Apollo Pro vs Apollo Ghost 2022 - Premium Tech Cruiser Meets Old-School Power Hooligan

APOLLO Pro 🏆 Winner
APOLLO

Pro

2 822 € View full specs →
VS
APOLLO Ghost 2022
APOLLO

Ghost 2022

1 694 € View full specs →
Parameter APOLLO Pro APOLLO Ghost 2022
Price 2 822 € 1 694 €
🏎 Top Speed 70 km/h 60 km/h
🔋 Range 100 km 90 km
Weight 34.0 kg 29.0 kg
Power 6000 W 3400 W
🔌 Voltage 52 V 52 V
🔋 Battery 1560 Wh 947 Wh
Wheel Size 12 " 10 "
👤 Max Load 150 kg 136 kg
Speed Comparison

Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)

If you want the more complete everyday vehicle, the Apollo Pro edges out the Ghost 2022 with its calmer, more refined ride, better weather protection, smarter electronics, and lower-maintenance package. It feels more like a serious transport tool than a big toy, even if it asks a lot from your wallet.

The Apollo Ghost 2022, meanwhile, is the budget-conscious thrill machine: lighter, cheaper, punchier off the line and easier to tinker with, but less polished, less techy, and not as confidence-inspiring in bad weather or at very high speeds. Choose the Pro if you want a high-tech, "just ride it" commuter; choose the Ghost if you want maximum grins per euro and don't mind a bit of wrenching and compromise.

If you're still reading, good-you're the kind of rider who actually wants to know what living with these two is really like.

Putting the Apollo Pro and Apollo Ghost 2022 side by side is a bit like comparing a modern electric SUV with an older, slightly scruffy hot hatch. Both are quick, both are fun, and both can replace your public transport pass-but they go about it in very different ways.

I've spent a lot of kilometres on both: city commutes, late-night blasts, hill climbs, and more than a few "let's see if that shortcut is actually a road" detours. They sit in the same broad performance bracket-proper dual-motor scooters with serious speed-but target different personalities. One tries very hard to be the smart, low-maintenance daily vehicle. The other is unapologetically about bang-for-buck thrills.

If you're torn between them, this comparison will walk you through how they differ where it matters: comfort, confidence, cost of ownership, and how you actually feel after 20 km of mixed city chaos.

Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?

APOLLO ProAPOLLO Ghost 2022

Both scooters live in that "serious performance" tier: they're far beyond flimsy rental-style commuters, but not quite in the "I should really be wearing motorcycle armour" monster-scooter league.

The Apollo Pro is pitched as a premium, tech-heavy urban vehicle-think "car replacement" vibes. It's for riders who want integrated software, strong water protection, minimal fiddling, and a smoother, more mature ride. It sits firmly in the high-price bracket and doesn't pretend otherwise.

The Apollo Ghost 2022 is more of a value-driven performance scooter. It gives you proper dual-motor shove, full suspension and decent range at a noticeably lower price. It's the classic upgrade for someone coming from a Xiaomi or Ninebot and thinking, "This is fun, but... I want more."

They compete because: similar top speeds, similar voltage, both dual-motor Apollos, both capable of "proper" commuting. The real question is whether you want modern integration and polish, or raw value and mod-friendly hardware.

Design & Build Quality

Specs Comparison

In the flesh, the Apollo Pro looks like it fell off a sci-fi film set. The unibody aluminium frame is thick, smooth and largely cable-free. Touch it, and it feels like one big solid piece rather than a collection of bolted-on bits. The finish is tidy, the lighting is fully integrated, and nothing rattles if you slap the deck (yes, I do that; no, I don't apologise).

The Ghost 2022, by contrast, is proudly mechanical. You see the arms, springs, bolts, and a lot of exposed cabling. It has that "industrial skeleton" look-less Apple, more Meccano. The frame is still solid and forged, but you do get more small creaks and the occasional cable you'd rather not snag on a railing if you're careless.

Ergonomically, the Pro feels more resolved. The cockpit with its integrated Quad Lock mount, clean bars and built-in matrix display comes across like a modern vehicle, not an afterthought. The Ghost's QS-S-style display and trigger throttle are familiar scooter fare: they work, but they're generic and a bit dated now.

If you like your scooter to look like a finished product, the Pro wins. If you like seeing the mechanical bits and having easy wrench access, the Ghost's openness has its charm-even if that charm occasionally squeaks.

Ride Comfort & Handling

This is where the two start to really diverge in character.

The Apollo Pro rides on larger, self-healing tubeless tyres and a mix of adjustable front hydraulics with a rubber rear damper. On broken city tarmac, tram tracks and the usual European "heritage cobblestone torture test", the Pro glides more than it ought to. Those big wheels smooth out the high-frequency chatter, and the front fork-once you've dialled in the damping-does a good job of soaking up the heavier hits. The rear rubber block is more about durability than plushness, but combined with the tyres, it works better than it sounds on paper.

The Ghost uses dual spring suspension and smaller air-filled tyres. It's softer and more animated; you feel more of what's going on under you. On fresh asphalt, that feels lovely-bouncy, playful, almost floaty. Hit a long stretch of cracked pavement, and you start to notice more vertical motion and the occasional sharp thud. It's not punishing, but it's less composed than the Pro when the surface truly deteriorates.

Handling-wise, the Pro feels planted and calm. That self-centring steering geometry pays off: even when you nudge into higher speeds, you get less of that nervous, twitchy feeling. The deck is long and supportive, and the grips plus bar angle do a decent job of keeping wrists happy over longer rides.

The Ghost is more eager to change direction. The shorter wheelbase and lighter chassis give it a sportier, slightly more nervous feel. Great for weaving through traffic and playful carving; a bit less confidence-inspiring when you're flat-out on a windy day. After 5 km on rough inner-city patches, the Pro has you thinking about your destination. The Ghost has you thinking about where the next smooth stretch of road is.

Performance

Both scooters are properly quick, but they deliver that speed in very different flavours.

The Apollo Pro's dual motors and sophisticated controller give you a smooth, linear shove. There's plenty of grunt-enough to make city traffic feel slow-but the way it builds speed is progressive and controlled rather than punchy. You pull the CommandTouch throttle and the scooter surges forward with a steady, relentless push. In its more aggressive mode, it will happily fling you up to city-limit speeds in a handful of heartbeats, but it still feels measured rather than manic.

The Ghost 2022, meanwhile, is the one that makes you swear the first time you double-tap into full power. With dual motors in Turbo and everything turned up, the throttle hit is sharp. From the line, it leaps; your knees instinctively bend, your weight shifts back, and if you weren't ready, you learn quickly. Acceleration to urban speeds feels more dramatic than on the Pro, even if on a stopwatch they aren't worlds apart.

Top-end speed on both is more than enough for sane road use. The Pro stretches a bit further at the very top, which, combined with its more stable chassis, makes it the better high-speed cruiser. The Ghost is absolutely happy tearing around in the mid to high range, but above that its more basic steering geometry and smaller wheels make you work a bit harder to stay relaxed.

Hill climbing is a non-issue on both. On steep urban ramps and long bridges, the Pro barely changes tone; it just keeps hauling. The Ghost powers up too, but you notice a bit more drop in urgency once the battery dips and the climb is long. Braking is where opinions split: the Pro leans heavily on its powerful regenerative system backed by drums, which feels smooth and low-maintenance, but lacks that immediate, aggressive bite. The Ghost's hydraulic discs bite harder and modulate beautifully-great for spirited riding-but do require more eventual pad and rotor care.

Battery & Range

On paper, the Pro's battery is in a different league from the Ghost's, and out on the road that gap is noticeable if you ride them back to back.

With the Pro, even if you ride with a reasonably heavy hand, you can rack up a long, mixed-pace commute and still have a fair reserve in the tank. Ride gently and you can stretch it to the kind of distances that make a round-trip commute plus errands entirely realistic without recharging. Range anxiety is more of a theoretical concept than a daily concern-unless you spend the whole ride pretending you're in a drag race.

The Ghost 2022 does fine, but it is more sensitive to how you ride. Keep it civil-medium speeds, some Eco use, not constantly slamming the trigger-and it will cover a solid day's errands without fuss. Start riding it the way the twin motors encourage you to, full send from every light, and you watch the battery gauge drop faster. You'll still make it across town and back, but you're more aware of the percentage ticking down.

Charging is another practical difference. The Pro ships with a fast charger and, considering the size of its battery, the "empty to full" time is actually pretty reasonable; plug in at work and you'll usually be fine by the end of the day. The Ghost's standard charger, by contrast, asks for a proper overnight relationship. You can cut that significantly with a second or faster charger thanks to its dual ports, but that means more accessories and more money.

In day-to-day life: the Pro feels like a genuine "forget to charge sometimes and still be okay" scooter; the Ghost feels like something you plan around a little more carefully.

Portability & Practicality

Let's be blunt: neither of these is what you buy if you need to carry a scooter up narrow stairs every day. But there are levels of pain.

The Pro is the heavier, bulkier machine. The big frame and wide bars make it a bit of a unit to wrestle through doorways or into small lifts. Folded, it still takes up a lot of floor space, and carrying it for more than a few steps is a "two deep breaths and maybe a break halfway up" sort of chore. As a roll-it-into-the-garage or ground-floor-storage scooter, it's fine; as a fifth-floor-walk-up companion, it's borderline masochistic.

The Ghost, while no featherweight, is noticeably easier to manhandle. The lower weight and folding handlebars mean it's more realistic to slot into a car boot, stand in a hallway, or shuffle into a lift without apologising to half the building. You still wouldn't want to shoulder it up three flights daily, but short carries are doable for most riders.

From a "live with it" perspective, the Pro claws back practicality with better water protection, built-in GPS, app-based locking and alarms, and generally more "vehicle-like" features. You can genuinely treat it as a year-round urban tool. The Ghost is more basic: key ignition, reasonable splash resistance, and that's about it. It'll commute, but it wants slightly kinder conditions and a rider who's okay with a bit more compromise.

Safety

Safety splits into two sides here: active hardware and passive stability.

The Ghost's headline act is those hydraulic disc brakes. They bite firmly, modulate beautifully, and give great feedback. Add in adjustable regen and you can tune the overall braking feel from mild to "better hold onto the bars". In emergency stops, especially from sporty speeds, the Ghost lets you haul it down decisively, provided your weight is in the right place.

The Pro's approach is more modern and somewhat controversial. Its regen system is tuned to be the main stopper, with sealed drums as the backup. Used properly, that regen is smooth, progressive and surprisingly strong, and it saves a huge amount of mechanical wear. You don't get the initial "grab" of discs, but you do get consistency in all conditions and far less tinkering. For pure outright bite, I still give the edge to the Ghost; for fuss-free, all-weather braking, the Pro is hard to fault.

Lighting is an area where the Pro simply walks away. High-mounted headlight, wrap-around deck lighting, clear turn signals, and a proper 360-degree presence on the road-it's the kind of visibility package that makes you feel noticed even in busy traffic. The Ghost's deck and stem lights are fun and visible from the side, but the front light is only "fine". For pitch-black paths, most owners sensibly strap an extra lamp on the bars.

Stability at speed tilts towards the Pro as well. Those larger tyres and the self-centring steering design mean death wobbles are basically a non-topic if you ride with halfway sensible weight distribution. The Ghost can be perfectly stable too, but faster runs ask for more attention on your stance and steering input.

Community Feedback

Apollo Pro Apollo Ghost 2022
What riders love
  • Very smooth, quiet ride
  • Fantastic lighting and visibility
  • Low-maintenance braking and tyres
  • Strong app and phone integration
  • Great water resistance
  • Solid, rattle-free chassis
What riders love
  • Brutal acceleration for the price
  • Excellent hydraulic braking feel
  • Adjustable suspension comfort
  • Folding handlebars practicality
  • Strong value/performance ratio
  • Fun, "alive" handling
What riders complain about
  • Heavy and bulky to move
  • Drum brakes lack disc "bite" feel
  • Price feels steep vs raw specs
  • Kickstand and some ergonomics
  • Reliance on specific phone mount
  • Not very mod-friendly
What riders complain about
  • Slow stock charging
  • Finger trigger fatigue on long rides
  • Display hard to read in sunlight
  • Short fenders in wet conditions
  • Weight still high for stairs
  • Regen can feel abrupt until tuned

Price & Value

This is where the Ghost 2022 punches above its weight, and the Pro has to work harder to justify itself.

The Ghost sits in a mid-range price bracket and gives you dual motors, real suspension, hydraulic discs and solid range. If your primary question is "how much speed and power can I get without raiding my savings?", the Ghost is frankly hard to ignore. You can get into serious performance territory for what many people pay for far more basic commuters.

The Pro costs significantly more and doesn't utterly destroy the Ghost on headline performance. Instead, you're paying for that bigger battery, the integrated electronics, the unibody chassis, better water protection and a lower-maintenance, more premium-feeling ecosystem. If you value polish, smart features and everyday reliability more than peak thrills per euro, the price gap starts to make more sense. If you're a pure numbers-per-coin buyer, the Ghost looks like the more rational deal.

Service & Parts Availability

Both scooters come from the same brand, which helps. Apollo has built a reputation-imperfect but generally better than the average rebadged import brand-for actually supporting its products and stocking spares.

For the Pro, the downside of its integrated, proprietary design is that you're more tied to Apollo's ecosystem for key components: controller, display integration, and certain structural parts. That's fine while support is strong, less so if you're the type to keep a scooter for many years and do your own surgery.

The Ghost uses more "standard" parts: common displays, widely used brake systems, off-the-shelf-style suspension components. In Europe especially, that makes it easier for independent shops or handy owners to keep it going. Need a new set of discs, levers, or even a display? Plenty of compatible hardware exists.

In short: the Pro is more of a dealership scooter; the Ghost is more of a workshop scooter. Both are serviceable, but the Ghost is easier to live with if you're outside Apollo's direct service network or like doing upgrades yourself.

Pros & Cons Summary

Apollo Pro Apollo Ghost 2022
Pros
  • Very stable and confidence-inspiring at speed
  • Excellent lighting and visibility
  • Large battery with strong real-world range
  • Low-maintenance tyres and drum + regen braking
  • Top-tier water resistance and weather readiness
  • Best-in-class app and phone integration
Pros
  • Fantastic power and acceleration for the price
  • Hydraulic discs with strong stopping power
  • Adjustable spring suspension and plush ride
  • Lighter and more compact, folding bars
  • Very strong value-for-money proposition
  • Mod-friendly, easy to upgrade and tweak
Cons
  • Very heavy and bulky to carry
  • Drums lack the sharp feel of discs
  • Expensive compared with similar-speed rivals
  • Not ideal for tinkerers and heavy modders
  • Physical size awkward for small flats
Cons
  • Range more limited and sensitive to riding style
  • Slow stock charging without upgrades
  • Less planted at very high speeds
  • Trigger throttle discomfort on long rides
  • Lighting weaker for serious night riding

Parameters Comparison

Parameter Apollo Pro Apollo Ghost 2022
Motor power (nominal) 2 x 1.200 W 2 x 1.000 W
Motor power (peak) 6.000 W n/a (higher than nominal)
Top speed ca. 70 km/h ca. 58-60 km/h
Battery 52 V 30 Ah (1.560 Wh) 52 V 18,2 Ah (947 Wh)
Claimed range 50-100 km 40-90 km
Realistic mixed range (approx.) 50-70 km 40-50 km
Weight 34 kg 29 kg
Brakes Regen + dual drum Dual hydraulic disc + regen
Suspension Front hydraulic, rear rubber Front C-shaped, rear dual spring
Tyres 12" self-healing tubeless pneumatic 10" air-filled pneumatic
Max load 150 kg 136 kg
Water resistance IP66 IP54
Charging time (standard) ca. 6 h (fast charger included) ca. 12 h (single standard charger)
Price (approx.) 2.822 € 1.694 €

Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?

If you strip away all the hype, the Apollo Pro is the better all-round machine, but only if you actually use what you're paying for. Daily commuting through mixed weather, longer journeys, a desire for low maintenance and good tech integration-all that plays perfectly into the Pro's strengths. It rides calmer, goes further, shrugs off rain and bad roads, and generally feels like a more mature vehicle.

The Ghost 2022, though, remains a bit of a sweetheart for the right rider. If your budget is capped closer to its price, you enjoy that sharp, hot-hatch torque, and you don't mind a slower charger, a little more hands-on care, and less electronic polish, it still makes a lot of sense. For shorter to medium commutes and spirited weekend rides, it's great fun and doesn't pretend to be anything else.

So: if you're replacing a car or seriously leaning on a scooter as your main transport in all kinds of weather, the Pro is the one I'd pick-even if it's not perfect for the money. If you're graduating from entry-level scooters and want a big, grinning leap forward without emptying your bank account, the Ghost 2022 remains a very tempting, if slightly rough-around-the-edges, choice.

Numbers Freaks Corner

Weight per km/h (kg/km/h)
Metric Apollo Pro Apollo Ghost 2022
Price per Wh (€/Wh) ❌ 1,81 €/Wh ✅ 1,79 €/Wh
Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) ❌ 40,31 €/km/h ✅ 28,71 €/km/h
Weight per Wh (g/Wh) ✅ 21,80 g/Wh ❌ 30,63 g/Wh
Weight per km/h (kg/km/h)✅ 0,49 kg/km/h✅ 0,49 kg/km/h
Price per km of real-world range (€/km) ❌ 47,03 €/km ✅ 37,64 €/km
Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) ✅ 0,57 kg/km ❌ 0,64 kg/km
Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) ❌ 26,00 Wh/km ✅ 21,04 Wh/km
Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) ✅ 34,29 W/km/h ❌ 33,90 W/km/h
Weight to power ratio (kg/W) ✅ 0,0142 kg/W ❌ 0,0145 kg/W
Average charging speed (W) ✅ 260,00 W ❌ 78,92 W

These metrics show where each scooter is objectively more "efficient" in a strict, numerical sense. Price-per-Wh and price-per-km/h show how much performance and capacity you get for each euro; weight-related metrics indicate how much mass you're hauling per unit of performance or range; Wh/km reflects energy consumption; the power-to-speed and weight-to-power ratios expose how strongly powered each scooter is relative to its top speed and weight; and average charging speed tells you how quickly each pack can realistically be refilled.

Author's Category Battle

Category Apollo Pro Apollo Ghost 2022
Weight ❌ Very heavy, bulky ✅ Noticeably lighter, easier
Range ✅ Longer, more forgiving ❌ Shorter, more sensitive
Max Speed ✅ Higher, more headroom ❌ Slightly lower ceiling
Power ✅ Strong, very controlled ❌ Punchy but less refined
Battery Size ✅ Much larger capacity ❌ Smaller overall pack
Suspension ✅ More composed, tunable front ❌ Softer, less controlled
Design ✅ Clean, integrated, modern ❌ Exposed, more utilitarian
Safety ✅ Better lighting, stability ❌ Strong brakes, weaker rest
Practicality ✅ Better for all-weather use ❌ Needs kinder conditions
Comfort ✅ Calmer, smoother overall ❌ More busy, bouncy
Features ✅ App, IoT, regen system ❌ Basic display, fewer tricks
Serviceability ❌ Proprietary, integrated ✅ Standard parts, easier
Customer Support ✅ Strong brand backing ✅ Same brand support
Fun Factor ❌ More grown-up, reserved ✅ Rowdy, hot-hatch feel
Build Quality ✅ Unibody, tight, solid ❌ More rattles, basic
Component Quality ✅ Higher-spec battery, details ❌ More generic hardware
Brand Name ✅ Strong Apollo flagship ✅ Popular Apollo performer
Community ✅ Active, tech-focused owners ✅ Huge, mod-heavy base
Lights (visibility) ✅ 360°, excellent presence ❌ Okay, less comprehensive
Lights (illumination) ✅ Better headlight placement ❌ Needs extra front light
Acceleration ❌ Strong but smoother ✅ Sharper, more dramatic
Arrive with smile factor ✅ Satisfied, confident ✅ Grinning, slightly wired
Arrive relaxed factor ✅ Very relaxed cruising ❌ More mentally "on it"
Charging speed ✅ Much faster stock charging ❌ Slow without extra charger
Reliability ✅ Low-maintenance ethos ❌ More wear items
Folded practicality ❌ Bulky footprint ✅ Narrower with folding bars
Ease of transport ❌ Very heavy to lift ✅ Manageable for short lifts
Handling ✅ Stable, predictable ❌ Nimbler but more nervous
Braking performance ❌ Smooth but less bite ✅ Strong hydraulic bite
Riding position ✅ Spacious, ergonomic ❌ Good, slightly less refined
Handlebar quality ✅ Solid, integrated cockpit ❌ More basic hardware
Throttle response ✅ Smooth, controllable ❌ Abrupt at high settings
Dashboard/Display ✅ Phone + matrix combo ❌ Generic, glare issues
Security (locking) ✅ App lock, GPS, alarm ❌ Basic key lock only
Weather protection ✅ High IP rating ❌ Lower, more cautious
Resale value ✅ Flagship, tech appeal ✅ Sought-after value scooter
Tuning potential ❌ Closed, less mod-friendly ✅ Great platform for mods
Ease of maintenance ❌ More proprietary bits ✅ Off-the-shelf components
Value for Money ❌ Expensive for many riders ✅ Strong performance per euro

Overall Winner Declaration

Winner

In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the APOLLO Pro scores 6 points against the APOLLO Ghost 2022's 5. In the Author's Category Battle, the APOLLO Pro gets 29 ✅ versus 15 ✅ for APOLLO Ghost 2022 (with a few ties sprinkled in).

Totals: APOLLO Pro scores 35, APOLLO Ghost 2022 scores 20.

Based on the scoring, the APOLLO Pro is our overall winner. Between these two, the Apollo Pro feels like the scooter you can actually live with day in, day out: calmer, more confidence-inspiring, better in bad weather, and less needy when it comes to maintenance. The Ghost 2022 fights hard on fun and price, and if you're chasing raw excitement for reasonable money it absolutely delivers, but it never quite shakes the feeling of being a very quick toy rather than a fully rounded vehicle. If I had to pick one to keep as my main transport, I'd grit my teeth about the price and weight and go Pro; it simply demands fewer compromises in real life. The Ghost is the one I'd borrow for a Sunday blast and hand back on Monday before the slow charger and shorter range start to annoy me.

That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.