Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)
If I had to pick one to live with, the INMOTION RS JET edges out overall thanks to its stronger brakes, better weather protection, higher-voltage punch and far more modern cockpit. It feels like a current-generation performance scooter rather than a tuned-up relic.
The ZERO 10X still makes sense if you want plush, sofa-like suspension, love tinkering and modding, or you are shopping on a slightly tighter budget and don't care about the latest tech frills. It's the enthusiast's Lego set on wheels.
Both are heavy, both are fast, and both are a bit rough around the edges - you're choosing between refined aggression (RS JET) and old-school muscle (10X). Keep reading if you want the full, warts-and-all comparison before you drop that kind of money.
Now let's dig in and see which one actually deserves your parking space.
There's a certain category of scooter that stops being "last mile" and quietly becomes "first choice instead of a car". The INMOTION RS JET and the ZERO 10X both live squarely in that universe. They're fast enough to feel mildly irresponsible and heavy enough that you only carry them if you've really upset someone.
On paper, they aim at the same rider: someone who's bored of flimsy commuters, wants real dual-motor punch, and is willing to accept a bit of drama in exchange for fun. In practice, they represent two different generations of thinking. The RS JET is the shiny new 72V kid with a big colour screen and adjustable geometry; the 10X is the grizzled veteran with proven hardware and a rabid modding community.
If you're torn between them, you're not alone - I've put serious kilometres on both, in weather I probably shouldn't have, on roads that definitely weren't designed for scooters. Let's unpack how they really compare, beyond the brochure talk.
Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?
Both scooters sit in that dangerous "I-could-have-bought-a-used-car" price bracket, but they deliver genuine high-performance riding rather than commuter compromise.
The RS JET aims to be the gateway drug into 72V "hyper-scooter" territory without full hyper-scooter money. It targets riders who want serious acceleration, a modern interface, and strong safety features, but are willing to live with a slightly trimmed battery to keep weight and price under control. It's for someone who cares about tech and polish almost as much as raw speed.
The ZERO 10X, by contrast, is the OG mid-heavy dual-motor machine: big power, very plush suspension, and an unapologetically mechanical feel. It's cheaper, more modular, and massively documented online. It's for riders who don't mind tightening a bolt here and there, and maybe enjoy it a bit too much.
They overlap in performance, range, and intended use so closely that if you're cross-shopping one, you'd be irresponsible not to look at the other. Same ballpark, different flavour.
Design & Build Quality
Pick up the RS JET (or more realistically, half-lift it while swearing) and the first impression is: dense, compact, deliberately engineered. The frame feels overbuilt, with minimal flex and tidy cable routing. The black-and-yellow "industrial sci-fi" aesthetic is deliberate: it looks like something a film prop department would call "prototype military scooter". The big touchscreen front and centre reinforces that feeling - this is not a parts-bin special.
The ZERO 10X feels like an older-generation machine because, well, it is. Its exposed springs and single-sided swing arms give it a rugged, mechanical charm - more garage-built rally car than polished EV. The deck is wide and solid, the frame stout, but you do get more visible welds, more external cabling, and more "I could service this with hand tools" energy. Which, depending on your personality, is either a feature or a warning.
In terms of refinement, the RS JET wins: better integration, cleaner cockpit, higher perceived quality. The 10X counters with simplicity: fewer fancy bits to break, everything straightforward. But ride them back-to-back and the RS JET just feels like the newer design it is.
Ride Comfort & Handling
Comfort is where these two start to diverge in character rather clearly.
The RS JET uses large, tubeless tyres and a fully adjustable suspension setup. That means you can dial it soft for city abuse or firm it up for high-speed stability. Out of the box, it rides on the "controlled and planted" side of things. On broken tarmac and patched-up city streets, it filters out the harshness but still tells you what's happening under the wheels. After a few kilometres on rough suburbs, my knees were fine and my brain still trusted the chassis at higher speeds - which is a useful combination.
The ZERO 10X, meanwhile, is unapologetically plush. Its long-travel, spring-hydraulic suspension plus fat tyres give a true "magic carpet" effect. Old cobblestones, roots pushing through asphalt, lazy speed bumps - you just roll over and keep chatting. The price you pay is some dive under hard braking and a slightly floaty feeling if you really start pushing through fast, sweeping turns. It's very comfortable; it's just not as composed when you ride it like a maniac.
Handling-wise, the RS JET feels more precise and confidence-inspiring at speed; the adjustable geometry lets you drop the centre of gravity and tame wobble. The 10X is easier-going and super forgiving at moderate speeds, but demands a bit more vigilance when you really open it up, especially if the stem clamp hasn't been meticulously sorted.
Performance
Both scooters qualify as "far too fast for cycle lanes if we're honest", but they go about it differently.
The RS JET's 72V system gives it an immediacy that 60V and 52V setups struggle to match. From a standstill, you get that elastic, continuous shove that just keeps building. Mid-range punch - the leap from city pace up to "keeping up with cars" - is particularly strong. The way it holds speed even as the battery drains is noticeable on longer runs; it doesn't feel like someone's slowly winding the fun down as the day goes on. Hill starts on steep grades? Lean forward, brace your arms, and it just goes.
The ZERO 10X still hits very hard, especially in its burlier configurations. Thumb the Turbo and Dual buttons, lean back, and you get that classic, violent trigger-throttle surge. It's slightly more abrupt and less refined in its power delivery than the RS JET. Fun? Absolutely. Subtle? Not really. On steep hills the 10X still climbs like a mountain goat, but you feel the system working harder at the very top end, and high-speed runs don't feel as effortless as on the 72V Inmotion.
Braking is another key difference. The RS JET's fully hydraulic system with large rotors gives strong, predictable stopping with one-finger effort. It's confidence-inspiring when you're coming off higher speeds or doing repeated hard stops. The ZERO 10X can match that feel only if you buy one of the better-specced versions; the lower trim with mechanical discs just isn't what you want for serious high-speed riding. On performance balance - acceleration feel, sustained speed, and stopping - the RS JET has the more modern, composed package, while the 10X is the hooligan that can still keep up, but with a bit more drama.
Battery & Range
The RS JET runs a high-voltage battery with solid capacity, but not mega-tourer levels. In sensible mixed riding - bursts of fun, then cruising at realistic city speeds - you can comfortably plan for medium-length round trips without plugging in at work. Ride it like you're qualifying for a race and you'll watch the battery percentage fall more quickly, but it doesn't nosedive. Efficiency is decent for the performance, and the higher voltage helps keep things cooler and more consistent.
The 10X offers several battery flavours, and real-world range depends heavily on which one you choose and how disciplined your right thumb is. In the "sensible but not boring" riding mode, the larger battery versions get comparable real-world range to the RS JET, despite the older architecture. Push constant Turbo-and-dual-motor launches, and the 10X will chew through its battery more noticeably; it feels a bit more eager to trade watt-hours for giggles.
Both take about an overnight session on a standard charger; both allow dual charging to speed things up. In day-to-day use, you're not choosing range king here - you're in roughly the same league. The RS JET has the advantage of a more modern battery system and smart management; the 10X leans on sheer capacity and proven cells. Neither completely kills range anxiety, but both are genuinely usable for sizeable daily mileage.
Portability & Practicality
Let's be blunt: neither of these is "portable" in any sensible meaning of the word. They are roll-it, not carry-it machines.
The RS JET weighs in around the "please tell me there's a lift" mark. Short, careful lifts into a car boot are doable, but you won't be shoulder-carrying it up three flights for fun. The fold is solid for riding rigidity but half-baked for daily handling: the stem doesn't lock to the deck, so when folded it's more "awkward metal octopus" than nicely packaged object. For ground-floor storage or a garage, it's fine; for a tiny flat, less so.
The ZERO 10X is a bit lighter but still firmly in the "this is a vehicle, not a toy" category. Its clamp-style folding mechanism is sturdy but clunky, and, just like the RS JET, the stem doesn't lock down to the deck. Carrying it any meaningful distance is a workout and usually results in some combination of swearing and shin contact. It does fit into most normal car boots with a bit of angling, but it eats space.
In everyday life, both are best suited to people with a garage, bike room, or level access. The RS JET fights back with better water resistance and more built-in commuting features (turn signals, better display), while the 10X fights back with slightly less mass and simpler hardware that's easy to live with long-term. Practical, yes - if you accept them as scooter-sized motorbikes rather than big e-kicks.
Safety
On the safety front, the RS JET takes a much more "2020s" approach. You get a complete lighting package with a reasonably bright headlight positioned low enough to reveal road texture, integrated indicators, deck lighting, and proper water resistance. The adjustable geometry lets you drop the ride height for extra stability at speed, noticeably reducing the tendency to wobble if you're heavy-handed on the bars. Grippy, wide tubeless tyres and consistent hydraulic braking round out a package that actually feels designed to go fast, not just capable of it.
The ZERO 10X relies more on mass, tyre width, and that long, stable wheelbase. At speed, its weight gives an impressively planted feel, but the Achilles heel has always been the stem clamp. Newer iterations are better, and the aftermarket has effectively solved it, but you do need to pay attention and keep things tight. Lighting is adequate to be seen, not great for seeing - most serious riders add a proper handlebar light almost immediately. Braking varies with spec, and while the hydraulic versions are fine, the mechanical-brake models feel out of step with the scooter's speed capability.
In the rain, the RS JET's defined water resistance gives at least some peace of mind for those "oh, that cloud was closer than I thought" rides. The 10X, with no official rating and exposed elements, is more of a fair-weather machine unless you're willing to do DIY waterproofing. In the real world, the RS JET simply feels like the safer package out of the box.
Community Feedback
| INMOTION RS JET | ZERO 10X |
|---|---|
| What riders love | What riders love |
| Premium-feeling chassis and stability; addictive 72V torque; excellent touchscreen; strong hydraulic brakes; adjustable suspension and geometry; serious water resistance; very good value for the performance. | Brutal acceleration for the price; ultra-plush "cloud-like" suspension; great hill-climbing; massive modding ecosystem; easy DIY repairs; huge community knowledge base; proven long-term workhorse. |
| What riders complain about | What riders complain about |
| Heavy and awkward to carry; no stem-to-deck lock when folded; parts availability not yet as ubiquitous; cockpit a bit low for very tall riders; range drops sharply with very aggressive riding. | Stem wobble on some units; weak lights; base models' mechanical brakes underwhelming; weight still a pain; rattly fenders; no official water rating; constant small maintenance if used hard. |
Price & Value
The RS JET comes in above the ZERO 10X, but it brings some justification with it: higher-voltage system, stronger standard brakes, serious water protection, and that excellent touchscreen plus app integration. You're paying for a more modern design and a more complete spec sheet out of the box. You don't immediately need to budget for better lamps, a clamp upgrade, and new levers just to feel comfortable at speed.
The 10X counters with its lower entry price and fiercely good performance-per-euro. For pure watts and comfort per buck, it still punches hard. But once you factor in typical upgrades (lights, clamp, possibly brake improvements) and the time you'll spend tinkering, the gap narrows. If you enjoy tinkering, that's part of the value. If you just want to ride, the RS JET starts making more sense despite its higher sticker.
Service & Parts Availability
ZERO has the advantage of age here. The 10X has been around long enough that parts, clones, and upgrades are everywhere. Need a new swing arm, controller, or display? There's probably a version in a warehouse within your time zone. Independent shops know the platform, and YouTube is essentially one long ZERO 10X repair manual at this point.
INMOTION is a serious, established brand with a growing European network, but the RS JET is still comparatively newer in scooter terms. Official parts and support exist and are generally better than the no-name imports, but you don't yet have that same wild-west abundance of third-party components. If your riding style involves regular contact with kerbs and experimental tuning, the 10X ecosystem is kinder.
For a rider who wants predictable serviceability over many years, the 10X currently has the edge. For someone who prefers brand-backed support and less DIY, the RS JET is the more reassuring choice, just not quite as omnipresent in every back-street workshop yet.
Pros & Cons Summary
| INMOTION RS JET | ZERO 10X |
|---|---|
Pros
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
Cons
|
Parameters Comparison
| Parameter | INMOTION RS JET | ZERO 10X |
|---|---|---|
| Motor power (rated) | 2 x 1.200 W (dual) | 2 x 1.000 W (dual) |
| Motor power (peak) | 4.600 W | ca. 3.200 W |
| Top speed | ca. 80 km/h (claimed) | ca. 65-70 km/h (config-dependent) |
| Battery | 72 V 25 Ah (1.800 Wh) | 52 V 23 Ah (1.196 Wh) or 60 V 21 Ah (1.260 Wh) |
| Real-world range (approx.) | ca. 55 km | ca. 50 km (52 V 23 Ah) |
| Weight | 41 kg | 35 kg |
| Brakes | Full hydraulic discs, front & rear | Mechanical or hydraulic discs (version-dependent) |
| Suspension | Adjustable C-type hydraulic | Front & rear spring-hydraulic |
| Tyres | 11 inch tubeless pneumatic | 10 x 3 inch pneumatic |
| Max load | 150 kg | 120 kg (can handle up to 150 kg) |
| IP rating | IPX6 | No official rating |
| Charging time | ca. 10 h (single charger) | ca. 10-12 h (single charger) |
| Price (approx.) | 2.155 € | 1.749 € (configuration-dependent) |
Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?
If I strip away nostalgia for the 10X and focus on how these feel in 2025, the INMOTION RS JET is the more rounded package. It accelerates harder, stops better, and stays more composed at the top end. The high-voltage system, proper water resistance, and that big, legible touchscreen make everyday life easier and safer. It feels like a modern performance scooter you can genuinely commute on, not just a toy you unleash on sunny weekends.
The ZERO 10X is still likeable and, in the right trim, still very capable. It's especially attractive if you're budget-conscious, enjoy turning spanners, and want a platform with a vast modding community. Its suspension comfort out of the box is a genuine highlight. But you have to accept the quirks: stem clamp babysitting, weaker stock lighting, and less protection against bad weather.
If you want something to hop on, ride hard, and not think about too much, go RS JET. If you enjoy fettling your machine, swapping parts, and being part of a long-running cult classic, the 10X still has plenty of life in it. Personally, for day-in, day-out use, I'd live with the extra kilos and take the RS JET's more complete, more confidence-inspiring experience.
Numbers Freaks Corner
| Metric | INMOTION RS JET | ZERO 10X |
|---|---|---|
| Price per Wh (€/Wh) | ✅ 1,20 €/Wh | ❌ 1,46 €/Wh |
| Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) | ❌ 26,94 €/km/h | ✅ 26,91 €/km/h |
| Weight per Wh (g/Wh) | ✅ 22,78 g/Wh | ❌ 29,27 g/Wh |
| Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) | ✅ 0,51 kg/km/h | ❌ 0,54 kg/km/h |
| Price per km of real-world range (€/km) | ❌ 39,18 €/km | ✅ 34,98 €/km |
| Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) | ❌ 0,75 kg/km | ✅ 0,70 kg/km |
| Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) | ❌ 32,73 Wh/km | ✅ 23,92 Wh/km |
| Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) | ✅ 57,50 W/km/h | ❌ 49,23 W/km/h |
| Weight to power ratio (kg/W) | ✅ 0,0089 kg/W | ❌ 0,0109 kg/W |
| Average charging speed (W) | ✅ 180,00 W | ❌ 108,70 W |
These metrics give a cold, numerical view of efficiency and "bang for buck". Price per Wh and price per km/h show how much you pay for energy storage and speed potential. Weight-related metrics show how much scooter mass you carry around for each unit of performance or range. Wh per km is your running efficiency, akin to fuel consumption. Power-to-speed and weight-to-power illustrate how strongly each scooter is powered relative to its top speed and mass, while average charging speed tells you how fast they realistically refuel.
Author's Category Battle
| Category | INMOTION RS JET | ZERO 10X |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | ❌ Noticeably heavier overall | ✅ Lighter, slightly easier |
| Range | ✅ Slightly better real range | ❌ Similar but a bit less |
| Max Speed | ✅ Higher top-end potential | ❌ Slower flat-out |
| Power | ✅ Stronger 72V punch | ❌ Feels older, softer |
| Battery Size | ✅ Larger total capacity | ❌ Smaller main packs |
| Suspension | ✅ Adjustable, more controlled | ❌ Plush but a bit floaty |
| Design | ✅ Modern, integrated look | ❌ Older, industrial vibe |
| Safety | ✅ Better brakes, IP rating | ❌ Stem wobble, no rating |
| Practicality | ✅ Better in bad weather | ❌ Fair-weather biased |
| Comfort | ❌ Firm, more controlled feel | ✅ Softer, plusher ride |
| Features | ✅ Touchscreen, indicators, app | ❌ Basic cockpit, fewer toys |
| Serviceability | ❌ Less documented platform | ✅ Extremely easy to service |
| Customer Support | ✅ Strong brand backing | ✅ Wide dealer network |
| Fun Factor | ✅ Fast, refined aggression | ✅ Raw hooligan energy |
| Build Quality | ✅ Feels more refined | ❌ Solid but a bit crude |
| Component Quality | ✅ Strong brakes, nice screen | ❌ Mixed, depends on version |
| Brand Name | ✅ Inmotion engineering reputation | ✅ Zero long-standing presence |
| Community | ❌ Smaller scooter community | ✅ Huge, very active |
| Lights (visibility) | ✅ Better integrated package | ❌ Adequate but basic |
| Lights (illumination) | ✅ Usable stock headlight | ❌ Needs aftermarket lamp |
| Acceleration | ✅ Stronger, smoother surge | ❌ Punchy but less refined |
| Arrive with smile factor | ✅ Fast, techy, satisfying | ✅ Naughty, playful, grinning |
| Arrive relaxed factor | ✅ Stable at higher speeds | ❌ More mental workload |
| Charging speed | ✅ Faster per Wh | ❌ Slower average rate |
| Reliability | ✅ Good, modern electronics | ✅ Proven long-term workhorse |
| Folded practicality | ❌ Heavy, floppy stem | ❌ Heavy, floppy stem |
| Ease of transport | ❌ Heavier to manhandle | ✅ Slightly easier mass |
| Handling | ✅ More composed, adjustable | ❌ Plush but less precise |
| Braking performance | ✅ Strong hydraulic as standard | ❌ Depends, base spec weaker |
| Riding position | ✅ Stable, decent ergonomics | ✅ Spacious, very natural |
| Handlebar quality | ✅ Cleaner, more modern setup | ❌ Cluttered, older controls |
| Throttle response | ✅ Smooth sine-wave feel | ❌ Harsher trigger behaviour |
| Dashboard / Display | ✅ Big colour touchscreen | ❌ Basic QS-S4 style |
| Security (locking) | ✅ App lock, electronics | ❌ Mostly physical only |
| Weather protection | ✅ IPX6, better sealing | ❌ No rating, needs DIY |
| Resale value | ✅ Modern, desirable spec | ✅ Cult platform, easy sell |
| Tuning potential | ❌ Less open ecosystem | ✅ Massive upgrade options |
| Ease of maintenance | ❌ More complex architecture | ✅ Simple, well-documented |
| Value for Money | ✅ More complete package | ❌ Cheaper, but needs mods |
Overall Winner Declaration
In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the INMOTION RS JET scores 6 points against the ZERO 10X's 4. In the Author's Category Battle, the INMOTION RS JET gets 31 ✅ versus 14 ✅ for ZERO 10X (with a few ties sprinkled in).
Totals: INMOTION RS JET scores 37, ZERO 10X scores 18.
Based on the scoring, the INMOTION RS JET is our overall winner. Between these two bruisers, the INMOTION RS JET simply feels like the more rounded companion: it rides with more composure, stops with more authority, shrugs off bad weather, and wraps it all in a cockpit that doesn't feel like a relic. It's the one I'd be happier to grab on a grim Monday morning, not just on a sunny Sunday. The ZERO 10X still tugs at the heart a bit - that raw, slightly chaotic character is fun - but if you're looking for the scooter that will quietly do the job day after day while still feeling exciting, the RS JET is the one that leaves you stepping off thinking, "yes, that was worth it" more often.
That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.