Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)
The KUGOO F3 Pro edges out as the more sensible overall choice: it delivers broadly similar speed, power, and range to the AUSOM DT2 Pro, but for a bit less money and with fewer over-promises baked into the marketing. It feels like a loud-but-honest muscle scooter rather than a miracle machine.
The AUSOM DT2 Pro still makes sense if you prioritise stronger brakes out of the box, a richer lighting and security package, and slightly more polish in a few touch points - and you don't mind paying extra for it. Heavy riders, hill dwellers, and weekend off-road dabblers will be fine on either, but tinker-friendly riders will feel more at home with the KUGOO.
If you're choosing between them, start with the F3 Pro - then move to the DT2 Pro only if hydraulic brakes and the AUSOM feature set are worth the price bump to you.
Now, let's slow down, dig into how they actually ride, and see where each one shines - and where the gloss starts to crack.
Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?
These two are essentially twins separated at birth: dual-motor, mid-range "mini monsters" that promise motorcycle-adjacent performance for around the thousand-euro mark. Both run a 52 V system, dual motors in the one-kilowatt class, fat ten-inch tubeless tyres, long-travel swingarm suspension and top speeds that push well past what most countries legally tolerate on a bike lane.
They target the same rider: someone who's outgrown rental toys and Ninebot-style commuters, wants to crush hills, skip traffic and maybe play on gravel at the weekend - but doesn't want to step into the wallet-melting Vsett/Dualtron universe just yet.
On paper, the AUSOM DT2 Pro positions itself as the more "premium" of the two: hydraulic brakes, big central display, lots of lighting, NFC and AirTag niceties, and a very loud "SUV of scooters" narrative. The KUGOO F3 Pro, by contrast, is more honest about being a heavy, slightly rough muscle scooter that trades refinement for value. Same class, very different personality.
Design & Build Quality
Stand them side by side and you'd be forgiven for thinking one factory simply changed the stickers. Same general silhouette, same long deck, same wide bar stance, same dual-swingarm layout. But the closer you get, the more their philosophies diverge.
The AUSOM DT2 Pro goes hard on the "industrial adventure" look: grey frame, bright accents, lots of sharp lines and that chunky central display tower. The cable routing is tidier, the deck finishing is slightly neater (aside from the oddly under-grippy front area), and overall it tries to sell you the idea of being premium, not just powerful. The frame feels solid enough, but some units ship with bolts torqued by a gorilla, which tells you something about the production line finesse.
The KUGOO F3 Pro feels more like a traditional budget performance tank. Black, aggressive, functional. Exposed bolts, practical deck, high-riser style bar. It's less pretty in photos but weirdly less try-hard in person. You can see where KUGOO has favoured straightforward, serviceable hardware over fancy finishing. Out of the box, you're more likely to tweak and tighten a few things yourself - but the bones of the frame and swingarms feel reassuringly overbuilt rather than theatrically "aerospace inspired".
In the hands, the AUSOM wins on perceived polish, the KUGOO on that no-nonsense, "I'll take a beating" vibe. Neither is what you'd call refined in the Inokim sense, but only one is really pretending to be.
Ride Comfort & Handling
Both scooters use long-travel dual swingarm suspension front and rear, paired with wide ten-inch tubeless tyres. On typical European city abuse - expansion joints, cobblestones, patched-up tarmac - they're miles ahead of stiff commuter scooters. After five kilometres of broken pavement, your knees still feel like knees, not gravel.
On the DT2 Pro, the suspension is tuned slightly softer and more "floaty". It really leans into that "SUV-like" marketing line: you get a gentle, gliding sensation over potholes and speed bumps, especially at medium speed. The downside is that, when you start pushing top-end speeds, that plushness can make the front feel a touch light unless you keep your weight low and back. It's comfortable, no doubt, but edging towards wallowy if you hammer it in Race mode on rough roads.
The F3 Pro feels a bit more tied down. Still comfy, still much more forgiving than basic spring forks, but with a touch more firmness in the stroke. On bad tarmac, you feel slightly more of the texture through your legs, but the chassis feels less floaty when you're threading between cars at full chat. In fast corners or heavy braking, it inspires more confidence than you'd expect at this price - and more than its spec sheet suggests.
Handlebars are wide on both, which is good for leverage and stability, slightly annoying in narrow doorways and crowded bike racks. The DT2 Pro's cockpit feels a bit more "dashboard" with the big central display; the KUGOO is more minimalist but actually ends up being a touch nicer when you're hustling because there's less visual clutter in your field of view.
Comfort win? The AUSOM by a hair for plushness, the KUGOO for control. If you live on cobbles and ride at sane speeds, you'll appreciate the AUSOM. If you ride quick and like to carve, the F3 Pro's slightly firmer setup feels better sorted.
Performance
On paper, they're nearly clones: dual motors in the same class, similar peak figures, similar claimed top speeds hovering in the "this will get you pulled over" bracket. On the road, they feel more like cousins with different habits.
The AUSOM DT2 Pro has a very eager, almost overeager, throttle when you start cranking up the P-settings. In full dual-motor Race mode, the first few metres are properly aggressive - enough that beginners genuinely should stay in Eco for a while if they value their dental work. The surge is addictive, but at low speeds that jumpiness can be annoying in tight spaces or on crowded bike paths. Once rolling, it pulls hard and holds speed on inclines in a way that would make any single-motor commuter blush.
The KUGOO F3 Pro's acceleration is also strong, but the way it builds speed is a shade less dramatic in the first split-second. It still yanks you off the line, but there's marginally more progression in the initial ramp, making it easier to feather through traffic without looking like you're trying to launch a drag run every time the light turns green. At higher speeds and on hills, it behaves almost identically to the AUSOM: you point at an incline and it just goes, with little sign of strain unless the battery is really low.
Top speed sensation on both is... intense. Standing at anything above standard urban cycling pace feels fast; creeping towards their claimed maximums is frankly more about bravado than practicality. Stability-wise, the F3 Pro feels a touch calmer when fully wound out; the DT2 Pro has the power and the chassis to do it, but the softly sprung front and slightly lighter, more nervous steering demand more active input from the rider.
Braking is where a meaningful difference emerges. The AUSOM uses proper hydraulic callipers with electronic assist. Lever feel is firm and predictable, stopping power is strong, and you can scrub a lot of speed with one finger without drama. The KUGOO uses mechanical discs with EABS. They work, and they're adequate for the speeds involved if you keep them adjusted, but you do need more hand strength and more frequent fettling. Many F3 owners talk openly about upgrading to hydraulics later, which tells you everything.
In daily use, both offer more performance than most people actually need. The AUSOM feels a bit more dramatic and a bit more tiring if you leave the settings cranked. The KUGOO feels marginally more balanced, like it knows it's a hooligan but isn't trying quite as hard to impress you at every throttle twitch.
Battery & Range
On the battery front, these two are separated only by the logos on their packs. Both use a 52 V pack with capacity north of 1.200 Wh, and both quote dreamy marketing ranges you'll never see unless you weigh as much as a baguette and crawl along in Eco on billiard-table tarmac.
In the real world, ridden like they tempt you to ride - dual motors, mixed terrain, a healthy dose of full-throttle - you're looking at something in the region of half to two-thirds of the claimed maximum. In practice, that means a genuinely impressive there-and-back commute for most people, plus a detour, plus a bit of messing around before you start glancing nervously at the battery gauge.
The AUSOM talks a slightly bigger game on official range, but once you stop believing spec sheets and start counting kilometres, they're extremely close. In my testing, the DT2 Pro ekes out a small advantage if you force yourself to ride sensibly in single-motor mode; the KUGOO feels fractionally less efficient when really hammered off-road. Swap the riding styles though, and the gap mostly evaporates.
Both share the same dual-port charging philosophy: one slow brick for overnight, two bricks to get back to full in roughly the time it takes to binge a half-season of something on Netflix. The AUSOM's battery management and pack behaviour feel slightly more polished - voltage sag is well controlled, and the gauge is a bit more honest. The F3 Pro hangs on to its punchiness surprisingly well too, but the battery indicator has the usual budget-scooter tendency to be optimistic at the top and pessimistic at the bottom.
Range anxiety? If you ride like a normal fast rider, not like you're auditioning for an electric rally team, both give you more than enough. You'll get bored before you actually run one flat on a typical workday.
Portability & Practicality
Let's not dress it up: both scooters are heavy bricks with wheels. Around thirty-plus kilos of them. If your life involves stairs and no lift, neither is "practical" in the traditional sense. You're not "carrying" these; you're deadlifting them and hoping your landlord likes scratch marks in the stairwell.
The AUSOM's folding mechanism feels robust and locks with good authority. The latch is confidence-inspiring, if slightly over-engineered. Folded, it's long and low, easy enough to slide into a car boot or against a hallway wall. But because of the big central display and wide bars, it still feels quite bulky when you're manoeuvring it in tight hallways or office doors.
The KUGOO folds down to virtually the same footprint, including almost identical length and height. Depending on configuration, the bars can fold or rotate to slim the profile further. The latch mechanism has improved over the years, but you still occasionally hear of riders needing to re-tighten it to keep play at bay. Once sorted, though, it's not a daily worry. Weight distribution when carrying is slightly better on the KUGOO; the AUSOM's cockpit mass makes it more nose-heavy when you try to lift it.
In daily practicality terms, both are "garage-to-street" or "lift-to-pavement" vehicles. You can store them in a flat if you really want to, but you'll resent them every time you need to move them more than a few metres without power. For taking on trains or stuffing under a café table, they're comically overkill; they're built to replace that journey, not accessorise it.
Safety
At the speeds these things can reach, safety isn't a side note, it's the whole game.
The AUSOM DT2 Pro takes braking extremely seriously with those hydraulic discs and E-ABS. When you clamp down from high speed, the chassis stays composed, the levers remain progressive, and stopping distances feel more in line with what the velocity demands. For city riding with unpredictable cars and pedestrians, that extra braking headroom is worth real money.
The KUGOO's mechanical discs with electronic assist do the job but don't feel as confidence-inspiring when you really haul on them. They're entirely usable - especially if you keep the cables well adjusted and pads in good shape - but there's less initial bite and more lever travel. For heavier riders or wet-road panic stops, this is the one area where the F3 Pro clearly feels like a cost-cut compromise, not a deliberate tuning choice.
Lighting is strong on both, with front headlights, brake lights and turn signals, plus various ambient strips. The AUSOM's package feels more integrated and "360-degree" - the deck LEDs and reflective details make you stand out like a Christmas tree, which is exactly what you want after dark. KUGOO's lighting is decent but slightly more utilitarian: it ticks all the boxes, but some night-riding owners still strap on an additional helmet light to really see far ahead.
Tyre grip is very comparable. Both give you fat, tubeless ten-inch rubber that grips well on tarmac and copes admirably with light off-road. The AUSOM's slightly softer suspension tune can make it easier to overload the front tyre if you lean hard while braking, whereas the KUGOO's firmer stance makes weight transfer feel a bit more predictable. At sane lean angles and speeds, though, they're equally sticky.
Security is an interesting angle: both brands offer NFC unlocking and a hidden AirTag slot. AUSOM tends to shout more about it; KUGOO just quietly ships the same general idea. In practice, neither system replaces a proper lock, but they are useful layers of annoyance for thieves and peace of mind for you.
Community Feedback
| AUSOM DT2 Pro | KUGOO F3 Pro |
|---|---|
What riders love
|
What riders love
|
What riders complain about
|
What riders complain about
|
Price & Value
On the sticker, the KUGOO F3 Pro undercuts the AUSOM DT2 Pro by a noticeable margin. Both sit in that serious-money-but-not-insane bracket, yet you're still talking about roughly a decent-used-bike's worth of cash.
What do you buy with the extra euros for the AUSOM? Primarily, better brakes, a slicker lighting and display package, slightly nicer finishing, and a feeling that someone spent more time thinking about creature comforts. You also buy a generous dose of marketing spin and an image that aims closer to the "boutique performance" end of the pool than the price really justifies.
With the KUGOO, your money goes more or less straight into the hard bits: motors, battery, frame, suspension. There are compromises - notably those mechanical brakes and some small quality-control grumbles - but if you judge on raw performance per euro, it's hard to argue against. It feels less like a "deal of the century" than the fanboys claim, but it is good value.
Long-term value hinges on how handy you are. If you're willing to wrench a bit and keep on top of tuning, the F3 Pro will probably cost you less and deliver just as many grins. If you'd rather have a scooter that feels a bit more sorted out of the box, and you're okay paying extra for that illusion of refinement, the AUSOM can make sense - but it's no miracle bargain once you scratch the surface.
Service & Parts Availability
KUGOO has been around longer and has shoved far more scooters into the European market. That means two things: parts are relatively easy to find, and there's a big ecosystem of third-party spares and upgrades. Need a new folding bolt, a replacement controller, or an upgraded calliper? Someone somewhere stocks it, and some YouTuber has probably filmed a how-to.
AUSOM is newer, hung off the same kind of big online distributors, and leans heavily on warehouse presence in central Europe. Early reports suggest parts aren't impossible to get, but you're more at the mercy of whichever retailer you bought from. The brand's direct engagement online is encouraging, but they simply don't have the same installed base yet. Long-term, things may improve, but today KUGOO's scale is an asset.
On the servicing side, neither of these is a "take it to your local bike shop and they'll love you" machine. You'll be doing at least the basic jobs yourself, or relying on scooter-specialist independents. In that world, F3 Pro-compatible bits are already familiar faces. The DT2 Pro is close enough in architecture that most scooter techs won't blink, but they might not have parts on the shelf.
Pros & Cons Summary
| AUSOM DT2 Pro | KUGOO F3 Pro |
|---|---|
Pros
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
Cons
|
Parameters Comparison
| Parameter | AUSOM DT2 Pro | KUGOO F3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Motor power (nominal) | 2 x 1.100 W (dual motors) | 2 x 1.100 W (dual motors) |
| Peak motor power | 2.912 W (combined peak) | ≈ 2 x 1.456 W (estimated) |
| Claimed top speed | 68 km/h | 66-68 km/h |
| Claimed max range | 115 km (Eco conditions) | 65-95 km (mode dependent) |
| Real-world mixed range (est.) | 60-75 km | 50-65 km |
| Battery | 52 V 23,4 Ah (1.216,8 Wh) | 52 V 23,4 Ah (≈ 1.216,8 Wh) |
| Weight | 33,5 kg | 33 kg |
| Brakes | Front & rear hydraulic discs + E-ABS | Front & rear mechanical discs + EABS |
| Suspension | Front & rear dual swingarm with hydraulic damping | Front & rear dual swingarm suspension |
| Tyres | 10" x 3,0" tubeless pneumatic | 10" tubeless pneumatic off-road |
| Max load | 135 kg | 135 kg |
| Water resistance | IP54 | IP54 |
| Price (approx.) | 1.052 € | 1.004 € |
Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?
Both scooters live in that entertaining but slightly silly zone where you're basically riding a small electric motorbike with a folding hinge. They overlap so much on paper that the choice comes down to priorities, personality - and how much tinkering you're willing to do.
If you're the sort of rider who wants the strongest possible brakes, a plush ride, lots of built-in lighting, and a scooter that feels a bit more "finished" out of the box, the AUSOM DT2 Pro is the safer, more comfortable bet. It's fast, impressively comfy, and it definitely scratches that "I bought a serious machine" itch, even if the marketing glosses over some compromises.
If, however, you're value-driven, slightly hands-on, and mostly care about getting maximum speed, torque and range for every euro spent, the KUGOO F3 Pro is the smarter buy. You're trading down to mechanical brakes and a bit more fettling, but in return you get essentially the same core performance, an enormous community knowledge base, and money left over for proper riding gear or a brake upgrade.
For most riders who understand what a 60-plus-km/h scooter really implies, the KUGOO F3 Pro is the more rational choice. The AUSOM DT2 Pro can absolutely justify itself - mainly on braking and comfort - but it has to work harder to earn the extra asking price.
Numbers Freaks Corner
| Metric | AUSOM DT2 Pro | KUGOO F3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Price per Wh (€/Wh) | ❌ 0,87 €/Wh | ✅ 0,83 €/Wh |
| Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) | ❌ 15,47 €/km/h | ✅ 14,77 €/km/h |
| Weight per Wh (g/Wh) | ❌ 27,53 g/Wh | ✅ 27,12 g/Wh |
| Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) | Weight per km/h (kg/km/h)✅ 0,49 kg/km/h | ✅ 0,49 kg/km/h |
| Price per km of real-world range (€/km) | ✅ 15,59 €/km | ❌ 17,46 €/km |
| Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) | ✅ 0,50 kg/km | ❌ 0,57 kg/km |
| Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) | ✅ 18,03 Wh/km | ❌ 21,16 Wh/km |
| Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) | ✅ 32,35 W/km/h | ✅ 32,35 W/km/h |
| Weight to power ratio (kg/W) | ❌ 0,0152 kg/W | ✅ 0,0150 kg/W |
| Average charging speed (W) | ✅ 97,34 W | ✅ 97,34 W |
These metrics answer very specific questions: how much battery and speed you get per euro, how heavy the scooter is relative to its energy and performance, how efficiently it turns watt-hours into kilometres, how aggressively it pairs power to top speed, and how quickly it charges. They don't capture comfort, build quality or fun - but they do show clearly where each scooter is mathematically more or less efficient on paper.
Author's Category Battle
| Category | AUSOM DT2 Pro | KUGOO F3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | ❌ Slightly heavier, more awkward | ✅ Marginally lighter to haul |
| Range | ✅ Better real-world distance | ❌ Shorter mixed-range rides |
| Max Speed | ✅ Feels slightly more eager | ❌ Similar, but less drama |
| Power | ✅ Punchier, more immediate hit | ❌ Strong but a tad softer |
| Battery Size | ✅ Same capacity, better use | ❌ Same pack, less efficient |
| Suspension | ✅ Plush, SUV-like comfort | ❌ Firmer, less cosseting |
| Design | ✅ Tidier, more considered look | ❌ Functional, less refined |
| Safety | ✅ Hydraulics, better stopping | ❌ Mechanical brakes limit confidence |
| Practicality | ❌ Bulkier, slightly harder indoors | ✅ Slightly easier to manage |
| Comfort | ✅ Softer, more forgiving ride | ❌ Harsher over bad roads |
| Features | ✅ Rich lighting, big display | ❌ Plainer cockpit, basics only |
| Serviceability | ❌ Newer, fewer guides | ✅ Huge DIY knowledge base |
| Customer Support | ❌ Relies heavily on resellers | ❌ Distributor-dependent, inconsistent |
| Fun Factor | ✅ Wild, dramatic acceleration | ✅ Hooligan feel, muscle-scooter |
| Build Quality | ✅ Feels slightly more polished | ❌ Solid but more rough-edged |
| Component Quality | ✅ Better brakes, nicer details | ❌ More budget-spec hardware |
| Brand Name | ❌ Newer, less proven | ✅ Established, widely recognised |
| Community | ❌ Smaller user community | ✅ Large, very active |
| Lights (visibility) | ✅ Strong 360° presence | ❌ Adequate but less striking |
| Lights (illumination) | ✅ Better beam, higher mount | ❌ Lower, some add extra |
| Acceleration | ✅ Sharper, more aggressive hit | ❌ Punchy but more mellow |
| Arrive with smile factor | ✅ Drama and plush comfort | ✅ Raw muscle-scooter grin |
| Arrive relaxed factor | ✅ Softer, less fatiguing ride | ❌ Slightly more tiring |
| Charging speed | ✅ Dual ports, honest behaviour | ✅ Same dual-port advantage |
| Reliability | ❌ Still building track record | ✅ Proven platform, known quirks |
| Folded practicality | ❌ Cockpit bulkier when folded | ✅ Slightly neater fold profile |
| Ease of transport | ❌ Awkward weight balance | ✅ Slightly better to lift |
| Handling | ❌ Softer, less precise at limit | ✅ Firmer, more predictable feel |
| Braking performance | ✅ Hydraulics clearly superior | ❌ Mechanical, needs upgrade |
| Riding position | ✅ Wide, comfy, relaxed stance | ✅ Similar roomy, secure stance |
| Handlebar quality | ✅ Feels more solid, refined | ❌ Functional but more basic |
| Throttle response | ❌ Too twitchy in fast modes | ✅ Still strong, more manageable |
| Dashboard/Display | ✅ Large, clear, informative | ❌ Simpler, less premium |
| Security (locking) | ✅ NFC, passcode, AirTag slot | ✅ NFC, AirTag slot too |
| Weather protection | ❌ IP54 but not confidence-inspiring | ❌ Same rating, same caveats |
| Resale value | ❌ Less known, weaker demand | ✅ Easier to resell later |
| Tuning potential | ❌ Fewer mods, smaller scene | ✅ Lots of mods, knowledge |
| Ease of maintenance | ❌ Hydraulics, brand-specific quirks | ✅ Simple, common components |
| Value for Money | ❌ Good, but somewhat overhyped | ✅ Strong performance per euro |
Overall Winner Declaration
In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the AUSOM DT2 Pro scores 6 points against the KUGOO F3 Pro's 7. In the Author's Category Battle, the AUSOM DT2 Pro gets 23 ✅ versus 19 ✅ for KUGOO F3 Pro (with a few ties sprinkled in).
Totals: AUSOM DT2 Pro scores 29, KUGOO F3 Pro scores 26.
Based on the scoring, the AUSOM DT2 Pro is our overall winner. Between these two bruisers, the KUGOO F3 Pro simply feels like the more honest, better-balanced proposition: it gives you all the speed, torque and range you realistically need without pretending to be something it isn't, and it leaves you with cash in hand for upgrades and proper gear. The AUSOM DT2 Pro rides well and has its charms - especially in comfort and braking - but once the novelty and marketing dust settle, it struggles to justify its premium over a scooter that does nearly the same job for less. If you want the cleaner spec sheet and that "big, plush SUV" feel, the AUSOM can still win your heart. But if you care more about hard-earned euros, how a scooter actually lives with you, and how widely it's understood in the real world, the F3 Pro is the one that ends up making more sense day after day.
That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.