Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)
The overall winner here is the Angwatt F1 NEW, simply because it delivers outrageous performance and range for a fraction of the price, and rides like a "big scooter" without the big-scooter bill. If you care mostly about value, speed and comfort per euro, the Angwatt walks away with it.
The Apollo City still makes sense if you want a more polished, app-connected, weatherproof commuter from a more established brand, and you are willing to pay heavily for refinement and IP66 peace of mind. It's the safer choice for all-weather, low-maintenance commuting; the Angwatt is the better choice for anyone who wants maximum fun and distance on a tighter budget.
Both will get you to work with a grin, but how much you spend on that grin is up to you-read on before you swipe your card.
Some scooters are bought with the heart, others with the spreadsheet. The Apollo City and Angwatt F1 NEW sit awkwardly close on performance, but worlds apart on price and philosophy. One wants to be the "iPhone of scooters"; the other is more "overclocked gaming PC in a cheap case".
I've put serious kilometres on both: weekday commuting in drizzle and rush-hour traffic on the Apollo, and weekend abuse, questionable shortcuts and too-many-full-throttle runs on the Angwatt. On paper they overlap a lot; on the road they couldn't feel more different.
If you're wondering whether to go polished and pricey or raw and ridiculous value, this comparison will save you from buying the wrong machine for your life-not just for your spec sheet.
Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?
Both scooters live in that "serious commuter with real speed" tier: far above rental toys, well below the unhinged dual-motor monsters. They both cruise comfortably beyond typical bike-lane pace, both have grown-up suspensions, both carry heavier riders without whining, and both can realistically replace a short car commute.
The key difference: the Apollo City plays premium, integration and brand trust. The Angwatt F1 NEW plays brutal value, big battery and big smile for small money. They're natural rivals for anyone who has outgrown a Xiaomi-class scooter and is ready for a "proper" ride-but still wants something you can justify to your bank account.
Design & Build Quality
Pick up the Apollo City and it feels like a finished product. The frame has that dense, one-piece feel, cables vanish inside the stem, and the cockpit is minimalist and tidy with its embedded matrix display and neat thumb controls. It looks like a device, not a DIY project, and in a corporate lobby it blends in as "acceptable technology", not a garage hobby.
The Angwatt F1 NEW is the opposite aesthetic: angular arms, visible welds, a big central display and bright red highlights that shout "budget fighter jet". Cables are more exposed, the finish is more utilitarian, and you're never in doubt this came from a mass-production line rather than an industrial designer's mood board.
In the hands, the Apollo's folding joint and stem feel more precisely engineered, with very little play and a generally rattle-free ride right out of the box. The Angwatt's latch is strong enough, but it's typical direct-import: you really want to give it a full bolt-check and some grease in the first week to keep creaks at bay.
If visual polish, hidden cabling and "premium object" vibes matter, the Apollo is clearly ahead. If you care more about whether the frame survives potholes than whether the screws are colour-matched, the Angwatt's more industrial look won't bother you.
Ride Comfort & Handling
On rough city streets, both leave basic commuters in the stone age, but they do it differently.
The Apollo City uses a triple-spring setup that's tuned for urban chaos. It has that "plush but controlled" feel: hit a manhole cover or expansion joint and you get a soft thud rather than a spike to the knees. Combined with its self-healing tubeless tyres, the whole chassis feels cohesive and quiet, with very little clatter. The wide bars and long deck give a stable, almost "grown-up bike" stance.
The Angwatt fights back with a front hydraulic shock plus springs. That oil damping is noticeable: the front end soaks up hits and doesn't rebound like a pogo stick, which keeps the wheel glued to the ground on broken asphalt and cobblestones. The rear is more basic but strong; with its big tubeless tyres and long wheelbase, the F1 NEW genuinely glides over ugly surfaces you'd dread on small, solid-tyre scooters.
Handling-wise, the Apollo feels slightly more composed at higher speeds: its geometry and weight distribution encourage a relaxed, planted ride, and you can lean into corners with confidence, even when the road is less than perfect. The Angwatt feels a bit more "SUV with a lift kit": stable, big-feeling, but a touch less refined in how it deals with quick direction changes and mid-corner bumps.
If you do long stretches of bad tarmac every day, the Angwatt's front hydraulic shock is a real treat. If you want a quieter, more dialled-in, "premium commuter" feel, the Apollo edges it on overall sophistication.
Performance
Let's start with acceleration. The Apollo City in dual-motor form has that smooth, insistent shove that just keeps building. It's not trying to rip your arms off; it's tuned to give you a confident launch to the mid-20s in seconds, perfect for beating city traffic off the line. The power delivery feels very curated-especially if you tweak it in the app-so you rarely get surprised by the throttle.
The Angwatt F1 NEW, despite being a single-motor machine, comes across as more playful. That rear motor, fed by a beefy controller, gives a proper kick when you punch it. It's not as brutally quick off the line as a serious dual-motor, but compared with typical commuters, it simply walks away. At traffic lights you will be out front, wondering why everyone else is moving so slowly.
Top speed impressions are interesting. The Apollo will run to "this really is enough" territory and sit there comfortably, feeling solid under your feet. The Angwatt will also push into that same "this should not be legal on a scooter in many places" zone, and lighter riders can see that on GPS-but the chassis tells you a bit more about the road, and wind and slight bar vibrations are more present. You feel the speed more on the F1, both the fun and the sketch potential.
Hill climbing is where Apollo's dual-motor setup pulls ahead. On steep ramps and nasty city climbs, the City keeps its composure and momentum better, with both wheels sharing the work. The Angwatt will get up almost everything you'd reasonably ride, but on really steep sections it slows, and you feel the rear motor working hard.
Braking is a split decision. Apollo's dedicated regen paddle is honestly brilliant: you can modulate electronic braking with a thumb, barely touching the mechanical drums most days, and the scooter scrubs speed quickly and very smoothly. The mechanical system is low-maintenance and weather-proof, but lacks the immediate bite of discs. The Angwatt's twin mechanical discs plus electronic assist give more initial grab and that familiar "bike-like" feel, but they need occasional adjustment and can squeal until dialled in.
Battery & Range
On paper, both promise "commute all week" numbers. In reality, ridden like a sane but enthusiastic human, they're closer than you'd think-but the Angwatt quietly brings more battery for less money.
The Apollo City's pack is sized for serious daily use: you can commute, do errands, and still have juice for an evening ride, as long as you're not riding full-tilt everywhere. Push it hard in sport mode and you end up in the comfortable "two decent days before you worry" bracket. The app's detailed battery readout is handy here; you're rarely guessing your remaining range.
The Angwatt stuffs in a big 48 V pack that's visibly closer to "touring scooter" territory. Ridden hard, it will still clock long stretches before the voltage sags enough to annoy you. Tone it down a bit and you're easily into ranges that make suburban-to-city commutes plus detours completely realistic on a single charge.
In terms of efficiency, the Apollo's dual motors and higher polish don't magically beat physics: at similar speeds, the Angwatt's larger battery simply lets you go further for less money spent up front. Charging is another trade-off: the Apollo fills up in a normal workday window with a fast charger, while the Angwatt's big battery and standard charger mean more of an "overnight ritual" if you've run it low.
If your commute is moderate and you prize smart battery management and good telemetry, the Apollo feels grown-up. If you just want a big tank and don't mind long charges, the Angwatt is the better distance machine for the wallet.
Portability & Practicality
Neither of these is a dainty last-mile toy. They're both "treat them like a small motorbike" in daily life.
The Apollo City is heavy, edging closer to thirty kilos depending on version. The folding is slick and confidence-inspiring, and the stem hooks nicely to the deck, but the wide, non-folding handlebars make it an awkward guest on cramped trains and buses. Carrying it up a few stairs is doable; anything more and you're questioning your life choices.
The Angwatt F1 NEW is marginally lighter on paper but doesn't feel it much in the hand; it's still a big lump of metal. Folded, it's reasonably compact lengthwise and fits into most car boots without drama, but your back will remember every lift. As a pure "out of the door, ride to destination, park on ground level" scooter, it's fine; as a multi-modal companion, it's overkill.
Day-to-day practicality swings on weather. Apollo's high water-resistance rating means you can genuinely treat it as an all-season commuter, short of riding through rivers. Puddles, heavy rain, winter slush-it shrugs most of it off, which changes how confidently you plan your journeys. The Angwatt, by contrast, is more "try not to" when it comes to rain. Light drizzle in a pinch is fine, but long wet commutes and standing water are asking for trouble unless you do your own sealing.
For city dwellers without lifts, honestly, neither is perfect-but at least the Angwatt doesn't ask you to pay premium money for the privilege of wrestling a heavy scooter upstairs.
Safety
Safety is more than just brakes, but both start strong there.
Apollo's regen paddle changes how you ride. You end up doing most of your slowing with your left thumb, always ready, always predictable. In traffic it's brilliant: you can scrub a little speed to slot between cars or bring the scooter down from pace without upsetting your balance. The enclosed drum brakes sit there as reliable backup, largely unaffected by rain, mud or neglect.
The Angwatt counters with mechanical discs front and rear plus electronic braking. When adjusted properly they haul the scooter down firmly, and the brake feel is more familiar for anyone used to bicycles. In extended wet use, though, open discs will never have the same resistance to grit and grime as Apollo's sealed drums.
Lighting is decent on both, with front headlights, brake lights and turn signals. Apollo scores extra points with its higher-mounted indicators that are more in drivers' eyelines, while the Angwatt adds side lighting and a bit of a "rolling light show" vibe. Neither has a headlight I'd trust alone on an unlit forest path; for real night riding, bolt-on bar lights are still wise.
Stability-wise, both benefit from big, tubeless tyres and sensibly long wheelbases. The Apollo feels slightly more composed at its top speeds, with fewer hints of wobble if you hit a bump mid-turn. The Angwatt is solid, but you're more aware you're pushing a budget chassis near its upper limits when the road gets sketchy.
Community Feedback
| Apollo City | Angwatt F1 NEW |
|---|---|
| What riders love Smooth regen braking, refined ride, strong water resistance, low maintenance, sleek design, good app, solid hill climbing. |
What riders love Huge value for money, strong torque, plush suspension, big battery, tubeless tyres, NFC start, rugged look. |
| What riders complain about High price, heavy weight, so-so headlight, short fenders, kickstand stability, display visibility in bright sun. |
What riders complain about Dim display in sunlight, weight, brake squeal, loose bolts out of box, modest water resistance, basic manual, NFC dependency. |
Price & Value
This is where the fight stops being polite.
The Apollo City lives in the four-figure price club. For that, you're buying design, software polish, strong weather-proofing and low maintenance. You're not getting mind-blowing performance for the money; you're getting a well-rounded, grown-up scooter that feels more "product" than "project". If you treat it as a car substitute and keep it for years, the lifetime cost makes more sense.
The Angwatt F1 NEW, meanwhile, costs roughly a third of that. Yet it delivers comparable speed, plenty of real-world range, serious suspension and proper brakes. It doesn't have the brand halo, the high IP rating, or the same out-of-box refinement-but in raw euros-to-experience terms, it absolutely demolishes the Apollo. You are quite literally getting "serious scooter" performance for basic-commuter money.
If you are budget-sensitive at all, it's very hard to justify the Apollo unless the specific extras-waterproofing, app, and a more established brand-are mission-critical to you.
Service & Parts Availability
Apollo is a known quantity with a growing European footprint. You get official support channels, documentation, how-to videos and a reasonably active owner community. Parts like tyres, controllers and stems are sourceable through Apollo or authorised partners, and warranty processes, while not always lightning fast, are at least structured.
Angwatt, being effectively a house brand for big Chinese retailers, works differently. You're mostly dealing with online support, parts shipped to you, and doing more of the wrenching yourself or via an independent shop. The upside is that spares are usually cheap and available; the downside is, you're the service centre. Community groups fill in some of the gap with guides and shared experience.
If you want a scooter backed by a "real" brand infrastructure and you're not keen on DIY, Apollo has the edge. If you're comfortable with Allen keys, YouTube and waiting on parcels, the Angwatt's ecosystem is adequate, just less polished.
Pros & Cons Summary
| Apollo City | Angwatt F1 NEW |
|---|---|
Pros
|
Pros
|
Parameters Comparison
| Parameter | Apollo City (dual motor) | Angwatt F1 NEW |
|---|---|---|
| Motor power (rated / peak) | 2 x 500 W / up to 2.000 W | 1 x 1.000 W peak |
| Top speed | Up to 51 km/h | Real ~45 km/h |
| Realistic range | ~35-45 km mixed riding | ~35-45 km aggressive, more if gentle |
| Battery | 48 V, up to 960 Wh | 48 V, ~873 Wh |
| Weight | Up to 29,5 kg | 27 kg |
| Brakes | Dual drum + dedicated regen paddle | Front & rear mechanical disc + E-ABS |
| Suspension | Front spring, dual rear springs | Front oil + spring, rear spring |
| Tyres | 10" tubeless pneumatic, self-healing | 10" tubeless off-road / street hybrid |
| Max load | 120 kg | 120 kg |
| Water resistance | IP66 | Short-term rain only, no high IP rating |
| Approx. price | ~1.208 € | ~422 € |
Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?
If you're choosing with your accountant, the Angwatt F1 NEW is the obvious answer. It gives you serious speed, long real-world range, genuinely comfortable suspension and decent safety kit for what many people are paying for entry-level, no-suspension commuters. You accept a bit more DIY, some compromises on waterproofing and refinement, and in return you get more ride for far less money.
The Apollo City, on the other hand, is for riders who want their scooter to behave like a mature product: excellent weather protection, low maintenance, smart software, tidy looks and a wonderfully civilised braking system. It's easy to live with, feels trustworthy in bad weather, and looks the part in front of an office-but you pay significantly for that privilege, and its performance edge over cheaper rivals is not as dramatic as the marketing suggests.
If your commute includes frequent rain, if you hate maintenance, and if brand support matters more than price, the Apollo City still earns its place. But for most riders who just want a fast, comfy, long-range scooter without emptying their savings, the Angwatt F1 NEW is the more compelling-and frankly, harder-hitting-choice.
Numbers Freaks Corner
| Metric | Apollo City | Angwatt F1 NEW |
|---|---|---|
| Price per Wh (€/Wh) | ❌ 1,26 €/Wh | ✅ 0,48 €/Wh |
| Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) | ❌ 23,69 €/km/h | ✅ 9,38 €/km/h |
| Weight per Wh (g/Wh) | ✅ 30,73 g/Wh | ❌ 30,93 g/Wh |
| Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) | ✅ 0,58 kg/km/h | ❌ 0,60 kg/km/h |
| Price per km of real-world range (€/km) | ❌ 30,20 €/km | ✅ 10,55 €/km |
| Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) | ❌ 0,74 kg/km | ✅ 0,68 kg/km |
| Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) | ❌ 24,00 Wh/km | ✅ 21,83 Wh/km |
| Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) | ✅ 39,22 W/km/h | ❌ 22,22 W/km/h |
| Weight to power ratio (kg/W) | ✅ 0,0148 kg/W | ❌ 0,0270 kg/W |
| Average charging speed (W) | ✅ 213,33 W | ❌ 109,13 W |
These metrics strip everything down to pure maths. Price per Wh and per km/h tell you how much performance and energy storage you're buying for each euro. Weight-based metrics show how much scooter you haul around for the performance and range you get. Efficiency (Wh/km) reflects how gently each scooter sips its battery. Power-to-speed and weight-to-power highlight how muscular the drivetrain is relative to its limits. Charging speed indicates how quickly you can refill the tank. None of this captures comfort or brand trust-but it's a clear look at the hard trade-offs.
Author's Category Battle
| Category | Apollo City | Angwatt F1 NEW |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | ❌ Slightly heavier overall | ✅ A bit lighter lump |
| Range | ❌ Similar, worse per € | ✅ Great range for price |
| Max Speed | ✅ Slightly higher ceiling | ❌ A touch slower |
| Power | ✅ Dual motors, stronger pull | ❌ Single motor, less grunt |
| Battery Size | ✅ Slightly larger capacity | ❌ Smaller, though still big |
| Suspension | ❌ Good, but basic springs | ✅ Front hydraulic feels plusher |
| Design | ✅ Sleek, integrated, cable-hidden | ❌ Busy, utilitarian look |
| Safety | ✅ IP66, refined braking | ❌ Limited water protection |
| Practicality | ✅ All-weather daily workhorse | ❌ Fair-weather, more DIY |
| Comfort | ✅ Very plush, quiet ride | ❌ Comfortable but less refined |
| Features | ✅ App, regen paddle, signals | ❌ Fewer smart integrations |
| Serviceability | ✅ Better documentation, guides | ❌ More self-service, generic |
| Customer Support | ✅ Brand support structure | ❌ Marketplace-style support |
| Fun Factor | ❌ Controlled, a bit serious | ✅ Punchy, hooligan vibes |
| Build Quality | ✅ Tight, low rattles | ❌ Needs bolt check, creaks |
| Component Quality | ✅ Generally higher-grade parts | ❌ More cost-cut elements |
| Brand Name | ✅ Established, recognisable | ❌ New, house-brand feel |
| Community | ✅ Active, lots of owners | ✅ Lively budget-mod scene |
| Lights (visibility) | ✅ Good, well-placed signals | ❌ Lower, less conspicuous |
| Lights (illumination) | ❌ Headlight still underwhelming | ✅ Slightly better road wash |
| Acceleration | ✅ Strong, especially from standstill | ❌ Quick, but less shove |
| Arrive with smile factor | ❌ Calm, competent satisfaction | ✅ Grin every throttle pull |
| Arrive relaxed factor | ✅ Very composed, stress-free | ❌ More noise, more drama |
| Charging speed | ✅ Faster turnaround per charge | ❌ Slow overnight refill |
| Reliability | ✅ Proven, low-maintenance layout | ❌ More small niggles |
| Folded practicality | ❌ Wide bars, awkward indoors | ✅ Slightly neater footprint |
| Ease of transport | ❌ Heavy, bulky to carry | ✅ Still heavy, but easier |
| Handling | ✅ More composed at speed | ❌ Good, but less precise |
| Braking performance | ✅ Strong regen + drums | ❌ Good, but needs tuning |
| Riding position | ✅ Very ergonomic cockpit | ❌ Fine, but less dialled |
| Handlebar quality | ✅ Wide, solid, confidence-inspiring | ❌ Functional, less premium |
| Throttle response | ✅ Smooth, app-tunable curve | ❌ Less refined delivery |
| Dashboard / Display | ✅ Clean integration, useful data | ❌ Big but hard to read |
| Security (locking) | ❌ Software lock only | ✅ NFC start adds hurdle |
| Weather protection | ✅ IP66, real all-weather | ❌ Only light-rain friendly |
| Resale value | ✅ Stronger brand on used market | ❌ Generic name, lower resale |
| Tuning potential | ❌ More locked-down ecosystem | ✅ Easy modding, parts swaps |
| Ease of maintenance | ✅ Low-wear brakes, tyres | ❌ More adjusting, bolt checks |
| Value for Money | ❌ Premium price, modest gain | ✅ Huge performance per euro |
Overall Winner Declaration
In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the APOLLO City scores 5 points against the ANGWATT F1 NEW's 5. In the Author's Category Battle, the APOLLO City gets 28 ✅ versus 12 ✅ for ANGWATT F1 NEW.
Totals: APOLLO City scores 33, ANGWATT F1 NEW scores 17.
Based on the scoring, the APOLLO City is our overall winner. Living with both, I keep coming back to the Angwatt F1 NEW when I just want to go far, go fast and not overthink the finances-it's a shamelessly generous package for the money, and it makes every throttle squeeze feel like you've outsmarted the market. The Apollo City is the one I'd pick for grim winter commutes and office-friendly polish, but it never quite escapes the feeling that you're paying a lot for niceness rather than getting blown away by the ride. If you're chasing the most complete, sensible commuter, the Apollo City makes a solid, grown-up case. If you're chasing joy per euro, and you're willing to live with a bit more roughness around the edges, the Angwatt F1 NEW is the scooter that truly earns its spot in your hallway.
That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.