Apollo City 2022 vs Fluid WideWheel Pro - The Civilised Commuter Takes on the Street Brawler

Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)

If you want a scooter to replace - or seriously reduce - your car and public transport use, the Apollo City 2022 is the more complete, better-rounded choice for most riders: comfier, safer in mixed conditions, better finished, and easier to live with long term.

The Fluid WideWheel Pro hits harder off the line and climbs hills like it's allergic to gravity, but you trade away comfort, wet-weather grip and refinement to get that thrill.

Pick the Apollo if you value daily reliability, comfort and low maintenance; pick the WideWheel Pro if you're a torque addict with decent roads, dry weather and a higher tolerance for quirks.

If you're still reading, you probably care about more than just raw power - so let's dig into what these two are really like to live with.

Urban riders often end up torn between two temptations: the sensible commuter that promises to quietly get the job done every day, and the wild child that makes every errand feel like a stunt rehearsal. The Apollo City 2022 and the Fluid WideWheel Pro sit right on that divide.

On paper they're obvious rivals: both mid-sized, mid-to-upper mid-price scooters with serious performance, proper suspension and enough range for real-world commuting. In practice, they embody opposite philosophies. One is a modern, integrated "transport appliance" that wants to replace your bus pass. The other is a die-cast slab of attitude that wants to yank your arms out of their sockets at every green light.

The Apollo City 2022 is for riders who use their scooter like a daily vehicle. The Fluid WideWheel Pro is for riders who secretly wish their commute were a drag strip. They cost similar money, but the way they spend that money is very different - and that's where the story gets interesting.

Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?

Both scooters live in that sweet spot between toy-grade commuters and full-blown 40-kg monsters. They're aimed at people who ride more days than not, often as primary transport.

The Apollo City 2022 (we'll assume the dual-motor Pro version here, as it's the natural rival) is the "grown-up commuter" option: strong acceleration, very good suspension, serious water resistance and a highly integrated design. Think: someone upgrading from a Xiaomi or Ninebot and ready to treat a scooter like they'd treat a small motorbike - but without the noise and petrol bills.

The Fluid WideWheel Pro positions itself as a "budget muscle scooter": dual motors, brute-force hill climbing and a visually striking frame, often at a noticeably lower price than the Apollo. It clearly targets riders who care more about excitement and never fixing flats than about featherbed comfort.

They sit close enough in speed, range and weight that many riders will cross-shop them - which is exactly why this comparison matters.

Design & Build Quality

Pick them up (carefully) and the difference in design philosophy hits you immediately.

The Apollo City 2022 looks like it was designed as a whole object: smooth lines, hidden cabling, integrated lights, rubberised deck, proprietary frame. It feels like a finished product from a consumer-tech brand. The stem latch closes with a solid "clunk", the fenders don't rattle, and nothing screams "parts bin". In the hands it feels dense but well thought-out, like it's been user-tested by people who actually commute.

The WideWheel Pro goes the other way: it's die-cast, aggressive and unapologetically mechanical. The chassis looks like a piece of industrial equipment that escaped a factory. No skinny tubes, just a chunky monocoque and those absurdly wide wheels. It absolutely has presence. But closer inspection reveals a bit more parts-bin energy: exposed brake cabling, plastic adjustment dials on the stem joint, and a cockpit that's functional rather than refined. Solid enough, but it feels like "performance first, everything else second".

In terms of pure solidity, both are respectable, but the Apollo feels more mature and cohesive. The WideWheel feels tough but slightly more "old school hobby scooter" in its detailing. One looks like it belongs in a modern office lobby; the other looks like it belongs outside a bar with a row of motorbikes - you'll know which appeals to you.

Ride Comfort & Handling

This is where the gap gets big, fast.

The Apollo City 2022 has proper suspension at both ends and large, tubeless, air-filled tyres. Add a long, grippy deck and decent bar width and you get a ride that genuinely deserves the word "glide". You can charge along broken bike paths, dodgy asphalt patches and the usual city rubble without your knees writing a complaint letter. The deck gives enough room for a staggered stance, and the rear kickplate lets you brace under acceleration. Steering is predictable, with enough weight to feel stable but not sluggish.

On the WideWheel Pro, comfort is... conditional. On smooth tarmac, the suspension and those fat, foam-filled tyres combine into a floating, hoverboard-ish feeling that's honestly addictive. But hit older, cracked roads and the truth of solid tyres emerges: every little vibration comes through the deck and bars. Big hits - pothole edges, drops off small kerbs - are handled decently by the spring arms, but the constant high-frequency buzz is far more fatiguing than on the Apollo.

Handling is also very different. The Apollo's rounded tyres let you lean and carve naturally; think "sporty bicycle with juice". The WideWheel's flat, square tyres resist leaning and prefer to be steered rather than carved. Once you adapt, it's stable in straight lines and wide arcs, but quick direction changes need more body input and a bit of faith. In tight city manoeuvres, the Apollo feels intuitive; the WideWheel feels like it's asking "are you sure?" before every sharp turn.

For long or rough commutes, the Apollo is the clear winner. The WideWheel can be fine - even lovely - if your roads are decent and your rides are shorter, but it doesn't hide bad infrastructure at all.

Performance

Both scooters are properly quick; they just express it in very different ways.

The Apollo City 2022 Pro delivers its dual-motor power with surprising polish. Acceleration is strong enough to leave rental scooters looking like they're stuck in first gear, but the throttle mapping is smooth and predictable. It ramps up rather than slapping you, which makes it easier to control in traffic and at low speed. Top speed is comfortably into "helmet is non-negotiable" territory, yet the chassis remains composed, without nervous twitching through the bars.

The WideWheel Pro is more... theatrical. Dual motors on small wheels plus aggressive tuning means the first time you pin the throttle, you genuinely might giggle - or swear. It lunges off the line with urgency; hills that embarrass lesser scooters barely slow it down. It's a superb hill climber and probably the more dramatic off-the-line performer of the two.

The downside: that drama comes with a slightly binary throttle feel. Especially in its more aggressive mode, the WideWheel is keen to surge; feathering it for slow, precise manoeuvres takes more practice. At speed it actually feels very planted thanks to the wide contact patches and low centre of gravity, but it clearly prefers "go now" to "tiptoe through pedestrians".

Braking is an interesting contrast. Apollo's dual drums combined with a dedicated regen thumb brake give you progressive, predictable stopping with minimal fuss and almost no maintenance. The WideWheel's dual mechanical discs bite harder and can stop you very quickly if you're assertive with the levers - but they need occasional adjustment and are easier to lock if you panic-grab. Both will haul you down safely; the Apollo just does it with more finesse and less wrenching over the lifetime of the scooter.

Battery & Range

Range claims from both brands are optimistic, as usual. In real use, you're looking at "solid daily commuter" territory rather than epic tourer - which is fine, that's the segment.

The Apollo City 2022 Pro has a noticeably larger battery on paper, and it shows when you ride it hard. Ride fast, climb hills and use the power enthusiastically and it still tends to outlast the WideWheel by a noticeable margin. The regenerative braking, while not magic, does claw back a bit in stop-start city riding, and it all adds up to fewer "will I make it home?" moments.

The WideWheel Pro does reasonably well for its battery size, but the combination of dual motors, solid tyres and a design that encourages aggressive riding means you chew through its pack quicker. In spirited use, it's solid for medium-length commutes; long, fast, hilly round-trips start to feel a bit tight on headroom.

Charging is another story. Apollo's pack charges in a few hours, which makes lunchtime top-ups quite realistic. The WideWheel, on the other hand, is an overnight charging affair with its stock charger - you plug it in, go to bed and hope tomorrow's route isn't any longer. For riders who drain most of the battery daily, that difference in turnaround time is very real.

Portability & Practicality

Neither of these is light. If your daily routine involves multiple flights of stairs, your quads have my sympathy in advance.

The Apollo City 2022 Pro is the heavier of the two. You feel that extra heft when you try to carry it, especially if you're not used to lugging awkward weights. The folding mechanism itself is quick and confidence-inspiring, and when folded it hooks to the rear deck - though that hook can be a bit finicky when actually carrying the scooter. Under a desk or in a car boot, it behaves well enough; on a crowded tram, it's a nuisance.

The WideWheel Pro is a little lighter and folds into a very compact length, which is a plus for car transport and tight storage spaces. But the handlebars don't fold, and the wide stance makes it a bit of a hallway bully. The screw-type stem lock is rock solid once tightened, but takes longer to operate than Apollo's latch. If you're constantly folding/unfolding, the Apollo wins on speed; if you prioritise zero wobble once set, the WideWheel's approach has merit - as long as you remember to actually tighten it properly.

In day-to-day practicality, the Apollo counters its weight with low-maintenance touches: drum brakes, self-healing tyres, better water sealing. The WideWheel fights back with the "never fix a flat ever" promise of its solid tyres - you lose comfort, but you gain peace of mind about punctures. For many commuters, that's a compelling trade; for others, the harshness will be a deal-breaker.

Safety

Safety isn't just about brakes and lights; it's also about how forgiving the scooter is when things aren't perfect - bad roads, bad weather, or bad decisions.

The Apollo City 2022 feels like it was designed by someone who actually rides in the rain. Strong water resistance, enclosed drum brakes, grippy pneumatic tyres and compliant suspension add up to a scooter that remains predictable in damp conditions. The integrated lighting - including high-mounted headlight, tail light and indicators - does a decent job in city environments, though I'd still add an extra light for truly dark paths.

The WideWheel Pro is a bit more "rider beware". Dry grip from those wide solids is good, and the lack of speed wobble is reassuring at the top end. But wet grip is clearly inferior to air-filled tyres, and painted lines or wet metal become "do not touch mid-corner" zones. You learn to ride around it, but you do need to learn. The low-mounted front light looks cool and is fine for being seen, but it's not ideal for seeing into potholes at speed; again, an aftermarket bar-mounted light almost feels mandatory if you ride at night.

Both brake well. Apollo wins on wet performance and "grab and it just works the same every time", while the WideWheel wins on sheer disc-brake bite when conditions are good. Overall, the Apollo comes out ahead on everyday safety, especially if your weather isn't permanently Mediterranean.

Community Feedback

Price & Value

The Apollo City 2022 Pro usually sits clearly above the WideWheel Pro in price. You're paying extra for a bigger battery, more modern chassis, better weather sealing, self-healing pneumatics, a clever regen system and generally a more refined package. If you view your scooter as a serious daily vehicle and value comfort, reliability and polish, that premium can be justified; you feel where much of the money went.

The WideWheel Pro as typically priced undercuts the Apollo noticeably. For that lower price you get dual motors, a solid frame, decent range and the "never fix a puncture" life. But you also accept long charging times, harsher ride, weaker wet-grip and a design that's showing its age in certain areas. In pure euros-per-torque terms, it's attractive; as an overall transport tool, the value argument is a bit more nuanced than fan forums might suggest.

Long-term, Apollo's lower routine maintenance (no pads to swap constantly, fewer flats, better weather protection) quietly saves both money and hassle. The WideWheel pushes some of that cost into your wrists, knees and occasional rim repairs if you misjudge a pothole. Value isn't just what you pay upfront; it's how often you regret it later.

Service & Parts Availability

Apollo has built much of its reputation on customer support and a willingness to iterate. Parts for the City line are relatively easy to source in Europe, and the move to proprietary components means you're generally dealing with one ecosystem rather than a random set of factory suppliers. That's a double-edged sword in theory, but in practice Apollo's ecosystem is reasonably well supported and documented.

Fluidfreeride is genuinely one of the better names in the game for after-sales in the WideWheel's home markets, and they stock spares for the Pro. If you're in North America, that's a clear plus. In Europe, availability can depend more on where you buy from - the "Fluid" edition is usually better supported than generic Mercane / WideWheel listings. However, the more niche nature of some parts (particularly those rims) means you may occasionally be at the mercy of international shipping if you break something substantial.

In short: both are better than random no-name imports, but Apollo has a slight edge in global cohesion and ecosystem maturity, especially on this particular model generation.

Pros & Cons Summary

Parameters Comparison

Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?

Putting them head to head, the Apollo City 2022 Pro is the better all-round scooter for most real people, most of the time. It rides more comfortably, copes with bad weather more gracefully, asks less of you in day-to-day maintenance and generally feels like a modern, sorted commuting tool rather than a hot-rod project. It's not perfect and it definitely isn't cheap, but if you want something you can just ride, day in, day out, with minimal drama, it's the smarter choice.

The Fluid WideWheel Pro is the more specialised creature. It will make you grin more in the first fifty metres than the Apollo probably will in the first fifty kilometres. If your roads are fairly smooth, your climate relatively dry, and your inner child still gets excited about brutal launches away from traffic lights, it absolutely delivers - especially considering its usually lower price. But you have to accept its limitations: comfort on rough surfaces, wet grip, long charging, and some ageing design compromises.

So: if you're shopping for a vehicle, lean Apollo. If you're shopping for an adrenaline gadget that can also commute and you understand what you're trading away for that thrill, the WideWheel Pro will happily misbehave with you.

Numbers Freaks Corner

These metrics look purely at maths: how much you pay per unit of battery or speed, how heavy each scooter is relative to its energy and power, how efficiently they use their battery in real riding, and how fast they recharge. Lower values are generally better for cost and efficiency metrics; higher is better for raw power delivery per speed and for charging wattage. They don't capture comfort, safety or fun - but they do show where each scooter is objectively more or less efficient on paper.

Author's Category Battle

Overall Winner Declaration

In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the APOLLO City 2022 scores 7 points against the FLUID WIDEWHEEL PRO's 3. In the Author's Category Battle, the APOLLO City 2022 gets 32 ✅ versus 13 ✅ for FLUID WIDEWHEEL PRO (with a few ties sprinkled in).

Totals: APOLLO City 2022 scores 39, FLUID WIDEWHEEL PRO scores 16.

Based on the scoring, the APOLLO City 2022 is our overall winner. In daily use, the Apollo City 2022 Pro simply feels more like a modern transport solution than a toy: it's calmer, more forgiving, kinder to your body and noticeably easier to live with when the weather or roads aren't cooperating. The Fluid WideWheel Pro still has its charm - and if you mainly crave that slap of torque and have decent tarmac under you, it can be a riot - but it asks more compromises than it really pays back for most riders. For me, the Apollo is the scooter I'd actually want to own and rely on, while the WideWheel is the one I'd borrow for a weekend just to remind myself how silly electric torque can feel.

That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.