Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)
The NAMI Super Stellar is the overall winner: it delivers far more punch, significantly more real-world range, and higher-spec brakes while keeping the same compact NAMI DNA. If you want a scooter that laughs at hills, keeps up with fast city traffic, and feels like a shrunken hyper-scooter, this is the one.
The regular NAMI Stellar still makes a ton of sense if you mainly ride in flat cities, prioritise comfort and manageability over brutal acceleration, and want to save a meaningful chunk of money - all while keeping that trademark NAMI smoothness. It is the sweeter, calmer daily companion; the Super Stellar is the one that turns every commute into a mini track session.
If you can live with the extra weight and price, go Super Stellar. If your back, staircase or bank account says "absolutely not", the Stellar is a deeply satisfying, grown-up commuter.
Now, let's dive into how they really compare once the honeymoon specs are over and the kilometres start piling on.
There's something oddly charming about NAMI deciding to "go small". This is the brand that gave us the Burn-E, a scooter that looks like it should come with a pilot licence, not a manual. And now here we are, with two compact siblings: the NAMI Stellar and the NAMI Super Stellar - both promising that legendary NAMI smoothness in a package you can actually live with.
I've put serious kilometres on both: weekdays in grim traffic, weekend blasts, and a few ill-advised late-night "let's see what it really does" runs. On paper they look similar - same frame philosophy, same 9-inch tubeless tyres, similar displays, same IP rating. But on the road, they have very different personalities.
Think of the Stellar as the refined, comfort-obsessed commuter, and the Super Stellar as the caffeinated twin who discovered weight training and now sprints up hills for fun. Both brilliant, but brilliant in different ways. Let's sort out which one fits your life - and which one would just be an expensive mistake.
Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?
Both scooters sit in that "premium compact" space: more serious than rental-grade commuters, less ridiculous than full-blown hyper-scooters. Price-wise, they live in the mid-to-upper tier - not impulse buys, but still a far cry from flagship insanity.
The Stellar is aimed squarely at riders who want a plush, confidence-inspiring commuter that doesn't try to rip their arms off. Single rear motor, commuter-class battery, very civilised top speed - but planted, quiet and extremely composed. It's for people who might have looked at a Klima or Burn-E and thought: "Love the quality, not the weight - or the speed ticket."
The Super Stellar is for the same type of rider... right up until the moment they say, "But I want dual motors." It lives in that compact dual-motor performance segment: much stronger acceleration, bigger battery, hydraulic brakes, more headroom for heavy riders and hilly cities. It feels like the "enthusiast mode" of the same concept.
They share a frame concept, tyres, brand DNA and even similar ergonomics, so it's absolutely fair to cross-shop them. The real question isn't "which is better?" but "how much power and range do you actually use, and what are you willing to carry and pay for it?"
Design & Build Quality
Pick either scooter up and you instantly feel that classic NAMI attitude: welded tubular frame, exposed structure, minimal plastic, and a general sense that these things were built by people who are allergic to stem wobble.
The Stellar looks every bit the "mini NAMI": industrial, purposeful, matte black, with that open-frame, skeletonised style. The welds are chunky and confidence-inspiring, and the folding clamp feels more like a piece of workshop hardware than a consumer gadget. In your hands, nothing creaks, nothing flexes - it's closer to a small motorbike chassis than a toy scooter.
The Super Stellar shares the same overall aesthetic and construction philosophy but feels beefier once you're standing over it. You can tell there's more going on inside the frame and under the deck - more battery, more wiring, more everything. The cockpit is similarly serious: the large central display, sturdy stem and wide bars all shout "proper vehicle", not "fun gadget."
In terms of componentry, the Super Stellar clearly sits a step up: hydraulic brakes instead of mechanical, more complex suspension hardware, more power electronics tucked into the same basic form. It feels more densely engineered. The Stellar, by contrast, feels a little cleaner and lighter - less overbuilt, but still very much premium.
Different design philosophies then: the Stellar is the "solid commuter with overkill chassis"; the Super Stellar is the "mini hyper-scooter squeezed into commuter dimensions". Both feel excellent in the hand, but the Super Stellar undeniably feels like the more serious bit of kit.
Ride Comfort & Handling
If you've never ridden a NAMI before, both of these will spoil you forever. Coming from a stiff budget scooter to either Stellar is like upgrading from a folding chair to a proper armchair.
The Stellar's suspension is the star of its show. Adjustable springs front and rear with generous travel soak up cracked pavement, cobbles and small potholes in a way most commuters can only dream of. The deck is long enough for a relaxed stance, handlebars are nicely wide, and the whole chassis feels calm and settled. After a good stretch of ugly city tarmac, you get off thinking "that was surprisingly civilised", not "where's my chiropractor?"
The Super Stellar is impressively plush for such a compact dual-motor machine. Its hybrid spring-and-rubber setup filters out high-frequency buzz nicely and still has enough stroke to cope with bigger hits. However, with more power on tap and a slightly more "eager" geometry, the whole scooter feels livelier. Turn-in is sharper, body movement under acceleration and braking is more pronounced, and the suspension is doing more work more of the time.
On rough city roads, the Stellar feels just that bit more relaxed and unhurried - you can cruise and forget about the road under you. The Super Stellar feels more like it wants to dance over the same surface: still comfortable, but more alert. On tight urban corners, the Super Stellar is the more playful one, happy to lean and carve. The Stellar is a touch more "set it and forget it", with a calmer front end that flatters less experienced riders.
So: for pure comfort and easygoing stability, the regular Stellar has a slight edge. For sporty handling and that agile, "flick it wherever you want" feel, the Super Stellar pulls ahead - at the cost of demanding more from the rider.
Performance
This is where the family resemblance ends and the sibling rivalry begins.
The Stellar's single rear motor is genuinely punchy for its class. Off the line, it pulls enthusiastically, and thanks to the sine wave controller, the power comes in smooth and predictable. Rolling through city traffic at moderate speeds, it feels right in its element: quick enough to dart through gaps and surge ahead when the light turns green, without ever feeling like it wants to catch you out. Top speed is plenty for bike lanes and most city streets; you're not going to outrun motorcycles, but you're also not the slowest thing in the lane.
Hill performance is perfectly adequate on normal urban gradients. Bridges, underpasses, mild suburban climbs - all dispatched without drama. You do feel it working harder on truly steep, long hills, and heavier riders in very hilly cities will eventually start wishing for a second motor. But for most European-style cities that aren't impersonating San Francisco, it's absolutely fine.
The Super Stellar, on the other hand, is a different animal. Dual motors transform the character: throttle up, and instead of "zippy", you get "oh, that's serious." Acceleration becomes properly strong - the sort that will happily embarrass inattentive car drivers at the lights. Again, the sine wave controllers keep it civilised rather than violent, but if you dial up your modes and pull hard, you will absolutely feel the front lighten and your body weight shift sharply backwards.
At higher speeds, the Super Stellar continues building pace with ease, cruising where the Stellar is starting to nudge its comfort ceiling. On long, fast stretches, the extra headroom makes a big difference psychologically: you're not running at the scooter's limit all the time. And on hills, the dual motors make inclines feel almost irrelevant - you simply lean forward and keep going. Heavy riders or steep cities are what this thing was built for.
Braking-wise, the difference is just as clear. The Stellar's mechanical discs are good for its speed class: decent leverage, predictable feel, and with regen set up properly, you can ride quite aggressively without cooking your cable brakes. You'll, however, be tweaking them more often, and hard stops demand more finger effort.
The Super Stellar's hydraulic system is in another league: one-finger control, stronger bite, and easier modulation. It feels closer to a small motorcycle brake than a "scooter brake". At the kind of speeds it can reach, that's not a luxury, it's a necessity - and it nails it.
In short: the regular Stellar gives you "more than enough" performance for sensible commuting; the Super Stellar gives you "I might need to recalibrate what I think a scooter can do".
Battery & Range
Range is where the spec sheets diverge in a very practical way.
The Stellar's battery is firmly in commuter territory. In real life - moderate rider weight, mixed speeds, some stops, and no monk-like eco-riding - you're looking at roughly a solid commute in and out of town with a bit of buffer, or a decent long loop around the city. Ride flat-out everywhere and you'll drain it noticeably faster, but for daily round-trips in the twenty-odd kilometre range, it's absolutely fine. You just accept that you're charging most nights or every workday.
The Super Stellar's battery steps things up a level. Even ridden in a spirited way, you're realistically looking at close to double the real-world range of the Stellar. That changes how you use it: instead of constantly thinking "can I afford an extra detour?", you mostly stop caring. Commute all week and charge a couple of times, or hammer it on a Sunday blast without planning your entire day around a wall socket. For riders doing longer commutes, or for those who want weekend fun and weekday practicality in one machine, that extra capacity isn't abstract - it's the difference between planning and just riding.
Charging times are similar on both, which is nice: you're not punished with painfully long charges just because the Super Stellar's battery is bigger. The controllers in both are efficient, but obviously the dual motors will use more energy when you lean on them. The key is that the Super Stellar simply starts with a much bigger tank.
Range anxiety scorecard: the Stellar is "commuter-safe if you're honest with yourself"; the Super Stellar is "use it hard and still get home with juice to spare."
Portability & Practicality
Neither of these scooters is what I'd call "shoulder-friendly" in the way an ultra-light commuter is, but they live in different pain thresholds.
The Stellar sits in that mid-twenties kilo range. You feel it, but it's manageable. Carrying it up a short flight of stairs, lifting it into a car boot, or navigating a few steps at a train station is perfectly doable for most reasonably fit adults. Doing four floors every day? That turns into your new gym routine very quickly - but for occasional lifting, it's fine. Folded, it's reasonably compact and will disappear into most car boots or a hallway corner.
The Super Stellar crosses the psychological line for many people. Around thirty kilos doesn't sound much on paper until you're lifting it, slightly awkwardly, with outstretched arms in a cramped stairwell. One flight is fine; three flights every day will make you question your life choices. It still folds into a compact footprint - impressively so for what it is - but you have to be honest with yourself about your back, your stairs and your willingness to heft a small e-motorbike on one arm.
On the flip side, both share very usable features for daily life: sensible fenders (if not perfect), a decent IP rating so light rain doesn't send you into a panic, strong lights so you're not forced into aftermarket upgrades on day one, and NFC start so you're not rummaging for tiny keys. The Stellar gets points for being more approachable to live with if you're constantly folding, lifting, parking, and wiggling through tight storage spaces. The Super Stellar wins if your "portability" mostly means rolling it into a garage, lift or hallway and only occasionally lifting it.
Safety
Safety on both scooters is more than an afterthought; it's clearly baked into the design, but each takes a slightly different route.
Tyres first: both sit on wide 9-inch tubeless pneumatics. Tubeless is a win - fewer sudden blowouts, better puncture behaviour, and generally better grip. The downside, of course, is wheel size: 9-inch wheels demand more attention on broken roads than larger 10 or 11-inch setups. On both scooters you still need to scan ahead for deep potholes and nasty edges. The Stellar's slightly calmer pace makes this feel less sketchy; on the Super Stellar, hitting a big hole at serious speed on 9-inch wheels is something you only do once.
Brakes are the major separator, as mentioned earlier. The Stellar's mechanical discs plus regen are perfectly adequate for its performance envelope, and with sensible setup they stop strongly. But there's no getting around the fact that hydraulic brakes on the Super Stellar are a big safety upgrade when you regularly travel at higher speeds. Less effort, more power, better modulation - and far more forgiving when you get surprised by traffic doing something stupid.
Lighting is a strong point on both. The high-mounted headlight on each actually lights the road rather than pretending to, and the Super Stellar adds particularly comprehensive signalling and a very visible brake light setup, which is fantastic in real city traffic. On either scooter, you can ride at night without immediately going online to buy extra lights - which is depressingly rare in this industry.
Chassis stability is equally impressive on both: the welded frame and stiff stem mean no unnerving flexing when you grab a handful of brake or hit a bump at speed. The Super Stellar simply pushes that stability further into higher speed territory. The Stellar feels bombproof at its natural cruising pace; the Super Stellar feels stable far beyond what you'd reasonably do on 9-inch tyres.
If we're splitting hairs: for the speeds it does, the Stellar is very safe; for the speeds it does, the Super Stellar is also very safe - and the hydraulic stoppers plus extra lighting tip the safety balance slightly in its favour overall.
Community Feedback
| NAMI Stellar | NAMI Super Stellar |
|---|---|
| What riders love | What riders love |
| Cloud-like suspension comfort, incredibly smooth throttle, premium welded frame, excellent central display, truly usable headlight, quiet motor, confident torque for a single motor, solid weather protection, "serious machine" looks. | Brutal torque for its size, super-smooth dual-motor power, hydraulic brakes, rock-solid frame, bright lighting and indicators, tunable suspension, strong water resistance, compact footprint for the performance, NFC security and tubeless tyres. |
| What riders complain about | What riders complain about |
| Heavier than expected for a "compact", 9-inch wheels not ideal for awful roads, mechanical brakes need regular fiddling, occasional loose screws and fender rattle, kickstand not confidence-inspiring, some riders wanting more power or a second motor. | Feels surprisingly heavy to carry, 9-inch tyres nervous on really rough roads, price higher than some dual-motor rivals, kickstand needing attention, deck a bit short for big feet, fenders could be longer, periodic bolt checks required like any performance scooter. |
Price & Value
Price-wise, there's a clear step between the two. The Stellar slots into the premium-commuter bracket: not cheap, but very competitive once you factor in chassis quality, suspension and electronics. You can easily find cheaper scooters with bigger motors or larger-looking batteries, but they rarely ride as refined or hold up as nicely over time. You're essentially buying "mini flagship" engineering at commuter money.
The Super Stellar costs noticeably more, but you're not just paying for a second motor sticker. You're getting a much larger battery, dual motors with serious torque, hydraulic brakes, and still that same overbuilt NAMI frame and suspension philosophy. In the real world, it gives you a big jump in capability - especially for heavier riders, hilly terrain, longer commutes, or those who just honestly love going fast.
From a value-for-money angle: if your riding is mostly flat, modest-distance commuting, the extra spend on the Super Stellar may simply not pay off - the Stellar already feels premium and sorted. But if you'll actually use the extra speed and range, the Super Stellar justifies its price very quickly, particularly compared to other dual-motor compact "power toys" with flimsier frames and weaker brakes.
Service & Parts Availability
Both scooters come from the same brand and ecosystem, which is good news. NAMI's distribution in Europe is now relatively mature, and there's a healthy dealer network plus a very loud, very opinionated online community that has already discovered and solved most minor quirks these models have.
Parts like brakes, tyres, suspension bits and electronics are available through established retailers and service centres. Both scooters do benefit from the classic "first week" ritual of bolt-checking and dab of thread locker - a familiar story in the performance scooter world - but once sorted, they are not particularly high-maintenance compared with similarly capable machines.
The Super Stellar's hydraulic brakes may require a slightly more specialised shop visit if you're not happy bleeding them yourself, whereas the Stellar's mechanical setup is more DIY-friendly. On the other hand, hydraulics need less constant tweaking once properly set up. Either way, you're not dealing with an obscure, no-name brand where parts vanish after a year.
Pros & Cons Summary
| NAMI Stellar | NAMI Super Stellar | |
|---|---|---|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
Parameters Comparison
| Parameter | NAMI Stellar | NAMI Super Stellar |
|---|---|---|
| Motor power (rated) | 1.000 W single rear | 2 x 1.000 W dual |
| Top speed | ca. 45-50 km/h | ca. 60 km/h |
| Real-world range | ca. 30-35 km | ca. 45-55 km |
| Battery | 52 V 15,6 Ah (ca. 812 Wh) | 52 V 25 Ah (ca. 1.300 Wh) |
| Weight | ca. 25,5-27 kg | ca. 30 kg |
| Brakes | Mechanical Logan disc + regen | Hydraulic Logan disc + regen |
| Suspension | Adjustable spring/coil, front & rear | Adjustable spring + rubber, front & rear |
| Tyres | 9-inch tubeless pneumatic | 9-inch x 2,5-inch tubeless |
| Max load | 110-120 kg | 110-120 kg |
| IP rating | IP55 | IP55 |
| Price (approx.) | ca. 1.109 € | ca. 1.361 € |
Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?
After living with both, the pattern is pretty clear: the Super Stellar is the more complete, more future-proof scooter if you'll actually use what it offers. The extra power, range, and braking performance don't feel like vanity upgrades - they transform how confidently you can ride in fast or hilly environments, especially if you're on the heavier side or regularly mix with real traffic rather than staying in sleepy bike lanes.
That said, the regular Stellar is not some "lite" consolation prize. For many riders, it is the smarter, more sensible choice. If your commute is medium distance, mostly flat, and you care more about comfort, refinement and manageability than sheer acceleration, the Stellar already feels like a luxury scooter. It's easier to carry, cheaper to buy, cheaper to maintain, and still gives you that trademark NAMI smoothness and comfort that makes other commuters feel crude.
So: choose the NAMI Stellar if you want a premium, ultra-comfortable daily scooter that feels solid and grown-up, but you don't need to crush hills or chase motorbikes. Choose the NAMI Super Stellar if you want that same premium feel, yet you know you'll crave extra torque, longer range, and sharper brakes every single time the road opens up. In my book, the Super Stellar edges it overall - but only if your riding style and environment are bold enough to justify what it can do.
Numbers Freaks Corner
| Metric | NAMI Stellar | NAMI Super Stellar |
|---|---|---|
| Price per Wh (€/Wh) | ❌ 1,37 €/Wh | ✅ 1,05 €/Wh |
| Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) | ✅ 22,18 €/km/h | ❌ 22,68 €/km/h |
| Weight per Wh (g/Wh) | ❌ 32,02 g/Wh | ✅ 23,08 g/Wh |
| Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) | ❌ 0,52 kg/km/h | ✅ 0,50 kg/km/h |
| Price per km of real-world range (€/km) | ❌ 31,69 €/km | ✅ 24,75 €/km |
| Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) | ❌ 0,74 kg/km | ✅ 0,55 kg/km |
| Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) | ✅ 23,20 Wh/km | ❌ 23,64 Wh/km |
| Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) | ❌ 20,00 W/km/h | ✅ 33,33 W/km/h |
| Weight to power ratio (kg/W) | ❌ 0,026 kg/W | ✅ 0,015 kg/W |
| Average charging speed (W) | ❌ 147,64 W | ✅ 236,36 W |
These metrics put hard numbers on aspects we feel while riding: how much range and speed you get for your money, how efficiently each scooter converts battery into distance, how much performance you get for every kilo you have to drag around, and how quickly the battery refills. Lower "per-something" values mean better efficiency or value, while higher power ratios and charging speed indicate more performance or less waiting.
Author's Category Battle
| Category | NAMI Stellar | NAMI Super Stellar |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | ✅ Noticeably lighter to haul | ❌ Heavier, tougher to carry |
| Range | ❌ Commute-class only | ✅ Comfortable long-range capability |
| Max Speed | ❌ Lower top cruising | ✅ Much higher ceiling |
| Power | ❌ Strong single, still mild | ✅ True dual-motor punch |
| Battery Size | ❌ Smaller, commuter focused | ✅ Bigger, more flexible |
| Suspension | ✅ Slightly plusher, floaty | ❌ Sportier, a bit firmer |
| Design | ✅ Cleaner, less intimidating | ✅ Beefier, more aggressive |
| Safety | ❌ Brakes limit ultimate safety | ✅ Hydraulics, better at speed |
| Practicality | ✅ Easier to live with | ❌ Weight hurts daily use |
| Comfort | ✅ Calmer, more relaxed ride | ❌ Sporty, slightly busier |
| Features | ❌ Fewer premium touches | ✅ Hydraulics, bigger battery etc. |
| Serviceability | ✅ Simpler brakes, easier DIY | ❌ Hydraulics need more skill |
| Customer Support | ✅ Same solid NAMI network | ✅ Same solid NAMI network |
| Fun Factor | ❌ Fun, but more restrained | ✅ Addictive acceleration grin |
| Build Quality | ✅ Excellent welded construction | ✅ Excellent welded construction |
| Component Quality | ❌ Mechanical brakes, smaller pack | ✅ Hydraulics, upgraded hardware |
| Brand Name | ✅ Strong NAMI reputation | ✅ Strong NAMI reputation |
| Community | ✅ Enthusiast support, active | ✅ Enthusiast support, active |
| Lights (visibility) | ✅ Great headlight, horn | ✅ Great headlight, indicators |
| Lights (illumination) | ✅ Excellent beam for night | ✅ Equally excellent beam |
| Acceleration | ❌ Zippy, but modest | ✅ Properly hard-pulling |
| Arrive with smile factor | ✅ Smooth, relaxed satisfaction | ✅ Adrenaline-charged grins |
| Arrive relaxed factor | ✅ Very chilled, low stress | ❌ More intense, engaging |
| Charging speed (experience) | ❌ Smaller pack, similar time | ✅ More juice per charge |
| Reliability | ✅ Simple, less stressed drivetrain | ✅ Robust, proven components |
| Folded practicality | ✅ Lighter, easier to handle | ❌ Awkward weight folded |
| Ease of transport | ✅ Better for stairs, cars | ❌ Only "okay" for lifting |
| Handling | ✅ Stable, confidence-building | ✅ Sharper, sportier response |
| Braking performance | ❌ Good, but cable-limited | ✅ Strong hydraulic stopping |
| Riding position | ✅ Relaxed, commuter-friendly | ❌ Slightly tighter deck |
| Handlebar quality | ✅ Wide, solid cockpit | ✅ Same robust cockpit |
| Throttle response | ✅ Smooth, linear, gentle | ✅ Smooth, but more urgent |
| Dashboard/Display | ✅ Excellent, bright, tunable | ✅ Excellent, bright, tunable |
| Security (locking) | ✅ NFC adds deterrence | ✅ NFC adds deterrence |
| Weather protection | ✅ Strong IP, decent fenders | ✅ Strong IP, decent fenders |
| Resale value | ✅ Desirable compact NAMI | ✅ Even more desirable spec |
| Tuning potential | ✅ Controller tuning, upgrades | ✅ Even more room to tweak |
| Ease of maintenance | ✅ Mechanical brakes, simpler | ❌ Hydraulics, more complex |
| Value for Money | ✅ Superb commuter value | ✅ Excellent performance value |
Overall Winner Declaration
In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the NAMI Stellar scores 2 points against the NAMI Super Stellar's 8. In the Author's Category Battle, the NAMI Stellar gets 28 ✅ versus 29 ✅ for NAMI Super Stellar (with a few ties sprinkled in).
Totals: NAMI Stellar scores 30, NAMI Super Stellar scores 37.
Based on the scoring, the NAMI Super Stellar is our overall winner. For me, the Super Stellar is the one that lingers in your mind after you park it - the surge of power, the easy range, the feeling that it will handle whatever route you throw at it. It takes the compact NAMI formula and turns the excitement dial up without losing the refinement that makes these scooters special. The Stellar, though, is the one I'd happily recommend to a friend who just wants their daily ride to feel smooth, solid and grown-up without turning every commute into a race. Whichever you choose, you're getting that rare combination of comfort and seriousness - but if your roads, hills or inner child are demanding more, the Super Stellar is simply the more thrilling way to get to work.
That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.