Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)
If you want the safer, more rounded bet for daily commuting, the Xiaomi Electric Scooter 4 Pro 2nd Gen is the overall winner. It feels more sorted as a product: stronger hill performance, better traction, better safety features, and a far more proven ecosystem for parts, guides, and long-term ownership.
The MEARTH City fights back with a genuinely useful hot-swappable battery and cushier suspension, making it tempting for range-hungry riders and comfort addicts who clock long days in the saddle. But you trade that clever battery trick for weaker brand support, some build niggles, and a scooter that just doesn't feel as mature.
If you want a reliable "tool" that quietly does the job every day, Xiaomi is the sensible choice. If you're willing to live with a few rough edges in exchange for swappable range and softer ride quality, the MEARTH City can still make sense. Keep reading-the devil, as always, is in the gritty commuting details.
Two scooters, one price bracket, and a very different idea of what "city commuting" should look like. On one side, the MEARTH City - the Australian upstart promising to cure range anxiety with hot-swappable batteries and cushy suspension. On the other, the Xiaomi Electric Scooter 4 Pro 2nd Gen - the latest evolution of the world's most copied scooter silhouette, now with more power, more grip, and a very serious rear motor.
I've ridden both of these in the real world: rainy commutes, gritted bike lanes, nasty expansion joints, that lovely cobbled shortcut you regret the moment you roll onto it. One of them feels like a carefully engineered mass-market product refined over years of feedback. The other feels a bit more like a clever idea bolted onto a scooter that still hasn't fully grown up.
If you're trying to choose your daily electric mule, this comparison will walk you through comfort, performance, safety, ownership and, yes, how annoying they are to carry up stairs. Spoiler: they're both heavier than your optimism. Let's dig in.
Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?
Both scooters sit in that "serious commuter" mid-range: not cheap toys, not hulking dual-motor monsters. They're built for people who want to ditch the bus or car and actually rely on a scooter every day, not just on sunny Sundays.
The MEARTH City aims at riders who worry about running out of juice or who ride long shifts-delivery workers, big-city commuters, people with chaotic schedules. Its pitch is simple: when the battery's flat, you don't stop; you swap.
The Xiaomi Electric Scooter 4 Pro 2nd Gen targets the "I just want something that works, every day, with minimal drama" crowd. Bigger motor, rear-wheel drive, chunky tubeless tyres, and the backing of a global brand. It's for commuters who value predictability over clever tricks.
They cost similar money, weigh about the same, and promise broadly similar range, so it's a perfectly valid head-to-head. The real difference is philosophy: modular flexibility vs refined simplicity.
Design & Build Quality
Pick up the two scooters and the design intent is obvious from the first clunk of metal.
The MEARTH City uses a tubular aluminium frame with a fairly classic commuter-scooter silhouette. It looks fine-matte black, a few accents, relatively clean lines-but it doesn't exactly scream engineering finesse. The folding joint works, but on well-used units I've ridden, you can feel a hint of play creeping into the stem over time if you don't keep on top of tightening. It's not disastrous, just... typical of a smaller brand still figuring out long-term durability.
The Xiaomi 4 Pro 2nd Gen, by contrast, feels like one solid piece of kit. The carbon steel frame is stiffer, the stem feels rock solid when you lean into corners, and the folding latch has that reassuringly industrial "thunk" when it locks. Cable routing is mostly internal, the finish is neat, and nothing rattles unless you've abused it. It's not artistic, but it is very well executed.
In the hands, the Xiaomi feels like a mature, mass-produced product. The MEARTH feels more like a nicely specced niche scooter: good ideas, decent materials, but not quite the same polish. If you're picky about long-term tightness and creak-free riding, the Xiaomi clearly has the upper hand.
Ride Comfort & Handling
This is where the MEARTH City tries to flip the script-and occasionally succeeds.
The MEARTH City serves up a combo of big air-filled tyres and hydraulic suspension. On battered city asphalt, this translates to a properly soft ride. You can roll over the usual city scars-pothole patches, cracked pavement, tram track joins-without your knees writing complaint letters. The front and rear suspension smooth out the chatter and let you stay relaxed even when the surface tries not to be.
The trade-off is a touch of float. At higher speeds or sweeping turns, you can occasionally feel the suspension's extra movement, especially if the setup isn't perfectly tight. It's not wobbly, but you're more aware you're on a sprung platform.
The Xiaomi 4 Pro goes the opposite way: no suspension, just high-volume, wider tubeless tyres doing all the work. On decent tarmac or well-maintained bike lanes, it actually feels fantastic-direct, planted, and precise. The wide tyres track nicely through bends, and the rear motor planted over the back wheel gives superb traction when accelerating out of corners.
On broken surfaces, though, the Xiaomi starts to show its compromise. It doesn't beat you up like a solid-tyre scooter, but on repetitive roughness-old cobbles, rough brick, badly repaired roads-the MEARTH's hydraulic setup is simply kinder to your joints. Over a full week of commuting on mixed surfaces, I felt noticeably less fatigued stepping off the MEARTH at the end of a long day.
Handling-wise, Xiaomi wins for stability and precision; MEARTH wins for pure bump absorption. If your route is mostly smooth cycle paths with the odd nasty section, Xiaomi's sharper ride is more rewarding. If your city feels like it was resurfaced last in the previous century, the MEARTH makes more sense.
Performance
Both scooters will legally top out around typical EU/UK limits, but how they get there-and how they handle hills-differs a lot.
The MEARTH City has a slightly stronger-rated motor on paper than the Xiaomi, and off the line it feels perfectly respectable. From a traffic light, it pulls you away cleanly, without drama or wheelspin, and it copes with moderate urban hills well enough. On long or steeper inclines, it'll get you there, but you can feel it working. With a heavier rider, you start to dip into "encouraging it with body English" territory on serious gradients.
The Xiaomi 4 Pro is a different story. Although the rated power number doesn't sound wildly impressive, the higher voltage system and generous peak output make it feel significantly stronger once you're rolling. Throttle response in Sport mode is brisk without being stupid, and on hills you very clearly feel that extra torque. With a heavy rider and a backpack, on ramps where the MEARTH begins to wheeze, the Xiaomi just digs in and holds speed far better.
Braking also tells two different philosophies. MEARTH runs a rear disc plus electronic front brake. When adjusted well, stopping power is decent and modulation is okay, but you do need to stay on top of rotor and cable tweaks to keep it sharp and quiet. Xiaomi uses a sealed front drum with rear electronic braking, which sounds old-school but in practice is brilliant for commuting. Performance stays consistent in wet and grime, and there's almost no maintenance beyond occasionally checking lever feel.
In real-world riding, the Xiaomi feels like the more confident performer: stronger on hills, more reassuring brakes in bad weather, and better traction thanks to rear-wheel drive and wider tyres. The MEARTH is totally adequate for normal urban duties, but it doesn't feel like it has much headroom in reserve.
Battery & Range
On paper, their battery capacities live in the same neighbourhood. On the road, it depends heavily on how-and how far-you ride.
The MEARTH City has a decently sized battery and, ridden sensibly, will take an average-weight rider through a solid day of city commuting: think there and back with some errand detours, as long as you don't hammer full speed constantly. In "real rider, real city" conditions, expect your range to land somewhere in the mid double digits in km. Crucially, when that's over, you pop in a fresh battery and off you go again. From a flexibility standpoint, it's a very appealing system, especially for delivery riders or people without easy access to a plug near their scooter.
The Xiaomi 4 Pro uses a similar-capacity pack paired with a more efficient 48 V system. In practice, it holds its voltage well as the battery empties, so performance doesn't nose-dive too early. Realistically, you're looking at a comfortable one-direction commute plus the return, as long as you're not riding like you're late to a MotoGP qualifying session. For most office workers, that means charging every few days rather than every single night.
Charging is where the Xiaomi drags its feet a bit: a full top-up is an overnight affair. The MEARTH isn't dramatically faster, but its swap concept means you don't really need fast charging if you own multiple packs-you just rotate them like laptop batteries.
If you're a "single commute per day, plug it in at home" rider, Xiaomi's straightforward setup is more than fine. If you're racking up serious daily mileage or working shifts, MEARTH's hot-swap system is genuinely useful and one of its few clear technical advantages over the Xiaomi.
Portability & Practicality
Both scooters weigh about the same, and both have a talent for feeling heavier than that figure once you're halfway up a stairwell.
The MEARTH City folds down to a reasonably compact footprint, fine for car boots and under-desk storage. The folding action itself is quick enough, which is handy if you're sprinting for a train. But the bars don't fold inward, so the width remains full-size. Not a deal-breaker, just occasionally awkward on very crowded public transport.
The Xiaomi 4 Pro is similarly practical in footprint, maybe a touch bulkier in presence. The folding mechanism is more confidence-inspiring; you don't get that nagging "better re-check the latch" sensation. Carrying-wise, both are in the "doable but not fun" category. One or two flights of stairs, sure. Five flights daily, and you'll quickly start scouring listings for something lighter.
In day-to-day use, the Xiaomi edges ahead thanks to the better-integrated app, electronic lock, and the sheer number of accessories and spares available. Need a wall mount, a better hook, a different tyre style? There's probably three versions of each on sale. With the MEARTH, it's more a case of "what you see is what you live with," plus occasional hunting for compatible third-party parts.
Safety
Both scooters tick the basic boxes, but Xiaomi clearly treats safety as a design pillar rather than a bullet point.
On the MEARTH City, the basics are covered: dual brakes, a bright display, decent lights, and chunky pneumatic tyres that help you stay upright when the surface gets sketchy. In dry conditions on normal roads, it feels secure and predictable. The suspension also helps you maintain control when you hit mid-size bumps at commuting speed.
The Xiaomi 4 Pro goes further. The combination of rear-wheel drive, traction control, wide tubeless tyres and a sealed front drum brake gives noticeably better grip and stopping consistency, especially in wet conditions or on leaf-strewn cycle paths. You also get integrated turn signals at the bar ends and automatic lights that come on when it gets dark or you dive into a tunnel-small touches that make a very real difference in chaotic city traffic.
At higher speeds within the legal limit, the Xiaomi simply feels more planted. There's less flex, more tyre on the ground, and better-balanced braking. MEARTH isn't unsafe, but it feels like a "good" scooter in a world where Xiaomi is starting to feel like entry-level transport-grade hardware.
Community Feedback
| MEARTH City | Xiaomi Electric Scooter 4 Pro 2nd Gen |
|---|---|
What riders love
|
What riders love
|
What riders complain about
|
What riders complain about
|
Price & Value
The awkward truth for MEARTH is this: it's positioned in a price zone where Xiaomi sits very comfortably-and the Xiaomi gives you a lot of scooter for that money.
The MEARTH City charges a noticeable premium over entry-level commuters, mainly justified by its hydraulic suspension and hot-swappable battery design. If you truly exploit those two features-long daily mileage, multiple packs, or awful roads-then it can be argued as fair value. But if you're only ever doing a modest round-trip and charging overnight from a fixed wall socket, most of that premium is essentially wasted on you.
The Xiaomi 4 Pro isn't a bargain-bin special either, but it feels appropriately priced. You're getting better overall refinement, a stronger hill climber, superior safety tech and a massive ecosystem of support and parts. For most "I just want a solid commuter" riders, the value equation tilts very clearly towards Xiaomi: fewer quirks, fewer unknowns, more confidence.
Service & Parts Availability
This is where the difference between a global tech giant and a smaller regional brand really bites.
With the MEARTH City, feedback on support is mixed. Some riders report responsive help, others report slow replies, tricky parts sourcing, or limited stock depending on country. If you're handy with tools and happy to adapt generic parts, you can work around a lot of this. If you want fuss-free, plug-and-play support... you may occasionally find yourself waiting and refreshing your inbox.
With the Xiaomi 4 Pro, the story is almost boringly predictable-in a good way. Spares are widely available across Europe, independent shops understand the platform, and there's a huge DIY community with guides for everything from tyre changes to firmware quirks. Warranty tends to be handled by established retailers, which simplifies things further. In terms of long-term serviceability, Xiaomi is on another level.
Pros & Cons Summary
| MEARTH City | Xiaomi Electric Scooter 4 Pro 2nd Gen |
|---|---|
Pros
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
Cons
|
Parameters Comparison
| Parameter | MEARTH City | Xiaomi Electric Scooter 4 Pro 2nd Gen |
|---|---|---|
| Motor rated power | 450 W (rear hub) | 400 W (rear hub, 1.000 W peak) |
| Top speed (software limited) | 25 km/h (higher possible off-road) | 25 km/h (hard limited) |
| Battery capacity | 468 Wh (36 V 13 Ah, hot-swappable) | 468 Wh (48 V 10 Ah, fixed) |
| Claimed max range | 50 km | 60 km |
| Realistic range (average rider) | ca. 30-35 km | ca. 35-45 km |
| Weight | 19 kg | 19 kg |
| Brakes | Rear disc + front electronic | Front drum + rear E-ABS |
| Suspension | Hydraulic suspension | None (pneumatic tyres only) |
| Tyres | 10" pneumatic | 10" tubeless pneumatic, 60 mm wide |
| Max load | 100 kg | 120 kg |
| Water resistance | IPX4 | IPX4 |
| Price | ca. 645 € | ca. 526 € |
Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?
When the dust settles, the Xiaomi Electric Scooter 4 Pro 2nd Gen comes out as the more convincing everyday machine. It climbs better, feels more planted at speed, has smarter safety features, and is backed by an ecosystem that makes long-term ownership far less of a gamble. It's not thrilling, but it's the kind of scooter you trust on a wet Monday morning with a meeting you can't miss.
The MEARTH City is more specialised. Its trump cards-hydraulic suspension and that hot-swappable battery-are genuinely useful if you live on broken roads or regularly ride far beyond what a single pack can cover. But wrapped around those good ideas is a scooter that just isn't as comprehensively sorted: support is less consistent, build feels less bulletproof, and value hinges heavily on you actually buying and using spare batteries.
If your commute is within the Xiaomi's comfortable range window, mostly on tarmac, and you want something low-maintenance and confidence-inspiring, go Xiaomi and don't look back. If you're a heavy user racking up long shifts or your city's infrastructure is basically a cobblestone museum, the MEARTH City can still be a logical, if slightly more compromisy, choice.
Numbers Freaks Corner
| Metric | MEARTH City | Xiaomi Electric Scooter 4 Pro 2nd Gen |
|---|---|---|
| Price per Wh (€/Wh) | ❌ 1,38 €/Wh | ✅ 1,12 €/Wh |
| Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) | ❌ 25,80 €/km/h | ✅ 21,04 €/km/h |
| Weight per Wh (g/Wh) | ✅ 40,60 g/Wh | ✅ 40,60 g/Wh |
| Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) | ✅ 0,76 kg/km/h | ✅ 0,76 kg/km/h |
| Price per km of real-world range (€/km) | ❌ 19,85 €/km | ✅ 13,15 €/km |
| Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) | ❌ 0,59 kg/km | ✅ 0,48 kg/km |
| Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) | ❌ 14,40 Wh/km | ✅ 11,70 Wh/km |
| Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) | ✅ 18,00 W/km/h | ❌ 16,00 W/km/h |
| Weight to power ratio (kg/W) | ✅ 0,04 kg/W | ❌ 0,05 kg/W |
| Average charging speed (W) | ✅ 72,00 W | ❌ 52,00 W |
These metrics show how efficiently each scooter uses your money, its weight, and its battery. Lower price-per-Wh or price-per-kilometre means better value. Lower Wh-per-km means the scooter sips energy more gently. Ratios involving weight tell you how much bulk you carry per unit of performance or range. Power-to-speed and weight-to-power hint at how lively or loaded a scooter feels for its class, while average charging speed simply reflects how quickly the battery fills back up relative to its size.
Author's Category Battle
| Category | MEARTH City | Xiaomi Electric Scooter 4 Pro 2nd Gen |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | ✅ Same, but swap battery | ✅ Same, robust frame |
| Range | ❌ Shorter per battery | ✅ Better real-world reach |
| Max Speed | ✅ Unlockable on private land | ❌ Strictly limited, no unlock |
| Power | ❌ Weaker in real hills | ✅ Stronger torque, climbs better |
| Battery Size | ✅ Same, hot-swappable | ❌ Same, fixed only |
| Suspension | ✅ Hydraulic comfort | ❌ Tyres only, no suspension |
| Design | ❌ Less refined, some play | ✅ Clean, rigid, polished |
| Safety | ❌ Basic, decent only | ✅ RWD, TCS, signals, lights |
| Practicality | ✅ Swap packs, easy charging | ❌ Fixed pack, no swap |
| Comfort | ✅ Softer on rough streets | ❌ Harsher on bad surfaces |
| Features | ✅ Swappable battery, suspension | ✅ Turn signals, TCS, app |
| Serviceability | ❌ Harder parts, mixed support | ✅ Easy parts, known platform |
| Customer Support | ❌ Inconsistent experiences | ✅ Retail-backed, predictable |
| Fun Factor | ✅ Cushy, unlockable speed | ❌ Sensible more than playful |
| Build Quality | ❌ More flex, joint issues | ✅ Tank-like, rattle-free |
| Component Quality | ❌ Brakes, hinge need love | ✅ Strong core components |
| Brand Name | ❌ Smaller, regional presence | ✅ Global, proven track record |
| Community | ❌ Smaller, fewer resources | ✅ Huge, active worldwide |
| Lights (visibility) | ❌ Standard, nothing special | ✅ Indicators, auto lights |
| Lights (illumination) | ❌ Adequate only | ✅ Strong, well-tuned beam |
| Acceleration | ❌ Respectable but modest | ✅ Punchier, especially on hills |
| Arrive with smile factor | ✅ Plush, playful ride | ✅ Confident, powerful feel |
| Arrive relaxed factor | ✅ Suspension saves your joints | ❌ More fatigue on rough |
| Charging speed | ✅ Faster charge, swappable | ❌ Slower full top-up |
| Reliability | ❌ More reports of niggles | ✅ Very solid track record |
| Folded practicality | ❌ Wider, less refined lock | ✅ Secure, compact enough |
| Ease of transport | ❌ Heavy, awkward stairs | ❌ Heavy, awkward stairs |
| Handling | ❌ Softer, slightly floaty | ✅ Precise, planted cornering |
| Braking performance | ❌ Good but needs tuning | ✅ Consistent, low-maintenance |
| Riding position | ✅ Comfortable, roomy deck | ✅ Good for taller riders |
| Handlebar quality | ❌ Fine, but unremarkable | ✅ Wider, stiffer, nicer |
| Throttle response | ❌ Smooth but a bit soft | ✅ Crisp, well-tuned |
| Dashboard/Display | ✅ Bright, easy to read | ❌ Good, but scratches easily |
| Security (locking) | ❌ Basic, no ecosystem | ✅ App lock, many solutions |
| Weather protection | ❌ Standard IPX4, that's it | ❌ Same rating, similar limits |
| Resale value | ❌ Niche, harder resale | ✅ Strong second-hand demand |
| Tuning potential | ✅ Unlockable speed options | ❌ Locked-down firmware |
| Ease of maintenance | ❌ More fiddly to keep perfect | ✅ Documented, shops know it |
| Value for Money | ❌ Pricey for a niche brand | ✅ Strong package for price |
Overall Winner Declaration
In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the MEARTH City scores 5 points against the XIAOMI Electric Scooter 4 Pro 2nd Gen's 7. In the Author's Category Battle, the MEARTH City gets 14 ✅ versus 27 ✅ for XIAOMI Electric Scooter 4 Pro 2nd Gen (with a few ties sprinkled in).
Totals: MEARTH City scores 19, XIAOMI Electric Scooter 4 Pro 2nd Gen scores 34.
Based on the scoring, the XIAOMI Electric Scooter 4 Pro 2nd Gen is our overall winner. On balance, the Xiaomi Electric Scooter 4 Pro 2nd Gen simply feels like the more complete partner for daily life: strong where it matters, calm under pressure, and backed by a support network that makes owning it feel pleasantly uneventful. The MEARTH City has its charms-the suspension and swappable battery are genuinely attractive-but once the novelty fades, its rougher edges and weaker ecosystem are hard to ignore. If you want your commute to feel like a considered, confidence-building routine rather than an ongoing experiment, the Xiaomi is the scooter that will quietly earn your trust day after day.
That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.

