Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)
The NAMI Klima is the better all-round scooter for riders who care most about how a machine actually rides: its suspension, braking feel, chassis solidity and tuning options make it the more rewarding, confidence-inspiring partner on real roads. The APOLLO Pro fights back with slick software, outstanding water resistance and low-maintenance hardware, making it attractive if you live in the app and just want a techy, nearly "set and forget" urban vehicle.
Choose the Klima if you're a rider first and a gadget lover second - someone who wants supple suspension, powerful hydraulic brakes and a frame that begs to be hustled. Choose the Pro if you prioritise connectivity, weatherproofing, big wheels and minimal maintenance over pure ride feel.
Both will get you to work quickly; only one feels like a performance scooter that happens to commute well. Read on for the deep dive before you drop a few thousand Euro on the wrong one.
So, we've got two very serious scooters here - the NAMI Klima, essentially a compacted-down hyper-scooter with manners, and the APOLLO Pro, a tech-saturated, unibody spaceship with tyres. On paper they live in the same high-performance, premium-price neighbourhood. On the road, they go about life very differently.
I've put long days on both: rush-hour commutes, badly paved city centres, stupidly steep hills and the odd late-night blast where you "accidentally" take the long way home. One of them feels like it was built by riders who obsess about suspension clicks and brake feel. The other feels like it was built by a software team that refused to accept that scooters have to be dumb.
If you're wondering which one should live in your hallway - or your garage, or your office corner - let's break it down properly.
Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?
Both the NAMI Klima and the APOLLO Pro sit in that spicy middle ground between "serious commuter" and "entry-level hyper-scooter". They're nowhere near the flimsy rental toys, but they also aren't those 50 kg monsters that require a gym membership and a ground-floor flat.
They share a similar mission: dual motors, serious speed, proper range, premium components and price tags that will make your non-scooter friends raise an eyebrow. You buy either of these instead of a second car, not instead of a bicycle.
The overlap is clear: heavier riders, hilly cities, longer daily commutes, and people who want a machine that still makes weekend rides fun. They're natural rivals in budget, performance and ambition - but they're aiming at different personalities. One is more analogue-enthusiast performance, the other more digital luxury commuter.
Design & Build Quality
Put them side by side and the philosophical split is obvious.
The NAMI Klima is unapologetically mechanical: a welded tubular frame, visible engineering, generous welds and a stealthy, purposeful stance. It feels like industrial equipment that someone accidentally made fast. Grab the stem, bounce it, and there's no drama - no creaks, no flex, just that reassuring one-piece solidity. Cables are visible but tidy; it looks like something you could work on with normal tools, because you can.
The APOLLO Pro is the opposite: a unibody casting with almost no visible wiring, all smooth curves, space-age grey and integrated lighting. In the hand it feels like a single sculpted piece, more "consumer electronics" than "garage-built hot rod". Beautiful, absolutely - and the internal routing does protect cables - but it also feels more closed and proprietary. You get the sense Apollo would prefer you talk to the app than to your toolbox.
Build quality on both is high, but in different flavours. The Klima's frame and KKE hardware have that heavy-duty, ride-hard-daily vibe. The Pro counters with extremely clean finishing, tight tolerances and a cockpit that looks like it came from a design studio, not a welding bench. If you're into raw, functional engineering, the Klima is the one you keep walking back to admire. If you want something your architect friend will compliment, the Pro wins the hallway beauty contest.
Ride Comfort & Handling
This is where the personalities really separate.
The Klima's suspension is the star of the show: fully adjustable hydraulic coil shocks front and rear, with proper rebound adjustment. You actually feel the difference when you twist those red knobs. On battered city asphalt, the Klima doesn't just soften impacts - it erases them. Cobblestones turn from dental work to background texture, and speed bumps become polite suggestions rather than spine tests.
After a few kilometres of deliberately hunting for potholes, the Klima still feels composed, with that "floating but connected" sensation you normally get from high-end MTBs or motorbikes. The wide, stable deck and tall-ish bar height encourage a relaxed, athletic stance. Throw it into a corner and the chassis settles rather than wallows, keeping your line predictable even when the surface is not.
The APOLLO Pro takes a different approach: very large, self-healing 12-inch tyres doing a lot of the comfort work, supported by an adjustable hydraulic fork up front and a rubber block at the rear. The big wheels roll beautifully over city obstacles - tram tracks and deep cracks that would unsettle smaller scooters are shrugged off. The front fork can be dialled in from plush to firm, but the rear has a more "set and forget" feel.
On smoother roads, the Pro delivers a relaxed, big-wheeled glide. On repeated sharp hits, you start to feel the rear's rubber element reminding you it's built for durability as much as comfort. It's never harsh, but compared directly, the Klima is simply more supple and more tunable. After a 20 km loop on mixed surfaces, my knees and wrists felt fresher on the NAMI.
In tight urban handling, both are stable. The Klima feels compact and eager to change direction; the Pro feels longer, more planted, a bit more "grand tourer". At higher speeds, both are impressively calm - especially once the Klima's steering damper is dialled properly - but the NAMI's fully hydraulic suspension gives it that extra layer of composure when you hit something ugly at pace.
Performance
Both scooters are fast enough that your helmet choice becomes a safety decision, not a fashion one.
The NAMI Klima hits the road with dual motors fed by smooth sine wave controllers. The way it delivers power is addictive: pull the thumb throttle and the scooter doesn't just leap forward; it surges in a perfectly controlled, linear whoosh. In the more aggressive modes, it will happily lighten the front wheel if you're sloppy with weight distribution, but it never feels twitchy. There's plenty of head-snapping torque for hill starts and overtakes, yet you can dial the punch down in the settings if you're not in the mood to play hero.
The APOLLO Pro has the bigger bragging rights on paper, and it does feel potent. In its milder modes, acceleration is extremely civilised - almost limousine-like - thanks to the MACH 2 controller. In its "Ludo" profile the Pro wakes up properly, shoving you towards traffic speeds with an unbroken, muscular pull. It's quick enough that you'll be hunting gaps in traffic rather than waiting for them.
Where the Klima edges it for keen riders is in the feedback. You feel more of what the tyres and suspension are doing under you, and the hydraulic brakes give you that precise modulation when you're charging into a bend and scrubbing speed late. The Pro's performance is impressive but a bit more... insulated. It's fast, but it feels more like a high-speed appliance - very competent, slightly less involving.
Hill climbing? Honestly, you're not going to be disappointed with either. On nasty, long grades, both just keep pulling. The Klima feels like it has a little more eagerness out of slow, steep corners, while the Pro is almost boringly unbothered by inclines - it just goes, without any drama.
Battery & Range
Both scooters sit comfortably in the "don't worry about your commute" zone, even if your idea of a commute involves detours and full-throttle temptation.
The Klima uses a 60 V system with two battery sizes, both offering substantial real-world range. Ride it like a sane person in mixed modes, and a round trip of several dozen kilometres is entirely realistic, including hills and some spirited bursts. Even when you're having fun, you don't watch the battery bar drain with that sinking feeling. Voltage sag is well managed, so the scooter still feels lively when the percentage drops.
The APOLLO Pro counters with a slightly larger-capacity pack on a lower voltage system. In easy-going eco riding, it can stretch things nicely. In more spirited use - the way most people actually ride a powerful scooter - you still get a comfortably long day's riding out of a charge. The Samsung cells and smart BMS inspire confidence about longevity and safety, and the app read-out of pack health is genuinely useful.
Charging times are similar: both include fast chargers that make overnight or workday top-ups perfectly realistic. You're not babysitting them for half a day just to get juice back. In pure, nerdy efficiency metrics, the Klima is slightly kinder on the battery per kilometre when you match pace and rider weight, but the differences aren't night and day.
Range anxiety? On the Klima, it rarely even shows up. On the Pro, it's more about how much "Ludo" you're abusing; ride it like you stole it and, unsurprisingly, you'll see the gauge move faster.
Portability & Practicality
Let's be honest: neither of these is a "tuck under your arm and hop on the metro" scooter. They're both firmly in the "roll it, don't carry it" category.
The Klima is a proper mid-weight bruiser. You can muscle it up a few stairs or into a car boot now and then, but you wouldn't want that to be part of your daily routine unless your gym is free. The folding mechanism itself is robust and secure, but there's no latch to lock the stem to the deck when folded, so carrying it is awkward - you end up doing this slightly undignified bear hug while the front end swings around.
The handlebars do not fold either, so the Klima keeps its full bar width even when folded. If you've got a narrow hallway or a tiny lift, measure first. As a "roll to the lift, roll into the office, park under the desk" machine, it's fine. As something you drag across platforms and up staircases, it's punishment.
The APOLLO Pro is slightly lighter on the spec sheet, but in reality it feels just as big. Those wide bars and the long deck make it a substantial lump to manoeuvre in tight spaces. The upgraded folding mechanism is excellent in terms of rock-solid riding stiffness, and there is a proper hook system to keep things together when folded - nicer to handle than the Klima once it's down, but still no featherweight.
Where the Pro does score higher on practicality is in weather resistance and low-maintenance hardware. With its high water protection rating, self-healing tyres and drum brakes, it's built for being used like a daily vehicle in all sorts of conditions. The Klima is weather-capable too, but it doesn't quite reach that "ride in the rain, shrug, put it away wet" confidence the Pro gives.
Safety
Both scooters take safety seriously, but they come at it from quite different angles.
The Klima goes the traditional performance route: powerful hydraulic disc brakes with large rotors, grippy tyres and a chassis that resists flex and wobble. Pull a lever with one finger and you get immediate, predictable deceleration. The modulation is excellent; you can trail-brake into a corner with real finesse, and full-force emergency stops feel controlled rather than panicky. Add in that brutally bright, high-mounted headlight and you've got night-time visibility that genuinely lets you ride at speed without guessing where the road ends.
The APOLLO Pro leans heavily on tech: strong regenerative braking as the primary system, backed up by sealed drum brakes. The regen is impressively powerful once dialled in, and it's smooth - there's no on/off jerk. You can ride whole commutes barely touching the mechanical levers, which is great for pad longevity. The flip side is that some riders miss the sharper feel and outright bite you get from quality hydraulics, especially in aggressive riding.
In terms of lighting and conspicuity, the Pro wins easily. The 360-degree lighting, deck accents and multiple turn-signal positions make you look like a rolling light show - in a good way. Drivers see you, pedestrians see you, pigeons probably see you from orbit. The Klima's headlight is superb, and it has signals, but they're lower and less dramatic. It's more about seeing well than being seen from every angle.
Stability-wise, both are solid at speed when correctly set up. The Klima's steering damper is a great safety net once adjusted, and the frame gives no unpleasant wiggles under braking. The Pro's self-centring geometry and big tyres make high-speed rides feel calm, even for less experienced riders. On truly wet days, the Apollo's higher water resistance and enclosed braking hardware make it the more relaxed choice; on dry or merely damp days, the Klima's superior braking feel is hard to beat.
Community Feedback
| NAMI Klima | APOLLO Pro |
|---|---|
| What riders love | What riders love |
|
|
| What riders complain about | What riders complain about |
|
|
Price & Value
Both scooters ask serious money, but how they justify it is different.
The NAMI Klima undercuts the APOLLO Pro by a noticeable margin while offering high-end hardware where it actually matters for riding: full hydraulic suspension, hydraulic brakes, premium cells, powerful controllers and an overbuilt frame. You get the feeling you're paying for metal, oil and engineering rather than marketing slides. Out of the box, there are very few things you feel compelled to upgrade.
The APOLLO Pro sits in a higher price bracket and leans on its ecosystem: app, connectivity, IoT, lights, IP rating, firmware development and North American support model. Spec-for-spec in raw performance hardware it doesn't embarrass itself, but you are clearly paying a premium for software and refinement rather than for the most exotic mechanical bits. For some riders, that's a completely fair trade; for pure performance-per-Euro junkies, it stings a little.
Long-term, the Klima's strong resale and enthusiast following help offset its initial hit. The Pro's value lies in hassle reduction: less maintenance, better weather reliability, strong brand after-sales support. You can't put that in a spec table, but you do feel it over a couple of winters.
Service & Parts Availability
NAMI works with specialist distributors and dealers who know the machines and stock core parts - motors, controllers, suspension bits, braking components. The Klima's fairly open, modular design makes it friendly for independent shops and competent DIY owners. Need a new shock or a brake lever? You're generally dealing with standard, recognisable parts, not strange proprietary unicorns.
APOLLO, especially in North America, has a well-earned reputation for good customer service and a growing service network. The Pro is very much an Apollo ecosystem product: custom controller, custom frame, custom app. That's great for updates and official support; less great if you're in a region without a strong Apollo presence or if you like to tinker outside the official channels. In Europe, support and part pipelines exist but are a bit patchier than in their home market.
If you want to be able to hand your scooter to any competent e-mobility mechanic and say "fix it", the Klima is the easier proposition. If you're happy to stay within a branded service network and enjoy the app-driven diagnostics, the Pro works, provided you're in its coverage zone.
Pros & Cons Summary
| NAMI Klima | APOLLO Pro |
|---|---|
| Pros | Pros |
|
|
| Cons | Cons |
|
|
Parameters Comparison
| Parameter | NAMI Klima | APOLLO Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Motor power (nominal) | 2 x 1.000 W | 2 x 1.200 W |
| Top speed | ca. 67 km/h | ca. 70 km/h |
| Battery | 60 V 25-30 Ah (1.500-1.800 Wh) | 52 V 30 Ah (1.560 Wh) |
| Claimed range | 65-85 km | 50-100 km |
| Real-world range (mixed riding) | ca. 45-55 km | ca. 50-70 km |
| Weight | 36-38 kg | 34 kg |
| Brakes | Full hydraulic discs (Logan) | Regen + dual drum brakes |
| Suspension | Front & rear hydraulic coils, rebound adjustable | Front hydraulic fork, rear rubber absorber |
| Tyres | 10" tubeless pneumatic | 12" tubeless self-healing pneumatic |
| Max rider load | 120 kg | 150 kg |
| Water resistance | IP55 (scooter), IP65 (display) | IP66 |
| Charging time (fast charger) | ca. 4-6 h | ca. 6 h |
| Approx. price | ca. 2.028 € | ca. 2.822 € |
Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?
If you strip away the marketing and the app screenshots and just focus on what it's like to live with these day in, day out, the NAMI Klima comes out as the more satisfying scooter for riders who actually enjoy riding. The chassis feels bombproof, the suspension is in another league for this class, the brakes inspire real confidence and the whole package feels like it was tuned by people who ride hard and care about feel as much as figures. It's the one that makes you look for the long, bumpy way home simply because it's fun.
The APOLLO Pro is a very competent machine - and in some use cases, the smarter one. If you're riding in foul weather half the year, park outside, hate maintenance, love app control and want something that just quietly does its job with minimal tinkering, the Pro makes a lot of sense. Its big tyres, water resistance and tech features make it an excellent "serious commuter" that happens to be quick.
But as an overall package, balancing performance, ride quality, hardware and price, the Klima feels more honest and more rewarding. It gives you premium mechanicals where they matter and lets you shape the ride to your taste. If you're a rider first and a tech enthusiast second, the NAMI Klima is the one that will keep you grinning the longest. The APOLLO Pro is the better choice only if your daily reality puts water, low maintenance and connectivity ahead of pure riding joy.
Numbers Freaks Corner
| Metric | NAMI Klima | APOLLO Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Price per Wh (€/Wh) | ✅ 1,23 €/Wh | ❌ 1,81 €/Wh |
| Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) | ✅ 30,27 €/km/h | ❌ 40,31 €/km/h |
| Weight per Wh (g/Wh) | ❌ 22,42 g/Wh | ✅ 21,79 g/Wh |
| Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) | ❌ 0,55 kg/km/h | ✅ 0,49 kg/km/h |
| Price per km of real-world range (€/km) | ✅ 40,56 €/km | ❌ 47,03 €/km |
| Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) | ❌ 0,74 kg/km | ✅ 0,57 kg/km |
| Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) | ❌ 33,0 Wh/km | ✅ 26,0 Wh/km |
| Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) | ❌ 29,85 W/km/h | ✅ 34,29 W/km/h |
| Weight to power ratio (kg/W) | ❌ 0,0185 kg/W | ✅ 0,0142 kg/W |
| Average charging speed (W) | ✅ 330 W | ❌ 260 W |
These metrics look purely at maths, not feel. Price per Wh and per km/h show how much you pay for energy storage and headline speed. Weight-based metrics indicate how much mass you're hauling around per unit of performance or range. Efficiency (Wh/km) reflects how gently each scooter sips from its battery. Power-to-speed and weight-to-power ratios show how muscular the scooters are relative to their top speed and bulk, while average charging speed tells you how quickly they can realistically get back on the road.
Author's Category Battle
| Category | NAMI Klima | APOLLO Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | ❌ Heavier, harder to lift | ✅ Slightly lighter mid-weight |
| Range | ❌ Shorter real mixed range | ✅ Goes further when cruising |
| Max Speed | ❌ Marginally slower | ✅ Slightly higher top end |
| Power | ❌ Less nominal motor power | ✅ Stronger dual motors |
| Battery Size | ✅ Bigger optional capacity | ❌ Slightly smaller pack |
| Suspension | ✅ Fully hydraulic, tunable | ❌ Rear rubber, less plush |
| Design | ✅ Industrial, rider-focused look | ✅ Sleek unibody, futuristic |
| Safety | ✅ Strong brakes, huge headlight | ✅ 360° lights, stable, wet-proof |
| Practicality | ❌ No latch, wide bars | ✅ Better latch, smarter features |
| Comfort | ✅ Plush, highly adjustable ride | ❌ Comfort more tyre-dependent |
| Features | ❌ Fewer smart features | ✅ App, IoT, phone display |
| Serviceability | ✅ Standard parts, easy to wrench | ❌ More proprietary ecosystem |
| Customer Support | ✅ Strong specialist dealers | ✅ Great brand-side support |
| Fun Factor | ✅ Engaging, playful performance | ❌ Fast but more appliance-like |
| Build Quality | ✅ Tank-like welded chassis | ✅ Clean, solid unibody |
| Component Quality | ✅ KKE, hydraulics, good cells | ✅ Samsung cells, solid hardware |
| Brand Name | ✅ Enthusiast premium reputation | ✅ Mainstream premium reputation |
| Community | ✅ Strong enthusiast following | ✅ Large owner base, support |
| Lights (visibility) | ❌ Good but less dramatic | ✅ 360° lighting, very visible |
| Lights (illumination) | ✅ Extremely bright headlight | ❌ More about being seen |
| Acceleration | ✅ Strong, very controllable | ✅ Strong, refined MACH 2 |
| Arrive with smile factor | ✅ Feels like a mini motorbike | ❌ Impressive, less emotional |
| Arrive relaxed factor | ✅ Plush, easy on body | ✅ Big tyres, smooth control |
| Charging speed | ✅ Faster average top-up | ❌ Slightly slower charging |
| Reliability | ✅ Simple, robust mechanicals | ✅ Mature electronics, sealed parts |
| Folded practicality | ❌ No stem latch, wide | ✅ Hook system, slightly tidier |
| Ease of transport | ❌ Awkward to lift/carry | ❌ Also heavy and bulky |
| Handling | ✅ Agile, communicative chassis | ❌ More grand-touring feel |
| Braking performance | ✅ Hydraulic discs, strong bite | ❌ Drums less sharp-feeling |
| Riding position | ✅ Spacious, natural stance | ✅ Comfortable, relaxed ergonomics |
| Handlebar quality | ✅ Solid, no flex, functional | ✅ Integrated mount, clean look |
| Throttle response | ✅ Sine wave, tuneable feel | ✅ MACH 2, ultra smooth |
| Dashboard/Display | ✅ Big, bright central display | ✅ Phone + matrix, flexible |
| Security (locking) | ✅ NFC start, sturdy frame | ✅ GPS, park mode, alarm |
| Weather protection | ❌ Good, but not class-leading | ✅ Excellent, ride in rain |
| Resale value | ✅ Strong demand, enthusiast market | ✅ Recognised brand, good demand |
| Tuning potential | ✅ Open, mod-friendly platform | ❌ Closed, app-focused system |
| Ease of maintenance | ✅ Standard parts, DIY friendly | ❌ More specialised components |
| Value for Money | ✅ Hardware-heavy for price | ❌ Pay premium for ecosystem |
Overall Winner Declaration
In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the NAMI Klima scores 4 points against the APOLLO Pro's 6. In the Author's Category Battle, the NAMI Klima gets 29 ✅ versus 25 ✅ for APOLLO Pro (with a few ties sprinkled in).
Totals: NAMI Klima scores 33, APOLLO Pro scores 31.
Based on the scoring, the NAMI Klima is our overall winner. When you step off these scooters after a long ride, the NAMI Klima is the one that leaves you a little buzzed, like you've just had a spirited drive in a well-sorted hot hatch - composed, engaging and deeply satisfying. The APOLLO Pro feels more like a very competent luxury EV: quiet, clever and reassuring, but a bit more emotionally distant. If your heart wants a performance machine that just happens to commute brilliantly, the Klima is the one that will keep you falling in love every time you thumb the throttle. If your head values low drama, high tech and all-weather dependability above all, the Pro will quietly do its job - but it's the Klima that makes every ride feel like time well spent, not just distance covered.
That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.

