Apollo Go vs Apollo City 2022 - Which "Luxury Commuter" Scooter Actually Deserves Your Money?

APOLLO Go 🏆 Winner
APOLLO

Go

922 € View full specs →
VS
APOLLO City 2022
APOLLO

City 2022

1 145 € View full specs →
Parameter APOLLO Go APOLLO City 2022
Price 922 € 1 145 €
🏎 Top Speed 45 km/h 44 km/h
🔋 Range 48 km 45 km
Weight 22.0 kg 26.0 kg
Power 1500 W 2000 W
🔌 Voltage 36 V 48 V
🔋 Battery 540 Wh 650 Wh
Wheel Size 9 " 10 "
👤 Max Load 120 kg 100 kg
Speed Comparison

Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)

The Apollo Go is the better all-round package for most urban riders: it's lighter, more manageable, still brutally capable on hills, and feels like a modern, tightly integrated "daily driver" you'll actually want to live with. The Apollo City 2022 fights back with a plusher ride, more range and higher top speed, but it's heavier, costlier and crosses the line from "commuter" into "small moped you can just about fold".

Pick the Go if you care about portability, everyday practicality, water resistance, and a refined dual-motor punch in a compact chassis. Choose the City 2022 (ideally the Pro) if you want a sofa on wheels for longer, faster commutes and don't mind wrestling the extra kilos. Both are good scooters, but only one truly nails the modern city rider sweet-spot.

If you want to know which one will actually make your commute the best part of your day, keep reading.

There's something very satisfying about comparing two scooters from the same brand that clearly learned from its past homework. The Apollo City 2022 was Apollo's first big "we design everything ourselves now" statement. The Apollo Go is what happens a little later, when the industrial designers and engineers get to refine their ideas instead of reinventing the wheel every time.

On paper, the City 2022 is the grown-up: bigger battery, more suspension travel, larger tires, more speed, more range. The Go, meanwhile, slips in as the lighter, newer, slightly cheekier sibling that looks at your stairs, your office door and your car boot and says: "Yeah, I'll fit. And I'll still smoke hills on the way there."

If you've been circling between these two wondering whether to buy the "classic" City or the fresh Go, this comparison will walk you through how they really feel on the road, and where each one genuinely shines - and stumbles. Let's get into it.

Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?

APOLLO GoAPOLLO City 2022

Both the Apollo Go and Apollo City 2022 live in that upper-midrange "serious commuter" segment: well above rental toys, well below the hulking hyper-scooters that need a gym membership and a will. They're built for riders who actually depend on a scooter several days a week, not just for Sunday fun runs.

The City 2022 (especially the Pro version) leans into the "power commuter": longer distances, higher average speeds, rougher roads, heavier riders. Think longer suburban-to-centre hops, or people actively replacing a car or public transport. It's basically a compact electric moped in scooter clothing.

The Go aims squarely at the urban realist: city-dwellers who want real performance, but still have to drag the thing through front doors, past lifts and occasionally up a flight of stairs. It trades some outright range and suspension plushness for everyday living ease, without feeling compromised in normal city use.

They cost close enough that most buyers will be choosing one or the other - not "this plus something else". That's why the details matter.

Design & Build Quality

Specs Comparison

Both scooters share Apollo's modern, integrated design language: clean frames, hidden cabling, and that "this is a vehicle, not a DIY project" energy. But they express it differently.

The City 2022 looks like the original flagship concept made real. It has a thick, sculpted unibody frame with a wide deck, fat stem and big 10-inch tyres that visually scream stability and comfort. Everything feels overbuilt: chunky triple suspension, wide rubber deck, substantial fenders. It's the kind of scooter you park outside an office and people assume it cost more than it actually did.

The Go feels like the refined, leaner evolution. The lines are even cleaner, the frame slightly more compact, and the whole thing has that "Pro design, shrunken to city scale" vibe. The dot-matrix display integrated into the stem, the discreet branding, the internal cabling - it looks like something that fell out of a sci-fi film and decided to commute. In the hands, the Go feels dense and solid, but not brick-like; panels align well, nothing rattles, and there's a satisfying lack of cheap plastics.

In terms of materials and finishing, they're closer than you'd think from the spec sheets. The City 2022 does win on sheer presence and physical robustness - it feels like you could ride it for years of abuse. The Go counters with a more contemporary, slightly more premium-feeling execution, especially around the cockpit and display. If build quality is your priority, both deliver; if you like your scooter to look like a freshly designed piece of tech rather than a small motorbike, the Go edges it.

Ride Comfort & Handling

This is where the family resemblance splits into two clear personalities.

The City 2022 is calibrated for comfort first. The triple suspension setup, combined with larger 10-inch self-healing tyres, genuinely smooths out ugly surfaces. Long stretches of broken asphalt, expansion joints, tram tracks, even modest cobblestones - the City just shrugs and keeps gliding. You feel isolated from the worst hits, and at higher speeds the chassis stays reassuringly composed. It's one of those scooters where you look down at the speed and think, "Really? It feels slower than that." That's comfort doing its job.

The Go, in contrast, is tuned for "sporty comfort". The hybrid Airflow suspension (coil up front, rubber block at the rear) does an impressive job given the smaller 9-inch tyres, but you are a bit more aware of the road. Cracked bike lanes and typical city imperfections are handled competently, but sharp potholes and chunky cobbles make their presence known. The upside: the Go feels more connected and playful. Turn-in is quicker, mid-corner adjustments are easier, and weaving through traffic feels more natural. After a few kilometres, you realise you're throwing it around like a much smaller scooter.

On a long, rough commute, the City 2022 will leave your knees and back more relaxed. On a twisty urban route with lots of dodging and carving, the Go's lighter, more agile chassis is simply more fun. Comfort vs agility: pick your poison. For pure plushness, the City wins. For a balanced, lively feel that still won't murder your joints, the Go hits a very sweet spot.

Performance

Both scooters can move, but the way they do it - and how much they ask from you in return - is quite different.

The City 2022 in Pro (dual-motor) form is the brawler. Twin motors give it a harder initial punch, especially off the line; twist the throttle in top mode and it lunges forward with that "yep, this is a quick one" sensation. It holds higher speeds with ease and has enough headroom that cruising slightly below maximum feels relaxed rather than strained. On long, steep inclines, it powers up confidently, even with heavier riders.

The single-motor City 2022 is more restrained, but still no slouch - brisk enough to keep up with fast bike-lane traffic and conquer moderate hills without drama. It's just that once you've tasted the Pro's dual-motor shove, it's hard to go back.

The Go runs dual motors too, but in a much lighter frame and on a lower-voltage system. On paper it looks more modest. On the road, it feels anything but slow. The initial pick-up is strong and very controllable - no nasty snap, just a smooth surge that very quickly gets you into "keeping up with city traffic" territory. You hit a comfortable, fast cruising speed and the scooter feels eager but not manic. On hills, the Go is genuinely impressive: it just keeps pulling where similar-weight single-motor commuters would have you kicking along, swearing at physics.

Braking on both is excellent, thanks to Apollo's regen-brake philosophy. The City 2022 adds dual sealed drum brakes at both wheels, giving it a very secure, "grab a fistful and it just stops" feel, particularly at higher speeds. The Go pairs a rear drum with a very effective regen throttle; in everyday riding, you'll mostly rely on that regen lever, modulating deceleration with one thumb and barely touching the mechanical brake.

If raw speed and full-throttle acceleration are your thing, the City 2022 Pro clearly sits higher up the performance ladder. But for actual city use, the Go's power delivery feels brilliantly judged: it's fast enough to be exciting, and never so aggressive that you regret bumping the mode up. In daily mixed riding, the Go rarely feels "underpowered"; the City just has more excess performance on tap.

Battery & Range

Range is where the City 2022 makes its biggest numerical argument - and where you have to ask how much you actually need, versus how much you just like to boast about.

The City 2022 carries a noticeably bigger energy tank, especially in Pro trim. In the real world, ridden with enthusiasm rather than nursing Eco mode, that translates to commutes that stretch further into the suburbs without any battery anxiety. Longer round trips, extra detours, going across town for dinner and back without thinking about a charger - the City is comfortable here. With a more powerful system, though, you'll burn through that energy quicker if you spend your life in top mode.

The Go runs a more compact battery on a lower voltage. Manufacturer claims are optimistic, as usual. Ridden like a human - plenty of throttle, hills, some headwind, maybe a bit of competitive spirit when a cyclist looks too smug - you're looking at a comfortable daily commuting radius with some buffer, rather than half a province. For typical urban use - say, a handful of tens of kilometres per day with errands sprinkled in - it's enough. You just won't be doing grand tours without planning.

Both benefit slightly from regenerative braking in stop-and-go city traffic, squeezing a few extra kilometres out of lots of red lights. In practice, the big difference is this: the City 2022 is the obvious choice for longer and faster commutes, or if you routinely flirt with the limits of range. The Go is calibrated around the realistic needs of most city riders rather than the fantasies of range charts - and that's reflected in its lighter weight and friendlier portability.

Portability & Practicality

This is the category where a lot of riders underestimate how much reality hurts. Numbers on a website don't capture the feeling of hauling a scooter up yet another flight of stairs when you're already late.

The City 2022 is not a portable scooter in any relaxed sense of the word. Whether you get the single or dual-motor version, you're firmly in "this is a heavy object" territory. Carrying it up one short flight is doable; doing that every day from a fourth-floor walk-up becomes a workout plan. The folding mechanism is well engineered and fast enough, but the sheer mass means it's better suited to rolling, not lifting. If you have a lift at home and work, no problem. If not, think very hard.

The Go lives at that Goldilocks threshold: not featherweight, but absolutely manageable. You can lift it into a car boot solo without plotting revenge against the laws of gravity; you can carry it up a couple of flights without writing your will. The stem latch is solid and confidence-inspiring, with almost no wobble once locked. The only ergonomic misstep is the slightly fiddly hook that locks the stem to the deck when folded - it's fine once you build the muscle memory, mildly annoying before that.

Both scooters have non-folding handlebars, so width is similar and still needs a bit of space in narrow hallways or packed trains. But the difference in mass is what you feel every single day. On that front, the Go is simply better suited to real-world urban life; the City 2022 is happier living like a small motorcycle - rolled, parked, and moved occasionally, not swung around like luggage.

Safety

Both models are strong on safety, just optimised for slightly different realities.

Braking first: each uses a dedicated regen throttle, which is a massive step up from the crude "regen mixed into the main throttle" or barely-there motor braking you get on many rivals. On both scooters, you can modulate slowing force very precisely with your left thumb, which not only feels intuitive, but keeps the chassis stable and the tyres gripping instead of skidding.

The City 2022 backs this up with dual sealed drum brakes - one front, one rear. In the wet, in winter grime, in the kind of conditions that chew through exposed discs, these closed drums just keep working. Stopping power is more than enough for its higher speeds, and they require almost no adjustment. For high-speed city riding, that combination is deeply reassuring.

The Go combines a rear drum with strong regen that does most of the work. For its lower weight and slightly lower top speed, the braking setup feels perfectly matched. In typical commuting, you'll mostly ride one-finger on the regen throttle and only haul the mechanical brake in emergencies or sharp surprises. It feels very controlled and progressive - ideal for tight city environments.

Lighting and visibility are solid on both. The City 2022's integrated system looks slick, with deck-level turn signals and a decent headlight. It's fine for lit streets, but on truly dark, unlit paths at higher speeds, you'll quickly wish for an auxiliary light - it's more "be seen" than "see everything at 40 km/h". The Go's 360-degree setup is one of its standout features: a properly high-mounted headlight, bright rear light and clear turn signals that let you keep both hands planted while signalling. At night, the Go genuinely feels like it announces itself better to surrounding traffic.

On weather protection, the Go quietly crushes most of the market with its high water-resistance rating - it's one of the few scooters in this class I'd happily ride in genuinely grim weather without clenching. The City's protection is also above the industry norm and absolutely fine for year-round use, but the Go gives just that little bit more peace of mind when the sky decides to dump on you.

Community Feedback

Category Apollo Go Apollo City 2022
What riders love Compact dual-motor punch; superb regen brake feel; modern design and display; strong water resistance; self-healing tyres; stable chassis with no rattles; very "sorted" ride feel; safety lighting that actually works in traffic. Exceptionally smooth, "floating" ride; powerful regen plus dual drum brakes; long real-world range (especially Pro); premium integrated look; low-maintenance tyres and brakes; very stable at higher speeds; app tuning options.
What riders complain about Real-world range below brochure dreams; display can wash out in harsh sun; folding hook a bit fiddly; non-folding bars awkward in tight spaces; some wish for 10-inch tyres; charging not exactly rapid. Heavy - surprisingly so for new owners; awkward to carry when folded; folding hook sometimes disengages when lifting; headlight not bright enough for totally dark roads; some early QC gremlins; price stings compared to generic rivals.

Price & Value

Both scooters live in the "this is a real vehicle, not a toy" price bracket. But they don't deliver value in the same way.

The City 2022 asks for a noticeable premium. In return, you get more battery, more suspension, more speed, and a chassis that's very comfortable at the kind of velocities most scooters in this class merely tolerate. If you use all that - longer daily runs, higher average speeds, bad roads - the price is justifiable. If you just cruise short inner-city distances, you're paying for capacity you won't tap very often, while carrying the weight penalty every single day.

The Go undercuts the City while still delivering dual motors, great water resistance, a modern design, app integration and genuinely high-quality ride feel. It doesn't swamp you with headline specs; instead it quietly gives you pretty much everything you need for realistic urban commuting, with very few genuine compromises. For many riders, that's the smarter spend: less money, easier to live with, still plenty of grin factor.

If you are a "specs per euro" spreadsheet warrior, the City 2022 Pro's bigger numbers might tempt you. If you're more interested in how the money translates into everyday experience, the Go pulls ahead as the better value for most.

Service & Parts Availability

The good news: both scooters are from Apollo, which means you're not dealing with an anonymous marketplace brand that vanishes the moment your rear tyre looks at a nail funny. Apollo has established support channels, documentation and an active community across Europe and beyond.

The City 2022, being the older and more widely sold model, currently enjoys very good parts availability. Drums, tyres, suspension components, stems - they're all fairly common and well-understood by service centres. There's a ton of community knowledge; if something behaves oddly, chances are someone on a forum has already annoyed Apollo support with that exact issue.

The Go, as the newer model, doesn't quite have the same years of accumulated tribal knowledge yet, but it benefits from Apollo's clear shift toward modular, repairable designs. Self-healing tubeless tyres reduce puncture drama, and the overall construction is clean enough that most competent shops won't panic when they see it. Apollo has been pretty good about stocking parts for their own designs, and the Go is front and centre in their current line-up, which always helps.

For Europe-based riders, both are among the safer bets in this price class. The City 2022 may still have a slight edge today purely on the basis of time-in-market, but the Go is hardly a risky pick.

Pros & Cons Summary

Apollo Go Apollo City 2022
Pros
  • Light enough to carry when needed.
  • Dual motors in a compact chassis - strong hill performance.
  • Excellent regen braking with very natural feel.
  • Futuristic, integrated design and dot-matrix display.
  • High water resistance for true all-weather commuting.
  • Self-healing tubeless tyres reduce puncture stress.
  • Refined ride and handling; agile yet stable.
  • Great overall value for serious city use.
  • Superb ride comfort thanks to triple suspension and larger tyres.
  • Very strong braking with regen plus dual drums.
  • Longer real-world range, especially on Pro version.
  • High top speed and powerful acceleration (Pro).
  • Premium, integrated design with clean cabling.
  • Low-maintenance brakes and tyres.
  • Good water resistance and solid chassis stability.
Cons
  • Range is "enough", not amazing.
  • Smaller 9-inch wheels less forgiving on really rough surfaces.
  • Folding hook can be fiddly at first.
  • Non-folding bars limit ultra-tight storage.
  • Display visibility not perfect in blazing sun.
  • Heavy to carry - not ideal for stairs.
  • Folding hook can slip when lifting.
  • Headlight underwhelming for dark, unlit roads.
  • Early batches had some QC niggles.
  • Pricier; you pay for range and comfort even if you don't always use them.

Parameters Comparison

Parameter Apollo Go Apollo City 2022 (Pro where applicable)
Motor configuration Dual motors Single (City) / Dual (Pro)
Rated motor power 2 x 350 W 2 x 500 W (Pro) / 500 W (City)
Peak motor power (total) 1.500 W 2.000 W (Pro) / 1.000 W (City)
Top speed ca. 45 km/h ca. 43,5 km/h (City) / 51,5 km/h (Pro)
Real-world range (typical) ca. 30-35 km ca. 35-40 km (Pro, fast riding)
Battery voltage 36 V 48 V
Battery capacity 15 Ah 18 Ah (Pro) / 13,5 Ah (City)
Battery energy 540 Wh 864 Wh (Pro) / 650 Wh (City)
Charging time ca. 7,5 h ca. 4 h
Weight 22 kg 26 kg (City) / 29,5 kg (Pro)
Max rider load 120 kg 100 kg (City) / 120 kg (Pro)
Brakes Rear drum + dedicated regen throttle Dual drum + dedicated regen throttle
Suspension Front spring, rear rubber block Triple spring suspension
Tyres 9-inch tubeless self-healing 10-inch tubeless self-healing
Water resistance IP66 IP56
Approx. price ca. 922 € ca. 1.145 €

Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?

If you forced me to live with just one of these as my daily city scooter, I'd take the Apollo Go. It's the one that feels most in tune with how people actually live and ride in dense European-style cities: strong performance without drama, highly usable water resistance, genuinely portable weight, and a refined ride that still feels lively and engaging. You step off the Go at your destination thinking "that was fun", not "where's the ibuprofen?".

The Apollo City 2022 absolutely has its place. If your commute is long, fast and rough, or you're a heavier rider who values a plush, planted feel above all else, the City - ideally the Pro - will absolutely justify its premium. It's a superbly comfortable, capable machine that can easily replace many short car journeys, provided you don't have to heft it around too much.

But for the majority of riders with mixed urban commutes, limited storage, a few stairs, and a desire for something that feels properly modern without becoming a burden, the Go is the smarter, more balanced choice. It captures that "luxury commuter" brief better than its older sibling - and it's the one I'd be happiest to grab every morning without thinking twice.

Numbers Freaks Corner

Metric Apollo Go Apollo City 2022 Pro
Price per Wh (€/Wh) ❌ 1,71 €/Wh ✅ 1,33 €/Wh
Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) ✅ 20,49 €/km/h ❌ 22,23 €/km/h
Weight per Wh (g/Wh) ❌ 40,74 g/Wh ✅ 34,14 g/Wh
Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) ✅ 0,49 kg/km/h ❌ 0,57 kg/km/h
Price per km of real-world range (€/km) ✅ 28,37 €/km ❌ 30,53 €/km
Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) ✅ 0,68 kg/km ❌ 0,79 kg/km
Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) ✅ 16,62 Wh/km ❌ 23,04 Wh/km
Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) ❌ 33,33 W/km/h ✅ 38,83 W/km/h
Weight to power ratio (kg/W) ✅ 0,0147 kg/W ❌ 0,0148 kg/W
Average charging speed (W) ❌ 72,00 W ✅ 216,00 W

These metrics strip the scooters down to pure maths: how much you pay per unit of energy and speed, how efficiently they turn weight and battery into distance, how aggressively they push power relative to their top speed, and how quickly they refill from the wall. Lower values are usually better for cost, range and efficiency; higher values are better where you want more "oomph per unit", like power per km/h or charging rate. It's a blunt tool, but useful if you want to see beyond marketing blurbs.

Author's Category Battle

Category Apollo Go Apollo City 2022
Weight ✅ Noticeably lighter, easier carry ❌ Heavy, stair-unfriendly
Range ❌ Adequate but not generous ✅ Better for longer commutes
Max Speed ❌ Fast enough, but lower ✅ Higher top-end cruising
Power ❌ Strong, but less punch ✅ More grunt, especially Pro
Battery Size ❌ Smaller pack, lighter focus ✅ Bigger pack, more energy
Suspension ❌ Good, but shorter travel ✅ Plush triple-suspension feel
Design ✅ Sleeker, more modern techy ❌ Older, more utilitarian look
Safety ✅ Better lighting, higher IP ❌ Slightly weaker lighting, IP
Practicality ✅ Easier to live with daily ❌ Great if you never lift it
Comfort ❌ Sporty, less cushy ✅ Very comfortable, gliding
Features ✅ Strong feature set, modern ❌ Similar, but less refined
Serviceability ✅ Newer design, still modular ✅ Proven design, many guides
Customer Support ✅ Same Apollo ecosystem ✅ Same Apollo ecosystem
Fun Factor ✅ Lively, tossable, engaging ❌ More serious, less playful
Build Quality ✅ Very tight, modern finish ✅ Solid, overbuilt feeling
Component Quality ✅ Thoughtful, high-spec details ✅ Similarly solid components
Brand Name ✅ Apollo branding strength ✅ Apollo branding strength
Community ✅ Growing, very positive buzz ✅ Larger, established base
Lights (visibility) ✅ 360° presence, clear signals ❌ Good, but less visible
Lights (illumination) ✅ Headlight better aimed, higher ❌ Adequate, weak off-grid
Acceleration ❌ Strong, but milder ✅ Harder hit, especially Pro
Arrive with smile factor ✅ Playful, satisfying ride ❌ More businesslike, less cheeky
Arrive relaxed factor ❌ Sporty, more road feedback ✅ Softer, less body fatigue
Charging speed ❌ Slower, overnight top-ups ✅ Much faster turnaround
Reliability ✅ Simpler, lighter stresses ✅ Mature platform, proven
Folded practicality ✅ Lighter, easier to handle ❌ Bulkier, hook quirks
Ease of transport ✅ Stairs and cars friendly ❌ Fine only if rolling
Handling ✅ Nimble, city-carver feel ❌ Stable, but less agile
Braking performance ✅ Excellent for its speed ✅ Stronger overall stopping
Riding position ✅ Comfortable, roomy enough ✅ Spacious, very stable
Handlebar quality ✅ Integrated, tech-forward cockpit ✅ Solid, ergonomic bars
Throttle response ✅ Smooth, precise, friendly ✅ Very smooth, powerful
Dashboard/Display ✅ Cooler dot-matrix integration ❌ Functional, less exciting
Security (locking) ✅ App lock, manageable weight ✅ App lock, hefty deterrent
Weather protection ✅ Higher IP, better sealing ❌ Good, but slightly lower
Resale value ✅ Newer, high-desirability ✅ Known, proven workhorse
Tuning potential ✅ Lightweight base for mods ✅ Strong platform, power ceiling
Ease of maintenance ✅ Lighter, simpler to wrench ✅ Common parts, known issues
Value for Money ✅ Better everyday bang-per-euro ❌ Great, but more specialised

Overall Winner Declaration

Winner

In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the APOLLO Go scores 6 points against the APOLLO City 2022's 4. In the Author's Category Battle, the APOLLO Go gets 30 ✅ versus 24 ✅ for APOLLO City 2022 (with a few ties sprinkled in).

Totals: APOLLO Go scores 36, APOLLO City 2022 scores 28.

Based on the scoring, the APOLLO Go is our overall winner. For me, the Apollo Go is the scooter that just makes more sense in real life: it's the one you actually look forward to grabbing every day, light enough not to curse at, yet still powerful and refined enough to feel genuinely premium. The City 2022 is a formidable, comfortable bruiser that shines on longer, faster runs, but unless you routinely exploit that extra range and speed, it starts to feel like you're carrying around more scooter than you truly need. In the end, both are capable machines, but the Go is the one that marries performance, practicality and sheer ride enjoyment into a single, cohesive package - the kind of scooter that quietly becomes part of your daily routine and makes that routine better.

That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.