Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)
The INOKIM OX is the more complete, confidence-inspiring scooter for riders who care about ride quality, robustness, and long-term ownership - it feels like a serious vehicle rather than a clever gadget. The APOLLO City 2022 fights back with better weather protection, smarter tech, and lower price, making it attractive if you want features, app control, and dual motors (on the Pro) without going into crazy-scooter territory. Choose the OX if you value comfort, build quality, and that "carved-from-solid" feel above all else. Choose the City 2022 if you want modern integration, strong performance for the money, and you ride in the rain a lot.
If you want to know which one will actually make your daily rides happier, safer, and less annoying, read on - the differences get very real once you're past the brochure headlines.
You can think of the INOKIM OX and the APOLLO City 2022 as two very different answers to the same question: "What should a serious everyday e-scooter feel like?" One comes from a design-obsessed Israeli brand that's been doing this since before rentals were even a thing; the other from a young Canadian company that throws software, regen, and high IP ratings at the problem like it's 2025 already.
The OX is the calm, planted long-distance cruiser that feels like it could outlive several of your phones. The City 2022 is the slick, feature-packed commuter that really wants you to talk to it via an app, ride it in the rain, and use regen instead of brake pads.
Both make a strong case for themselves, but in very different ways - and depending on whether you care more about glide and build, or tech and price, you'll end up on one side pretty quickly. Let's break it down where it matters: on the road, over potholes, and up dodgy hills.
Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?
On paper, these scooters live in the same rough neighbourhood: serious adult commuters who want "real vehicle" capability, not a foldable toy. They both deliver proper top-end speeds, proper suspension, and ranges that don't force you onto a charger every evening.
The INOKIM OX plays in the premium space: think "I'd rather pay more once than buy twice later." It's aimed at riders who want a plush, stress-free glide to work, longer suburban runs, and the ability to explore light off-road paths on the weekend without shaking their spine loose.
The APOLLO City 2022 (especially the Pro) plants itself in upper mid-range pricing but sprinkles in high-end touches: regen throttle, self-healing tyres, strong water protection, and app integration. It targets the urban power commuter who mostly lives on tarmac, values tech, and rides rain or shine.
They compete because they hit similar real-world use cases: daily commuting, medium-range comfort, mixed city surfaces, and riders who are done with rental scooters. But they get there with very different priorities - and that's where the choice gets interesting.
Design & Build Quality
Pick up (or try to) an INOKIM OX and it feels like it was hewn from a single chunk of aluminium. The frame is thick, beautifully finished, and proudly mechanical. You see proper metal, a striking single-sided swingarm, and tidy cable routing that wouldn't look out of place in an industrial design museum. It's the kind of scooter you can park in a lobby and not feel the need to apologise.
The APOLLO City 2022 goes for consumer-electronics chic: a sleek unibody look, almost no visible cabling, rubber-topped deck, and very deliberate lines. It's handsome, modern, and clearly designed in CAD for a living room, not a warehouse. It feels cohesive, but more "smart gadget" than "mechanical tool."
In the hands, the OX gives that reassuring weight and overbuilt impression: levers feel solid, the folding mechanism is beefy, and there's very little about it that feels delicate. The City 2022 is also well put together - the folding claw is sturdy, the fenders don't flap, and the deck rubber is quality - but you are more aware that this is a sophisticated system. The Apollo's proprietary parts, hidden wiring and app-linked electronics are brilliant when everything works; the OX's more old-school hardware inspires confidence if you plan to keep it for years and wrench on it yourself.
Visually, the OX is bold and distinctive - the orange suspension arms and single-sided wheel scream "premium toy for grown-ups". The City is more understated, blending in nicely in business districts. If you want something that looks like a designer vehicle, both qualify, but the OX feels more like industrial art, the City more like a very nice gadget.
Ride Comfort & Handling
On comfort, both are good. One of them is exceptional.
The INOKIM OX rides like someone bolted a magic carpet to a motor. Its rubber torsion suspension is silent, progressive and strangely addictive. Small cracks vanish, cobblestones turn into a muted rumble, and even rough bike paths become completely tolerable. Add those generously sized tyres and a long, stable wheelbase and you get a scooter that encourages you to relax your shoulders and just flow. Five kilometres of broken pavement on the OX feels like a gentle warm-up, not a punishment.
The APOLLO City 2022 counters with triple spring suspension and tubeless pneumatic tyres. It soaks up most urban nastiness very well - expansion joints, manhole covers, patched asphalt - all handled with a soft "thud" rather than a sharp crack to the knees. It's definitely among the comfier scooters in its price bracket, and the self-healing tyres let you run reasonable pressures for grip and comfort without constant flat paranoia.
Handling-wise, the OX has that surfy rear-drive feel. It loves long, sweeping curves and encourages you to steer with your hips. The steering is calm at speed, with very little twitchiness; it's a scooter you can ride one-handed briefly to adjust your backpack without a heart attack (don't, but you could). The City 2022 is more "city bike": agile, communicative, and happy to zigzag through traffic. The wide bars and rounded tyres make carving fun, and the chassis stays reassuringly planted even at its upper speed range.
If your commute includes truly rough surfaces - cobbles, broken bike lanes, utility cuts every few metres - the OX simply does a better disappearing act. The City 2022 is comfortable; the OX borders on decadent.
Performance
Both scooters are properly quick for urban use - neither will feel like a rental - but they deliver performance with different personalities.
The INOKIM OX is all about smooth, controlled thrust. Its rear motor has enough grunt to leave bicycles and most cars at the lights wondering what just happened, but INOKIM deliberately softens the initial hit. From a standstill, the power comes in like a well-tuned automatic car: no lurch, no drama, just a steady surge that builds with speed. Some riders call it "lazy"; others (especially those who like their teeth) call it civilised. On moderate hills it chugs along confidently, though it will slow on very steep gradients - this is a refined single-motor cruiser, not a dual-motor hill-climbing monster.
The APOLLO City 2022, particularly in Pro form, is noticeably more eager. Even the single-motor version gets off the line with more urgency than the OX, and the dual-motor Pro will happily try to yank your jacket if you slam the throttle. It feels livelier and more enthusiastic, especially under about half its top speed. On hills, the Pro just walks away from the OX: where the INOKIM digs in and grinds, the City Pro keeps pushing, making inclines feel almost flat.
Top-end speed on both is more than enough for sane city riding; they both sit happily at the kind of pace where you start passing scooters that look genuinely terrified. The OX feels rock-solid at its upper cruising speeds, like a long-wheelbase tourer. The City 2022 feels a bit more alert, but still controlled - there's no notable stem wobble, even when you're really stretching its legs.
Braking is where the philosophies split again. The OX uses a tried-and-true combo of front drum and rear disc. It's very predictable, nicely modulated, and strong enough to haul the scooter down in a hurry without drama. The APOLLO City 2022 introduces the "regen throttle plus dual drums" approach: you can do most of your speed control with your left thumb, using the motor to slow you while feeding energy back into the battery, and the sealed drum brakes are there when you need hard stops or emergency anchors. It feels very modern and, once you adapt, oddly addictive.
If you want raw acceleration and hill-crushing ability, the City Pro wins. If you prefer a calmer, confidence-boosting power delivery with a planted high-speed feel, the OX is the more grown-up choice.
Battery & Range
Both scooters live comfortably in the "charge a couple of times a week, not every day" category, but one is clearly built for longer legs.
The INOKIM OX in its larger-battery guise carries a seriously chunky pack. Real-world, ridden briskly with a normal-to-heavy adult, you're looking at a distance that comfortably covers typical suburban there-and-back commutes with margin, and still leaves juice for a detour to the shop on the way home. Ride it gently in eco modes and it becomes a weekend explorer - long riverside paths, loops around town, that sort of thing. Range anxiety on the OX is mostly something you read about rather than experience, as long as you start above half.
The price you pay is charging time: filling that big battery from near empty is an overnight affair. In practice, most riders just top up from partial rather than deep-cycle every time.
The APOLLO City 2022, especially in Pro trim, offers a healthy but more commuter-oriented pack. Ridden enthusiastically, you're in very comfortable daily-commute territory - think a decent multi-digit kilometre round trip with room to spare - but it doesn't have quite the same "forget the charger for days" luxury of the OX if you ride hard. Where the Apollo fights back is charging speed: it refills in a fraction of the time, making an office top-up during the workday totally realistic.
Efficiency-wise, both are respectable for their weight and power. The OX's larger pack naturally stretches its legs further; the Apollo claws some of that back with regen and a slightly more efficiency-focused platform. If your rides are long and you hate planning charging, the OX has the upper hand. If you value a quick mid-day refill and rarely push beyond medium-distance urban loops, the Apollo is more than sufficient.
Portability & Practicality
Let's be clear: neither of these is a "lightweight throw it on your shoulder" scooter. They are both firmly in the "you can lift it, but you'll think about it first" class.
The INOKIM OX is heavy and doesn't pretend otherwise. The folding mechanism is strong and confidence-inspiring, but the handlebars don't fold in, so the package remains quite wide. Carrying it up a couple of steps or into a car boot is fine; dragging it up multiple flights of stairs, daily, is how people discover their core muscles. It's a scooter you park at each end of your journey, not something you elegantly swing into a crowded tram.
The APOLLO City 2022, in single-motor form, is roughly similar in heft to the lighter OX variants; the Pro version edges into slightly heavier territory again. The difference is in folded behaviour: the Apollo's stem folds quickly and hooks into the deck, making it more manageable to drag around lobbies, into lifts, and under desks. That said, the much-mentioned quirk with the hook sometimes slipping while carrying means you do need to hold it "just so" to avoid an awkward clang. It's a practical scooter to roll, less so to lug up stairs every day.
Storage-wise, the Apollo's narrower folded footprint and folding bars make it easier to slot next to a desk or against a wall. The OX takes up more visual and physical space but looks so good while doing it that many owners don't mind dedicating it a corner like a piece of industrial furniture.
In practical daily terms: if your commute is door-to-door with maybe a lift at each end, both are fine. If you have serious stairs or tight multi-modal use, neither is ideal - but the Apollo's fold and narrower stance give it a small edge in survivability.
Safety
Safety is about much more than just brakes, and both scooters address the full package - just from different angles.
The INOKIM OX leans on stability and mechanical reliability. The long, low chassis with battery in the deck gives it a wonderfully low centre of gravity. At higher speeds it feels planted and predictable; there's that reassuring sensation that you can hit a mid-corner bump and the scooter will shrug, not twitch. The mixed brake setup (front drum, rear disc) gives very progressive, confidence-inspiring stopping, and the frame feels like it will happily absorb a lifetime of pothole hits without complaining.
The weak points are lighting and water. The OX's low-mounted front lights look fantastic but don't throw a beam far down dark paths, and the rear lighting, while bright, sits quite low. For serious night riding you will want an additional handlebar light. The moderate water protection rating means drizzle and damp roads are usually fine, but regular downpour commuting is not what it was built for.
The APOLLO City 2022 goes the other way: sealed drum brakes front and rear, plus that regenerative thumb brake, deliver consistently strong, low-maintenance stopping in all weather. You're not fiddling with pads or rotors; the system just keeps working, which is its own kind of safety. The high-mounted headlight is better placed for visibility, and the integrated rear indicators are a welcome touch, even if their low position isn't ideal for cars sitting higher up.
Where Apollo really scores is the water protection. With its much higher IP rating, the City 2022 is purpose-built for riders who can't or won't avoid rain. Knowing you can ride through a sudden downpour without gambling on your electronics is a major safety (and sanity) win.
So: the OX wins on sheer stability and "mechanical trust," the City 2022 on all-weather braking and electrical robustness. If you live somewhere wet, that might be the deciding factor all by itself.
Community Feedback
| INOKIM OX | APOLLO City 2022 |
|---|---|
What riders love
|
What riders love
|
What riders complain about
|
What riders complain about
|
Price & Value
Here the two scooters sit in noticeably different brackets. The INOKIM OX costs significantly more - squarely in "premium enthusiast" territory - while the APOLLO City 2022 undercuts it by a healthy margin, especially given what the Pro version offers in terms of dual motors and tech.
If you buy by spreadsheet and spec sheet alone, the Apollo looks like the obvious bargain: more peak power (on the Pro), strong water protection, modern regen braking, self-healing tyres, and app features at a substantially lower ticket price. For many riders, that's game over already.
However, value isn't just watts per euro. The OX's justification is in its chassis, ride quality, longevity, and brand track record. It feels engineered to last well beyond the first few thousand kilometres, and the market clearly believes that - used prices stay surprisingly high. It's very much a "buy once, cry once" product.
So the Apollo delivers excellent performance and feature value per euro; the OX delivers long-term satisfaction and premium feel per euro. If cost is tight, Apollo is the smarter buy. If you're willing to spend more for refinement and durability, the OX earns its keep.
Service & Parts Availability
INOKIM has been around for a long time and has a fairly mature distribution and service network, especially in Europe and Israel. Parts are not cheap, but they exist, and many components are specific to the platform in a good way - designed for it, documented, and widely known by specialist shops. Independent workshops are also more likely to have seen an OX before and know how to deal with it.
APOLLO, being younger and based in North America, leans heavily on its direct support and partner network. In many European countries, parts availability is decent but can involve shipping delays or dealing directly with Apollo support for warranty and spares. The bespoke nature of some components and the app-driven electronics mean you're more reliant on the manufacturer for diagnosis and certain fixes.
For a mechanically inclined owner, the OX is the more "open" and documented platform. The Apollo is more like a modern car: clever, integrated, but happier when serviced within the ecosystem that designed it.
Pros & Cons Summary
| INOKIM OX | APOLLO City 2022 (incl. Pro) |
|---|---|
Pros
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
Cons
|
Parameters Comparison
| Parameter | INOKIM OX | APOLLO City 2022 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Motor power (rated) | 1.000 W rear | 2 x 500 W (dual) |
| Top speed | ca. 45 km/h (unlocked) | ca. 51,5 km/h |
| Max range (claimed) | ca. 97 km | ca. 61 km |
| Real-world range (brisk riding) | ca. 50-60 km | ca. 35-40 km |
| Battery energy | ca. 1.210 Wh | ca. 864 Wh |
| Battery voltage / capacity | 60 V / 21 Ah | 48 V / 18 Ah |
| Weight | ca. 28 kg | ca. 29,5 kg |
| Brakes | Front drum, rear disc | Dual drum + regenerative |
| Suspension | Dual rubber torsion swingarm, height-adjustable | Triple spring suspension |
| Tyres | 10 x 2,5 inch pneumatic | 10 inch tubeless self-healing |
| Max load | 120 kg | 120 kg |
| Water resistance | IPX4 | IP56 |
| Approx. price | ca. 2.537 € | ca. 1.145 € |
Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?
If you strip away the marketing and look at how these scooters actually feel after hundreds of kilometres, the INOKIM OX comes across as the more mature, confidence-inspiring machine. Its suspension is genuinely special, the frame inspires long-term trust, and the whole package feels like it was built to be ridden hard for years, not just to impress in an unboxing video. It's the scooter you step onto when you want to arrive calm, joints intact, and without wondering which bolt just started rattling.
The APOLLO City 2022, especially in Pro form, is the pragmatic choice for riders who want a modern, tech-forward scooter with strong performance and proper weather credentials at a much friendlier price. If your commute is urban, your climate damp, and you like the idea of tuning regen strength from your phone, it delivers a lot of scooter for the money, with enough comfort and power to keep most riders grinning.
So, who should buy what? Choose the INOKIM OX if you care most about ride quality, mechanical elegance, and that "I could keep this for a decade" feeling - and you're willing to pay for it. Choose the APOLLO City 2022 Pro if you want more punch, better all-weather usability, faster charging and solid value, and you're okay with a scooter that feels a bit more like a smart device than a timeless machine.
Numbers Freaks Corner
| Metric | INOKIM OX | APOLLO City 2022 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Price per Wh (€/Wh) | ❌ 2,10 €/Wh | ✅ 1,33 €/Wh |
| Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) | ❌ 56,38 €/km/h | ✅ 22,23 €/km/h |
| Weight per Wh (g/Wh) | ✅ 23,14 g/Wh | ❌ 34,15 g/Wh |
| Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) | ❌ 0,62 kg/km/h | ✅ 0,57 kg/km/h |
| Price per km of real-world range (€/km) | ❌ 46,13 €/km | ✅ 30,53 €/km |
| Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) | ✅ 0,51 kg/km | ❌ 0,79 kg/km |
| Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) | ✅ 22,00 Wh/km | ❌ 23,04 Wh/km |
| Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) | ✅ 22,22 W/km/h | ❌ 19,42 W/km/h |
| Weight to power ratio (kg/W) | ✅ 0,028 kg/W | ❌ 0,0295 kg/W |
| Average charging speed (W) | ❌ 110,0 W | ✅ 216,0 W |
These metrics put some hard numbers behind the feeling. Price-per-Wh and price-per-km/h show how much "spec" you get for each euro. Weight-per-Wh and weight-per-km tell you how much battery and range you drag around per kilo. Wh-per-km reflects real-world efficiency. Power-to-speed and weight-to-power show how much motor muscle you have relative to speed and mass. Finally, average charging speed is simply how fast the charger can refill the battery - crucial if you rely on rapid top-ups.
Author's Category Battle
| Category | INOKIM OX | APOLLO City 2022 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | ✅ Slightly lighter overall | ❌ A bit heavier build |
| Range | ✅ Goes noticeably further | ❌ Shorter fun-ride range |
| Max Speed | ❌ Slightly lower ceiling | ✅ Higher top-end pace |
| Power | ❌ Single motor limitation | ✅ Dual motors, stronger pull |
| Battery Size | ✅ Bigger, long-legged pack | ❌ Smaller overall capacity |
| Suspension | ✅ Plush rubber "magic carpet" | ❌ Good, but more ordinary |
| Design | ✅ Iconic, award-winning frame | ❌ Sleek but less character |
| Safety | ❌ Weaker lighting, wet worry | ✅ Strong brakes, rain-friendly |
| Practicality | ❌ Bulky, awkward indoors | ✅ Better fold, easier storage |
| Comfort | ✅ Best-in-class plushness | ❌ Very good, but second |
| Features | ❌ Basic, no smart extras | ✅ App, regen, indicators |
| Serviceability | ✅ Mechanic-friendly, long-proven | ❌ More proprietary electronics |
| Customer Support | ✅ Established dealer network | ❌ Brand still scaling support |
| Fun Factor | ✅ Surf-like, flowing ride | ❌ Fast, but less soulful |
| Build Quality | ✅ Tank-like, zero rattles | ❌ Good, early issues noted |
| Component Quality | ✅ Premium hardware choices | ❌ More cost-balanced parts |
| Brand Name | ✅ Veteran, strong reputation | ❌ Newer, still proving |
| Community | ✅ Loyal, long-term owners | ❌ Growing, but smaller |
| Lights (visibility) | ❌ Low, needs add-on | ✅ Higher headlight, signals |
| Lights (illumination) | ❌ Poor reach on dark roads | ✅ Slightly better placement |
| Acceleration | ❌ Soft, relaxed launch | ✅ Snappier, stronger shove |
| Arrive with smile factor | ✅ Effortless, floaty satisfaction | ❌ Fun, but more clinical |
| Arrive relaxed factor | ✅ Supremely low fatigue | ❌ Slightly busier feel |
| Charging speed | ❌ Long overnight sessions | ✅ Quick office top-ups |
| Reliability | ✅ Very strong long-term record | ❌ Good, but younger data |
| Folded practicality | ❌ Wide, bars don't fold | ✅ Narrower, hooks to deck |
| Ease of transport | ❌ Heavy, awkward on stairs | ✅ Slightly better to manoeuvre |
| Handling | ✅ Stable, confidence-boosting | ❌ Agile, but less planted |
| Braking performance | ❌ Strong, but old-school | ✅ Regen + drums feel |
| Riding position | ✅ Spacious, natural stance | ❌ Slightly tighter deck |
| Handlebar quality | ✅ Solid, ergonomic sweep | ❌ Good, but more generic |
| Throttle response | ❌ Deliberately softened curve | ✅ Tunable, responsive feel |
| Dashboard/Display | ❌ Functional, nothing fancy | ✅ Integrated, app-linked info |
| Security (locking) | ❌ No electronic lock | ✅ App lock, motor resistance |
| Weather protection | ❌ Light rain only | ✅ Built for wet commutes |
| Resale value | ✅ Holds price impressively | ❌ Drops faster used |
| Tuning potential | ✅ Popular with modders | ❌ More locked-down ecosystem |
| Ease of maintenance | ✅ Straightforward, parts known | ❌ More proprietary systems |
| Value for Money | ❌ Pricier, niche value | ✅ Strong spec per euro |
Overall Winner Declaration
In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the INOKIM OX scores 5 points against the APOLLO City 2022's 5. In the Author's Category Battle, the INOKIM OX gets 22 ✅ versus 17 ✅ for APOLLO City 2022.
Totals: INOKIM OX scores 27, APOLLO City 2022 scores 22.
Based on the scoring, the INOKIM OX is our overall winner. In day-to-day riding, the INOKIM OX simply feels like the more complete, deeply satisfying machine - the one you build a relationship with over thousands of kilometres. The APOLLO City 2022 Pro is clever, fast, and terrific value, but it never quite matches the OX's blend of composure, comfort, and quiet confidence. If you want a scooter that feels like a solid, long-term companion rather than the latest tech fad, the OX is the one that keeps you coming back for "just one more ride". The Apollo will absolutely get you to work with a grin, but the INOKIM is the one that makes you take the long way home.
That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.

