Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)
The DRAGON Cyclone PRO edges out overall thanks to stronger brakes, slightly better real-world range, and a more planted "grown-up" ride that feels closer to a small moped than a toy. It's the better choice if you care about braking confidence, all-terrain versatility, and long-term daily abuse more than fancy lighting and NFC tricks.
The SPLACH Phoenix fights back with livelier styling, brighter and more complete road lighting, and a slightly more playful suspension feel - it suits riders who mostly stay on tarmac, love visible techy features, and want something that looks a bit flashier outside the café.
Both are heavy, fast, mid-range dual-motor scooters; neither is perfect, but each has a clear personality. Keep reading if you want to know which one will still make sense after the honeymoon phase is over.
Stick around - the devil here is in the details, and both scooters have a few surprises tucked behind those spec sheets.
By now, the mid-priced "budget beast" category is absolutely packed: dual motors, hefty batteries, and claims of car-killing performance for the price of a city bike. The SPLACH Phoenix and DRAGON Cyclone PRO are two of the louder voices in that chorus, both promising serious speed, real suspension and "commuter capable" range without heading into silly money.
I've put real kilometres on both - enough dodging potholes, hopping kerbs and grinding up mean hills to know where the brochures stop and reality begins. On paper they're remarkably close: similar top speed, similar weight, similar voltage. In practice, they feel like cousins who made very different life choices: one went to design school, the other joined a mining crew.
If you're trying to pick a workhorse that can still make you grin on the way home, this comparison will walk you through how they stack up when the asphalt is rough, the traffic is impatient, and your battery gauge is doing that worrying slow-motion countdown.
Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?
Both scooters sit in that awkward but tempting middle ground: far too heavy and powerful to be "last-mile toys", not quite refined or premium enough to be true high-end flagships. Think of them as budget muscle bikes of the e-scooter world.
The SPLACH Phoenix targets the "urban hot-hatch" mindset: lots of acceleration, eye-catching looks, strong lighting, and a suspension tune that favours comfort and fun on typical city surfaces. It's pitched at riders coming from Xiaomi/Segway levels who want their first real taste of dual-motor power without selling a kidney.
The DRAGON Cyclone PRO, on the other hand, feels designed by someone who lives next to a badly maintained Australian B-road. It's more utilitarian, built around hydraulic brakes, tubeless all-terrain tyres and a frame that looks like it was specced by a civil engineer. Less flair, more function.
They compete directly on price, speed class and weight, and they're both realistic "car replacement" candidates for short to medium commutes. Comparing them makes sense because you'd rarely buy both - you'll either lean toward the Phoenix's flash and lighting, or the Cyclone PRO's seriousness and off-road leanings.
Design & Build Quality
Side by side, the Phoenix is the one that tries to charm you. The interchangeable glossy panels do give it a bit of personality in a world of matte-black tubes, and the NFC ignition plus hidden AirTag compartment feel satisfyingly gadgety. The frame itself is chunky and reasonably stiff, but there's definitely an element of "styled scooter with performance" rather than "performance scooter that happens to be styled".
The Cyclone PRO is the opposite. No piano gloss, no colour-swapping party tricks - just thick alloy, visible welds and very little to distract from the fact this is a tool, not a toy. It exudes that "welded in a shed by someone wearing hi-vis" look - in a good way. Panels sit more utilitarian, less cosmetic. Nothing rattled loose on my test unit faster than I'd expect at this price, and the overall impression is of a scooter that doesn't mind being treated a bit roughly.
Both weigh about the same, both use aviation-grade alloy, and both feel solid when you stomp on the deck. But the way that solidity is presented is different. The Phoenix gives you shine and styling, the Dragon gives you confidence that it'll shrug off a few seasons of potholes and dust. If you care what your scooter looks like leaned against a café window, the Phoenix wins. If you care what it looks like after two winters and a bit of off-road, the Dragon feels the safer bet.
Ride Comfort & Handling
On typical city streets - patched tarmac, tram tracks, the occasional abused paving stone - the Phoenix is initially the more "plush" of the two. Its quad-spring setup is tuned on the softer side, so it soaks up cracks and expansion joints in a pleasantly floaty way. New riders love it. After a few kilometres of bumpy sidewalks, your knees still feel alive, not like they're filling out HR paperwork.
The downside is that softness. Under hard braking or quick weight shifts, the front end of the Phoenix likes to dive. It's not dangerous, but it does remind you that you're on a comfort-biased scooter rather than a sharp-handling performance chassis. Push hard into corners and the suspension can feel slightly underdamped, with a bit of extra pitch and squat.
The Cyclone PRO goes for a more controlled approach. The air shocks up front and heavy-duty rear feel more progressive: small chatter is nicely absorbed, but the suspension firms up as you hit bigger hits or really lean on it in a turn. It's less "bouncy castle", more "well-worn 4x4". On rougher asphalt and gravel paths, it stays composed and predictable, and at higher speeds it inspires more trust than the Phoenix.
Handling-wise, both have wide handlebars and roomy decks, so you've got adequate leverage and stance. The Phoenix feels a tad more playful weaving through city corners; the Cyclone PRO feels more planted when the speed climbs or the surface deteriorates. If your riding is 90 % urban and you value cushiness, the Phoenix has a slight edge in comfort. If your route involves abuse - bad roads, dirt tracks, higher sustained speeds - the Dragon's suspension tune feels more grown-up.
Performance
Both scooters belong firmly in the "this really should not be your first scooter" camp. Dual motors, traffic-matching speeds and enough torque to embarrass the average rental bike are standard here.
The Phoenix delivers its power in a friendly, linear way. In dual-motor, top gear, it launches hard enough to clear intersections ahead of cars, but the throttle mapping is civilised out of the box. You get a strong shove off the line, then a steady, confident climb into speeds where you start rethinking your life choices and your helmet selection. Hills that kill single-motor commuters barely register; the Phoenix keeps rolling without that demoralising mid-slope slowdown.
The Cyclone PRO adds a bit more drama. That "S" button for the second motor turns it from competent into borderline cheeky. Acceleration in dual-motor mode has more punch, especially for heavier riders or steeper climbs, and it holds speed on long inclines a bit better. It feels like the controller and motors are happier delivering hard torque for longer. You can feel that extra headroom when you ask for a burst to get out of a tight spot in traffic.
Top speed on both is in the same mental ballpark - fast enough that road quality, your helmet, and your own sense of self-preservation become the real limits. The difference is more in how they behave approaching that ceiling. The Phoenix can feel a little light in the front if you're on imperfect tarmac; the Cyclone PRO remains more planted and less nervous at the same pace.
Braking performance is where the Dragon pulls clearly ahead. The Phoenix's cable discs plus E-ABS are absolutely fine for the class - they'll stop you quickly and consistently, and the anti-lock assistance helps avoid ham-fisted skids. But once you've tried the Cyclone PRO's fully hydraulic system, it's hard to go back. Lever feel is smoother, lighter, and more controllable, especially on long descents or in emergency stops. One-finger braking at serious speed is not a gimmick - it genuinely changes how relaxed you feel riding fast.
Battery & Range
On spec sheets, the Dragon has a slightly bigger tank; in the real world, that translates into what you'd expect: a modest but noticeable edge in usable range.
On the Phoenix, riding like a normal human (dual motors when you feel like it, speed well above regulation when you can get away with it), you're realistically looking at commutes in the low-to-mid double digits before the battery gauge starts to nag. Nurse it in single-motor eco modes and it will go much further, but the scooter is clearly at its best when you're using the power, not babying it.
The Cyclone PRO stretches that envelope a bit. Similar riding style, similar rider weight, and you typically get a few extra kilometres before things feel "low". It also holds its punch further down the battery; that 52 V architecture and slightly larger pack mean it doesn't feel as lethargic in the last third of the charge as cheaper systems often do.
Both take basically an overnight session to refill with their standard chargers. Neither is fast-charging royalty, and both will punish forgetfulness the same way: if you don't plug in after work, don't expect miracles in the morning. Range anxiety is therefore similar - the Dragon just buys you a little more headroom, especially if you mix eco and dual-motor modes intelligently.
Portability & Practicality
Let's be blunt: both of these are terrible if your daily routine involves stairs. At roughly 33 kg each, they're in "You will regret this on the second flight" territory. These are scooters you roll, not scooters you shoulder.
The Phoenix's folding mechanism is solid enough and the stem locks down to the rear, making it reasonably manageable to lift into a car boot or through a doorway, but the combination of length and mass is still a challenge in cramped hallways or busy trains. If your commute includes a metro during rush hour, you're going to be unpopular very fast.
The Cyclone PRO is no featherweight either, but its utilitarian design makes it slightly less fussy to manhandle. The stem folds down confidently, the deck feels like a solid handle point, and nothing feels fragile while you're wrestling it into a car. Storage-wise, its footprint is similar to the Phoenix: you'll need a corner of a room or a bit of garage space; it will not elegantly disappear behind a wardrobe.
Day-to-day practicality is where the Dragon's puncture-resistant tubeless tyres quietly earn their keep. Flats are the single most annoying failure on commuter scooters, and tubeless all-terrain rubber massively reduces that risk. The Phoenix's regular pneumatics ride nicely but require more vigilance: keep an eye on pressures and be prepared for the occasional tube-related swear session.
Security-wise, the Phoenix scores points for its NFC ignition and integrated AirTag hiding spot - great for urban riders who park in semi-public areas. The Dragon counters with a literal key switch: crude, but effective. Neither replaces a good lock, but both add small friction for the opportunistic thief.
Safety
At these speeds, safety is non-negotiable, and both scooters do enough to feel like vehicles rather than toys - but they focus on different aspects.
The Phoenix shines (quite literally) in visibility. High-mounted headlight, strong brake light, side deck lighting, and - importantly - proper separate turn signals. At night, it looks like a mobile Christmas tree in a hi-vis vest, which is exactly what you want when mixing with distracted drivers. For urban commuting after dark, this lighting package is genuinely useful, not just decoration.
The Cyclone PRO's lighting is perfectly acceptable - bright enough to see and be seen - but it doesn't come close to the Phoenix's "rolling light show" in terms of signalling and 360° presence. Where it claws back safety points is braking and stability. Those hydraulic discs offer a level of control that cable systems simply don't match, especially in wet or panic situations. And combined with the more controlled suspension and all-terrain tyres, the chassis feels calmer when you have to brake hard over imperfect surfaces.
Tyre-wise, both use inflatable 10-inch rubber, which is the bare minimum you want at these speeds. The Dragon's all-terrain tread gives you a bit more reassurance on loose gravel and wet leaves; the Phoenix's street-oriented rubber feels a touch more precise on smooth tarmac. Neither scooter is thrilled about deep water, but both have usable splash protection for light rain - with the Phoenix offering a slightly better water rating on paper.
In short: Phoenix is the better "see and be seen" machine; Cyclone PRO is the better "slow down right now without drama" machine. Personally, at this performance level, I lean toward the side with better brakes.
Community Feedback
| SPLACH Phoenix | DRAGON Cyclone PRO |
|---|---|
What riders love
|
What riders love
|
What riders complain about
|
What riders complain about
|
Price & Value
Both sit in the same general price band, with the Dragon usually costing a touch more. For that small premium, you're getting hydraulics, slightly more battery capacity, and tubeless all-terrain tyres. If those three words (hydraulic, tubeless, all-terrain) make your ears perk up, the extra spend is easy to justify.
The Phoenix undercuts it slightly and throws the kitchen sink at "visible features": fancy panels, deep lighting package, NFC, integrated theft-tracking considerations. It's the better deal if you want to feel like you've bought a lot of scooter features for the money, not just hard components.
In terms of long-term value as a daily commuter, the Dragon's simpler, more workmanlike spec wins me over: fewer flats, stronger brakes out of the box, and a bit more usable range matter more after six months than how pretty the side panels look on day one. But if you're budget-sensitive and mostly urban, the Phoenix still delivers a lot of bang for every euro.
Service & Parts Availability
SPLACH has grown up a bit from its early crowdfunding chaos and is now a reasonably established direct-to-consumer player, but you're still somewhat at the mercy of international shipping for certain parts. Community support is decent, and the platform isn't exotic, so generic consumables (brake pads, tyres, etc.) are easy enough to source, but don't expect a SPLACH service centre on every corner.
Dragon, especially in Australia, has built more of a local ecosystem. Frame warranty is generous, parts availability is generally better, and there's a larger base of mechanics and DIYers familiar with the brand. In Europe you'll still be ordering parts rather than walking into a high-street shop, but the odds of finding someone who's seen a Dragon before are higher than for many no-name imports.
For a rider who doesn't enjoy spanner time, the Cyclone PRO's brand and community footprint are a reassuring safety net. The Phoenix is fine if you're comfortable doing basic maintenance yourself and waiting a bit longer for specific plastics or electronics.
Pros & Cons Summary
| SPLACH Phoenix | DRAGON Cyclone PRO |
|---|---|
Pros
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
Cons
|
Parameters Comparison
| Parameter | SPLACH Phoenix | DRAGON Cyclone PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Motor power (nominal) | Dual 1.000 W | Dual 1.000 W |
| Peak power | 2.600 W (combined) | 3.600 W (combined) |
| Top speed (unrestricted) | ≈60 km/h | ≈60 km/h |
| Claimed max range | ≈65 km | ≈60 km |
| Realistic range (mixed riding) | ≈35-40 km | ≈40-45 km |
| Battery capacity | 52 V 18,2 Ah (≈946 Wh) | 52 V 21 Ah (≈1.092 Wh) |
| Weight | 33 kg | 33 kg |
| Brakes | Mechanical discs + E-ABS | Fully hydraulic discs (140 mm) |
| Suspension | Quad spring (front & rear) | Front air shocks, rear heavy-duty shock |
| Tyres | 10x3,0 pneumatic (tubed) | 10-inch tubeless all-terrain (puncture-resistant) |
| Max load | 150 kg | 150 kg (some sources 120 kg) |
| IP rating | IPX5 | IPX4 |
| Charging time | ≈8-9 h | ≈8-10 h |
| Typical price | ≈1.072 € | ≈1.126 € |
Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?
If you strip away the marketing fluff and look at how these two behave after a few hundred kilometres, the DRAGON Cyclone PRO comes out as the slightly more complete machine. The stronger brakes, tougher tyres, more controlled suspension and extra usable range make it the better choice for riders who treat their scooter as serious transport - especially if your routes include bad tarmac, hills, or a bit of off-road curiosity. It feels more like a compact electric moped and less like a tarted-up commuter.
The SPLACH Phoenix still has a clear audience. If your riding is primarily urban, your roads are reasonably decent, and you care a lot about lighting, looks and neat security touches, it remains a very tempting package. It's the one that makes passers-by say "nice scooter", and its soft suspension and bright indicators make city life genuinely easier. Just accept that you're trading away hydraulic stoppers, tubeless tyres and a bit of long-term ruggedness for that flair.
So, if you're the kind of rider who wants to forget about flats, trust your brakes when a car door appears, and occasionally blast down a gravel track, go Dragon. If you want your ride to look sharp, glow at night and feel like a cushy urban hot-hatch, the Phoenix will do the job - just don't pretend it's built for a decade of abuse.
Numbers Freaks Corner
| Metric | SPLACH Phoenix | DRAGON Cyclone PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Price per Wh (€/Wh) | ❌ 1,13 €/Wh | ✅ 1,03 €/Wh |
| Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) | ✅ 17,87 €/km/h | ❌ 18,77 €/km/h |
| Weight per Wh (g/Wh) | ❌ 34,88 g/Wh | ✅ 30,22 g/Wh |
| Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) | ✅ 0,55 kg/km/h | ✅ 0,55 kg/km/h |
| Price per km of real-world range (€/km) | ❌ 26,80 €/km | ✅ 25,02 €/km |
| Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) | ❌ 0,83 kg/km | ✅ 0,73 kg/km |
| Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) | ✅ 23,65 Wh/km | ❌ 24,27 Wh/km |
| Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) | ❌ 43,33 W/km/h | ✅ 60,00 W/km/h |
| Weight to power ratio (kg/W) | ❌ 0,0127 kg/W | ✅ 0,0092 kg/W |
| Average charging speed (W) | ❌ 111,3 W | ✅ 121,3 W |
These metrics break down how much scooter you get for your money, mass and energy. Price-per-Wh and price-per-km show raw financial efficiency, while weight-based metrics tell you how effectively each scooter turns kilos and watt-hours into real-world range and speed. Wh/km indicates how thirsty each scooter is; lower means more distance per charge. Power-related ratios illuminate how much performance headroom you have at the top end, and average charging speed gives a simple view of how quickly each pack refills when empty.
Author's Category Battle
| Category | SPLACH Phoenix | DRAGON Cyclone PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | ✅ Same, but compact feel | ✅ Same, equally heavy |
| Range | ❌ Shorter realistic distance | ✅ Goes further per charge |
| Max Speed | ✅ Feels lively at top | ✅ Equally fast overall |
| Power | ❌ Less peak punch | ✅ Stronger peak output |
| Battery Size | ❌ Smaller capacity pack | ✅ Bigger energy tank |
| Suspension | ❌ Too soft, non-adjustable | ✅ More controlled, progressive |
| Design | ✅ Stylish, custom panels | ❌ Plain, industrial look |
| Safety | ❌ Weaker brakes overall | ✅ Hydraulics inspire confidence |
| Practicality | ❌ Tubes, more faffy flats | ✅ Tubeless, easier ownership |
| Comfort | ✅ Very plush on tarmac | ✅ Composed on mixed terrain |
| Features | ✅ NFC, turn signals, AirTag | ❌ Plainer, fewer extras |
| Serviceability | ❌ More online, DIY heavy | ✅ Better support ecosystem |
| Customer Support | ❌ Improving, still inconsistent | ✅ Stronger warranty presence |
| Fun Factor | ✅ Playful, flashy, cushy | ✅ Brutal torque, off-road fun |
| Build Quality | ❌ More cosmetic, some rattles | ✅ Feels tougher, fewer rattles |
| Component Quality | ❌ Mechanical brakes, tubes | ✅ Hydraulics, tubeless, shocks |
| Brand Name | ❌ Smaller, crowdfunded roots | ✅ Strong regional reputation |
| Community | ✅ Enthusiast, growing user base | ✅ Very active Dragon riders |
| Lights (visibility) | ✅ Bright, signals, side glow | ❌ Functional but basic |
| Lights (illumination) | ✅ High-mounted, decent throw | ❌ Adequate, less comprehensive |
| Acceleration | ❌ Strong but tamer | ✅ Harder hit, more torque |
| Arrive with smile factor | ✅ Flashy, playful experience | ✅ Power junkie's grin |
| Arrive relaxed factor | ❌ Softer but weaker brakes | ✅ Hydraulics, stable chassis |
| Charging speed | ❌ Slightly slower average | ✅ Marginally quicker refill |
| Reliability | ❌ More reports of small niggles | ✅ Robust, proven in rough use |
| Folded practicality | ✅ Solid latch, manageable fold | ✅ Similar, robust folding |
| Ease of transport | ❌ Weight plus more "fussy" | ✅ Still heavy, but simpler |
| Handling | ❌ Divey when pushed hard | ✅ Planted at higher speeds |
| Braking performance | ❌ Mechanical with E-ABS only | ✅ Strong hydraulic system |
| Riding position | ✅ Wide bars, comfy deck | ✅ Spacious, natural stance |
| Handlebar quality | ✅ Wide, stable, confidence-boosting | ✅ Wide, stiff, adjustable |
| Throttle response | ✅ Smooth, tunable via settings | ❌ Some units need tweaking |
| Dashboard/Display | ✅ Feature rich, NFC integration | ❌ Basic but readable |
| Security (locking) | ✅ NFC, AirTag hidey-hole | ✅ Key switch, simple deterrent |
| Weather protection | ✅ Better IP rating | ❌ Splash-only rating |
| Resale value | ❌ Less established in markets | ✅ Stronger demand used |
| Tuning potential | ✅ P-settings, mod-friendly | ✅ P-settings, powerful base |
| Ease of maintenance | ❌ Tubes, more faff, shipping | ✅ Tubeless, better parts access |
| Value for Money | ❌ Good, but hardware weaker | ✅ Hardware per euro is stronger |
Overall Winner Declaration
In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the SPLACH Phoenix scores 3 points against the DRAGON Cyclone PRO's 8. In the Author's Category Battle, the SPLACH Phoenix gets 18 ✅ versus 32 ✅ for DRAGON Cyclone PRO (with a few ties sprinkled in).
Totals: SPLACH Phoenix scores 21, DRAGON Cyclone PRO scores 40.
Based on the scoring, the DRAGON Cyclone PRO is our overall winner. Between these two, the Cyclone PRO simply feels more like a machine you can trust to take daily abuse without fuss while still giving you that guilty little grin when you open it up. The Phoenix has its charms - brighter lights, slicker touches, softer ride - but once the novelty fades, you notice the stronger brakes, tougher tyres and steadier chassis on the Dragon every single day. If I had to live with one of them as my only powered two-wheeler, I'd take the Cyclone PRO's slightly rougher character over the Phoenix's extra polish - it may not look as pretty in Instagram photos, but it feels more reassuring when the road gets ugly and the ride actually matters.
That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.

