Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)
The MUKUTA 8 is the overall winner here: it feels tougher, more practical long-term, and its removable battery plus "tank-grade" chassis make it a smarter workhorse for real commuting, not just spec-sheet bragging. The APOLLO City 2022 counters with a silkier ride and better wet-weather manners, but you pay more for style, comfort and integration than for pure everyday robustness.
Choose the MUKUTA 8 if you want a low-maintenance, zero-flats, leave-the-frame-downstairs urban tool that will quietly rack up thousands of kilometres. Choose the APOLLO City 2022 if comfort, suspension plushness and sleek design matter more than modularity and ease of servicing, and you rarely need to carry the scooter up flights of stairs.
Both will get you to work; only one feels like it was designed for the slightly abused reality of city life. Stick around and we'll dig into the details that the spec tables can't tell you.
You know a scooter segment has matured when you stop asking "Is it powerful enough?" and start asking "Will this thing still feel solid after two winters, three sets of brake pads and one unfortunate collision with a wheelie bin?". That's exactly where the MUKUTA 8 and APOLLO City 2022 meet: not toy scooters, not full-on monsters, but serious commuter machines aiming to replace buses, bikes and a depressing number of short car trips.
On one side, the MUKUTA 8 - a rugged, modular commuter that looks like it was built by someone who once over-engineered a bridge and never quite calmed down. On the other, the APOLLO City 2022 - a sleek, integrated "designed object" that wants to be the iPhone of scooters: beautiful, clever, and very good... as long as you accept its quirks.
The Mukuta is for riders who think in terms of "seasons" and "battery cycles". The Apollo is for riders who think in terms of "ride feel" and "looks like it belongs in a design magazine". If that already tickles your bias, good - now let's see which one actually makes more sense for you.
Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?
Both scooters sit in the same financial neighbourhood: mid-to-upper mid-range commuters you'd seriously consider instead of a monthly transit pass or that second car you swear you still need. They're fast enough to sit comfortably in the bike lane without feeling like a rolling roadblock, and sturdy enough to be proper transport, not weekend toys.
The MUKUTA 8 lives in the single-motor, "serious commuter" class with a focus on durability, removable battery and no-flat tyres. Its pitch: buy once, ride hard, maintain little. The APOLLO City 2022 (we'll focus on the Pro-like configuration with the bigger battery and dual-motor performance in mind) targets the same rider profile but leans into comfort, refinement and smart features: app integration, regen throttle, high water protection.
They compete because a typical urban rider with around 1.100-1.200 € to spend will absolutely cross-shop them. One offers a mechanic's dream of accessibility and toughness; the other offers a designer's dream of integration and glide. Same budget, same use case - very different answers.
Design & Build Quality
Put them side by side and the difference in philosophy is instantly obvious.
The MUKUTA 8 looks like it escaped from a VSETT lab after doing a cycle of steroids. Angular, industrial lines, exposed hardware, and a deck that opens like a vault to reveal that big removable battery. It feels like proper aviation-grade aluminium under your hands - there's heft, sharp edges where there need to be, and a stem clamp that locks with the kind of finality you normally associate with door bolts on a bank safe.
The APOLLO City 2022, by contrast, has all the visible complexity sanded away. The wiring is mostly hidden, the frame is smooth and sculpted, and the rubber deck feels like something lifted off a premium treadmill. It's elegant - almost too elegant if you like seeing where things bolt together. You get the sense Apollo's industrial designer had final say more often than their head mechanic.
In the hands, the Mukuta feels like a tool: grips are chunky, the folding collar is satisfyingly overbuilt, and that battery handle clicks into place with a power-tool vibe that's oddly addictive. On the Apollo, everything feels more refined: the display is flush, the controls are tidy, and nothing rattles, but you're also aware that you're dealing with more proprietary parts. When something eventually needs replacing, the Mukuta's "standard-ish" components and open layout make life easier; the Apollo's custom bits make it prettier - and more dependent on its brand ecosystem.
Pure solidity? They're both good, but the Mukuta frame and VSETT-style stem clamp have that "this will outlast me" aura. The Apollo wins on aesthetic integration; the Mukuta wins on the sort of brutal honesty mechanics love.
Ride Comfort & Handling
Comfort-wise, this is where their characters really split.
The APOLLO City 2022 glides. Between its triple spring suspension and those large self-healing pneumatics, it takes the edge off potholes, cracked tarmac and tram tracks with almost suspicious competence. You can roll over rough city patches and feel the chassis working underneath you rather than your knees doing the job. Long commutes stay surprisingly fresh; you arrive more "pleasantly alert" than "vaguely resentful of cobblestones".
The MUKUTA 8 takes a different route: it has genuinely impressive dual swing-arm suspension, and on decent asphalt it works wonders. But physics is physics: solid 8-inch tyres just don't erase noise the way big, air-filled rubber does. On smooth roads, the Mukuta actually feels exceptionally planted and composed, and the adjustable torsion setup lets you dial it in. Hit a long stretch of bricks or constant patchwork asphalt, though, and you're reminded that there's no air cushion in the tyres - the suspension is fighting hard, and it wins most of the time, but not always gracefully.
Handling-wise, the Mukuta's smaller wheels make it nimble and responsive, almost go-kart like, but also more sensitive to deep cracks and tram rails. You learn to pick your lines more carefully. The Apollo, with its larger wheels and wider stance, feels calmer and more forgiving at speed. Leaning into turns on the City is addictive - the rounded tyre profile invites carving in a way the solid 8-inchers can't quite match.
If your daily ride involves broken pavement and you value floating comfort over maintenance-free tyres, the Apollo has a clear edge. If you're mostly on decent roads, and you like that taut, controlled feel with zero flex and no-flat peace of mind, the Mukuta doesn't disappoint - just don't expect magic on cobblestones.
Performance
Both scooters sit squarely in the "quick enough to be fun, not stupid enough to be scary" segment, but they get there differently.
The MUKUTA 8's single rear motor hits harder than its class rating suggests. Off the line, in its sportier mode, it has that satisfying shove that leaves rental scooters vanishing in your peripheral vision. In city traffic, you can easily beat cars to the next light and merge assertively into bike lanes. On steeper hills, it does eventually reveal that it's still a single motor: lighter or average-weight riders will crest most urban inclines at respectable speeds, heavier riders will feel it work but not totally give up. It's more "confident commuter" than "mini rocket".
The APOLLO City 2022, especially in its Pro configuration, moves the ceiling up a notch. The way the controllers deliver power is silkier; acceleration feels less like a kick and more like a rising wave. You twist your thumb and the scooter just... goes, with less drama but more pace once you're rolling. On climbs, the dual-motor setup (when fitted) turns hills from "will I slow down?" to "how much throttle do I feel like today?". Even the single-motor City variant still feels a touch smoother and more polished than the Mukuta, if not dramatically quicker in normal use.
Braking is where the philosophies really diverge. The Mukuta uses mechanical discs (or a mix of disc/drum depending on region) plus a surprisingly sharp electronic brake. Hit the levers hard and it bites with conviction; you'll want to brace yourself the first time you do an emergency stop. It feels very mechanical, very direct, and it works - you always know what the scooter's doing under you.
The Apollo's dual drum plus dedicated regen throttle setup is more modern-vehicle-like. Once you get used to the left-thumb regen lever, you find yourself doing nearly all your slowing with that, rarely touching the mechanical drums except for panic stops. It's smooth, it recovers a bit of energy, and it keeps the drums basically eternal. Stopping power is fully on par with its performance, and the whole experience feels more "EV" than "electric toy".
If you want raw, no-nonsense punch with a slightly sportier, mechanical feel, the Mukuta scratches that itch nicely. If you like the idea of refined acceleration, one-pedal-style braking and fuss-free wet-weather performance, the Apollo has the more sophisticated drivetrain package.
Battery & Range
This is where the Mukuta quietly pulls out its trump card and grins.
On paper, the MUKUTA 8's removable battery delivers a very healthy chunk of energy. Out on the road, ridden like a normal human (mixed modes, some hills, not crawling in Eco all day), it realistically gives you a daily round-trip commute for most people with buffer to spare - think "two moderate days or one very confident long one" without touching a charger. More importantly, when that's not enough, you don't need a different scooter; you just buy a second pack, toss it in a backpack and double your real range. No hacking, no awkward external packs, just click-swap-go.
Range anxiety on the Mukuta is oddly low, not because its single battery is miraculous, but because mentally you know you can scale up by adding more batteries, not buying a new scooter. That changes how relaxed you feel once the gauge starts dipping.
The APOLLO City 2022, especially in its bigger-battery guise, also offers a solid real-world range - more than enough for typical urban commutes with weekend side trips. Pushed hard in its fastest settings, you won't see the optimistic catalogue numbers, but you'll still cover a respectable distance before the battery asks for mercy. The regen braking helps a little during stop-and-go riding, stretching range on hilly city routes.
Where Apollo scores is charging time: it refills respectably fast for its capacity, meaning a full workday at the office is plenty to go from "low" to "let's do that again". What it can't offer is Mukuta's modularity. When the Apollo's battery is empty, the ride is over - full stop. When the Mukuta's is empty, it's only over if you didn't bring a spare.
If you have fixed daily routes and like the idea of charging once or twice a day, Apollo is absolutely fine. If you're the "sometimes I go out for an extra 30 km just because the sun came out" type, the Mukuta's swappable battery system is a genuine lifestyle advantage.
Portability & Practicality
Neither of these is "throw it over your shoulder and sprint for the train" territory. They both live in the "I can carry it if I must, but I'd rather not" class.
The APOLLO City 2022 has the slight edge on pure weight in its single-motor trim, but once you're in the bigger-battery, higher-spec realm, the difference from the Mukuta isn't dramatic enough to change your life up a staircase. Up one or two flights it's manageable; four flights every day and you'll start pricing gym memberships just to make it less painful.
The Mukuta is unapologetically heavy for an 8-inch single motor. You feel it as soon as you lift it: dense, serious, like it's made from one solid billet. However, the removable battery helps in an unexpected way. Park the chassis in the basement or bike room, carry only the battery upstairs. Day to day, that's what matters far more than the last 2-3 kg of frame weight in your hands.
Folding mechanisms: the Mukuta's VSETT-style clamp is excellent in use - minimal wobble, easy to trust at speed. Handlebars fold too, which is brilliant if you're squeezing into crowded lifts or between office chairs. The only annoyance is that the stem doesn't always lock neatly to the deck when folded, so carrying it by the stem can feel like wrestling a sleepy metal dog.
The Apollo's Phantom-derived latch is equally robust, with a positive lock and safety catch. The stem hooking into the deck to carry is clever... until the hook slips if you don't balance it just so. Not dangerous, just irritating, especially when you're trying not to look like you're losing a fight with your own scooter in the lobby.
In terms of everyday practicality, the Mukuta's removable battery and NFC lock system are genuinely useful: leave the "shell" downstairs, carry the expensive and essential bit with you. The Apollo counters with app-based locking, tuning and IP56 water resistance, making it carefree in rain and easier to live with if you love tinkering with acceleration curves from your phone.
Safety
Safety is where both scooters take their "serious vehicle" role... well, seriously, but with different priorities.
The APOLLO City 2022 is the more rain-friendly machine. Those tubeless self-healing tyres grip well on wet tarmac, and the sealed drum brakes don't care if you've just ridden through a puddle deep enough to frighten small dogs. You can confidently commute through drizzle and the occasional downpour without feeling like you're tempting fate.
The MUKUTA 8 relies on solid tyres which, while immune to punctures, can be a bit more skittish in the wet. Painted lines, metal covers and very smooth asphalt require a bit more respect. The good news is that the chassis itself is stable; the suspension keeps things composed, and the braking performance is stout enough that you can scrub speed early and ride within the tyres' limit. But if your city spends six months a year damp, Apollo has an inherent traction advantage.
Lighting-wise, both actually care about you being seen. The Mukuta's high-mounted headlight plus deck and stem lighting make you look like a rolling neon installation - in the best possible way. The integrated indicators are a big plus: signalling without taking your hands off the bars is a real safety upgrade in chaotic traffic.
The Apollo brings an integrated lighting suite with front headlight, rear light and turn signals tucked into the rear. They look clean, and visibility for other road users is generally good, though some riders wish the rear signals were higher for car-level sightlines. The headlight is perfectly fine in lit urban environments, but I wouldn't rely on it alone for bombing down pitch-black country paths at full tilt.
Braking confidence is excellent on both. The Mukuta's regen plus mechanical combo gives very short stopping distances, with a more old-school lever feel. The Apollo's drum-plus-regen system adds a layer of consistency in all weather and reduces maintenance, which, indirectly, is a major safety win - brakes that are never out of adjustment are safer than slightly better brakes that no one ever bothers to tune.
Community Feedback
| MUKUTA 8 | APOLLO City 2022 |
|---|---|
What riders love
|
What riders love
|
What riders complain about
|
What riders complain about
|
Price & Value
Both scooters live within a stone's throw of each other in price, which means choice comes down to what kind of value you prioritise.
The APOLLO City 2022 asks you to pay for refinement: the design, the app, the regen system, the self-healing tyres, the IP rating, the polished ride. If you view your scooter like a daily driver car - something you want to be comfortable, quiet, and a bit classy - that premium feels justified. Pure performance-per-euro, though, it's not the screaming bargain some spreadsheet warriors might hope for, especially when generic models can throw bigger numbers at you for less money.
The MUKUTA 8, in contrast, spends your money on hardware density: removable high-capacity battery, overbuilt frame, sturdy suspension, NFC lock, solid tyres that never need patching. It doesn't have an app. It doesn't try to dazzle with futuristic UI. It just quietly solves real commuting problems - recharging in a flat, extending range, surviving bad roads and lazier maintenance routines - in a way that effectively future-proofs the scooter.
If you care about total cost over several years, including tyres, brake work and potential battery replacement, the Mukuta's modular battery and maintenance-light design give it a very strong argument. The Apollo gets close through lower ongoing faff - no tube changes, no disc alignment - but when the built-in battery ages, your options are less flexible.
Service & Parts Availability
Neither of these brands is an anonymous marketplace logo that vanishes when you need a warranty claim, which is already a big plus.
MUKUTA, with its roots in the same factories that birthed beloved VSETT and Zero models, leans on established distributor networks in Europe and North America. Parts like swing arms, clamps and electronics are broadly in the "enthusiast ecosystem", which makes long-term sourcing less scary. The removable battery is also a win here: if the pack degrades, you swap it, not the whole scooter or half the deck.
APOLLO, being a Western-facing brand with its own design language, has good support structures on paper: help centre, spares, and a clear contact path. Their move to more proprietary parts is a double-edged sword: the upside is everything fits perfectly and looks clean; the downside is you're more tied to Apollo for forks, displays, shells and some electronics. Community reports on support are generally positive but mixed, especially during busy periods - typical of a fast-growing brand still smoothing its processes.
If you live in Europe and like the idea of easily sourcing compatible parts or third-party upgrades, the Mukuta's underlying platform-style design feels slightly more future-proof. If you prefer a brand with a centralised app ecosystem and official upgrade path, Apollo is the tidier, if more locked-in, choice.
Pros & Cons Summary
| MUKUTA 8 | APOLLO City 2022 |
|---|---|
Pros
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
Cons
|
Parameters Comparison
| Parameter | MUKUTA 8 | APOLLO City 2022 (Pro) |
|---|---|---|
| Motor power (rated) | 600 W rear | 2 x 500 W (dual) |
| Top speed | ca. 38 km/h (uncapped) | ca. 51,5 km/h |
| Battery energy | ca. 749 Wh, removable | ca. 864 Wh, fixed |
| Claimed range | ca. 70 km | ca. 61 km |
| Realistic mixed range | ca. 40 km | ca. 38 km |
| Weight | 30 kg | 29,5 kg |
| Brakes | Front/rear mechanical + regen | Dual drum + regen throttle |
| Suspension | Front/rear adjustable torsion swing-arm | Triple spring suspension |
| Tires | 8" solid | 10" tubeless self-healing pneumatic |
| Max load | 120 kg | 120 kg |
| IP rating | Not specified / moderate | IP56 |
| Charging time | ca. 6-8 h | ca. 4 h |
| Price (approx.) | 1.126 € | 1.145 € |
Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?
If I had to distil both scooters into one sentence each, it would be this: the MUKUTA 8 is a no-nonsense urban workhorse built by people who commute hard, and the APOLLO City 2022 is a polished urban cruiser built by people who really hate potholes.
Choose the MUKUTA 8 if you live in an apartment or shared building, if you want to charge upstairs while the scooter sleeps downstairs, if the idea of buying a second battery to double your range appeals more than buying a second scooter, and if you prefer overbuilt hardware to slick apps. You'll forgive its extra weight and slightly harsher ride the first time you roll past a line of stranded riders fixing flats while your solid tyres just shrug and keep going.
Choose the APOLLO City 2022 if comfort is king, your roads are rough, and you ride in all weathers. It's the nicer place to stand for long, bumpy journeys, and the regen/drum combo plus self-healing tyres make it an easy scooter to own if you hate wrenching. Just accept that it's a more integrated, brand-tied machine, and that when the battery ages, you won't simply slide it out like a power tool pack.
Between the two, the MUKUTA 8 feels like the more honest long-term companion: tougher, more adaptable, and friendlier to people who think in years of daily use rather than in upgrade cycles. The Apollo City 2022 is undeniably comfortable and stylish, but if I had to pick one to live with through winter, questionable bike racks and the occasional flight of stairs, I'd take the Mukuta, grab a spare battery, and not look back.
Numbers Freaks Corner
| Metric | MUKUTA 8 | APOLLO City 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| Price per Wh (€/Wh) | ❌ 1,50 €/Wh | ✅ 1,33 €/Wh |
| Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) | ❌ 29,63 €/km/h | ✅ 22,23 €/km/h |
| Weight per Wh (g/Wh) | ❌ 40,05 g/Wh | ✅ 34,15 g/Wh |
| Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) | ❌ 0,79 kg/km/h | ✅ 0,57 kg/km/h |
| Price per km of real-world range (€/km) | ✅ 28,15 €/km | ❌ 30,13 €/km |
| Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) | ✅ 0,75 kg/km | ❌ 0,78 kg/km |
| Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) | ✅ 18,73 Wh/km | ❌ 22,74 Wh/km |
| Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) | ❌ 15,79 W/km/h | ✅ 19,42 W/km/h |
| Weight to power ratio (kg/W) | ❌ 0,05 kg/W | ✅ 0,0295 kg/W |
| Average charging speed (W) | ❌ 107,0 W | ✅ 216,0 W |
These metrics strip away feelings and focus purely on maths: how much battery and speed you get per euro, how much scooter you carry per unit of energy or performance, how efficiently each turns watt-hours into kilometres, and how fast they recharge. Lower is better for all except "power to speed" and "average charging speed", where more is an advantage. They don't tell you how the scooter feels under your feet, but they are handy for comparing raw efficiency and value.
Author's Category Battle
| Category | MUKUTA 8 | APOLLO City 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | ❌ Slightly heavier, denser feel | ✅ Marginally lighter overall |
| Range | ✅ Strong real range, swappable | ❌ Good, but fixed battery |
| Max Speed | ❌ Slower, commuter-appropriate | ✅ Faster, higher ceiling |
| Power | ❌ Single motor, adequate | ✅ More punch, better hills |
| Battery Size | ❌ Slightly smaller capacity | ✅ Bigger pack onboard |
| Suspension | ❌ Good, limited by solids | ✅ Plush triple-spring setup |
| Design | ❌ Functional, industrial tool look | ✅ Sleek, integrated aesthetics |
| Safety | ❌ Weaker grip in the wet | ✅ Better wet grip, IP56 |
| Practicality | ✅ Removable battery, NFC | ❌ Fixed pack, app-reliant |
| Comfort | ❌ Harsh on very rough | ✅ Clearly more comfortable |
| Features | ❌ Fewer smart features | ✅ App, regen throttle, extras |
| Serviceability | ✅ More standard, modular parts | ❌ Proprietary, brand-dependent |
| Customer Support | ➖ Decent via distributors | ➖ Good, but inconsistent peaks |
| Fun Factor | ✅ Punchy, tank-like feel | ❌ Refined, less raw character |
| Build Quality | ✅ Overbuilt, very solid | ❌ Great, but early hiccups |
| Component Quality | ✅ Robust, proven hardware | ❌ Mix of great and okay |
| Brand Name | ❌ Newer, less mainstream | ✅ Better-known urban brand |
| Community | ❌ Smaller, enthusiast pockets | ✅ Larger, active user base |
| Lights (visibility) | ✅ Very visible, lots of LEDs | ❌ Good, but less standout |
| Lights (illumination) | ✅ Strong beam for city | ❌ Adequate, not amazing |
| Acceleration | ❌ Strong, but single motor | ✅ Stronger, smoother shove |
| Arrive with smile factor | ✅ Punchy, engaging ride | ❌ Smooth, but less character |
| Arrive relaxed factor | ❌ More vibration on rough | ✅ Much less fatigue |
| Charging speed | ❌ Slower to refill | ✅ Noticeably quicker charge |
| Reliability | ✅ Simple, low-maintenance setup | ❌ More electronics, early issues |
| Folded practicality | ✅ Narrow with folding bars | ❌ Bulkier bars, hook niggles |
| Ease of transport | ❌ Heavy, awkward lift | ✅ Slightly easier to lug |
| Handling | ❌ Smaller wheels, more twitchy | ✅ Larger wheels, more composed |
| Braking performance | ❌ Strong, but less refined | ✅ Powerful, very controllable |
| Riding position | ✅ Spacious deck, kickplate | ❌ Good, but similar class |
| Handlebar quality | ✅ Foldable, solid feel | ❌ Non-folding, adequate |
| Throttle response | ❌ Slightly jerky in sport | ✅ Smooth, predictable delivery |
| Dashboard/Display | ❌ Hard to read in sun | ✅ Integrated, clearer overall |
| Security (locking) | ✅ NFC + removable battery | ❌ App lock only, no pack removal |
| Weather protection | ❌ Sensible, but un-rated | ✅ IP56, rain-friendly |
| Resale value | ❌ Less brand pull used | ✅ Stronger brand recognition |
| Tuning potential | ✅ More open, modder-friendly | ❌ Proprietary, closed ecosystem |
| Ease of maintenance | ✅ Solids, accessible components | ❌ More enclosed, drum quirks |
| Value for Money | ✅ Hardware, longevity, modularity | ❌ Paying extra for polish |
Overall Winner Declaration
In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the MUKUTA 8 scores 3 points against the APOLLO City 2022's 7. In the Author's Category Battle, the MUKUTA 8 gets 17 ✅ versus 21 ✅ for APOLLO City 2022.
Totals: MUKUTA 8 scores 20, APOLLO City 2022 scores 28.
Based on the scoring, the APOLLO City 2022 is our overall winner. For me, the MUKUTA 8 simply feels like the more complete long-term companion: it's tougher, more honest about what it is, and that removable battery turns a good commuter into a proper daily vehicle you can adapt to your life. The APOLLO City 2022 is lovely to ride and undeniably more refined, but it feels more like a polished gadget than a trusty tool, and over years of hard use that difference matters. If you want a scooter that will quietly take whatever the city throws at it and still be ready for more, the Mukuta 8 is the one that keeps you smiling after the honeymoon period. The Apollo City 2022 makes an excellent case if comfort and design are your top priorities, but it doesn't quite match the Mukuta's blend of practicality and sheer unbothered robustness.
That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.

