INMOTION AIR PRO vs APOLLO Air - Which "Goldilocks" Commuter Scooter Actually Nails It?

Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)

The INMOTION AIR PRO edges out the APOLLO Air as the better all-round commuter for most riders: it's faster for its weight, feels more eager off the line, and offers excellent build quality and water protection at a slightly lower price. If you want a lively, efficient city dart that still stays reasonably portable and low-maintenance, the Air Pro is the one that keeps tempting you out for "just one more ride".

The APOLLO Air fights back with noticeably better comfort thanks to front suspension and plush tubeless tyres, plus strong safety touches like turn signals and a very high water-resistance rating. If your roads are rough, your back is sensitive, and you value refinement and app features over raw punch, the Apollo will suit you better.

Both are serious commuters rather than toys - but they have very different personalities. Stick around and we'll unpack which one matches your roads, your body, and your riding style.

There's a sweet spot in the scooter world where you're no longer wobbling around on a rattly toy, but you're not dragging a 30 kg monster up the stairs either. That "Goldilocks" class of commuters is exactly where the INMOTION AIR PRO and the APOLLO Air square off - same broad price band, similar headline performance, very different ideas of what matters most.

I've spent plenty of time with both: early-morning commutes, wet-leaf autumn bike lanes, late-night dashes home when the last tram has already given up. One of them feels like a sharp, eager city blade; the other, like a small, comfy urban SUV that just happens to fold.

If you're trying to decide which one deserves that spot in your hallway, your car boot, or quite possibly next to your desk at work, keep reading - the devil is in the details, and the details are where these two really diverge.

Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?

Both scooters live in the "serious commuter, not a toy" category: single motor, mid-range price, proper brakes, decent range, and just enough speed to keep you ahead of rental fleets and most bicycles without tipping into hyper-scooter madness.

The INMOTION AIR PRO is aimed squarely at riders who want a brisk, efficient urban tool: strong pace for its weight, low fuss, and a very clean, techy look. Think of it as the fast, sleek city hatchback - simple, effective, slightly mischievous.

The APOLLO Air is pitched more as a mini luxury commuter: softer ride, more comfort features, better signalling, and a very polished ecosystem. It's the compact crossover with soft suspension and lots of buttons on the steering wheel.

They cost broadly similar money, live in the same performance neighbourhood, and both claim to be the smart step up from generic budget scooters - which makes this a genuinely fair fight.

Design & Build Quality

Side by side, both scooters scream "not a cheap Amazon special", but in different accents.

The INMOTION AIR PRO goes for aggressive minimalism. Hidden cabling, matte finish, slim stem - it looks like someone sketched an ideal commuter scooter on a napkin and then actually built it. There's almost nothing dangling or rattling: the drum brake and electronics are tucked away, the deck is clean, and the frame feels properly stiff when you reef on the bars. InMotion's EUC heritage shows here; it has that "engineered, not assembled" vibe.

The APOLLO Air looks more upmarket in a mainstream way: graphite grey with orange accents, a very tidy cockpit with integrated display, and equally well-hidden cables. The folding joint is beefy and feels secure, and the overall impression is of a slightly heavier, beefier chassis - more solid block than sleek blade.

Both use quality alloys and careful welding, but the character is different in the hands. The Air Pro feels lighter and more purposeful; you pick it up and think "tool". The Apollo feels a touch chunkier and cushier; you pick it up and think "little vehicle". Neither feels cheap, but if you like a lean, technical aesthetic, the InMotion has the edge; if you prefer a more premium, automotive look, the Apollo will appeal.

Ride Comfort & Handling

This is where the philosophies really go their separate ways.

The APOLLO Air wins the comfort game. Front fork suspension plus big, tubeless pneumatic tyres with self-healing goop make city imperfections fade into the background. Cobblestones, cracked tarmac, tram lines - you still feel them, but more as distant thumps than direct punches to your knees. The wide handlebars and slightly taller, relaxed stance make long rides feel very natural; you arrive with your hands and feet noticeably fresher.

The INMOTION AIR PRO, by contrast, is unapologetically rigid: no suspension, and that solid rear tyre reminds you exactly what the road's been up to lately. The front air tyre and frame flex do a respectable job on decent asphalt, and on smooth bike lanes it glides beautifully. But once the surface degrades, you'll quickly learn to ride "active", bending knees and hips as your personal shock absorbers. The upside? The direct connection to the road also gives it a very precise, sporty feel. Quick lane changes, avoiding potholes, threading through gaps - the InMotion feels sharper and more nimble.

In corners, both are reassuring. The Apollo feels planted and calm, a bit like a small motorcycle with training wheels you can't see. The Air Pro feels lighter on its feet and more flickable. On truly rough urban infrastructure, the Apollo's suspension makes a clear difference. On decent city surfaces, many riders will happily trade that away for the InMotion's tighter, more connected steering feel.

Performance

On paper, their motors are in the same league. On the road, they have very distinct personalities.

The INMOTION AIR PRO has that eager, rear-drive shove that makes you grin the first time you twist your thumb. From a standstill, it digs in and pushes; there's a sense of urgency, especially in the most powerful mode, that easily leaves rental fleets for dead and makes overtaking bicycles almost effortless. It pulls up to its top cruising pace with enthusiasm and holds it well on the flat. The throttle mapping is progressive but not sleepy - it feels like it wants to go.

The APOLLO Air is more civilised. Its motor has slightly more rated muscle on paper and a higher peak, but Apollo has tuned it for smoothness and control rather than fireworks. Acceleration is linear and soothingly predictable - lovely in traffic, excellent for newer riders, but it doesn't feel quite as snappy as the InMotion when you're already used to e-scooters. It's happy cruising in the low thirties and will sit there all day, but the journey there feels more like an escalator than a catapult.

Climbing is a similar story. The Air Pro tackles typical city bridges and moderate hills with surprising determination for its weight; it only really starts to suffer on sustained, steep grades with heavier riders. The Apollo Air copes fine with everyday inclines too, but add a heavier rider and a nasty gradient and it feels more "working hard" than "pulling eagerly".

Braking performance is strong on both, but the feel is different. The InMotion's single lever blends rear regenerative braking with the front drum, giving you a very intuitive, car-like stop - ease the lever in and you slow smoothly, pull harder and the drum bites convincingly. The Apollo goes one step further with a dedicated regen lever plus the front drum. You can almost ride it like an electric car, doing most of your slowing with regen and only calling on the drum when really needed. It's clever and satisfying, though some riders prefer the InMotion's simpler one-lever approach.

Battery & Range

Battery capacity and real-world range are close enough that your riding style matters more than the spec sheet.

The APOLLO Air carries a slightly bigger pack and, in gentle Eco riding, can stretch its legs quite a bit. In the real world, with a mix of modes and normal city riding, it tends to sit in the low-thirties of kilometres between charges for an average-weight rider - enough for most daily commutes with a safety buffer. Its efficient motor and strong regen help it use that capacity sensibly.

The INMOTION AIR PRO has a bit less stored energy on board, but it also weighs a bit less and generally feels more eager. In practice, riders report ranges that aren't dramatically different - somewhere from mid-twenties up into the thirties of kilometres, again depending on how often you're letting it stretch its legs in the fastest mode. Ride it flat-out everywhere and you'll drain it faster than the Apollo, but ride them both sensibly and they land much closer together than you'd expect from the marketing blurbs.

Where they diverge notably is charging. The Apollo returns to full significantly quicker; an overnight top-up is easy, and you can realistically go from low to healthy in a working day at the office. The InMotion's pack takes more of a leisurely approach: charge it when you get home, forget about it until morning. Not a big deal if your routine is predictable, but worth noting if you're the kind of person who discovers at 17:00 that you forgot to plug it in yesterday.

Portability & Practicality

On the scales, they're not worlds apart, but you feel the differences in day-to-day life.

The INMOTION AIR PRO sits comfortably in that "just about carryable" zone. You can get it up a flight of stairs in one hand without needing to visit a physiotherapist, and lifting it into a car boot or onto a train is straightforward. The clean stem without cable loops makes it less likely to snag on fellow passengers or doorways, and the folded package is slim enough to disappear beside a desk or in a hallway corner. If you're mixing riding with public transport regularly, that extra bit of lightness and compactness is noticeable.

The APOLLO Air is a shade heavier and feels it. One or two flights of stairs are fine, but doing that multiple times a day, or wrestling it up a narrow staircase in a walk-up, will get old faster than your enthusiasm for micromobility. The fold is solid and secure, but the wider bars and slightly chunkier frame make it a bit more awkward in cramped lifts or crowded trains. That said, if your "carrying" mostly involves a short shuffle into a lift or through a lobby, it's perfectly manageable.

On the maintenance front, the InMotion leans hard into low-fuss ownership: solid rear tyre (no punctures on the drive wheel, ever) and a drum brake that rarely needs attention. The Apollo takes a more comfort-centric approach: tubeless, self-healing pneumatic tyres and drum + regen braking still keep maintenance modest, but you're not completely immune to punctures and tyre care the way you are with the InMotion's rear wheel.

Safety

Both scooters take safety more seriously than the bargain-bin crowd, but they emphasise different parts of the equation.

Braking we've covered: both use a front drum plus strong regen at the rear, which is a great combo for wet weather and low maintenance. Stopping distances are competitive; the Apollo's dedicated regen lever offers more finesse if you like to control everything separately, while the InMotion's single blended lever feels instantly familiar to anyone coming from bicycles or cars.

Lighting and signalling are where the APOLLO Air clearly pulls ahead. High-mounted headlight, brake-responsive tail, and - crucially - bright handlebar-end indicators visible from front and rear. Being able to signal a lane change or turn without taking your hands off the bars is genuinely valuable in chaotic city traffic. The only real critique is that the headlight could be brighter for pitch-dark paths; many riders add a separate bar light.

The INMOTION AIR PRO counters with a very punchy headlight for its class, easily good enough for night-time city speeds, and excellent overall visibility. What it lacks is integrated turn signals; you're back to old-fashioned arm signalling, which is... optimistic, in some traffic conditions. Still, the low centre of gravity from the deck-mounted battery gives it a very stable feel at pace, and the high water-resistance ratings - especially for the battery - reduce the risk of electrical drama mid-ride.

On waterproofing, both are strong, but in different ways: the Apollo's body is rated to cope comfortably with serious rain and spray, while the InMotion goes especially heavy on protecting the battery pack itself. Either way, these are scooters you can ride in real-world weather, not just on sunny Sundays.

Community Feedback

Price & Value

Price-wise, they live in the same general neighbourhood, with the APOLLO Air usually a touch more expensive than the INMOTION AIR PRO.

With the Air Pro, a good chunk of your money goes straight into motor performance, waterproofing, and build quality. You're getting a scooter that punches hard, looks refined, and doesn't demand much in ongoing fettling, all without straying into silly price territory. It feels like proper value for someone who wants a fast, capable commuter without entering "hobbyist" pricing.

The Apollo asks you to pay slightly more for comfort, features, and support ecosystem. Suspension, self-healing tyres, excellent app, signals, UL certification - you're buying polish as much as raw specs. If you'll actually use those advantages (rough roads, heavy app usage, frequent night commuting with signalling), the price difference is easy to justify. If you mainly care about getting there quickly and simply, the InMotion gives you more grins per euro.

Service & Parts Availability

Both brands have real presences in Europe and North America, which is already a big step up from anonymous white-label imports.

InMotion has a long track record through their EUCs and scooters, with distributors and service partners across Europe. Spares for core components - tyres, controllers, displays, brake parts - are accessible, and the general construction of the Air Pro is fairly straightforward, which independent shops appreciate. It's the kind of scooter many PEV techs already know their way around.

Apollo has built a strong reputation for customer support, particularly via their online channels and structured warranty processes. They're very app-and-software focused, and they push updates and documentation actively. However, the more proprietary aspects - custom display, app integration, specific parts - can tie you more tightly to Apollo's ecosystem for some repairs. Not a disaster, but less "generic spares bin" friendly if you're far from an Apollo-savvy shop.

In practical terms: if you like doing your own basic maintenance or relying on generalist repair shops, the InMotion's simpler hardware layout is slightly friendlier. If you prefer theme-park levels of guided customer support and don't mind staying inside one brand's ecosystem, Apollo is very appealing.

Pros & Cons Summary

Parameters Comparison

Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?

If you stripped this down to a joy-per-euro decision for a typical urban rider, the INMOTION AIR PRO takes it. It's lighter, keener off the line, very nicely put together, and gives you genuinely lively performance and strong water protection without demanding much back in maintenance or purchase price. For most people on decent city infrastructure, it feels like the smarter, more entertaining long-term companion.

The APOLLO Air absolutely has a place, and a clear one: if your roads are rough, your wrists already hate you, you commute in all weathers, and you geek out over app-tunable regen curves and integrated signals, it does offer a more cushioned, feature-rich experience. It's a brilliant first "real scooter" for cautious, comfort-oriented riders who value polish over punch.

But if you're the sort of commuter who wants a scooter that feels eager every time you thumb the throttle, that you can carry without swearing, and that quietly shrugs off bad weather and daily abuse, the Air Pro is the one that will keep you smiling the longest.

Numbers Freaks Corner

These metrics let you peek under the marketing and see how efficiently each scooter turns money, mass, battery capacity, and time on the charger into speed and usable range. Lower "per Wh" and "per km" values mean better value or lighter weight for a given capacity or distance; efficiency (Wh/km) shows how gently each scooter sips from its pack. Ratios like power per speed and weight per watt hint at how hard the drivetrain can push relative to its size, while charging speed simply tells you how quickly you can get back out on the road.

Author's Category Battle

Overall Winner Declaration

In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the INMOTION AIR PRO scores 4 points against the APOLLO Air's 7. In the Author's Category Battle, the INMOTION AIR PRO gets 27 ✅ versus 24 ✅ for APOLLO Air (with a few ties sprinkled in).

Totals: INMOTION AIR PRO scores 31, APOLLO Air scores 31.

Based on the scoring, it's a tie! Both scooters have their strengths. Out on real streets, the INMOTION AIR PRO simply feels like the more rounded and rewarding partner: it jumps off the line with enthusiasm, shrugs off daily abuse, and stays light enough that you don't curse it when the lift is out of order. It's the scooter that makes mundane commutes feel just a bit like a guilty pleasure. The APOLLO Air is a very competent, likeable machine - especially if your roads resemble a test track for earthquake simulations - but it never quite matches the sheer easy joy and lean efficiency of the InMotion. If you're chasing the best overall experience rather than the fattest spec sheet, the Air Pro is the one that keeps calling your name when the weather looks marginal and you're half-tempted to take the bus.

That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.