NAMI Burn-E 3 vs INMOTION RS JET - Which 72V Beast Actually Deserves Your Money?

NAMI Burn-E 3 🏆 Winner
NAMI

Burn-E 3

3 482 € View full specs →
VS
INMOTION RS JET
INMOTION

RS JET

2 155 € View full specs →
Parameter NAMI Burn-E 3 INMOTION RS JET
Price 3 482 € 2 155 €
🏎 Top Speed 105 km/h 80 km/h
🔋 Range 80 km 90 km
Weight 51.0 kg 41.0 kg
Power 8400 W 4600 W
🔌 Voltage 72 V 72 V
🔋 Battery 2880 Wh 1800 Wh
Wheel Size 11 " 11 "
👤 Max Load 130 kg 150 kg
Speed Comparison

Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)

The NAMI Burn-E 3 is the more complete, polished hyper-scooter here: it rides better, feels more mature, and delivers that rare mix of brutal power and almost ridiculous comfort that makes you forget you ever liked cars. If you want an "endgame" scooter that you buy once and keep for years, the NAMI is the one.

The INMOTION RS JET fights back with a much lower price, lighter weight, still very serious performance and a fantastic display, making it a strong choice for budget-conscious thrill seekers who want 72V punch without going fully nuclear on their wallet. If your priority is value and you can live with less range and slightly rougher edges, the RS JET makes sense.

But judged purely on riding experience, refinement and long-term satisfaction, the Burn-E 3 walks away with the win.

If you can spare a few more minutes, let's dive into how these two really compare once rubber meets tarmac.

Put two 72V dual-motor scooters side by side, and to the uninitiated they look broadly similar: big, menacing, and fully capable of turning your "quick ride" into a three-hour detour just because the road looks fun. But the NAMI Burn-E 3 and the INMOTION RS JET come at this game from very different angles.

The Burn-E 3 is what happens when an engineer builds the scooter they always wanted to ride, price and convenience be damned. It's the hyper-scooter for people who already know this hobby can get out of hand, and are absolutely fine with that. The RS JET, meanwhile, is Inmotion's attempt to deliver serious 72V thrills in a slightly more approachable, more affordable package.

In simple terms: the NAMI is for riders who want a no-compromise, "this replaces my motorbike" machine. The RS JET is for riders who want most of that performance at a friendlier price and weight, and are willing to sacrifice some range and polish to get it.

If that sounds like a close fight, it is - on paper. On the road, some pretty clear differences emerge. Let's break them down.

Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?

NAMI Burn-E 3INMOTION RS JET

Both scooters live in the high-performance 72V segment - the place you end up after you've grown bored of "normal" scooters that top out where the fun just starts. They're built for experienced riders, not beginners, and for people who want to keep up with city traffic rather than hide from it.

The NAMI Burn-E 3 sits firmly in the "hyper-scooter" tier: huge battery, outrageous power, top-tier suspension, price to match. It suits riders who plan to ride far and fast, day after day, and want comfort and control to be non-negotiable. Think car replacement more than toy.

The INMOTION RS JET positions itself as the "accessible" 72V monster. It gives you very strong acceleration and serious top speed in a chassis that's a little lighter and a lot cheaper. It's aimed at riders moving up from mid-range scooters who want to taste the 72V club without selling a kidney.

They're natural rivals because they promise the same headline: dual-motor 72V power, hydraulic suspension, big wheels, proper brakes. What you're really deciding between is: "most performance for the money" (RS JET) versus "most scooter for the performance" (Burn-E 3).

Design & Build Quality

Specs Comparison

Pick up (or at least attempt to pick up) the Burn-E 3 and the first impression is: this thing feels like industrial equipment. The hand-welded tubular exoskeleton frame has that "if I crash, the scooter will be fine" vibe. Nothing creaks, nothing flexes. The carbon-fibre steering column isn't just for show; it lightens the front end and helps the steering feel more precise rather than top-heavy.

The RS JET feels solid too, particularly for its price. The chassis shares DNA with the flagship RS, and the frame doesn't complain when you start throwing power at it. Cable routing is tidy, the black-and-yellow finish is sharp, and overall build quality is much better than your usual mid-range scooter. But when you tap panels, wiggle parts and ride them back-to-back, the NAMI feels more like a long-term, "keep it for years" machine, whereas the RS JET still feels like a consumer product - a very good one, but not quite the same league of overkill.

Design philosophy is where they really diverge. The Burn-E 3 is unapologetically functional and industrial; it looks like it rolled straight out of a mad scientist's garage. Giant central display, bare metal, huge welds, no-nonsense hardware. The RS JET is more sci-fi: angular, "transformer" stance, slick touchscreen, and a more conventional deck-and-stem outline under the armour.

Ergonomically, the NAMI's wide, non-folding bars and huge deck give you a commanding position. You stand on it the way you stand on a big motorbike: planted, spread out, unbothered. The RS JET is slightly more compact. Still comfortable, but taller riders may notice the bars sitting a touch low; the NAMI feels like it was sized for grown adults who bring big boots and big expectations.

Ride Comfort & Handling

This is where the Burn-E 3 quietly flexes on almost everyone in the industry. Its fully adjustable hydraulic coil shocks, combined with large tubeless tyres and that rigid frame, produce what can only be described as "magic carpet for hooligans." You can roll into cobblestones, potholes, broken asphalt and the scooter just shrugs. Two hours of rough city riding later, your knees still feel like they belong to you.

The RS JET's adjustable suspension is good - impressively good for the price. You can tune it from pleasantly soft to reassuringly firm, and it handles bad tarmac very respectably. But side-by-side, the NAMI simply filters more of the world out. On the JET, you feel more of the sharp edges and high-frequency buzz. Not abusive, just less "luxury car" and more "well-sorted hot hatch".

Handling-wise, both are stable at speed, especially with their longer wheelbases and big wheels. The RS JET's party trick is the adjustable ride height: drop it low and it feels like a planted street racer; raise it and it's happier on rougher tracks. It's playful in that sense and invites tinkering. The NAMI, on the other hand, feels dialled even before you touch a tool. The steering is calm rather than twitchy, and once you've set your rebound to taste, you stop thinking about the chassis entirely - which is exactly what you want at serious speeds.

In tight city manoeuvres, the JET's slightly lower weight makes itself known. Dodging pedestrians, hopping down kerb cuts, U-turns in cramped streets - it's just that bit easier to throw around. The Burn-E 3 is never clumsy, but you're always aware it's a heavy, serious piece of kit.

Performance

Both of these will utterly embarrass anything in the rental-scooter universe. The question is not "are they fast?" but "how fast do you really want to go standing up?"

The Burn-E 3 delivers its power like a big electric locomotive. With brutal peak output on tap, full-tilt acceleration feels like the ground is being pulled backwards under you. Yet thanks to those sine-wave controllers, initial throttle take-up is buttery smooth. You can creep through pedestrians without scaring anyone, then, with a quick mode change, unleash the kind of thrust that leaves cars genuinely confused at the lights. High-speed stability is excellent; once you're past city speeds, the chassis and steering still feel calm, not nervous.

The RS JET is more of a punchy sprinter. Its dual motors and 72V system give you a proper shove in the back, more than enough to rocket you to urban speeds in a handful of seconds. Top-end is a notch lower than the NAMI's full lunacy mode, but still in "you really should be wearing full gear" territory. The thrill is absolutely there; what you lose isn't so much drama as headroom. At very high speeds, the NAMI still has more in reserve, where the JET is starting to work closer to its limits.

Hill climbing is almost a non-issue on both. On the Burn-E 3, steep hills feel like mild slopes - it just muscles up them, even with a heavier rider. The RS JET also handles nasty gradients confidently; it doesn't bog down the way many mid-tier scooters do. If you live somewhere hilly, both will make elevation feel optional, but the NAMI retains more of its punch as the ride goes on and the battery drops.

Braking performance is strong on both, thanks to proper hydraulic systems with decent-sized rotors. The NAMI's overall chassis stiffness and slightly more planted feel at the front give it the edge in "oh, that car really did just pull out on me" stops. The RS JET stops well, but you feel the extra drama through the more agile geometry. With either scooter, good tyres and rider skill are as important as the hardware.

Battery & Range

Here the story is very simple: the Burn-E 3 is the long-distance bruiser; the RS JET is the sprinter who left the big battery at home to save weight and money.

The NAMI's big 72V pack gives you a genuinely substantial real-world range, even when you're not behaving. Ride briskly - the way people actually ride these things - and you can easily cover long commutes or extended weekend blasts without worrying whether you'll have to limp home in Eco mode. Take it easy, and you're suddenly in "cross a metropolitan area and back" territory on a single charge. Voltage sag is minimal; the scooter feels eager even when the battery gauge has been visibly working hard.

The RS JET runs a noticeably smaller pack. In daily use, that translates into solid but clearly shorter range: enough for a serious round-trip commute or a big joyride, but not on the same level as the NAMI. If you're a heavier rider, love full-throttle launches and spend a lot of time at higher speeds, you'll see the battery drain at a pace that will make you wish for just a bit more capacity. Ride gently and it'll reward you, but this scooter constantly whispers, "go on, just one more pull." Range behaves accordingly.

Charging is long on both with stock chargers, and both offer dual-charge capability to speed things up. The NAMI's huge pack naturally takes longer to refill, though its twin ports help a lot if you invest in faster chargers. The RS JET, with the smaller pack, comes back to full in less time, which is handy if you're doing two rides in one day - though the flip side is that you needed to recharge sooner in the first place.

In practice: if you want to ride hard and far without planning your route around sockets, the Burn-E 3 is comfortably ahead. If most of your rides are under, say, an hour of spirited use, the RS JET's range is fine - just don't expect touring-bike behaviour from a trimmed battery.

Portability & Practicality

Let's address the elephant in the room: neither of these is "portable" in any normal sense. If you're dreaming of casually carrying your scooter up three flights of stairs like a backpack... you've opened the wrong comparison.

The RS JET does win the weight contest. Being noticeably lighter, it's less punishing to wrestle into a car, up a single flight, or onto a small ramp. You still don't want to do it often, but if you absolutely must move it manually, the JET feels more like a heavy object, whereas the NAMI feels like an unforgiving gym session with wheels attached.

Both have folding stems, and both share the same slightly silly omission: the stem doesn't latch to the deck when folded. That means lifting either by the stem alone leads to an awkward, swinging mass trying to re-arrange your spine. Owners of both scooters quickly discover straps, bungee cords or "just don't lift it unless you must" as coping strategies.

Storage-wise, the Burn-E 3 is the bulkier of the two - long, wide bars, tall stance. It's happiest with a garage, a ground-floor storage room or at least a wide corridor. The RS JET still wants real space, but its slightly smaller footprint and weight make it just a bit easier to live with in cramped European reality.

For day-to-day practicality as a vehicle, both work well: proper stands, real-world water resistance, lights you don't immediately need to replace, and enough presence on the road that cars take you seriously. Treat them like small motorbikes, not like foldable toys, and they integrate into life fairly well.

Safety

Raw power without safety is a disaster, and both manufacturers clearly know this.

The Burn-E 3 brings properly strong multi-piston hydraulic brakes, a rock-solid frame, a carbon steering column and the option to run a steering damper. Its lighting is excellent by scooter standards: a genuinely bright headlight and highly visible side and signal lighting mean you're not riding blind or invisible. High-speed stability is superb; stem wobble simply isn't part of the vocabulary when it's set up right.

The RS JET counters with its own full hydraulic brakes, big rotors and a very confidence-inspiring stance, especially when you drop the ride height. The IPX6 water rating is class-leading for peace of mind when the sky does what European skies do. Its headlight is good enough for real night riding, and the integrated indicators are not just for show - you can actually signal without letting go of the bars.

Where the NAMI pulls ahead is in how "planted" it feels when you're pushing deeper into its performance envelope. The combination of its frame design, longer effective wheelbase feel and that top-tier suspension makes it feel more like a small electric motorcycle than a scooter. The RS JET is totally safe when ridden with respect, but it feels more eager, more playful - which is fun, but demands a bit more self-control from the rider.

Community Feedback

NAMI Burn-E 3 INMOTION RS JET
What riders love What riders love
Ultra-plush suspension and "magic carpet" ride quality.
Rock-solid frame with zero wobble.
Huge, clear central display with deep tuning options.
Monster power with very smooth delivery.
Excellent stock lighting and signals.
Real-world range that actually matches big claims.
Strong community, lots of shared mods and support.
Outstanding value for a 72V dual-motor scooter.
Superb colour touchscreen, "best in class" for many.
Very punchy performance and hill-climbing for the price.
Adjustable geometry and suspension - fun to tweak.
Stable at speed with no scary wobble.
Modern, futuristic looks that turn heads.
Good water resistance and solid everyday robustness.
What riders complain about What riders complain about
Very heavy and awkward to move when not riding.
Large size, especially the non-folding bars.
No stem latch when folded - annoying for transport.
Price puts it out of reach for many.
Stock thumb throttle not loved by everyone.
Needs routine checks like any serious performance machine.
Still very heavy for anything "portable".
No latch between stem and deck when folded.
Some taller riders find the bars a bit low.
App activation and setup can be finicky.
Range drops quickly with hard riding.
Parts availability can lag in some regions.

Price & Value

This is where the RS JET comes out swinging. It delivers genuine 72V dual-motor performance, hydraulic suspension and a premium-feeling chassis at a price where many brands are still flogging 60V commuters with more modest specs. If the question is "how much performance per euro?", the JET looks very, very good.

The Burn-E 3, on the other hand, asks for a lot more money - but also gives you more of everything: more battery, more refinement, more comfort, more long-term depth. You're paying to own a scooter that doesn't feel like a stepping stone; it feels like the destination. For riders who will rack up serious mileage and keep the scooter for years, the extra outlay starts to make sense. For those mostly doing weekend blasts and shorter commutes, the RS JET may well hit the sweet spot without the financial sting.

In raw value terms, the RS JET wins on entry ticket. In "buy once, cry once, then grin for years" terms, the NAMI quietly justifies its price tag.

Service & Parts Availability

NAMI has built a surprisingly strong support reputation for a relatively young brand, largely thanks to engaged distributors and a very active owner community. Parts for common wear items - brakes, tyres, suspension components - are not exotic, and the scooter is built in a way that's friendly to tinkering and upgrades. In many European markets, specialist shops are now very familiar with the Burn-E platform.

Inmotion is a veteran in the PEV world, and their battery management and safety track record is solid. The RS series is still relatively new, but the brand's network is growing and you do get that big-company infrastructure behind the product. That said, in some areas spare parts can take a little longer to appear than the community would like, especially for RS-specific pieces, simply because demand spiked fast.

For DIYers, the NAMI's more "open" construction can actually make life easier. The RS JET is well put together but in a more enclosed, "finished product" way - fine if you mostly rely on dealers, slightly more fiddly if you love doing everything in your own garage.

Pros & Cons Summary

NAMI Burn-E 3 INMOTION RS JET
Pros
  • Exceptional ride comfort and suspension tuning.
  • Huge real-world range and strong battery.
  • Massive, smooth power with high-speed stability.
  • Rock-solid chassis and premium feel.
  • Excellent lighting and safety features.
  • Deep performance customisation on the display.
  • Strong owner community and "endgame" appeal.
Pros
  • Outstanding performance for the price.
  • Lighter than many 72V rivals.
  • Superb colour touchscreen and app features.
  • Adjustable geometry and suspension for versatile feel.
  • Strong brakes and stable high-speed behaviour.
  • Very capable hill climber.
  • Attractive, futuristic design.
Cons
  • Very heavy and not remotely portable.
  • Bulky even when folded; needs space.
  • Expensive - premium price to match performance.
  • No stem-to-deck latch when folded.
  • Thumb throttle not everyone's favourite.
  • Demands regular checks and maintenance.
Cons
  • Still heavy; not commuter-portable.
  • Range clearly shorter than the NAMI.
  • Folding stem doesn't lock to the deck.
  • App setup and activation can irritate.
  • Less refined ride than top-tier hyper-scooters.
  • Parts and accessories sometimes slower to source.

Parameters Comparison

Parameter NAMI Burn-E 3 INMOTION RS JET
Rated motor power 2 x 1.500 W (3.000 W total) 2 x 1.200 W (2.400 W total)
Peak motor power 8.400 W 4.600 W
Top speed (track use) ca. 105 km/h ca. 80 km/h
Real-world range ca. 60-80 km ca. 55 km
Battery 72 V 40 Ah (2.880 Wh) 72 V 25 Ah (1.800 Wh)
Weight ca. 49 kg (mid of range) 41 kg
Brakes Dual hydraulic disc, 4-piston Dual hydraulic disc
Suspension Adjustable hydraulic coil (front & rear) C-type adjustable hydraulic (front & rear)
Tyres 11" tubeless pneumatic 11" tubeless pneumatic
Max load 130 kg 150 kg
Water resistance IP55 IPX6
Approx. price 3.482 € 2.155 €
Charging time (standard) ca. 11 h ca. 10 h

Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?

If you're reading this with a calculator in one hand and your bank app in the other, the INMOTION RS JET looks very tempting - and fairly so. It gives you serious power, a great screen, proper suspension and the full 72V grin factor at a price that used to belong to far tamer machines. For riders stepping up from mid-tier scooters, it will feel like a revelation, and it won't obliterate your budget quite as savagely as the NAMI.

But if what you really want is the scooter that feels closest to a fully resolved, premium vehicle - the one you'll still be happy to ride five years from now without wishing you'd gone bigger - the NAMI Burn-E 3 is the stronger choice. It rides better, goes further, feels more planted and more thoroughly engineered, and wraps all that madness in a comfort and refinement package that few, if any, in its class truly match.

So: choose the RS JET if you want maximum punch per euro and can live with shorter range and a bit less polish. Choose the Burn-E 3 if you want the "no excuses" machine - the one that turns every ride into an event and quietly makes almost every other scooter you've tried feel like a warm-up act.

Numbers Freaks Corner

Metric NAMI Burn-E 3 INMOTION RS JET
Price per Wh (€/Wh) ❌ 1,21 €/Wh ✅ 1,20 €/Wh
Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) ❌ 33,16 €/km/h ✅ 26,94 €/km/h
Weight per Wh (g/Wh) ✅ 17,01 g/Wh ❌ 22,78 g/Wh
Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) ✅ 0,47 kg/km/h ❌ 0,51 kg/km/h
Price per km of real-world range (€/km) ❌ 49,74 €/km ✅ 39,18 €/km
Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) ✅ 0,70 kg/km ❌ 0,75 kg/km
Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) ❌ 41,14 Wh/km ✅ 32,73 Wh/km
Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) ✅ 80,00 W/km/h ❌ 57,50 W/km/h
Weight to power ratio (kg/W) ✅ 0,00583 kg/W ❌ 0,00891 kg/W
Average charging speed (W) ✅ 261,82 W ❌ 180,00 W

These metrics answer very specific questions: how much battery and speed you get per euro, how much mass you're hauling around for each unit of energy or performance, and how efficiently each scooter turns watt-hours into kilometres. Some favour frugality (lower is better), while others reward brute force (more power per unit of speed, or faster charging). They don't tell you which scooter is "better" overall, but they do reveal whether a machine is power-dense, energy-efficient, or just surprisingly heavy or expensive for what it delivers.

Author's Category Battle

Category NAMI Burn-E 3 INMOTION RS JET
Weight ❌ Noticeably heavier overall ✅ Lighter, easier to move
Range ✅ Comfortably longer real range ❌ Shorter, more planning needed
Max Speed ✅ Higher, more top-end headroom ❌ Slower, but still quick
Power ✅ Stronger peak and sustained ❌ Punchy but less brutal
Battery Size ✅ Much larger capacity ❌ Smaller, range-focused compromise
Suspension ✅ More plush, more composed ❌ Good, but less refined
Design ✅ Unique, purposeful exoskeleton ❌ Flashy but less cohesive
Safety ✅ More planted at speed ❌ Stable, but less confidence
Practicality ❌ Heavier, bulkier to store ✅ Slightly easier to live with
Comfort ✅ Class-leading ride comfort ❌ Comfortable, but not magic
Features ✅ Deep tuning, strong lighting ❌ Great screen, fewer extras
Serviceability ✅ More open, mod-friendly build ❌ More closed, brand-specific
Customer Support ✅ Strong distributor ecosystem ❌ Decent, but more variable
Fun Factor ✅ Addictive, "just one more ride" ❌ Fun, but less epic
Build Quality ✅ Feels overbuilt, premium ❌ Good, but not overkill
Component Quality ✅ Higher-spec parts overall ❌ Sensible, more budget-aware
Brand Name ✅ Strong hyper-scooter cred ❌ Known more for EUCs
Community ✅ Very active, mod-heavy ❌ Growing, but smaller base
Lights (visibility) ✅ Brighter, more presence ❌ Good, but less standout
Lights (illumination) ✅ Strong real night lighting ❌ Adequate, not exceptional
Acceleration ✅ Harder, stronger pull ❌ Quick, but tamer
Arrive with smile factor ✅ Grin plastered every time ❌ Big smile, slightly smaller
Arrive relaxed factor ✅ Less fatigue, smoother ride ❌ More vibration, more effort
Charging speed ✅ Faster average per hour ❌ Slower refill rate
Reliability ✅ Mature platform, proven ❌ Newer, still proving itself
Folded practicality ❌ Awkward, big footprint ✅ Slightly more manageable
Ease of transport ❌ Heavier, harder to lift ✅ Lighter, easier to handle
Handling ✅ Calm, precise, confidence ❌ Agile, but less composed
Braking performance ✅ More planted under hard stops ❌ Strong, but more drama
Riding position ✅ Roomy, natural for adults ❌ Bars a bit low tall riders
Handlebar quality ✅ Sturdy, confidence-inspiring ❌ Good, but less substantial
Throttle response ✅ Extremely smooth, tunable ❌ Good, slightly less refined
Dashboard/Display ❌ Excellent, but less flashy ✅ Best-in-class touchscreen
Security (locking) ❌ Basic, relies on external locks ✅ App features add deterrent
Weather protection ❌ Good, but lower rating ✅ Stronger formal water rating
Resale value ✅ Holds value very well ❌ Cheaper, but drops faster
Tuning potential ✅ Huge community and options ❌ Less explored ecosystem
Ease of maintenance ✅ Straightforward, accessible layout ❌ More panels, brand quirks
Value for Money ❌ Expensive, worth it if used ✅ Incredible performance per euro

Overall Winner Declaration

Winner

In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the NAMI Burn-E 3 scores 6 points against the INMOTION RS JET's 4. In the Author's Category Battle, the NAMI Burn-E 3 gets 31 ✅ versus 8 ✅ for INMOTION RS JET.

Totals: NAMI Burn-E 3 scores 37, INMOTION RS JET scores 12.

Based on the scoring, the NAMI Burn-E 3 is our overall winner. In the end, the NAMI Burn-E 3 simply feels like the more complete, mature and deeply satisfying machine. It doesn't just go faster or further; it does so with a composure and comfort that make every ride feel special rather than stressful. The RS JET earns huge respect for how much it delivers for the money, and for many riders it will be the perfectly sensible choice - but once you've spent time on the NAMI, it's hard not to see it as the scooter you secretly wanted all along. If your heart pulls you toward the Burn-E 3, listen to it. If your wallet pulls you toward the RS JET, you'll still have a fantastic time - just know there is a reason so many serious riders eventually end up on the NAMI side of the fence.

That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.