Egret X Series vs Xiaomi 4 Pro - Two "Serious" Commuters, One Clear Everyday Winner

EGRET X SERIES 🏆 Winner
EGRET

X SERIES

1 297 € View full specs →
VS
XIAOMI 4 Pro
XIAOMI

4 Pro

799 € View full specs →
Parameter EGRET X SERIES XIAOMI 4 Pro
Price 1 297 € 799 €
🏎 Top Speed 20 km/h 25 km/h
🔋 Range 55 km 55 km
Weight 21.0 kg 17.5 kg
Power 1350 W 1000 W
🔌 Voltage 48 V 36 V
🔋 Battery 499 Wh 446 Wh
Wheel Size 12.5 " 10 "
👤 Max Load 120 kg 120 kg
Speed Comparison

Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)

The Xiaomi 4 Pro is the better overall choice for most riders: it's cheaper, easier to live with, lighter to haul around, and still delivers a mature, confidence-inspiring commute with solid range and features. The Egret X Series fights back with bigger wheels, better weather protection, more torque on the higher trims, and true "SUV" comfort on rough, European-style streets - but you pay for it in price and weight.

Choose the Xiaomi if you want a dependable, polished daily workhorse that won't wreck your back when you have to carry it. Choose the Egret X (ideally Prime or Ultra) if your city streets look like an archeology site, you hate flats, and you treat your scooter as a primary vehicle, not a folding toy. Both will get you there; only one feels easy to own.

Now let's dig in and see where each one shines - and where the marketing gloss wears off.

They look like they belong to the same species - sober, black, adult scooters with proper lights and serious intentions - but the Egret X Series and Xiaomi 4 Pro come from different worlds. One is a German-built "urban SUV" on massive tyres; the other is a polished tech product designed to slot neatly into your life, like a smartphone that happens to roll.

I've put plenty of kilometres on both. I've rattled the Xiaomi over broken bike lanes until my knees started filing protest letters, and I've muscled the Egret X up staircases while wondering if I should have just bought a gym membership instead. Both are good enough to be taken seriously; neither is perfect. Which makes this comparison actually interesting.

If you're hovering over the buy button on either of these, keep reading - the differences are less obvious than the spec sheets suggest, and the right choice depends very much on how you ride, where you ride, and how often you need to carry the damn thing.

Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?

EGRET X SERIESXIAOMI 4 Pro

On paper, these two don't look like direct rivals. The Egret X Series sits in the "premium European commuter" bracket, with a price tag that makes your wallet swallow hard and a build that tries to justify it. The Xiaomi 4 Pro lives a floor or two lower in the price tower - solidly mid-range - but has ambitions of being the default daily commuter for normal people who don't spend evenings reading controller firmware changelogs.

In practice, though, plenty of riders cross-shop them. Both are single-motor, road-legal commuters with sensible top speeds, serious lighting, decent range, and a "grown-up" image. They're bought by office workers, not teenagers; by people who actually need to get to work on time, not just drag race in parking lots.

So: similar use case, different philosophies. Egret aims at "mini-vehicle you can trust in any weather". Xiaomi aims at "tool that simply works and doesn't get in the way". You're deciding, really, how much you want to pay for comfort and robustness - and how much you enjoy lifting heavy objects.

Design & Build Quality

Specs Comparison

Picking up the Egret X feels like grabbing a piece of street furniture that accidentally grew wheels. Thick tubular frame, hidden cabling, wide deck, metal fenders - it looks and feels purpose-built for abuse. Welds are clean, paint is chunky, and the whole thing has that "I'll still be here in ten years" vibe. It's industrial in a good way, like a compact bicycle that lost a few parts but kept the attitude.

The Xiaomi 4 Pro goes in the opposite direction: sleek, minimalist, very "tech company". The frame feels stiff and well-finished, but the design language is consumer electronics, not utility vehicle. Cables are mostly hidden, the cockpit is clean, and the display sits flush in the stem like something from a modern e-bike. It's less "tank", more "MacBook on wheels".

In the hands, Xiaomi feels lighter, more nimble, and frankly more approachable. The Egret feels more premium in some details - metal fenders, integrated locking points, that big rubber deck mat - but also more overbuilt than many riders will ever need. If you appreciate hardware that feels bombproof, the Egret will charm you. If you value compact elegance and a refined look, the Xiaomi wins by a comfortable margin.

Ride Comfort & Handling

This is where philosophy turns into knee pain (or lack of it).

The Egret X has those gloriously oversized tyres - noticeably larger than what you see on "normal" scooters - paired with a proper front suspension fork. On rough city streets, that combination is worth its weight in ibuprofen. Cobblestones, tram tracks, broken tarmac: you feel them, but you're not being assaulted by them. The bigger wheels climb over edges instead of head-butting them, and the long wheelbase gives a planted, almost bicycle-like stability. At legal speeds, you can ride one-handed to adjust your glove without feeling like you're about to become YouTube content.

The Xiaomi 4 Pro relies entirely on its tyres for damping. The larger 10-inch tubeless DuraGel tyres are a huge improvement over Xiaomi's older, smaller wheels. On decent asphalt and bike lanes the ride is impressively smooth for a rigid scooter - "floating" rather than chattering. But once the surface turns ugly, there's only so much rubber can do. After several kilometres of cobbles, my wrists were sending strongly worded emails.

In corners, the Xiaomi actually feels a bit sportier: lower stance, lighter weight, and predictable front-motor pull. The Egret is more relaxed - a big, steady carve rather than a flick. You stand taller on it, which helps visibility but makes fast, tight manoeuvres feel slightly more ponderous.

If your daily ride includes a lot of broken surfaces, long stretches of coarse pavement, or the usual European "historic charm" stones, the Egret's comfort advantage is obvious. If your commute is mostly smooth bike paths and decent tarmac, the Xiaomi is "comfortable enough" and feels more agile overall.

Performance

Both scooters are officially shackled to modest top speeds, so this isn't a race of who can terrify you the most. It's about how they get you to that legal ceiling - and what happens on hills.

The more powerful Egret X versions (Prime and Ultra) have a clear torque advantage. When you hit a proper climb, the Egret doesn't sound like it's making a last will and testament; it just grunts and goes. The shove is diesel-like: strong, smooth, and consistent even as the battery drains. You don't get neck-snapping launches, but you do get the confidence that a steep hill at the end of your commute won't turn into an embarrassing slow crawl.

The Xiaomi 4 Pro is no slouch, though. In Sport mode, it pulls away from lights briskly enough to leave rental scooters and casual cyclists behind. Short, moderate hills are handled with surprising composure; longer or steeper gradients are doable, but you feel it working harder. With a heavier rider, the Xiaomi will slow more noticeably on serious inclines than an Egret X Prime or Ultra, but it's still vastly better than older Xiaomi generations.

Braking is a close call. The Egret's dual mechanical discs with large rotors give strong, predictable stopping power and excellent modulation. You squeeze harder, it stops harder - simple, old-school, effective. Xiaomi's combo of rear disc plus front regenerative brake feels more high-tech: initial electronic "drag" when you pull the lever, then the rear disc bites. On dry urban roads, both systems inspire confidence; in the wet, the Egret's big wheels and weight help stability, while the Xiaomi's E-ABS helps avoid locking up.

In everyday use, the Xiaomi feels a bit more eager off the line at low speeds, the Egret feels more authoritative on hills and at sustained pace. If you're heavier or live in a hilly city, Egret has the performance edge. For flat-ish cities and average-weight riders, the Xiaomi is perfectly adequate and more than lively enough.

Battery & Range

Egret clearly aims to kill range anxiety with battery capacity, especially on the Ultra. In practice, that translates into commutes where you check the battery out of curiosity, not concern. Even riding normally rather than hypermiling, the bigger Egret packs can comfortably cover long round trips and still have enough in reserve for detours. For many riders, that means plugging in once or twice a week, not daily.

The Xiaomi 4 Pro plays a different game: "enough range for almost everyone, most of the time". Push it hard in Sport mode with an average rider and mixed terrain, and you're still looking at a solid commute both ways without sweating the last kilometre. Ride more gently in the mid mode and it stretches surprisingly far. You do, however, think about charging more regularly - it's more of an "every day or every other day" machine.

Charging is where the Egret's big batteries show their downside: larger packs take longer to fill. The smaller Xiaomi battery is easier to top up overnight or during a full day at the office. So Egret wins on pure autonomy, Xiaomi wins on "time from empty to full". Decide whether your life is more constrained by distance or by access to a socket.

Portability & Practicality

Let's be blunt: the Egret X is not portable in the "carry it up three floors daily" sense. The folding mechanism is excellent - solid, confidence-inspiring, and rattle-free - but the resulting lump is large and heavy. You can lug it into a car boot or up a short staircase, but you won't enjoy doing it regularly. It's designed more as a compact vehicle you occasionally fold than as a folding object you occasionally ride.

The Xiaomi 4 Pro is much closer to the sweet spot. It's still no featherweight, but lifting it into a trunk, up a flight of stairs, or onto a train is realistic for most adults. The new folding latch is quick and secure, and the folded package is slimmer and less awkward than the Egret's big-wheel bulk. In a small flat or office corner, the Xiaomi simply fits better.

Both have decent stands and are stable when parked. Egret's more robust frame and IP rating make it feel happier living outdoors or in a damp bike shed. Xiaomi is fine in typical urban weather, but you treat it with a bit more care - it feels like something you'd rather store inside.

If "multi-modal" is part of your life (scooter + train/bus + stairs), Xiaomi wins by a mile. If the scooter mostly rolls from garage to road to lift to office, the Egret's heft is less of an issue.

Safety

Both scooters clearly take safety seriously, but they do it differently.

Egret comes armed with a truly usable front light - bright enough to actually see the road, not just tick a legal box - plus a strong rear light and, on higher trims, bar-end indicators you can use without gymnastics. The big tyres and long wheelbase add the kind of mechanical safety that doesn't show on marketing slides: stability, predictability, and a lot of forgiveness when the road gets nasty. The integrated frame lock and app immobiliser add security, which is a flavour of safety we don't talk about enough.

Xiaomi's lighting is also genuinely good: a strong front beam with a decent cut-off, a bright brake-reactive tail light, and, depending on version, integrated indicators. On typical city roads, visibility is absolutely fine. The self-sealing DuraGel tyres are a stealth safety feature: fewer flats mean fewer "oh great, I'm walking home along this dark canal path" moments.

Where the Egret pulls ahead is high-speed stability over bad surfaces and wet-weather confidence, helped by those larger tyres and its water protection. The Xiaomi feels totally secure on dry and decent surfaces, less happy once the road is properly broken and slick. Both stop well; the Egret just feels more "motor-vehicle solid", the Xiaomi more "high-spec consumer gadget that happens to brake nicely".

Community Feedback

EGRET X SERIES XIAOMI 4 Pro
What riders love
  • Huge tyres & stable handling
  • Comfortable on cobbles and rough paths
  • Strong hill performance (Prime/Ultra)
  • Serious lighting and metal fenders
  • Robust, "premium" construction and good water resistance
  • Integrated security options and support from a European brand
What riders love
  • Self-sealing tyres and low puncture stress
  • Solid, rattle-free chassis and tidy design
  • Very good value and availability
  • Strong app ecosystem and easy updates
  • Good real-world performance for daily commuting
  • Feels like a polished, modern tech product
What riders complain about
  • Heavy and bulky to carry
  • Price feels high for the specs on paper
  • No rear suspension (some expected it at this price)
  • Mechanical rather than hydraulic brakes
  • Strict top-speed limit even off public roads
  • Occasional app/Bluetooth quirks
What riders complain about
  • No suspension; harsh on bad roads
  • Heavier than expected for some users
  • Dashboard screen scratches easily
  • Top-speed cap feels restrictive to enthusiasts
  • Turn signal controls not perfect ergonomically
  • Real-world range lower than official claims in full-power use

Price & Value

This is where the Xiaomi 4 Pro quietly smiles and pulls ahead. It costs notably less but still offers a thoroughly modern, reliable commuting experience. You're paying for mature design, a big brand ecosystem, self-sealing tyres, and a smooth, integrated app - all of which directly lower the "hassle cost" of ownership. For most urban riders, that's where the real value lies.

The Egret X Series, by contrast, asks for a premium that many riders will only partially exploit. Yes, the build feels more "vehicle-grade", yes, the big tyres and long range on higher trims are a joy, and yes, the water resistance and brand support matter. But if your commute is relatively short, mostly on decent surfaces, and you occasionally carry your scooter, a lot of that premium is overkill. For riders who truly use it as a primary, all-weather vehicle, the price becomes easier to swallow. For everyone else, the calculator starts clearing its throat.

Service & Parts Availability

Both brands do well here, but in different ways.

Egret is a European company with a solid reputation for after-sales support and parts availability. You can actually get spares, and you're dealing with a brand that cares about long-term ownership, not one-season dropshipping. That said, you're also dealing with a more niche platform, so street-corner repair shops may not have seen as many Egrets as they have Xiamis.

Xiaomi, on the other hand, is everywhere. Repair guides, YouTube tutorials, local shops, aftermarket parts - it's the default scooter ecosystem in many cities. Warranty usually goes through big retailers, which can be both a blessing (easy access) and a curse (bureaucracy), but overall it's easy to keep a Xiaomi running. If you like the idea of walking into almost any generic repair shop and seeing your scooter already on a poster, Xiaomi has the edge.

Pros & Cons Summary

EGRET X SERIES XIAOMI 4 Pro
Pros
  • Very comfortable on rough city surfaces
  • Big tyres and long wheelbase = great stability
  • Strong torque on Prime/Ultra for hills and heavier riders
  • Excellent water resistance and robust build
  • Serious lights and security integration
  • Good long-range options on higher trims
Pros
  • Lighter and more portable
  • Great value for money
  • Self-sealing tyres reduce puncture drama
  • Solid, refined ride on decent roads
  • Good app support and ecosystem
  • Widely available parts and community know-how
Cons
  • Heavy and bulky, poor for frequent carrying
  • Expensive relative to paper specs
  • No rear suspension despite comfort focus
  • Mechanical brakes only at this price
  • Strict speed cap, even where faster would be legal
  • Overkill for short, smooth urban commutes
Cons
  • No suspension; uncomfortable on very rough streets
  • Still fairly heavy for smaller riders
  • Real-world range less impressive in full-power use
  • Screen scratches easily
  • Speed limit frustrates enthusiasts
  • Water protection adequate but not "ride-through-anything" level

Parameters Comparison

Parameter EGRET X SERIES (Prime/Avg) XIAOMI 4 Pro
Motor power (rated / peak) 500 W / 1.350 W 350-400 W / 1.000 W
Top speed (limited) 20-25 km/h 25 km/h
Battery capacity 649 Wh (Prime, approx) 468 Wh (approx)
Theoretical range Bis etwa 65 km Bis etwa 55 km
Real-world range (mixed use) Etwa 45-50 km (Prime) Etwa 30-40 km
Weight Ca. 24 kg (Prime mid-value) Ca. 17 kg
Brakes Dual mechanical disc (160 mm) Front E-ABS + rear disc
Suspension Front fork, no rear Tyre damping only, no suspension
Tyres 12,5" pneumatic 10" tubeless self-sealing
Max load Bis 120-130 kg Bis 120 kg
Water resistance IPX5 (scooter) / IPX7 (battery) IPX4
Approx. price Ca. 1.297 € Ca. 799 €

Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?

If we zoom out from the spec tables and just think about life with these scooters, the Xiaomi 4 Pro quietly wins the "I actually own this thing" contest. It's kinder on your budget, kinder on your back when you have to carry it, and polished enough that you stop thinking about the scooter and just think about the ride. For the average urban commuter on halfway decent infrastructure, it is simply the more sensible, less annoying choice.

The Egret X Series, particularly in its stronger trims, does offer something the Xiaomi can't match: real comfort and stability on truly bad surfaces, a feeling of robustness that invites year-round use, and a level of water resistance that lets you shrug off miserable weather. If your city is full of cobbles, your roads are always wet, or you're heavier and fighting hills, that extra money buys you a calmer, more confident experience.

But if your daily ride is mostly bike lanes and asphalt, and you sometimes have to fold and carry your scooter, the Egret starts to feel like turning up to a supermarket car park in a lifted G-Wagon. Nice, sure. Necessary? Not really. For most riders, the Xiaomi 4 Pro is the one that makes more sense more of the time.

Numbers Freaks Corner

Metric EGRET X SERIES XIAOMI 4 Pro
Price per Wh (€/Wh) ❌ 2,00 €/Wh ✅ 1,71 €/Wh
Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) ❌ 51,88 €/km/h ✅ 31,96 €/km/h
Weight per Wh (g/Wh) ❌ 36,98 g/Wh ✅ 36,32 g/Wh
Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) ❌ 0,96 kg/km/h ✅ 0,68 kg/km/h
Price per km of real-world range (€/km) ❌ 25,94 €/km ✅ 22,83 €/km
Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) ✅ 0,48 kg/km ❌ 0,49 kg/km
Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) ✅ 13,00 Wh/km ❌ 13,37 Wh/km
Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) ✅ 54,00 W/km/h ❌ 40,00 W/km/h
Weight to power ratio (kg/W) ❌ 0,0178 kg/W ✅ 0,0170 kg/W
Average charging speed (W) ✅ 99,85 W ❌ 55,06 W

These metrics strip away the marketing and just look at how much scooter you get per euro, per kilogram, per watt, and per kilometre. Xiaomi is clearly stronger on cost-related efficiency - cheaper energy capacity and speed, and slightly better weight-to-power. Egret hits back with better energy use per kilometre, stronger power per unit of speed, and faster charging relative to its large battery. In other words: Xiaomi is the budget-conscious optimiser, Egret is the heavier-duty machine that makes better use of the energy and power it carries.

Author's Category Battle

Category EGRET X SERIES XIAOMI 4 Pro
Weight ❌ Heavy, hard to carry ✅ Lighter, more manageable
Range ✅ Longer real-world range ❌ Shorter effective range
Max Speed ✅ Similar, more stable ❌ Similar, less planted
Power ✅ Stronger peak, better hills ❌ Weaker on steep climbs
Battery Size ✅ Larger pack options ❌ Smaller capacity
Suspension ✅ Front fork, big tyres ❌ Only tyre damping
Design ✅ Rugged, industrial, purposeful ✅ Sleek, minimalist, refined
Safety ✅ Stability, lights, lock ❌ Less stable on rough
Practicality ❌ Bulky, awkward indoors ✅ Easier to store, carry
Comfort ✅ Far better on rough ❌ Harsh on bad roads
Features ✅ Lock, lights, app ✅ App, signals, DuraGel
Serviceability ✅ Good parts via dealer ✅ Huge third-party ecosystem
Customer Support ✅ Strong European backing ❌ Retailer-dependent experience
Fun Factor ✅ Plush, confident cruising ❌ Less inspiring, more functional
Build Quality ✅ More "vehicle-grade" feel ✅ Very solid for price
Component Quality ✅ Brakes, frame, tyres ❌ Some cost-cut details
Brand Name ✅ Respected European niche ✅ Massive global tech name
Community ❌ Smaller, more specialised ✅ Huge global user base
Lights (visibility) ✅ Brighter, better coverage ❌ Good but less serious
Lights (illumination) ✅ Stronger road lighting ❌ Adequate, not outstanding
Acceleration ✅ Stronger in real use ❌ Softer, especially uphill
Arrive with smile factor ✅ Plush, relaxed, confident ❌ Competent but less exciting
Arrive relaxed factor ✅ Less fatigue on rough ❌ More vibration, more effort
Charging speed ✅ Faster per Wh ❌ Slower relative charge
Reliability ✅ Solid hardware, sealed well ✅ Proven platform, fewer flats
Folded practicality ❌ Big footprint folded ✅ Compact enough for trunks
Ease of transport ❌ Heavy, awkward to lug ✅ Manageable for most riders
Handling ✅ Stable, calm at speed ✅ Nimble, agile in city
Braking performance ✅ Strong twin discs ✅ Good regen + disc
Riding position ✅ Tall, roomy, commanding ✅ Comfortable, improved ergonomics
Handlebar quality ✅ Wide, ergonomic grips ✅ Solid, well-shaped bar
Throttle response ✅ Smooth, torquey delivery ✅ Linear, city-friendly
Dashboard/Display ✅ Bright, clear, functional ❌ Easy to scratch
Security (locking) ✅ Integrated lock options ❌ App lock only, no frame
Weather protection ✅ Better IP rating, fenders ❌ Adequate but more limited
Resale value ✅ Niche, well-regarded brand ✅ Easy to sell, recognisable
Tuning potential ❌ More locked-down platform ✅ Huge mod community
Ease of maintenance ✅ Simple mechanical systems ✅ Tutorials, parts everywhere
Value for Money ❌ Pricey for most riders ✅ Strong value proposition

Overall Winner Declaration

Winner

In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the EGRET X SERIES scores 4 points against the XIAOMI 4 Pro's 6. In the Author's Category Battle, the EGRET X SERIES gets 32 ✅ versus 20 ✅ for XIAOMI 4 Pro (with a few ties sprinkled in).

Totals: EGRET X SERIES scores 36, XIAOMI 4 Pro scores 26.

Based on the scoring, the EGRET X SERIES is our overall winner. Riding both back-to-back, the Xiaomi 4 Pro feels like the scooter that quietly slots into your life and just works, while the Egret X feels like a sturdier, more indulgent tool that only really shines if your roads or demands are truly tough. The Egret is more comfortable and more "serious" in bad conditions, but the Xiaomi is the one you are less likely to resent when you're dragging it through a hallway or up a staircase. For most everyday riders, the Xiaomi 4 Pro is the more rounded, easier-to-love choice; it might not wow you, but it will earn your respect. The Egret X Series is for those who know exactly why they need its extra heft and comfort - and are willing to live with the compromises that come with it.

That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.