Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)
The INOKIM OXO Super 2023 is the overall winner here - it rides better, feels more solid, and is the kind of scooter you build a long-term relationship with, not just a fling for cheap thrills. Its suspension, stability, refinement and build quality are in a different league, especially if you're doing serious daily kilometres or care how your scooter is still going to feel two years from now. The JOYOR S10-S-Z fights back hard on price and straight-line punch, making it a very tempting "budget rocket" for riders who want big power at minimum cost and don't mind living with some rough edges.
If your priority is a refined, confidence-inspiring machine that feels engineered rather than assembled, go OXO. If you mainly want maximum speed and torque per euro and are prepared to tinker and compromise on polish, the S10-S-Z can still make a lot of sense. Keep reading - the trade-offs between these two are where things get really interesting.
You know a category has matured when you can choose between "luxury land yacht" and "budget missile" for roughly the price of a decent bicycle. The INOKIM OXO Super 2023 and the JOYOR S10-S-Z sit right in that sweet (and slightly unhinged) spot where scooters stop being toys and start muscling in on car territory.
I've spent enough time on both to know their personalities well. The OXO is that calm, poised friend who always shows up on time, never rattles, and somehow makes chaos feel organised. The S10-S-Z is the mate who appears on a loud motorbike with half a helmet, a big grin and a "trust me, it'll be fine" attitude. Both can be huge fun, but for very different riders.
Think of the OXO as "made for people who actually ride every day." The Joyor? "Made for people who want to go fast now, and will worry about the rest later." If you're not sure which side you're on yet, by the end of this comparison you will be.
Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?
On paper, these two belong in the same performance bracket: dual motors, serious top speeds well beyond what most city regulations allow, and batteries big enough to treat a commute like a casual warm-up. Both run on a higher-voltage system than typical commuter scooters, and both promise ranges that make public transport look increasingly optional.
The OXO Super 2023 sits in the "premium grand tourer" segment: it costs several times more than your average shared-scooter clone and happily takes aim at big names like Dualtron and Kaabo. It's for riders who'd rather have a beautifully sorted machine than the absolute strongest spec sheet for the money.
The JOYOR S10-S-Z punches up from the opposite direction. Its price puts it barely above mid-range commuters, yet it delivers dual-motor performance, hydraulic brakes and off-road capability that, on first glance, seem almost suspiciously generous. That's exactly why it deserves to be compared to something like the OXO: similar headline performance and range, radically different philosophies and price tags.
Design & Build Quality
Park these two side by side and you instantly see the philosophical split. The OXO looks like an industrial designer's graduation project that somehow escaped into production: flowing curves, single-sided swingarms that make the wheels look like they're hovering, and a frame that feels sculpted rather than welded together. There's a quiet confidence to the way panels line up, cables disappear, and nothing rattles when you pick it up and give it a shake.
The JOYOR S10-S-Z, by contrast, goes for industrial toughness. Chunky twin swingarms, thick stem, plenty of visible hardware. It's more "rally raid buggy" than "concept car". The matte-black frame with orange accents looks the part, and the overall impression is of a scooter that's ready to be abused. Up close, though, you start noticing the differences: cable runs are functional but less elegant, fenders can develop the occasional buzz, and the whole thing feels more like a well-executed parts bin special than a cohesive, ground-up design.
In the hands, the OXO's controls feel more premium: levers with a solid pivot feel, a sturdy, play-free stem latch, and that beautifully wide, grippy 2023 deck treatment that finally fixed the old slippery plastic. The Joyor's hardware is decent for its price - hydraulic levers, a colourful display, sturdy swingarms - but tolerances and finish aren't at the same surgical level. It's not "cheap" in the dangerous sense, just clearly built to a budget first and a design award second.
If you care about owning something that looks and feels engineered as a single piece rather than a strong collection of catalogue parts, the OXO is miles ahead. The S10-S-Z looks serious from a distance, but the closer you get, the more the cost savings reveal themselves.
Ride Comfort & Handling
This is where the INOKIM starts quietly, then absolutely runs away with things. The OXO's rubber torsion suspension is one of those systems you don't fully appreciate until you've done a few dozen kilometres on rough city streets and realise your knees aren't swearing at you. It's silent, progressive, and - crucially - adjustable between a higher, more forgiving setting and a lower, "glued to the tarmac" mode. Combine that with fairly wide pneumatic tyres and you get that "land surfing" sensation the community keeps going on about. It really does float.
The Joyor's dual-swingarm spring suspension does a respectable job, especially coming from a stiff commuter. On cobbles or broken asphalt, it takes the sting out and gives the ride a lively, slightly bouncy character. It's comfortable enough for an hour's ride without feeling beaten up, and the fat tyres help take the edge off sharp impacts. But side by side with the OXO, you feel the difference in sophistication - the Joyor transmits more chatter, especially at speed, and it's noisier over time as the usual creaks and rattles develop if you're not religious about maintenance.
Handling-wise, the OXO is the calm one. Wide bars, long and generous deck, low centre of gravity (especially in the lower suspension setting) - it all adds up to a scooter that wants to carve clean lines rather than bounce around. High-speed stability is excellent. Lean it into a fast corner and it feels like the motors, chassis and tyres are all reading from the same script.
The S10-S-Z is more of a playful handful. It feels lighter on its feet, darts into corners willingly and loves quick changes of direction. At sane speeds that's fun; at its upper end you start noticing more movement through the stem and suspension. Still safe, but more busy under your feet and hands than the OXO. Think "hot hatch with soft springs" versus "grand tourer with sorted chassis".
Performance
Both scooters are properly fast by any reasonable urban standard. Both have dual motors, both will happily break the usual city-limit speeds on private roads, and both climb hills in a way that makes rental scooters look like they're towing caravans.
The OXO's power delivery is what I'd call "adult". With the 2023 controller it finally wakes up promptly when you touch the throttle, but it never feels snappy just for the sake of drama. Acceleration builds hard but smoothly; you don't get that initial neck-snap, just a relentless shove that keeps piling on until you realise you're moving at speeds that would make your insurance company nervous. It's the sort of acceleration that makes you feel powerful, not precarious.
The Joyor by comparison is more of a party trick. Flick it into its higher power mode, engage both motors, and the thing absolutely lunges forward. From a standstill, it feels more eager, more "let's go now" than the OXO. For urban antics - darting away from traffic lights, blasting up short ramps - it's hilariously effective. The price you pay is finesse: the throttle is more abrupt, and you need a bit of restraint (and a good stance) to keep it civil in wet or loose conditions.
Top speed sensation is interesting. On both, once you're near the top of their envelope, you're well into the "this is enough" zone for 10-inch tyres. The big difference is how they feel there. The OXO cruises at high speed with a relaxed, planted demeanour; wind noise and motor hum rise, but the chassis remains unbothered. The Joyor will get to a similar ballpark but feels busier - more feedback through the bars, more movement in the suspension. Not scary if you know what you're doing, just less confidence-inspiring if you're new to fast scooters.
Braking performance is strong on both thanks to hydraulic discs front and rear. The OXO's setup feels more refined: levers with a clearer bite point and more consistent modulation, so you can brake hard without upsetting the chassis. The Joyor stops very well, but out of the box the system can sometimes need a little fettling to get to that same "one-finger, no drama" sweet spot. Again, budget shows up not in capability, but in refinement.
Battery & Range
Here the story is simple: the INOKIM brings a much bigger "fuel tank", and you feel it. In real life, riding at mixed speeds with some hills and normal traffic, it comfortably sits in the long-range category. You can commute in from the suburbs, run errands in town, and head back home without nervously watching the last battery bar. Even when you ride it fairly enthusiastically, you still get a range that most riders will be perfectly happy with.
The Joyor, with its smaller pack, still does surprisingly well. Used sensibly - mixing modes, not pinning it everywhere - it will take many riders through a full day of typical urban use: commute, coffee, maybe a detour on the way home. Ride it like a teenager with a new driving licence and you'll see the range shrink, of course, but it remains very usable for medium-distance commutes.
Where both suffer is charging time. With the stock chargers, you're looking at proper overnight sessions from low battery on either scooter. The OXO's larger pack understandably takes longer; many owners quickly invest in a faster third-party charger to bring it into the "plug in after work, ride again in the evening" territory. On the Joyor, the smaller battery means slightly less waiting, but we're still firmly in "plan ahead" rather than "quick splash and dash" land.
Range anxiety? On the OXO, almost non-existent unless you treat it like a track toy all day. On the Joyor, it can creep in if you have a long commute and a heavy hand on the throttle - it's less forgiving if you get carried away.
Portability & Practicality
Neither of these is a light scooter. They're both very much "vehicle replacement" devices, not folding toys. You can carry them, but you'll remember it in the morning.
The OXO feels denser and heavier. It's a beast to lug up more than a few stairs, and the fact that the stem doesn't lock to the deck when folded is... let's say "a choice". You can fold it fairly compactly for a car boot, but actually lifting it and keeping the stem under control at the same time requires either good technique, a second hand, or mild profanity. If you have ground-floor storage or a lift, no problem; if you're in a third-floor walk-up, this is not your friend.
The Joyor is a touch lighter, and crucially, its folding system is friendlier to the human body. The stem can latch down to the deck, the handlebars can collapse, and the whole package is that bit easier to wrestle into a boot or train. You're still not casually carrying it one-handed up a spiral staircase, but for multi-modal use where you occasionally have to lift or drag it, the S10-S-Z is the more forgiving of the two.
On the road, practicality swings back towards the OXO. The deck is huge and grippy, giving you all the foot positions you could want for long rides. The maintenance-friendly single-sided swingarms turn tyre changes from a horror show into a mildly annoying chore - a big deal for real-world ownership. The Joyor's more conventional setup works, but flats are a more involved affair, and you're likely to get intimate with your tyre levers sooner than you'd like.
Safety
Both scooters tick the main safety boxes: powerful hydraulics, decent tyres, and lighting packages that at least acknowledge the concept of riding after dark.
The OXO feels like it was engineered from day one to be stable first, fast second. The low-slung weight, adjustable geometry and long wheelbase mean speed wobbles are notably absent unless you really go looking for trouble. The frame and stem lock up into a single, solid-feeling piece, and that inspires the kind of confidence that quietly keeps you out of hospital. The one clear miss is the factory headlight position: mounted low on the deck, it's great for being seen but pretty poor as a genuine night-riding beam. Anyone who regularly rides after dark will want an additional bar-mounted light.
The Joyor takes a more checklist-driven approach to safety - but not in a bad way. Hydraulics? Check. Big tyres with off-road tread? Check. IP rating good enough for light rain? Check. Where it actually out-features the OXO is signalling: integrated indicators are a big plus in dense city traffic, and being able to show your intentions without taking a hand off the bar is properly useful. Stability at speed is decent if you respect its limits and keep it maintained, but it never feels quite as "unshakeable" as the OXO when you're really pressing on.
Tyre grip differs more by flavour than outright quality. The OXO's road-oriented rubber feels more planted on dry tarmac and more predictable in the wet. The Joyor's hybrid/off-road tread gives more bite on dirt and loose surfaces, but is slightly noisier and a bit more skittish on smooth, wet pavement. Neither is a death trap, but you do ride them differently depending on conditions.
Community Feedback
| INOKIM OXO Super 2023 | JOYOR S10-S-Z |
|---|---|
What riders love
|
What riders love
|
What riders complain about
|
What riders complain about
|
Price & Value
Now to the elephant in the room: money. The OXO costs several times more than the JOYOR. That's not a rounding error, that's an entire extra scooter (or two) worth of difference.
On a pure spec-per-euro basis, the Joyor is outrageously good. Dual motors, hydraulic brakes, serious top speed, long-ish range - all for a price that many brands would happily charge for a single-motor city scooter. If all you care about is going very fast for as little money as possible, the S10-S-Z makes a brutally compelling argument.
But value isn't just numbers. The OXO earns its price by feeling like a finished product rather than a bargain parts cocktail. The frame quality, the long-term reputation, the riding refinement, the clever maintenance touches - those things don't show up on a basic spec list, but you absolutely notice them in daily use. And when you're still riding the same scooter years down the line, not hunting for unobtainable parts in obscure forums, that premium starts to feel a lot more justifiable.
So yes: the Joyor is the better deal on paper. The OXO is the better investment if you have the budget and plan to ride hard and often.
Service & Parts Availability
Both brands have proper European footprints, which already puts them ahead of the no-name imports that vanish faster than their controllers.
INOKIM has been around for a long time, with a clear focus on support and longevity. Parts availability is generally solid through established distributors, and because the platform has been refined rather than replaced every season, compatibility and knowledge in the community are excellent. If you walk into a reputable shop with an OXO that needs love, they'll know what they're looking at.
JOYOR, based in Europe and with a sizable dealer network, also does well in this regard. Spares for the S-series are broadly available, and the big enthusiast base means tutorials and DIY guides are plentiful. The difference is more about expectations: Joyor riders are often more DIY-oriented by necessity, tightening bolts, chasing rattles and occasionally upgrading weak points. OXO owners, in my experience, spend more time riding and less time wrenching - not because it never needs maintenance, but because the baseline quality simply demands less attention.
Pros & Cons Summary
| INOKIM OXO Super 2023 | JOYOR S10-S-Z |
|---|---|
Pros
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
Cons
|
Parameters Comparison
| Parameter | INOKIM OXO Super 2023 | JOYOR S10-S-Z |
|---|---|---|
| Motor power (nominal) | 2 x 1.000 W | 2 x 1.000 W |
| Top speed (unlocked, approx.) | Ca. 65 km/h | Ca. 60-65 km/h |
| Realistic range (mixed riding) | Ca. 50-70 km | Ca. 45-55 km |
| Battery capacity | 60 V 25,6 Ah (1.536 Wh) | 60 V 18 Ah (1.080 Wh) |
| Weight | Ca. 33 kg (dual-motor real) | 27 kg |
| Brakes | Hydraulic discs front & rear | Hydraulic discs front & rear |
| Suspension | Adjustable rubber torsion, dual swingarm | Dual spring swingarm suspension |
| Tyres | 10 x 2,5 inch pneumatic | 10 inch pneumatic, off-road tread |
| Max rider load | 120 kg | 120 kg |
| Water resistance | IPX4 | IP54 |
| Charging time (stock charger) | Ca. 11-13 h | Ca. 10-12 h |
| Typical price (Europe) | Ca. 1.972 € | Ca. 719 € |
Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?
If price was no object and I had to choose one scooter to live with day in, day out, it would be the INOKIM OXO Super 2023. It simply feels more sorted: the ride quality is on another level, the stability at speed is reassuring rather than thrilling, and the overall sense of quality makes you want to look after it because you know it will look after you. For serious commuters, heavier riders, and anyone who values comfort and confidence as much as raw numbers, the OXO is the more complete, grown-up machine.
The JOYOR S10-S-Z, though, absolutely has its place. If your budget hits a ceiling where the OXO is just fantasy, the Joyor gives you a shocking amount of performance without demanding a second mortgage. It's ideal for riders stepping up from entry-level scooters who want to experience "proper torque" and off-the-line shove, and who don't mind tightening a few bolts and accepting a bit more noise and compromise along the way.
In short: choose the INOKIM OXO if you want a long-term partner for real-world riding that feels engineered to a standard, not a price. Choose the JOYOR S10-S-Z if you want maximum thrills per euro and are willing to live with the fact that, behind the fireworks, it's not quite in the same league of refinement.
Numbers Freaks Corner
| Metric | INOKIM OXO Super 2023 | JOYOR S10-S-Z |
|---|---|---|
| Price per Wh (€/Wh) | ❌ 1,283 €/Wh | ✅ 0,666 €/Wh |
| Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) | ❌ 30,34 €/km/h | ✅ 11,50 €/km/h |
| Weight per Wh (g/Wh) | ✅ 21,48 g/Wh | ❌ 25,00 g/Wh |
| Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) | ❌ 0,508 kg/km/h | ✅ 0,432 kg/km/h |
| Price per km of real-world range (€/km) | ❌ 32,87 €/km | ✅ 14,38 €/km |
| Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) | ❌ 0,55 kg/km | ✅ 0,54 kg/km |
| Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) | ❌ 25,60 Wh/km | ✅ 21,60 Wh/km |
| Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) | ❌ 30,77 W/km/h | ✅ 32,00 W/km/h |
| Weight to power ratio (kg/W) | ❌ 0,0165 kg/W | ✅ 0,0135 kg/W |
| Average charging speed (W) | ✅ 128 W | ❌ 98,18 W |
These metrics strip things down to pure maths. Price-per-Wh and price-per-kilometre show how much energy and range you buy for each euro. Weight-related metrics indicate how efficiently each scooter uses its mass for speed, battery and range. Wh per km reflects real-world energy consumption. Power-to-speed and weight-to-power give a sense of how much "oomph" you get relative to top speed and weight, while average charging speed shows how quickly each pack can be refilled with the stock charger. They don't capture ride quality or build, but they do make clear why the Joyor feels like such a bargain on paper.
Author's Category Battle
| Category | INOKIM OXO Super 2023 | JOYOR S10-S-Z |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | ❌ Heavier, harder to carry | ✅ Lighter for this class |
| Range | ✅ Clearly longer real range | ❌ Shorter, easier to drain |
| Max Speed | ✅ More composed at Vmax | ❌ Feels busier up top |
| Power | ✅ Smoother, more usable power | ❌ Punchy but less refined |
| Battery Size | ✅ Noticeably bigger battery | ❌ Smaller, less reserve |
| Suspension | ✅ Torsion, plush and quiet | ❌ Good, but less refined |
| Design | ✅ Award-winning, cohesive look | ❌ Functional, industrial feel |
| Safety | ✅ Ultra-stable chassis, brakes | ❌ Stable, but less planted |
| Practicality | ✅ Better for heavy daily use | ❌ More fiddly long term |
| Comfort | ✅ Far smoother over distance | ❌ Good, but more busy |
| Features | ❌ Lacks indicators, modern dash | ✅ Indicators, colourful display |
| Serviceability | ✅ Easy tyre changes, solid parts | ❌ Tyres harder to work on |
| Customer Support | ✅ Strong distributor backing | ✅ Good EU network too |
| Fun Factor | ✅ Surfing, confidence-inspiring fun | ✅ Wild, punchy acceleration |
| Build Quality | ✅ Premium, tight tolerances | ❌ More rattles over time |
| Component Quality | ✅ Higher-grade overall parts | ❌ Decent but budget-driven |
| Brand Name | ✅ Established premium reputation | ❌ Mid-range, value-focused |
| Community | ✅ Passionate, long-term owners | ✅ Large, active modders |
| Lights (visibility) | ❌ Low, minimal signalling | ✅ Indicators, stronger package |
| Lights (illumination) | ❌ Low headlight, weak beam | ✅ Better road illumination |
| Acceleration | ❌ Strong but measured | ✅ More explosive, thrilling |
| Arrive with smile factor | ✅ Smooth, smug satisfaction | ✅ Adrenaline, silly grins |
| Arrive relaxed factor | ✅ Calm, fatigue-free cruising | ❌ More demanding to ride |
| Charging speed (stock) | ✅ Slightly higher charge rate | ❌ Slower to refill |
| Reliability | ✅ Proven, robust platform | ❌ More minor niggles |
| Folded practicality | ❌ No stem lock, awkward | ✅ Locks down, easier handling |
| Ease of transport | ❌ Heavier, awkward to lift | ✅ Lighter, better fold |
| Handling | ✅ Composed, confidence inspiring | ❌ Fun but less precise |
| Braking performance | ✅ Strong, highly controllable | ❌ Strong, less refined feel |
| Riding position | ✅ Wide deck, natural stance | ✅ Adjustable bars, comfy deck |
| Handlebar quality | ✅ Solid, minimal flex | ❌ More flex, cheaper feel |
| Throttle response | ✅ Smooth, controllable curve | ❌ Jerky in highest mode |
| Dashboard/Display | ❌ Dated, basic LCD | ✅ Colourful, more modern |
| Security (locking) | ✅ Heavier, discrete premium frame | ❌ More generic, easier target |
| Weather protection | ❌ Modest splash resistance | ✅ Slightly better rating |
| Resale value | ✅ Holds value very well | ❌ Cheaper, drops faster |
| Tuning potential | ❌ Less tinkered, more closed | ✅ Popular with modders |
| Ease of maintenance | ✅ Swingarms, robust hardware | ❌ Tyres, rattles, more checks |
| Value for Money | ❌ Expensive but justified | ✅ Outstanding spec for price |
Overall Winner Declaration
In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the INOKIM OXO Super 2023 scores 2 points against the JOYOR S10-S-Z's 8. In the Author's Category Battle, the INOKIM OXO Super 2023 gets 28 ✅ versus 16 ✅ for JOYOR S10-S-Z (with a few ties sprinkled in).
Totals: INOKIM OXO Super 2023 scores 30, JOYOR S10-S-Z scores 24.
Based on the scoring, the INOKIM OXO Super 2023 is our overall winner. For me, the INOKIM OXO Super 2023 simply feels like the more complete machine - it rides with a calm confidence that makes every kilometre easier, and it gives off that reassuring sense of quality that makes you want to keep it for the long haul. The JOYOR S10-S-Z absolutely delivers grins per euro and will thrill plenty of riders, but it never quite shakes the feeling of being a very entertaining shortcut. If you want a fast scooter that feels like a well-engineered vehicle rather than a wild bargain, the OXO is the one you'll still be smiling on after years of use. The Joyor is the one you buy when your heart wants speed and your wallet refuses to cooperate - huge fun, but not the same depth of experience.
That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.

