Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)
If you want the more complete, grown-up scooter, the APOLLO City 2022 takes the win: it rides softer, brakes smarter, survives bad weather better and feels like an actually engineered vehicle, not just parts bolted together. It suits daily commuters who value comfort, low maintenance and long-term reliability more than raw spec-sheet bragging rights.
The KUKIRIN T3 makes sense if your budget is tight but you still want real punch, flashy lights and a bit of attitude for relatively little money. It's the "max power per euro" choice, provided you're willing to live with a heavier frame, more DIY tinkering and less refinement.
If that's all you needed, you're done. But if you want to know how they really feel after many kilometres of real riding, keep going - this is where it gets interesting.
Electric scooters in this power bracket are a funny bunch: too quick to be toys, not quite refined enough to replace a car, and yet absolutely addictive once you start commuting on them. The KUKIRIN T3 and APOLLO City 2022 both try to sit in that "serious but still fun" middle ground, just with very different priorities.
The T3 is the budget bruiser: lots of motor, big battery, loud styling and more light effects than a cheap gaming PC. It's for riders who want to go faster than rental scooters without paying double their monthly rent for the privilege.
The Apollo City 2022 is the office-friendly grown-up: integrated design, cushy suspension, clever braking and proper water protection. It's built for someone who actually depends on a scooter to get to work every day, not just to blast around at the weekend.
On paper they collide in the same "mid-range commuter" segment; on the road they feel like they come from different planets. Let's dig into why.
Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?
Both scooters live in what I'd call the "serious commuter" class: they're too heavy and powerful to be simple last-mile toys, but they stop short of the full-blown monster machines that need moto armour and a support group.
The KUKIRIN T3 aims at riders upgrading from basic rental-style 25 km/h machines. You want more speed, more range, and you're willing to accept some extra weight and a bit of DIY to get there for not much money.
The APOLLO City 2022, especially the Pro version, targets the same sort of rider a year or two later: someone who's realised they actually use their scooter as transport, not as a gadget. Comfort, weather resistance and low maintenance start to matter more than saving a few hundred euro upfront.
They're natural competitors because they promise broadly similar capability - decent speed, decent range, biggish wheels, suspension - but one goes hard on value and raw specs, the other on polish and long-term ownership experience.
Design & Build Quality
Pick up the KUKIRIN T3 (briefly - your back will complain if you linger) and it feels like exactly what it is: chunky alloy, a bit agricultural in places, but solid. The "Cyber Aesthetic" is all sharp angles, visible bolts and RGB everywhere. Think budget sci-fi prop rather than understated commuter tool. Cables are reasonably managed but still visible, and some parts - fenders, clamps - have that generic OEM feel.
The APOLLO City 2022, by contrast, looks like someone actually drew it on purpose. The unibody-style frame, internal cable routing and rubberised deck give it a far more premium presence. Nothing screams "AliExpress chassis"; it looks like a cohesive product, not a parts bin special. The stem latch clicks home with that satisfying mechanical "clunk" you normally associate with decent bicycles or motorbikes, not budget scooters.
In your hands, the difference is clear: the T3 feels like a lot of scooter for the money, but also like you'll be periodically tightening things and chasing the odd rattle. The Apollo feels tighter and more "finished" out of the box. Neither is perfect - Apollo's folding hook when carrying is mildly annoying - but if build quality and aesthetics matter to you, the City 2022 is operating in a higher league.
Ride Comfort & Handling
Riding the KUKIRIN T3 over broken city tarmac is... fine. The twin spring suspension takes the sting out of potholes and curb cuts, and the fat air-filled tyres shoulder a lot of the work. But the springs are on the firmer side, clearly tuned with heavier riders in mind. If you're lighter, you'll sometimes feel the scooter skip over smaller imperfections instead of soaking them up. After a dozen kilometres of lumpy pavements, your knees know you've been standing.
The APOLLO City 2022 is noticeably more composed. The triple spring setup front and rear, combined with those self-healing pneumatic tyres, makes it feel more like a small vehicle than a big toy. It doesn't magically erase bad roads, but the harshness is dulled and the chassis stays calmer. On cobblestones and patchy asphalt, the City glides where the T3 hops and chatters a bit.
In corners, both benefit from 10-inch pneumatic tyres, but the Apollo's rounded profile and wider, ergonomic bar setup give it a more natural, scooter-like lean. The T3 is stable at speed, but it feels heavier in the steering and a bit more "point and pray" on rougher curves. If you enjoy carving bike lanes and weaving smoothly through traffic, the City 2022 handles with more finesse.
Performance
Performance is where the KUKIRIN T3 tries to punch above its class. That rear motor delivers brisk launches from traffic lights; you pull away from bicycles and sluggish rental scooters without effort. In its highest mode, it climbs to its top pace with enough urgency to keep up with city traffic on secondary roads. On moderate hills it chugs along gamely; only steeper ramps or a very heavy rider start to drag it down into "come on, you can do it" territory.
The Apollo City 2022 in single-motor trim feels more restrained but very civilised. Acceleration is smooth and predictable, without the "all or nothing" surge some budget controllers give you. It's absolutely fast enough for urban use, but you don't get that same punchy shove the T3 gives off the line.
Step up to the City Pro with dual motors and the tables turn dramatically. That second motor wakes the scooter up: hills stop being an issue, and sprints to urban speeds happen alarmingly quickly for something with a deck. The important bit isn't just that it's faster - it's that the power is delivered cleanly. Twisting the throttle doesn't feel like flipping a switch; it's more like turning up a very well-behaved dimmer. Where the T3 gives you "budget muscle car" vibes - fun, a bit crude - the City Pro feels like it's been tuned by someone who actually rides these things hard.
On the braking side, the gap widens further. The T3's dual mechanical discs bite strongly when adjusted correctly, but they demand occasional tweaking and can squeal or rub if neglected. In an emergency stop, they'll do the job, but lever feel isn't exactly surgical.
The Apollo's combo of dual drum brakes plus a dedicated regenerative thumb throttle completely changes daily riding. Most of the time you just roll off the main throttle and squeeze regen with your thumb, slowing smoothly while feeding a bit of energy back into the pack. The sealed drums are there when you need real bite, but they live a fairly easy life. It's calmer, more controlled and frankly more confidence-inspiring than the T3's "hope you adjusted your cable last month" approach.
Battery & Range
On paper, the KUKIRIN T3's battery looks generous for the price, and in the real world it's respectable. Ride sensibly in the middle speed mode, be of average weight, and you can cover a typical there-and-back commute with some buffer. Hammer it flat out in top mode and throw in a few hills and you'll see the gauge drain faster, landing you in that "home with a few bars left" zone rather than "weekend touring machine." It's enough to ditch range anxiety for most city riders, but not enough to stop you thinking about the battery on longer joyrides.
The Apollo City 2022 in single-motor form offers a similar pattern but with slightly less outright capacity; the Pro's larger pack steps things up and is clearly the one to pick if range is a concern. When riding with enthusiasm in the fastest mode, you can realistically expect to cover a decent medium-length commute with room for detours, especially on the Pro. Take it easy in eco mode and you can creep much closer to the optimistic manufacturer claim.
Efficiency is where Apollo's smoother power delivery and regen system buy it a small edge: you don't waste as much energy in jerky acceleration and braking cycles. The T3, being more brute-force and without meaningful regen, demands more discipline from your right thumb if you want to squeeze out maximum distance.
Charging is another quality-of-life separator. The T3 is very much "plug it in after work, it'll be ready by morning" - perfectly fine, but slow by today's standards. The City 2022, with its faster turnaround, lets you realistically top up in a half day at the office, doubling your usable daily range without owning a second charger. That matters if you're clocking serious weekly mileage.
Portability & Practicality
Let's be blunt: neither of these is a featherweight. The KUKIRIN T3 sits in that awkward "too heavy to pretend it's portable, too light to feel truly tank-like" middle. Carrying it up one or two flights of stairs is doable; doing that every day is an unasked-for fitness programme. The fold is simple and reasonably compact, fine for a car boot or under a big desk, but you won't love threading it through crowded train aisles.
The Apollo City 2022 doesn't exactly fix that; in Pro trim it's heavier again. The fold mechanism itself is excellent - quick, solid, and confidence-inspiring on the road - but any illusion of true "last mile" portability ends the moment you attempt a staircase. For lift-equipped buildings and roll-on/roll-off train commutes it's fine; for daily shoulder-carry life, it's really not.
Where the Apollo claws back points is in daily faff. The rubber deck wipes clean; the charging port has a proper magnetic cap; there's an app to fine-tune behaviour and lock the wheels digitally; the high water-resistance rating means fewer days where you think "maybe I'll just take the bus." The T3 is more basic: ignition key, decent but unremarkable IP rating, and the usual budget-scooter expectation that you occasionally get your hands dirty.
Safety
Safety is one of the KUKIRIN T3's better stories, at least at first glance. Dual mechanical discs are absolutely the right call at its speeds, and the motor cut-off helps avoid "fighting the motor" in a panic stop. Traction from the tubeless off-road tyres is good, especially on loose city debris, and the frame feels stable even at its top mode. The headline, of course, is the lighting: the rear "Angel Wings" laser projection and RGB deck lights don't just look wild, they do make you more visible, especially side-on at junctions. At night it's like riding inside your own small nightclub, albeit one limited to straight drum & bass: no hydraulic brake upgrade on the track list.
The Apollo City 2022 takes a quieter, more serious approach. On dry ground, its mix of regen plus dual drum brakes is excellent: predictable, strong, and most importantly consistent over time because the system is almost sealed away from muck. In the wet, the fact that those drums are protected is a big deal; discs plus mechanical cables plus cheap pads have a bad habit of turning "brake" into "vague suggestion" after enough rainy kilometres.
Lighting on the Apollo is solid but not showy. You get a decent front light, a clear tail light and integrated indicators. They're perfectly adequate for city use; for fast riding on unlit paths you'll probably want an extra bar-mounted lamp, but that's true of most scooters in this class. Where Apollo wins quietly is weatherproofing: that higher IP rating genuinely expands the days you can ride without constantly worrying about killing your electrics. In real commuting, that's not just convenience - it's safety by allowing you to maintain routine.
Community Feedback
| KUKIRIN T3 | APOLLO City 2022 |
|---|---|
What riders love
|
What riders love
|
What riders complain about
|
What riders complain about
|
Price & Value
This is where the KUKIRIN T3 stakes its whole identity. For not much more than the cost of a well-optioned entry-level scooter, you get a stronger motor, a bigger battery and a small circus worth of lighting. If you look purely at headline specs per euro, it's undeniably good value. The flipside is that you're also buying into budget-brand compromises: more self-service, more variability between individual units, and less support infrastructure if something serious fails.
The Apollo City 2022 asks roughly double the money. In return you get a better-engineered frame, more sophisticated ride, real weather protection, proper regen, self-healing tyres and drum brakes that pretty much never ask for attention. Whether that's "worth it" depends how you treat your scooter. If it's mainly a fun toy and you're price-sensitive, the T3 gives you more visible bang. If it replaces a chunk of your car or public-transport usage, the Apollo's refinement, uptime and comfort start looking like a bargain spread over years of commuting.
Service & Parts Availability
KUKIRIN, like many aggressive online brands, leans heavily on direct sales and community support. Spares exist, but you're often dealing with overseas warehouses, third-party sellers or scavenging from compatible models. Basic parts like tyres, tubes, generic discs and cables are easy enough to source; proprietary plastics, displays or controllers can involve longer waits and more emails than you'd like. If you're reasonably handy and not in a panic when something breaks, it's workable; if you want walk-in service, it's not that kind of relationship.
Apollo, to their credit, has invested in a proper support structure. You get documentation, official parts, and at least a path to repairs that doesn't involve gambling on random sellers. In parts of Europe this may still mean shipping things around rather than visiting a local shop, but the intent and infrastructure are there. Community knowledge around Apollo models is strong as well, so independent repairers are more likely to have seen one before. Neither brand is at "local bike shop on every corner" level, but Apollo is clearly closer to that world than KUKIRIN.
Pros & Cons Summary
| KUKIRIN T3 | APOLLO City 2022 (incl. Pro) |
|---|---|
Pros
|
Pros
|
Parameters Comparison
| Parameter | KUKIRIN T3 | APOLLO City 2022 (Pro where differs) |
|---|---|---|
| Motor power (rated) | 800 W rear | 500 W rear / dual 500 W |
| Top speed (approx.) | 45 km/h | 43,5 km/h / 51,5 km/h |
| Claimed range | 58 km | 45 km / 61 km |
| Battery | 48 V 15,6 Ah (≈750 Wh) | 48 V 13,5 Ah (650 Wh) / 18 Ah (864 Wh) |
| Weight | 25,5 kg | 26 kg / 29,5 kg |
| Brakes | Dual mechanical discs + e-cutoff | Dual drum + regenerative thumb brake |
| Suspension | Dual spring (front & rear) | Triple spring system |
| Tyres | 10" tubeless off-road pneumatic | 10" tubeless self-healing pneumatic |
| Max load | 120 kg | 100 kg / 120 kg |
| Water resistance | IP54 | IP56 |
| Approx. price | 556 € | 1.145 € |
Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?
If you strip away the marketing and just live with these scooters, a pattern emerges. The KUKIRIN T3 is the scrappy budget overachiever: fast enough, stable enough, and with a battery big enough to make daily commuting realistic, all while keeping the price surprisingly low. It's the right call if your priority is getting as much speed and range as possible for the least amount of money, and you don't mind the occasional spanner session or slightly harsher ride.
The APOLLO City 2022, especially the Pro, is the more serious tool. It's kinder to your joints, more forgiving in foul weather, easier to live with week in, week out, and its braking system genuinely makes city riding less stressful. It does cost a lot more, and it's not remotely portable in the lightweight sense, but as a daily urban vehicle it feels more mature and less like a hopped-up toy.
If you're upgrading from rentals and just want something faster and more exciting without draining your bank account, the KUKIRIN T3 will absolutely scratch that itch. If you already know you'll be clocking many kilometres every month and you want something you can trust through winter, potholes and the occasional biblical rainstorm, the Apollo City 2022 is the scooter you'll be happier with in the long run.
Numbers Freaks Corner
| Metric | KUKIRIN T3 | APOLLO City 2022 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Price per Wh (€/Wh) | ✅ 0,74 €/Wh | ❌ 1,33 €/Wh |
| Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) | ✅ 12,36 €/km/h | ❌ 22,24 €/km/h |
| Weight per Wh (g/Wh) | ✅ 34,00 g/Wh | ❌ 34,15 g/Wh |
| Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) | ✅ 0,57 kg/km/h | ✅ 0,57 kg/km/h |
| Price per km of real-world range (€/km) | ✅ 15,98 €/km | ❌ 31,28 €/km |
| Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) | ✅ 0,73 kg/km | ❌ 0,81 kg/km |
| Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) | ✅ 21,55 Wh/km | ❌ 23,62 Wh/km |
| Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) | ❌ 17,78 W/km/h | ✅ 38,83 W/km/h |
| Weight to power ratio (kg/W) | ❌ 0,0319 kg/W | ✅ 0,0148 kg/W |
| Average charging speed (W) | ❌ 100 W | ✅ 216 W |
These metrics isolate the cold maths behind ownership: how much battery and speed you get per euro, how heavy each scooter is relative to its performance and range, how energy-efficient they are, and how quickly they refill their packs. Lower cost and weight per unit of performance generally favour budget machines like the T3, while higher power-to-speed and faster charging highlight the engineering muscle of the Apollo City Pro.
Author's Category Battle
| Category | KUKIRIN T3 | APOLLO City 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | ✅ Slightly lighter overall | ❌ Heavier, bulkier Pro |
| Range | ❌ Decent but smaller pack | ✅ Pro goes noticeably further |
| Max Speed | ❌ Fast but not fastest | ✅ Pro has higher top |
| Power | ❌ Strong single motor | ✅ Dual motors overpower it |
| Battery Size | ❌ Respectable, still smaller | ✅ Larger capacity on Pro |
| Suspension | ❌ Firmer, less refined | ✅ Plusher triple setup |
| Design | ❌ Busy, budget feel | ✅ Clean, integrated look |
| Safety | ❌ Good, but more basic | ✅ Brakes, IP rating, stability |
| Practicality | ❌ Less weather, more tinkering | ✅ All-weather, low maintenance |
| Comfort | ❌ Firm, a bit jittery | ✅ Noticeably smoother ride |
| Features | ❌ Fewer smart features | ✅ App, regen, self-healing |
| Serviceability | ❌ Parts more hit-and-miss | ✅ Better official parts access |
| Customer Support | ❌ Generic, slower channels | ✅ Structured brand support |
| Fun Factor | ✅ Punchy, flashy, playful | ❌ More sensible, less wild |
| Build Quality | ❌ Solid but rough edges | ✅ More refined chassis |
| Component Quality | ❌ Generic parts mostly | ✅ Higher-spec components |
| Brand Name | ❌ Budget-oriented reputation | ✅ Stronger, premium image |
| Community | ✅ Big modding community | ❌ Smaller but growing |
| Lights (visibility) | ✅ Angel Wings very visible | ❌ Functional but modest |
| Lights (illumination) | ❌ Adequate only | ✅ Slightly better overall |
| Acceleration | ❌ Strong, but single motor | ✅ Pro launches harder |
| Arrive with smile factor | ✅ Punch + light show | ❌ Calmer, more serious |
| Arrive relaxed factor | ❌ Harsher, more effort | ✅ Smoother, less fatigue |
| Charging speed | ❌ Slow overnight style | ✅ Fast turnaround times |
| Reliability | ❌ More variance, DIY fixes | ✅ Better controlled overall |
| Folded practicality | ✅ Slightly lighter, simpler | ❌ Heavier to manoeuvre folded |
| Ease of transport | ✅ Less weight to wrestle | ❌ Weighty, especially on stairs |
| Handling | ❌ Stable but less precise | ✅ More confidence in corners |
| Braking performance | ❌ Good, needs adjustment | ✅ Strong, consistent, regen |
| Riding position | ✅ Wide deck, good stance | ❌ Similar, slightly less room |
| Handlebar quality | ❌ Functional, generic | ✅ Ergonomic, better feel |
| Throttle response | ❌ Harsher, less refined | ✅ Smooth, well-tuned |
| Dashboard/Display | ❌ Harder in bright sun | ✅ Better integrated, clearer |
| Security (locking) | ✅ Key ignition helps | ❌ Digital lock only |
| Weather protection | ❌ Basic splash resistance | ✅ High-confidence wet riding |
| Resale value | ❌ Budget brand depreciation | ✅ Stronger used-market appeal |
| Tuning potential | ✅ Lots of DIY mod space | ❌ More closed ecosystem |
| Ease of maintenance | ❌ More frequent adjustments | ✅ Fewer tasks, sealed parts |
| Value for Money | ✅ Specs per euro superb | ❌ Pricier, pays in polish |
Overall Winner Declaration
In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the KUKIRIN T3 scores 7 points against the APOLLO City 2022's 4. In the Author's Category Battle, the KUKIRIN T3 gets 11 ✅ versus 28 ✅ for APOLLO City 2022.
Totals: KUKIRIN T3 scores 18, APOLLO City 2022 scores 32.
Based on the scoring, the APOLLO City 2022 is our overall winner. In the end, the Apollo City 2022 feels like the scooter you buy once you've had your fling with cheaper machines and want something calmer, more sorted and easier to trust every single morning. It doesn't scream the loudest on value charts, but it quietly looks after you in ways you only really appreciate after dozens of commutes in bad weather and worse traffic. The KUKIRIN T3 fights back hard on price and sheer attitude, and if your wallet is the main decision-maker it remains an appealing, if slightly rough-edged, companion. But as an overall package to actually live with, the Apollo is the one that feels more like a dependable small vehicle and less like a fast toy you'll eventually grow out of.
That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.

