Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)
The Segway ZT3 Pro edges out the Apollo City 2022 as the more rounded scooter: it rides softer over bad roads, brakes harder when things go wrong, and backs it all up with Segway's ecosystem and very solid tech. It feels more like a small, tough vehicle than a fancy gadget.
The Apollo City 2022 still makes sense if you want a cleaner, more integrated design, lower weight, better water protection and a very low-maintenance, "set and forget" commuter with excellent regen braking. Choose the ZT3 Pro if you care most about comfort, stability and off-road-friendly robustness; choose the Apollo City if you mainly ride urban tarmac, hate maintenance and like your scooters to look sharp in an office corridor.
If you want the full story - including where both of them quietly disappoint - keep reading.
Electric scooters have grown up. We're long past the days of flimsy rental clones and rattly toy-grade commuters. The Apollo City 2022 and Segway ZT3 Pro both sit in that "serious adult transport" zone - powerful enough to replace public transport for many riders, but not yet in the unhinged hyper-scooter category that terrifies pedestrians and insurance companies alike.
I've put decent mileage on both: the Apollo in its dual-motor Pro guise, and the ZT3 Pro as my "bad roads and bad weather" test mule. They live in the same broad price bracket, promise comfort, range and safety, and both weigh enough that you'll reconsider every time you see a staircase.
The Apollo is for the rider who wants an integrated, low-maintenance city slicker. The Segway is for the rider who suspects their city was paved by sadists and wants something that can shrug off punishment. Let's dig into where each one shines - and where the shine wears off.
Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?
Both scooters target the "power commuter" - someone who rides daily, often more than just a quick hop to the station. Think office workers ditching the car, students crossing an entire campus, or heavier riders who've already killed a cheap Xiaomi and are not keen to repeat the experience.
Price-wise, they sit in the same broad band: the Apollo City 2022 Pro costs a bit more, the Segway ZT3 Pro a bit less. Both offer real-world ranges comfortably beyond a typical inner-city commute, both can keep pace with city traffic when de-restricted, and both weigh close enough to 30 kg that "portable" is a generous term.
They're competitors because they promise similar things in different ways: Apollo sells polish and integration - pretty, tidy, app-tuned city functionality. Segway sells durability, suspension and big-brand assurance. If you're shopping in this bracket, these two will almost certainly end up on the same shortlist.
Design & Build Quality
The Apollo City 2022 looks like it was designed by an industrial designer who rides to work; the ZT3 Pro looks like it was designed by someone who rides down stairs for fun. Very different philosophies.
On the Apollo, cables disappear into the stem, the chassis flows in one continuous shape, and the rubber deck and integrated display give off "premium consumer electronics" vibes. Nothing screams for attention; it's understated, almost Apple-like in its minimalism. In the hands, the frame feels dense and solid, with very little flex. The folding latch closes with a clean clunk, and aside from the slightly fussy hook when folded, it all feels considered.
The Segway ZT3 Pro is the opposite of subtle. Tubular exoskeleton frame, visible suspension, big 11-inch tyres - it looks like the Ninebot Max went to the gym and got into motocross. There are more exposed parts and more plastic trim, and while some of that plastic scuffs a bit too easily, the structural bits are pure Segway: no stem wobble, no alarming creaks, and a folding joint that feels massively over-built.
Fit and finish are strong on both, but in different ways. Apollo wins on visual integration and a "no loose ends" feel. Segway wins on that tank-like, rental-fleet heritage where everything important feels oversized for the job. If you park in a sleek office, the Apollo looks more at home. Lock either one outside a supermarket and you'll care more that the ZT3's frame just feels like it could be thrown down a flight of stairs and still ride home.
Ride Comfort & Handling
This is where the gap between them starts to really open.
The Apollo's triple spring suspension and self-healing tyres give a very pleasant, floaty ride on typical city surfaces. Broken tarmac, tram tracks, the usual patchwork of repairs - it glides over all of that with a nicely damped, controlled feel. After a solid half hour of riding mixed urban nonsense, I'd step off the City 2022 thinking, "Yeah, I could do that again." The 10-inch tyres keep the centre of gravity reasonably low, and the wide bars give reassuring leverage in corners.
Then you ride the ZT3 Pro over the same route and realise that, for all Apollo's marketing poetry, Segway's suspension simply works better when the going gets ugly. The motorcycle-style front fork and beefy rear spring soak up sharper hits and repetitive bumps that start to fatigue you on the Apollo. On cobblestones or rough gravel, the ZT3 Pro stays calmer, with fewer harsh jolts coming through the deck. Those larger 11-inch tyres roll over holes and curbs more lazily; you don't have to pick your line as carefully.
Handling-wise, the Apollo feels a bit more nimble and "city agile". The smaller wheels and slightly lighter chassis make tight slaloms and weaving through bollards feel easy. The ZT3 Pro, with its big tyres and wide bars, is more of a stable cruiser. It prefers sweeping arcs to tight flicks. At higher speeds, that extra stability is very welcome - the Segway just tracks straight without drama, while the Apollo feels composed but a bit more lively underfoot.
If your daily terrain is mostly decent tarmac with occasional imperfections, the City 2022 is comfortable enough. If your city engineers apparently hate you, the ZT3 Pro is kinder to your knees and your confidence.
Performance
On paper, Apollo's dual-motor Pro version sounds like the hooligan here. In practice, both scooters deliver enough punch to make a normal commute entertaining, but in different flavours.
The Apollo Pro pulls briskly off the line; in its highest mode, it leaps ahead of traffic lights with that instant "EV shove" and plenty of torque for hills. It doesn't quite deliver the arm-yanking savagery that some dual-motor rivals offer, but that's not entirely a bad thing - acceleration is smooth and predictable, not a binary on/off switch. It's quick enough that you can easily find yourself nudging speeds that make small wheels and cycle lanes feel... optimistic.
The ZT3 Pro, despite its single motor, doesn't feel dramatically slower in the real world. Segway's tuning is punchy; Sport mode gives a satisfying surge and the scooter climbs hills more confidently than its rated power suggests. Top speed on the de-restricted versions is a little lower than the Apollo Pro's claim, but not by a life-changing margin, and in regulated markets both will be artificially capped anyway. Underfoot, the ZT3 feels more like a torquey tractor than a sprinter - you twist the throttle, it digs in and just hauls.
Braking is one of the biggest experiential differences. Apollo's dual drum setup plus regenerative thumb brake is clever and genuinely pleasant to use day-to-day. You can ride 90% of the time on regen alone, slowing smoothly and barely touching the mechanical drums. But when you really need a brutally hard stop from higher speeds, the Segway's dual discs simply bite harder and shed speed more aggressively. Add in traction control keeping the rear wheel in check on slick surfaces, and the ZT3 Pro feels more secure when you misjudge a car door or a wet zebra crossing.
On big, sustained hills, Apollo's dual motors give it the edge in outright pace. The ZT3 Pro still climbs with authority, but if you live somewhere genuinely steep and like to blast uphill at full tilt, the Apollo Pro will feel friskier. For mixed urban gradients, both feel competent enough that your legs will complain before the motors do.
Battery & Range
Neither of these is a true long-range tourer, but both offer enough real-world distance for typical daily use.
The Apollo City 2022 Pro carries a slightly larger battery than the Segway. In practice, when ridden aggressively in top mode, the Apollo tends to eke out a bit more distance before the last bar starts blinking at you. Think of it this way: you can hammer it to work and back, with some detours and still get home without sweating range, as long as your total is roughly within a broad couple-dozen-kilometre band.
The ZT3 Pro's pack is smaller on paper but helped by Segway's efficiency tricks. In my testing, ridden in a realistic mix of modes with plenty of full-throttle bursts, it comfortably hits that mid-thirties kilometre mark, sometimes more if you behave. RideyLONG isn't magic, but it does mean you're not throwing away watt-hours quite as carelessly as some competitors do.
Charging is a wash: both claim around a work-day-friendly four hours to go from empty to full. In practice, you plug in when you get to the office or home, forget about it for a few hours, and come back to a full battery. Apollo does get a minor nod for the magnetic charging cap and generally tidier port placement; Segway scores back points with its "Flash Charge" branding actually matching reality reasonably well.
On range anxiety: with the Apollo Pro, I'm more relaxed about pushing speeds for longer without constantly checking the display. With the ZT3 Pro, I'm slightly more aware of how hard I'm riding if I know I've got a long return leg. Neither will leave you stranded if you're sensible; neither is a cross-country machine. They're commuters first, explorers second.
Portability & Practicality
Let's be blunt: neither of these scooters is "portable" in the sense most people mean it. You can fold them; you cannot pretend they're light.
The Apollo City 2022, especially the single-motor version, has the edge on weight. When you pick it up, it's heavy but just about manageable for short stair sections or lifting into a car boot, assuming you don't skip arm day. The folding mechanism is quick and secure, but the hook that keeps stem and deck together in folded mode is a bit fussy - it can unhook if you don't balance it right, turning one awkward heavy piece into two even more awkward heavy pieces.
The Segway ZT3 Pro is heavier again and feels it. The frame is bulkier, the bars are wide and don't fold in, and the 11-inch wheels make the folded package tall and ungainly. Carrying it up several flights of stairs is an instant reminder that you could have joined a gym instead. If your commuting pattern involves frequent lifting, this is the wrong scooter. If it's a straight "garage to pavement" or "lift to street" life, the weight is less of an issue.
Day-to-day practicality tilts slightly in favour of the Apollo for low-maintenance city life: self-healing tyres, sealed drum brakes, strong water protection - you ride, park, repeat, without much tinkering. The Segway counters with smarter software (AirLock, Find My, traction control), a more versatile tyre and suspension setup for bad surfaces, and a better app. Storage-wise, both are fine under a desk or in a hallway if you have the space; neither is something you want to drag through a packed metro carriage at rush hour.
Safety
Both manufacturers clearly thought a lot about safety - just in different directions.
Apollo's approach is: keep it predictable and keep you visible. The regen thumb brake gives you precise control over deceleration; once you get used to it, it's wonderfully intuitive, especially in stop-and-go traffic. The dual drums are sealed from grime and water, so braking performance stays consistent over time. Lighting is neatly integrated, with high-mounted headlight, rear light and low-mounted turn signals on the deck. The water-resistance rating is among the best in this class, which translates directly into safety when you inevitably end up riding through a downpour - less worry about electronics, more focus on not sliding into a bus.
Segway goes a bit more "active safety". Dual disc brakes give more aggressive bite and shorter panic-stop distances. Traction control is genuinely useful when a rear wheel might otherwise spin up on wet leaves or polished stone. The X-shaped headlight throws a broader, more useful beam ahead - crucial if you ride fast on dim cycle paths. Turn signals are mounted higher and more in line with drivers' eye level, and the separate battery water-proofing adds confidence for wet-weather warriors.
In terms of stability at speed, the ZT3 Pro is the calmer of the two, thanks to its bigger wheels, longer wheelbase and plush suspension. The Apollo is absolutely stable enough for its intended speeds, but when you really let it run, you're more aware you're standing on a tall, narrow platform with smaller wheels under you.
If your riding includes a lot of night-time, bad weather or sketchy surfaces, the Segway's safety toolkit feels more reassuring. If your biggest concern is reliability of components in wet conditions and predictable braking in the city, the Apollo's sealed hardware and regen system do a solid job.
Community Feedback
| APOLLO City 2022 | SEGWAY ZT3 Pro |
|---|---|
| What riders love Super-smooth ride for a city scooter, very intuitive regen braking, clean integrated design, strong water resistance, low maintenance (drum brakes + self-healing tyres), comfy deck and cockpit, good app customisation. |
What riders love Plush suspension and big tyres, strong torque and hill-climbing, tank-like build, fast charging, excellent app and smart features (AirLock, Find My), stability at speed, powerful disc brakes, confident off-road manners. |
| What riders complain about Heavier than expected, awkward to carry, folding hook occasionally slips when carried, headlight a bit weak for dark paths, early QC quirks on first batches, turn signals a bit low, price creeping into "premium" territory. |
What riders complain about Very heavy and bulky when folded, plastics scratch easily, rear fender can rattle on rough terrain, no dedicated lock point, range drops quickly if ridden flat-out, still not exactly cheap. |
Price & Value
The Apollo City 2022 Pro asks more money up front than the ZT3 Pro. In return, it gives you a slightly bigger battery, dual motors, very strong water protection and a more integrated, low-maintenance package. You're paying for refinement and design as much as raw spec. The trouble is, at this price, the competition is fierce; you can find scooters that are faster or go further, even if they don't match Apollo's polish.
The Segway ZT3 Pro, usually coming in a bit cheaper, offers serious suspension, disc brakes, excellent software and big-brand reliability. It's not a spec monster either, but for what you pay, you get a lot of high-quality, well-tuned scooter that genuinely changes how comfortable rough commutes feel. And resale for Segway gear tends to be stronger, which quietly helps the value calculation over a few years.
If you absolutely hate wrenching and want the most "maintenance-light" experience, the Apollo makes a case for its higher ticket. If you're looking at bang-for-buck in terms of comfort, stability and braking hardware, the Segway's pricing is simply more compelling.
Service & Parts Availability
Apollo has come a long way from its early days. In Europe, you'll usually be dealing with distributors or partner shops rather than direct Canadian support, which can mean slightly longer shipping on some parts, but the City 2022 is popular enough that spares like throttles, controllers and even swingarms are not unicorns. Early QC issues were mostly handled under warranty, but you do occasionally hear of back-and-forth on diagnosis and shipping delays.
Segway, meanwhile, is everywhere. Their scooters underpin rental fleets across Europe, so workshops know them, and there's a healthy supply of third-party parts and guides. The ZT3 Pro is newer and not yet as ubiquitous as the old Max models, but it still benefits from the same ecosystem. Need a brake lever, display, or new tyre? There will be someone within driving distance who's seen one before and probably has the part.
For DIY-averse riders, Segway is the safer bet. Apollo is reasonably well supported, but you're more dependent on specific dealers and official channels. With Segway, you get economies of scale on your side.
Pros & Cons Summary
| APOLLO City 2022 (Pro) | SEGWAY ZT3 Pro |
|---|---|
Pros
|
Pros
|
Parameters Comparison
| Parameter | APOLLO City 2022 Pro | SEGWAY ZT3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Motor power (rated / peak) | 2 x 500 W / 2.000 W total | 650 W / 1.600 W |
| Top speed (unlocked) | ≈ 51,5 km/h | ≈ 40 km/h |
| Real-world top speed (EU-limited versions) | Typically 25 km/h (market-dependent) | 20-25 km/h (market-dependent) |
| Claimed range | ≈ 61 km | ≈ 70 km |
| Real-world range (mixed riding) | ≈ 35-40 km | ≈ 35-45 km |
| Battery | 48 V, 18 Ah (≈ 864 Wh) | 46,8 V, 12,75 Ah (≈ 597 Wh) |
| Weight | ≈ 29,5 kg | ≈ 29,7 kg |
| Brakes | Dual drum + regen thumb brake | Dual mechanical disc brakes |
| Suspension | Front spring + dual rear springs | Front dual telescopic fork + rear spring |
| Tyres | 10-inch tubeless self-healing | 11-inch tubeless all-terrain |
| Max rider load | 120 kg | 120 kg |
| Water resistance | IP56 | IPX5 body, IPX7 battery |
| Charging time | ≈ 4 h | ≈ 4 h (Flash Charge) |
| Typical street price | ≈ 1.145 € | ≈ 849 € |
Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?
If I had to live with one of these as my only scooter, day in and day out, I'd pick the Segway ZT3 Pro. It's more forgiving on awful roads, more confidence-inspiring at speed, and its braking and traction systems feel like they're designed for how people actually ride when they're late for work. Add Segway's parts availability and ecosystem, and it quietly becomes the more dependable long-term partner, despite not being the flashier spec sheet.
The Apollo City 2022 Pro is not a bad scooter - far from it. It's just a bit more style-conscious and, ironically, a touch less rounded than it wants to be. If your riding is mostly urban tarmac, you care about clean design, you want something that looks good in a lobby, and you absolutely loathe maintenance, it will do the job very nicely and keep you comfortable while doing it.
But if your roads are rough, your weather unpredictable, and you value sheer ride quality and composure over visual integration, the ZT3 Pro simply feels like the more complete - if slightly brutal - tool for the job.
Numbers Freaks Corner
| Metric | APOLLO City 2022 Pro | SEGWAY ZT3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Price per Wh (€/Wh) | ✅ 1,33 €/Wh | ❌ 1,42 €/Wh |
| Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) | ❌ 22,23 €/km/h | ✅ 21,23 €/km/h |
| Weight per Wh (g/Wh) | ✅ 34,15 g/Wh | ❌ 49,75 g/Wh |
| Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) | ✅ 0,57 kg/km/h | ❌ 0,74 kg/km/h |
| Price per km of real-world range (€/km) | ❌ 30,53 €/km | ✅ 21,23 €/km |
| Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) | ❌ 0,79 kg/km | ✅ 0,74 kg/km |
| Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) | ❌ 23,04 Wh/km | ✅ 14,93 Wh/km |
| Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) | ❌ 38,83 W/km/h | ✅ 40,00 W/km/h |
| Weight to power ratio (kg/W) | ✅ 0,0148 kg/W | ❌ 0,0186 kg/W |
| Average charging speed (W) | ✅ 216 W | ❌ 149,25 W |
These metrics put hard numbers on value and efficiency. Price-per-Wh and weight-per-Wh tell you how much battery you get for your money and your biceps. Price- and weight-per-kilometre show how cost-effective and "dense" the scooters are in real-world use. Wh-per-km reveals which scooter sips energy more gently. Power-to-speed and weight-to-power ratios show how much muscle you get for the speed and mass. Charging speed reflects how quickly you can turn an empty battery into a ready-to-ride scooter.
Author's Category Battle
| Category | APOLLO City 2022 Pro | SEGWAY ZT3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | ✅ Slightly lighter overall | ❌ Marginally heavier |
| Range | ✅ Bigger pack, more margin | ❌ Smaller battery capacity |
| Max Speed | ✅ Higher unlocked speed | ❌ Slower when derestricted |
| Power | ✅ Dual motors, more shove | ❌ Single motor only |
| Battery Size | ✅ Larger Wh capacity | ❌ Smaller Wh capacity |
| Suspension | ❌ Decent but less refined | ✅ Plusher fork, better control |
| Design | ✅ Sleek, integrated, office-friendly | ❌ Busy, industrial look |
| Safety | ❌ Weaker brakes, lower signals | ✅ Discs, TCS, better lights |
| Practicality | ✅ Low-maintenance city commuter | ❌ Bulkier, harder to live with |
| Comfort | ❌ Good, but less plush | ✅ Softer over bad roads |
| Features | ❌ Fewer smart tricks | ✅ TCS, AirLock, Find My |
| Serviceability | ❌ More proprietary, less common | ✅ Easy parts, known platform |
| Customer Support | ❌ Smaller network in Europe | ✅ Wide Segway infrastructure |
| Fun Factor | ✅ Dual-motor zippiness | ❌ Less playful, more serious |
| Build Quality | ✅ Solid, well machined | ✅ Tank-like, very robust |
| Component Quality | ✅ Nice hardware, tidy details | ❌ Plastics scratch easily |
| Brand Name | ❌ Smaller, less known mass-market | ✅ Huge global recognition |
| Community | ❌ Smaller user base | ✅ Massive Segway ecosystem |
| Lights (visibility) | ❌ Lower signals, modest beam | ✅ X-headlight, higher indicators |
| Lights (illumination) | ❌ Weak for fast dark riding | ✅ Better spread, brightness |
| Acceleration | ✅ Snappier dual-motor launch | ❌ Strong but less explosive |
| Arrive with smile factor | ✅ Punchy, sleek, satisfying | ❌ More sensible than exciting |
| Arrive relaxed factor | ❌ More jitter on bad surfaces | ✅ Calm, cushy ride |
| Charging speed | ✅ Higher effective rate | ❌ Slower in Wh per hour |
| Reliability | ❌ Early QC, smaller track record | ✅ Proven Segway durability |
| Folded practicality | ✅ Slimmer, neater folded | ❌ Bulkier, wide cockpit |
| Ease of transport | ✅ Slightly easier to lug | ❌ Brick-like, awkward carry |
| Handling | ✅ More nimble, city agile | ❌ Stable but less flickable |
| Braking performance | ❌ Drums fine, less bite | ✅ Discs stop harder |
| Riding position | ✅ Comfortable, well-judged cockpit | ✅ Commanding, roomy stance |
| Handlebar quality | ✅ Clean, ergonomic layout | ❌ Wider, more utilitarian |
| Throttle response | ✅ Very smooth, linear | ✅ Strong, well tuned |
| Dashboard/Display | ❌ Functional but less special | ✅ Bright hex display |
| Security (locking) | ✅ Easier to find lock points | ❌ No dedicated lock loop |
| Weather protection | ✅ Higher IP rating overall | ❌ Slightly lower body rating |
| Resale value | ❌ Niche brand, narrower market | ✅ Segway holds value better |
| Tuning potential | ✅ Community mods, app tweaks | ❌ More locked-down ecosystem |
| Ease of maintenance | ✅ Drums, self-healing tyres | ❌ Discs, larger tyres, weight |
| Value for Money | ❌ Pricey for what you get | ✅ Strong spec at price |
Overall Winner Declaration
In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the APOLLO City 2022 scores 5 points against the SEGWAY ZT3 Pro's 5. In the Author's Category Battle, the APOLLO City 2022 gets 23 ✅ versus 19 ✅ for SEGWAY ZT3 Pro (with a few ties sprinkled in).
Totals: APOLLO City 2022 scores 28, SEGWAY ZT3 Pro scores 24.
Based on the scoring, the APOLLO City 2022 is our overall winner. Between these two "almost great" machines, the Segway ZT3 Pro ultimately feels like the scooter that has your back more often - it rides calmer, shrugs off abuse, and gives you that quiet confidence that you can point it at pretty much any city surface and just go. The Apollo City 2022 Pro has its charms, especially if you love a clean, integrated look and hate spanners, but once you've spent a week smashing through real-world streets, the ZT3 Pro's planted, unflustered character is simply more reassuring. If you buy with your eyes and your heart, the Apollo will tempt you; if you buy with your spine, your commute and a bit of long-term pragmatism in mind, the Segway is the one you'll be happier to keep riding when the novelty wears off.
That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.