 €/Wh |
| Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) | ❌ 19,97 €/km/h | ✅ 13,50 €/km/h |
| Weight per Wh (g/Wh) | ✅ 34,44 g/Wh | ❌ 40,46 g/Wh |
| Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) | ✅ 0,55 kg/km/h | ❌ 0,60 kg/km/h |
| Price per km of real-world range (€/km) | ❌ 20,89 €/km | ✅ 9,60 €/km |
| Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) | ❌ 0,57 kg/km | ✅ 0,43 kg/km |
| Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) | ❌ 16,62 Wh/km | ✅ 10,60 Wh/km |
| Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) | ❌ 14,71 W/km/h | ✅ 17,19 W/km/h |
| Weight to power ratio (kg/W) | Weight to power ratio (kg/W)✅ 0,04 kg/W | ✅ 0,04 kg/W |
| Average charging speed (W) | ✅ 90,00 W | ❌ 59,63 W |
These metrics are a purely mathematical way to look at efficiency and value. Price-per-Wh and price-per-range tell you how much "battery and distance" you get for each euro. Weight-based metrics show how much you have to carry per unit of energy, speed or range. Wh per km is straight energy efficiency: how thirsty each scooter is. Power-to-speed and weight-to-power expose how strongly they're geared and how much motor you get per kilogram. Average charging speed reflects how fast energy flows back into the battery while plugged in. None of this captures comfort or fun - but it does show where each scooter is objectively more or less efficient on paper.
Author's Category Battle
| Category | Apollo Air | Segway F3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | ✅ Slightly lighter overall | ❌ Heavier, suspension bulk |
| Range | ❌ Slightly shorter real range | ✅ Goes further in practice |
| Max Speed | ✅ Marginally higher ceiling | ❌ Slightly lower hardware cap |
| Power | ❌ Weaker motor feel | ✅ Stronger torque, climbs better |
| Battery Size | ✅ Larger capacity pack | ❌ Smaller capacity pack |
| Suspension | ❌ Only front, basic | ✅ Dual, far more plush |
| Design | ✅ Cleaner, more cohesive look | ❌ More utilitarian aesthetic |
| Safety | ❌ Great, but less techy | ✅ TCS, stronger light, grip |
| Practicality | ❌ Less comfort, narrower use | ✅ Handles more conditions |
| Comfort | ❌ Rear still quite harsh | ✅ Much smoother over crap |
| Features | ❌ Fewer electronic tricks | ✅ TCS, Find My, TFT, etc. |
| Serviceability | ❌ Fewer generic parts around | ✅ Easier parts sourcing EU |
| Customer Support | ✅ More personal, brand-focused | ❌ Bigger, more bureaucratic |
| Fun Factor | ❌ Safe but a bit tame | ✅ Punchier, plusher, livelier |
| Build Quality | ✅ Very solid, tight stem | ✅ Robust, fleet-grade feel |
| Component Quality | ✅ Nice tyres, solid hardware | ✅ Strong motor, good suspension |
| Brand Name | ❌ Smaller, niche brand | ✅ Huge, globally recognised |
| Community | ✅ Engaged, enthusiast-focused | ✅ Massive, lots of resources |
| Lights (visibility) | ❌ Adequate but not standout | ✅ Brighter, better signalling |
| Lights (illumination) | ❌ Weak for dark paths | ✅ Much better road lighting |
| Acceleration | ❌ Gentler, less punchy | ✅ Stronger shove off line |
| Arrive with smile factor | ❌ Competent, not thrilling | ✅ Comfort plus grunt, grin |
| Arrive relaxed factor | ❌ Rougher on bad surfaces | ✅ Suspension really saves body |
| Charging speed | ✅ Faster relative to size | ❌ Slower full charge time |
| Reliability | ✅ Strong track record, simple | ✅ Proven platform, sturdy |
| Folded practicality | ❌ Wider bar, less neat | ✅ Folds quickly, compact |
| Ease of transport | ✅ Slightly lighter carry | ❌ Heavier, more effort |
| Handling | ❌ Safe but a bit numb | ✅ Planted, confident, composed |
| Braking performance | ✅ Great regen plus drum | ✅ Strong disc and e-brake |
| Riding position | ✅ Comfortable, stable stance | ✅ Relaxed, natural ergonomics |
| Handlebar quality | ✅ Wide, ergonomic grips | ✅ Curved, comfy geometry |
| Throttle response | ✅ Very smooth, tunable | ❌ Less sophisticated feel |
| Dashboard/Display | ❌ Basic, functional only | ✅ Bright, informative TFT |
| Security (locking) | ❌ No dedicated lock loop | ✅ Lock point, Find My, alarm |
| Weather protection | ✅ Higher IP rating | ❌ Slightly lower rating |
| Resale value | ❌ Smaller resale market | ✅ Strong Segway second-hand |
| Tuning potential | ✅ App tuning out-of-box | ❌ Less open custom tuning |
| Ease of maintenance | ❌ Some brand-specific quirks | ✅ Common parts, known platform |
| Value for Money | ❌ Pays more for polish | ✅ Much more for fewer euros |
Overall Winner Declaration
In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the APOLLO Air scores 4 points against the SEGWAY F3 Pro's 7. In the Author's Category Battle, the APOLLO Air gets 17 ✅ versus 29 ✅ for SEGWAY F3 Pro (with a few ties sprinkled in).
Totals: APOLLO Air scores 21, SEGWAY F3 Pro scores 36.
Based on the scoring, the SEGWAY F3 Pro is our overall winner. Riding both back-to-back, the Segway F3 Pro simply feels like the more forgiving, less fussy partner - the one that shrugs off bad roads and steep ramps without constantly reminding you of its limits. The Apollo Air is pleasant and well-mannered, but you're more aware of the compromises you've made, especially when the surface turns ugly. If you want a scooter that quietly gets on with the job, keeps you comfortable, and doesn't empty your bank account for the privilege, the F3 Pro is the one that makes more sense in everyday life. The Apollo Air is likeable, but the Segway just makes it easier to forget you're commuting at all - and that's the real win.
That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.

