Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)
The INOKIM OXO is the overall winner here: it rides more comfortably, feels more planted at speed, and is the better "daily vehicle" if you regularly cover longer distances or ride on rougher surfaces. It's the grand tourer: calmer, more stable, and built to swallow kilometres without punishing your knees or nerves.
The NAMI Super Stellar is the smarter choice if you want something more compact and affordable that still punches like a serious dual-motor machine. It's for riders who prioritise price, agility, tech features and strong lighting over ultimate comfort and big-wheel stability.
If you want a scooter that can realistically replace your car for many trips, start with the OXO. If you want a brutal little city missile that fits in tighter spaces and your wallet, look at the Super Stellar first.
That's the quick take-now let's dig into how they actually feel on the road, and where each one really shines (and stumbles).
There's something oddly satisfying about putting these two side by side. On one side, the INOKIM OXO, the "Land Surfer" that's been quietly convincing riders for years that comfort and refinement matter more than raw spec sheet bragging rights. On the other, the NAMI Super Stellar, a compact troublemaker with serious power, modern electronics, and the sort of headlight that makes half the market look like it's still on candles.
Both are proper dual-motor machines capable of speeds that will have rental scooter riders questioning their life choices. Both can annihilate hills, both are built to be real transport rather than toys, and both sit well above the cheap generic crowd. Yet they go about it with very different philosophies: the OXO is all about glide and stability, the Super Stellar about compact aggression and high-tech control.
If you're torn between them, you're already in the right performance ballpark. The real question is: do you want a long-legged grand tourer or a compact city brawler? Let's break it down.
Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?
On paper, these are surprisingly close cousins: dual-motor performance scooters with serious batteries, hydraulic brakes and real-world top speeds that comfortably sit in "keep your protective gear on, please" territory. They're pitched at riders who've outgrown entry-level commuters and now want something that can actually replace a fair chunk of their car or public transport use.
The INOKIM OXO lives in the premium, big-body, ten-inch-wheel universe. It's for riders who expect to cover decent distances, tackle mixed terrain, and want the ride to feel more like gliding than surviving. Think long commutes, weekend exploration, and a lot of time on the deck.
The NAMI Super Stellar slides into the compact dual-motor niche: smaller wheels, smaller footprint, lighter frame, but a powertrain that happily keeps up with much bigger scoots. It's ideal for city-centric riders with limited storage space and a strict budget ceiling, but who still want that "oh wow" acceleration and proper suspension.
They cross over in one crucial way: both are "serious" machines that can handle real commuting, real hills, and real speeds. That's why the comparison makes sense-they're two different answers to the same question: "What should my first 'proper' dual motor scooter be?"
Design & Build Quality
Put your hands on the OXO and you immediately feel that old-school, overbuilt confidence. The chassis is thick, sculpted aluminium, with that iconic single-sided swingarm that looks like it came out of a design museum rather than a scooter catalogue. Cables are tucked away, the finish is clean, and the whole thing radiates the vibe of a product that's been iterated and refined rather than rushed out to hit a spec number.
The Super Stellar goes a very different route: an exposed tubular frame, chunky welds on full display, and an overall look that screams "industrial cyberpunk" more than "lifestyle object". It's not trying to be pretty, it's trying to be serious. And to its credit, it feels it. The one-piece welded frame is stiff, the stem clamp is reassuringly chunky, and the cockpit-with its big, bright display and control layout-feels like a small-scale performance machine, not a toy.
Ergonomically, the OXO feels like a grown-up scooter for grown-up bodies. The deck is long and wide, with room to experiment with different stances, and the stem height and bar width combine into a commanding, relaxed riding posture. The NAMI's deck is more compact, with less fore-aft room. It's perfectly fine for city carving and medium rides, but if you like to stretch out or shift position over longer distances, the OXO simply gives you more real estate.
In terms of perceived quality, both are solidly above the generic pack, but in different ways. The OXO feels like a cohesive, sculpted product from a legacy brand; the NAMI feels like a purpose-built machine, emphasising structure and components over sleek integration. If you care deeply about clean aesthetics and seamless design language, the OXO has the edge. If you love visible welds and hardware that looks like it belongs on a small motorbike, the Super Stellar will speak your language.
Ride Comfort & Handling
This is where the OXO flexes. That rubber torsion suspension is not just marketing fluff-it genuinely transforms bad surfaces into something you tolerate rather than resent. On cracked city asphalt, cobblestones or uneven bike paths, the OXO shrugs and glides. You feel the texture of the road, but not every insult. After a long ride, your legs and lower back simply feel less used and abused than on most competitors.
The Super Stellar's adjustable spring-and-rubber setup is genuinely impressive for a scooter running on smaller nine-inch wheels. Dialled in correctly, it soaks up sharp hits and high-frequency vibrations far better than you'd expect from the tyre size. I've done long city loops on it without feeling like my joints were being used as shock absorbers. That said, where the OXO floats over nasty gaps and potholes with a reassuring "thump and done", the NAMI reminds you it's still a compact scooter: big holes and sharp edges need attention and active avoidance.
Handling-wise, they're very different characters. The OXO with its larger tyres and long, stable wheelbase feels carved from granite at speed. You can lean it into sweeping turns with confidence and it never gets twitchy, even when you're pushing well into "I really hope there are no surprise potholes" territory. It's like a big touring motorbike in scooter form-predictable, forgiving, and calm.
The Super Stellar is sharper, more eager. The combination of smaller wheels and compact geometry makes it want to flick into corners. It's brilliant for tight city manoeuvres, quick lane changes and weaving through slower traffic. But that agility comes with a trade-off: at higher speeds on rougher surfaces, you need to stay more alert and ride with a firmer hand. It's fun and engaging, but it doesn't have that same "I could do this half asleep" stability the OXO offers. (To be clear: please don't actually ride either of them half asleep.)
Performance
Both scooters have genuinely serious dual-motor setups. Twist either throttle hard and you're propelled forward in a way that makes rental scooters feel like malfunctioning toys. But the flavour of that power delivery is very different.
The OXO builds speed like a strong, quiet train. There's a tiny delay at the start of the throttle-Inokim's infamous "dead zone"-and then the power rolls in smoothly and relentlessly. It doesn't try to rip the bars out of your hands; it just keeps pushing, and pushing, until you look down and realise you're going much faster than you thought. For daily riding, this is actually brilliant: it's fast but not frantic, and you're far less likely to surprise yourself into trouble on a damp morning.
The Super Stellar, by contrast, feels like someone shrunk a hyper-scooter and forgot to tone down its enthusiasm. Thanks to the sine wave controllers, the throttle is beautifully smooth and controllable-but if you decide to give it full beans, it responds with real violence. Off-the-line punch is stronger and more immediate, and those smaller wheels make everything feel more urgent. You absolutely notice the torque when you pin it; hills vanish under your wheels like they never existed.
At the upper end of their speed range, the OXO feels more composed. That combination of chassis stability, rubber suspension and larger tyres means high-speed cruising feels pretty natural, almost boring in the best way. The Super Stellar will absolutely hit similar speeds, but on nine-inch rubber it feels more intense-fun, yes, but also more "pay attention or else".
Braking is a strong point on both. The OXO's hydraulics are powerful and progressive, more than enough to haul its mass down from speed without drama. The Super Stellar's Logan brakes are every bit as confidence-inspiring, with light lever effort and a very predictable engagement. If you forced me to choose, I'd call braking effectively a draw: both are in the "proper grown-up scooter" category here.
Battery & Range
The OXO is the distance specialist. Its big battery means that even when you ride it like a normal human-mixed modes, using both motors, not crawling in eco-you get the sort of real-world range that makes full-city days feel trivial. You can commute a decent distance, detour home the scenic way, and still not arrive staring nervously at a flashing battery icon. It's very much a "charge overnight, forget about it during the day" kind of scooter.
The Super Stellar's battery isn't small either, especially for its size, and in moderate usage it delivers a very respectable real-world range. For typical urban commuting-say, there and back with a bit of detouring-you're realistically charging every couple of days rather than every single night, which is exactly where a practical city scooter should be.
The real difference is what happens when you ride hard. When you lean into the OXO's power and speed, its larger battery gives you more leeway before you hit the "better head home" threshold. On the Super Stellar, spirited riding and lots of full-throttle launches will nibble away at the battery more noticeably. Not disastrously, but you're more aware of the trade-off between fun and remaining range.
Charging is where NAMI strikes back. The OXO's stock charger takes its sweet time-you're very much in the "plug it in early evening, it's ready the next morning" world. The Super Stellar, with a smaller pack and snappier charge time out of the box, is far easier to top up within a single afternoon or evening. If you often need a quick return to full after a long morning ride, the NAMI feels much more cooperative.
Portability & Practicality
Neither of these is "throw it over your shoulder and hop on the train" material, but there are important differences in how they live with you.
The OXO is heavy and unapologetic about it. Carrying it up even a single flight of stairs is very much a "two hands, think about your back" affair. Its wide, non-folding handlebars and long deck mean that even when folded, it occupies real space. In a hallway, it's a piece of furniture. In a small flat, it demands its own corner. It is a vehicle you own, not a gadget you tuck away.
The Super Stellar, while hardly featherweight, is noticeably more manageable. You still won't enjoy carrying it up several floors every day, but lifting it into a car boot or onto a train platform is less of an ordeal. It folds down smaller, making it easier to stash under a desk, behind a sofa or in a more modest storage area. And if you're mixing car-and-scooter commuting, the NAMI's footprint is significantly more convenient to live with.
Day-to-day practicality also includes weather and robustness. The Super Stellar's higher water resistance rating gives you a bit more peace of mind if you live somewhere where "light drizzle" is just the default setting. The OXO can handle damp conditions, but you're more inclined to treat heavy rain as "drive instead" territory. On the other hand, the OXO's single-sided swingarms are a dream when it comes to tyre work, making some aspects of maintenance far less painful than they are on many dual-motor scooters.
Safety
Beneath the fun and the numbers, the important question is: which one feels safer when things get messy?
The OXO builds safety from the ground up with stability. At speed, it feels planted; the steering is responsive but never nervous, and the big tyres and rubber suspension keep the wheels in meaningful contact with the road. Hydraulic brakes give strong, predictable stopping, and the chassis doesn't squirm under hard braking. Its one notable weak point in safety terms is lighting: the low-mounted front light is fine for seeing the patch of road right in front of you, but it doesn't do a stellar job of announcing you to cars at eye level. Most owners I know (myself included) run an extra bar-mounted headlight.
The Super Stellar takes a more "modern armour" approach: superb brakes, a stiff welded frame, very good water resistance, and, crucially, a genuinely powerful headlight placed where it should be-up high, actually lighting the road and making you visible. The integrated indicators and bright brake light further help in traffic. On the flip side, nine-inch tyres simply have less margin for error with big holes, debris and tram tracks. You need to ride with that in mind.
In clean urban conditions, the NAMI's lighting, braking and frame stiffness feel outstandingly secure. In mixed or rougher terrain, the OXO's larger wheels and calm chassis win back a lot of safety margin simply by being more forgiving when the road isn't perfect.
Community Feedback
| INOKIM OXO | NAMI Super Stellar |
|---|---|
What riders love
|
What riders love
|
What riders complain about
|
What riders complain about
|
Price & Value
There's no pretending: the OXO sits in a premium bracket. You're paying for a big battery, high-quality cells, proprietary suspension, and a mature chassis that's already proven itself over countless riders and seasons. You're also paying for a brand that designs its own platforms rather than re-skinning generic frames. If you use it heavily-daily commutes, weekend rides, genuine car-replacement duty-the premium feels justified, and resale value tends to reward you later.
The Super Stellar hits a much lower price point while still delivering a proper welded frame, hydraulic brakes, sine wave controllers and a robust battery. Compared with the OXO, it offers a huge chunk of real-world performance and capability for a noticeably smaller hit to your bank account. Versus cheaper clones, it gives you better engineering, better safety, and a nicer ride. As long as you actually use its power and range, it's very strong value.
Put bluntly: if budget is tight but you refuse to buy disposable junk, the NAMI looks like a steal. If you can afford to spend more and you care deeply about comfort, big-ride confidence and a more premium overall feel, the OXO earns its price tag.
Service & Parts Availability
INOKIM has been around for a long time by scooter standards, and it shows in the support network. Parts, tyres and consumables are relatively easy to source through established dealers across Europe, and many shops actually know how to work on them. The platform is mature, the quirks are well documented, and you're unlikely to be anyone's "first OXO" at a workshop.
NAMI is newer but has built a surprisingly solid ecosystem in a short time. The Burn-E explosion helped create a strong distributor and community base, and the Super Stellar benefits from this. Parts availability is decent in most major European markets, and the brand has a reputation for listening to riders and backing their products. That said, you'll still find more shops already familiar with INOKIM than with NAMI, especially outside big cities.
DIY-friendly riders will appreciate both, but the OXO's single-sided wheel design does make one of the most unpleasant maintenance jobs-tyre work-less of a swear-fest. On the Super Stellar, you're in more conventional territory: totally manageable, but not "oh, that was easy" territory.
Pros & Cons Summary
| INOKIM OXO | NAMI Super Stellar |
|---|---|
Pros
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
Cons
|
Parameters Comparison
| Parameter | INOKIM OXO | NAMI Super Stellar |
|---|---|---|
| Rated motor power | Dual 1.000 W hub motors | Dual 1.000 W hub motors |
| Peak power (approx.) | 2.600 W | Higher than rated, dual controllers |
| Top speed | Ca. 65 km/h | Ca. 60 km/h |
| Claimed range | Ca. 80-110 km | Up to ca. 75 km |
| Real-world range (mixed riding) | Ca. 50-65 km | Ca. 45-55 km |
| Battery | 60 V 25,6-26 Ah (ca. 1.536 Wh) | 52 V 25 Ah (ca. 1.300 Wh) |
| Weight | 33,5 kg | 30 kg |
| Brakes | Front & rear hydraulic discs | Logan hydraulic discs (2-piston) |
| Suspension | Adjustable rubber torsion front & rear | Adjustable spring & rubber shocks front & rear |
| Tyres | 10" pneumatic | 9" x 2,5" tubeless |
| Max load | 120 kg | Ca. 110-120 kg |
| Water resistance | IPX4 (newer batches) | IP55 |
| Charging time (stock charger) | Ca. 13,5 h | Ca. 5-6 h |
| Approximate price | 2.744 € | 1.361 € |
Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?
If you measure a scooter by how relaxed and in-control you feel after a long, mixed-terrain ride, the INOKIM OXO is the stronger package. It's more stable at speed, more forgiving on rough roads, and more comfortable for longer stints. It feels like a proper, mature vehicle-less dramatic day to day, but far easier to live with if you actually ride a lot. For many riders, especially those doing longer commutes or riding on patchy European infrastructure, that counts for more than raw initial punch.
The NAMI Super Stellar, though, is incredibly compelling if your life is more "dense city" than "suburban sprawl", and your budget has a ceiling. It gives you serious dual-motor aggression, fantastic braking, genuinely good lighting, and modern tech for far less money and in a more compact package. If you mostly ride shorter city hops, value agility and strong lighting, and have limited storage, it's a brilliant choice-and frankly a bit of a bargain for what it can do.
So: if you want a scooter that feels like a long-distance, low-drama land yacht with real range and comfort, choose the OXO. If you want a compact, high-tech hooligan that still behaves like a real vehicle and not a toy, the Super Stellar will keep you grinning. My heart leans toward the OXO as the more complete, long-haul machine-but the fact that the NAMI makes me think twice at its price tells you just how good it is.
Numbers Freaks Corner
| Metric | INOKIM OXO | NAMI Super Stellar |
|---|---|---|
| Price per Wh (€/Wh) | ❌ 1,79 €/Wh | ✅ 1,05 €/Wh |
| Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) | ❌ 42,21 €/km/h | ✅ 22,68 €/km/h |
| Weight per Wh (g/Wh) | ✅ 21,81 g/Wh | ❌ 23,08 g/Wh |
| Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) | ❌ 0,52 kg/km/h | ✅ 0,50 kg/km/h |
| Price per km of real-world range (€/km) | ❌ 47,74 €/km | ✅ 27,22 €/km |
| Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) | ✅ 0,58 kg/km | ❌ 0,60 kg/km |
| Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) | ❌ 26,72 Wh/km | ✅ 26,00 Wh/km |
| Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) | ❌ 30,77 W/km/h | ✅ 33,33 W/km/h |
| Weight to power ratio (kg/W) | ❌ 0,01675 kg/W | ✅ 0,015 kg/W |
| Average charging speed (W) | ❌ 113,78 W | ✅ 236,36 W |
These metrics tell you how efficiently each scooter turns money, mass and electricity into speed and distance. Lower values generally mean you're getting more performance or range per euro, per kilogram or per watt-hour, while higher values in the power-to-speed and charging-speed rows indicate a powertrain that delivers more shove for its top speed and gets you back to full battery quicker. The Super Stellar wins most of the raw efficiency battles, while the OXO's bigger battery and slightly heavier build give it small advantages in a couple of weight-related metrics.
Author's Category Battle
| Category | INOKIM OXO | NAMI Super Stellar |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | ❌ Heavier, harder to lift | ✅ Lighter, more manageable |
| Range | ✅ Longer real-world distance | ❌ Shorter but adequate range |
| Max Speed | ✅ Slightly higher cruising | ❌ A touch slower |
| Power | ❌ Gentle off the line | ✅ Punchier acceleration feel |
| Battery Size | ✅ Bigger long-haul pack | ❌ Smaller, still decent |
| Suspension | ✅ Plush rubber land surfer | ❌ Good, but less magic |
| Design | ✅ Sculpted, cohesive aesthetics | ❌ Functional, industrial look |
| Safety | ✅ Big wheels, calm chassis | ❌ Smaller wheels, twitchier |
| Practicality | ❌ Bulky, hard to store | ✅ More compact, easier fit |
| Comfort | ✅ Superior long-ride comfort | ❌ Very good, but firmer |
| Features | ❌ Simple, almost old-school | ✅ NFC, big display, signals |
| Serviceability | ✅ Easier tyre work, mature | ❌ More conventional, fiddlier |
| Customer Support | ✅ Wider established network | ❌ Newer, improving network |
| Fun Factor | ✅ Surf-like, flowing fun | ✅ Punchy, hooligan energy |
| Build Quality | ✅ Refined, time-tested frame | ✅ Solid welded structure |
| Component Quality | ✅ Strong, proven components | ✅ High-spec controllers, brakes |
| Brand Name | ✅ Older, established reputation | ❌ Newer, still building |
| Community | ✅ Larger, long-standing base | ✅ Enthusiastic, rapidly growing |
| Lights (visibility) | ❌ Low-mounted, modest front | ✅ Bright headlight, indicators |
| Lights (illumination) | ❌ Needs bar light upgrade | ✅ Stock light actually usable |
| Acceleration | ❌ Smooth but less snappy | ✅ Stronger low-end punch |
| Arrive with smile factor | ✅ Effortless, surfy grin | ✅ Adrenaline-fuelled grin |
| Arrive relaxed factor | ✅ Calm, low-fatigue ride | ❌ More demanding at speed |
| Charging speed | ❌ Slow overnight top-up | ✅ Much quicker turnaround |
| Reliability | ✅ Long, proven track record | ✅ Good so far, fewer years |
| Folded practicality | ❌ Wide bars, big footprint | ✅ Folds smaller, easier |
| Ease of transport | ❌ Heavy, awkward to haul | ✅ Lighter, better for cars |
| Handling | ✅ Stable, confidence-inspiring | ✅ Agile, razor-sharp steering |
| Braking performance | ✅ Strong, predictable hydraulics | ✅ Logan brakes bite hard |
| Riding position | ✅ Spacious, versatile stance | ❌ Tighter deck for big feet |
| Handlebar quality | ✅ Solid, no-nonsense setup | ✅ Wide, stable cockpit |
| Throttle response | ❌ Noticeable initial dead zone | ✅ Smooth, immediate control |
| Dashboard/Display | ❌ Basic, dated-looking screen | ✅ Large, info-rich display |
| Security (locking) | ❌ No electronic immobiliser | ✅ NFC keyless start |
| Weather protection | ❌ Lower water rating | ✅ Better for wet climates |
| Resale value | ✅ Holds price very well | ❌ Less data, newer model |
| Tuning potential | ✅ Established mod ecosystem | ✅ Controller configs, growing mods |
| Ease of maintenance | ✅ Mature, well-documented quirks | ❌ Fewer guides, smaller base |
| Value for Money | ❌ Premium, you pay for polish | ✅ Big performance per euro |
Overall Winner Declaration
In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the INOKIM OXO scores 2 points against the NAMI Super Stellar's 8. In the Author's Category Battle, the INOKIM OXO gets 24 ✅ versus 25 ✅ for NAMI Super Stellar (with a few ties sprinkled in).
Totals: INOKIM OXO scores 26, NAMI Super Stellar scores 33.
Based on the scoring, the NAMI Super Stellar is our overall winner. Both scooters are genuinely brilliant in their own ways, but the OXO feels like the more complete "live with it every day" machine: calmer, more comfortable, more mature, and simply better at turning rough urban reality into something you actually look forward to riding through. The Super Stellar fights back hard with sheer value, compactness and that intoxicating punch, and if your riding is mostly short, sharp city blasts, it's a fantastic partner in crime. For riders who see their scooter as a true replacement for many car trips and want their body to thank them after every ride, the OXO edges it. For those who want hyper-scooter flavour at a more approachable price and size, the NAMI will make every commute feel like a little event-and that's hardly a bad thing.
That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.

