Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)
The NAMI Super Stellar is the better overall scooter if you care about ride quality, refinement, braking, and that "premium small hyper-scooter" feeling - it simply rides on a different level. The ANGWATT CS1 2025 fights back hard with price and value, offering big wheels, long range and a monster load rating for a fraction of the money. Choose the CS1 if your budget is tight, you're a heavier rider, or you want maximum bang-per-euro and don't mind some compromises. Choose the Super Stellar if you want something that feels engineered rather than merely assembled, and you're willing to pay for that difference.
Both are serious machines, but they deliver very different ownership experiences - read on to see which one actually fits your life, not just your wallet.
Electric scooters have grown up. On one side you've got compact dual-motor "mini hypers" that will happily outrun city traffic, on the other, budget bruisers that promise big range and big wheels for small money. The NAMI Super Stellar and ANGWATT CS1 2025 sit right in the crosshairs of that evolution - same weight class, similar claimed speeds, wildly different philosophies.
I've put real kilometres on both: from broken city bike lanes and wet cobblestones to steep-ish climbs that make rental scooters cry. One of these feels like a carefully engineered instrument; the other like a gloriously overachieving bargain. One sentence version? The NAMI Super Stellar is for riders who want a compact, refined rocket. The ANGWATT CS1 2025 is for riders who want a cheap, heavy-duty tank with surprising pace.
They cost very different money, yet for many buyers they'll end up on the same shortlist. Let's unpack why - and which one you'll actually be happy to live with.
Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?
On paper, it looks like an odd match-up: the Super Stellar is a mid-priced, enthusiast-grade compact dual motor; the CS1 2025 is a budget single-motor workhorse priced closer to entry-level toys than to premium brands. Yet both weigh around the same, both promise "proper" speeds, and both claim ranges that make daily commuting trivial.
They target riders who've outgrown flimsy 350 W commuters but don't want (or can't store) a hulking 40+ kg hyper-scooter. You want real performance, real brakes, real suspension - but in a package that still fits in a car boot and doesn't require a gym membership to move around.
So yes, they live in different price universes, but in the real world the question many people actually face is: "Do I spend more once and get something like the NAMI, or do I save hundreds and grab a CS1 and hope it's 'good enough'?" This article is here to help you answer exactly that.
Design & Build Quality
Pick up the NAMI Super Stellar (or more realistically, try to) and the first thing you notice is how solid it feels. The one-piece tubular aluminium frame is welded like a small bridge. There's no creak, no flexy stem, no sense that anything is just "hanging on." The design is unapologetically industrial - more cyberpunk utility than lifestyle gadget - but the execution is premium: clean welds, tidy cabling, quality clamps and a cockpit that looks like it's been thought through rather than guessed.
The ANGWATT CS1 2025 approaches things differently. Its frame mixes iron and aluminium alloy, and the whole scooter radiates "budget tank". It's beefy, overbuilt in a good way, and you can tell immediately why it can cope with such a massive load rating. The finishing is decent for the price: the integrated NFC screen looks surprisingly modern, the new kickstand is sturdy, and the folding joint is better controlled than on many cheap scooters. But compare it side-by-side with the NAMI and the difference in refinement shows - tolerances are looser, surfaces a bit rougher, and the overall feel is more mass-produced than engineered.
Ergonomically, the NAMI's cockpit wins. The display is big and genuinely useful, with deep controller settings that make it feel like a rider's tool. Bars are wide, controls neatly placed, and nothing feels like an afterthought. The CS1's central screen is a huge improvement over typical budget clamp-on LCDs, but its switchgear and levers remind you where the money has been saved.
If you care about craftsmanship and long-term solidity, the Super Stellar clearly sits a league above. If you're more interested in "strong enough, costs half as much," the CS1 2025 makes a very convincing case.
Ride Comfort & Handling
This is where the two scooters diverge dramatically in personality.
The NAMI Super Stellar rides like a compact sports bike. The adjustable suspension, combined with its wide 9-inch tubeless tyres, irons out city chatter far better than the wheel size suggests. You feel the road, but you don't suffer it. Cracked asphalt, seams, manhole covers - they register as muffled thumps rather than bone-rattling hits. The chassis is very stiff, so the suspension can actually do its work without being sabotaged by a flexy stem.
Handling is sharp, very sharp. Those smaller wheels make steering immediate: great for carving through traffic and threading between parked cars, but you do need to be awake. It rewards an active rider - shift your weight, use both hands, and it feels planted and agile. Put someone half-asleep on it in top power mode, and they'll give themselves a fright.
The ANGWATT CS1 2025 is more of a couch on wheels. The dual spring shocks are not as sophisticated as NAMI's setup, but the sheer size of the 11-inch tubeless tyres gives it an easy advantage over potholes, tram tracks, and the kind of bombed-out paving many cities call "bike lanes". It floats over rough stuff with less drama, especially at moderate speeds, and the bigger rolling radius means it's less likely to get kicked around by deep cracks or edges.
Handling is slower and more relaxed. The CS1 likes sweeping arcs and steady lines rather than aggressive flicks. That suits its character: it's a cruiser and pack mule, not a slalom weapon. Stand up straight, set a comfortable pace, and it just munches kilometres. Heavier riders in particular will appreciate how unflustered it feels when loaded up.
So: if you want razor-turning precision and a sporty, "alive" feeling, the NAMI is your toy. If you value stability and big-wheel comfort over quick reactions, the ANGWATT will be kinder to your nerves - and your knees.
Performance
Power delivery is where the Super Stellar just walks away with a smirk. Dual motors driven by quality sine-wave controllers mean two things: serious shove and exceptional smoothness. From a standstill, in higher power modes, it surges forward with that addictive dual-motor yank that makes you instinctively lean back. Yet it's not violent - the throttle mapping is beautifully progressive, so you can also crawl along at walking pace without any twitchiness.
At speed, the NAMI feels like it still has plenty in reserve. Cruising at typical city traffic pace, it's barely coasting - twist a bit more and it happily edges into the "are you sure this is a scooter?" zone. Hills become background scenery. Even on long, nasty gradients that make single-motor scooters beg for mercy, the Super Stellar keeps pushing with surprising composure.
The ANGWATT CS1 2025 approaches performance more humbly, but for a single-motor budget scooter, it's seriously punchy. That upgraded controller feeds the motor enough current to give you brisk launches off the line; you'll comfortably outrun rental scooters and keep up with cars up to urban speeds. It doesn't have that "teleport" feeling of a dual-motor when you slam the throttle, but it very much does not feel slow.
Top-end pace is solid. The CS1 will run at "keep up with city traffic" speeds without sounding like it's going to melt, especially for lighter and mid-weight riders. On steeper hills, you do feel the difference: speed drops more noticeably, and you're aware there's only one motor doing the hard work. It still climbs far better than typical 500 W commuters, but if you live somewhere that's basically a vertical obstacle course, the NAMI is in another league.
Braking is where things get serious, and the NAMI makes its premium hardware count. Proper hydraulic discs, combined with that stiff frame and weight distribution, give you braking that feels car-like in confidence. You can feather speed in traffic with one finger, but if something stupid happens in front of you, clamping down hard produces strong, controlled deceleration without drama.
The CS1's mechanical discs plus electronic brake are decent for the price, but they need more lever force, more setup attention, and simply don't inspire the same level of "I can stop from anything" confidence. For relaxed riding they're fine; for emergency manoeuvres at higher speeds, you wish they were hydraulic.
Battery & Range
Both scooters promise the kind of range where you stop planning every ride around a plug socket and start just... using them. But they get there differently.
The NAMI Super Stellar packs a healthy battery in a slightly higher-voltage system, managed by efficient sine-wave controllers. In real life, ridden like an enthusiast (some full throttle, some cruising, some hills), you're looking at enough distance for a substantial two-way commute plus detours - or a solid half-day of spirited riding before the gauge makes you nervous. Ride gently and you can stretch it impressively; ride like you stole it and it still doesn't drop dead too quickly.
The ANGWATT CS1 2025 has a slightly lower nominal voltage but a generously sized pack for its class. Despite the lower price, it delivers very respectable real-world distance. Mixed riding sees roughly similar "usable" range to the NAMI for many riders, especially if you're not constantly hammering full power. The single motor is inherently more frugal, and the big tyres roll efficiently once up to speed.
The trade-off comes at the charger. The NAMI refuels noticeably faster; its battery is ready again in one long evening or a workday. The CS1's bigger pack paired with a more modest charger means you're waiting longer between big rides. For daily commuters who charge overnight, that's rarely an issue, but if you like doing big back-to-back weekend rides, the NAMI's charging behaviour is simply more convenient.
In short: range is surprisingly close in real-world conditions, but the NAMI feels more "eager" and the ANGWATT more "enduring". One sprints, one jogs; both finish the race, but you plug them back in on slightly different schedules.
Portability & Practicality
Both scooters weigh around that infamous "you can lift it, but you'll complain" threshold. If you were hoping one of them would magically be a featherweight, sorry. This is the price for big batteries, decent frames and proper components.
The NAMI Super Stellar folds into a fairly compact, dense package. The stainless clamp system is reassuringly robust - no budget wobbly collar nonsense - and when locked it feels like a single piece. Folded, it takes up less floor space than many 11-inch dual-motor monsters, so it's more apartment- and office-friendly than its performance suggests. Carrying it up multiple flights every day? Possible, but your back will file a complaint pretty quickly.
The ANGWATT CS1 2025 is also around the same weight, but with its taller stem and 11-inch wheels, it occupies more physical volume and feels bulkier to manhandle. The fold is quick and mechanically simple, and the new buckle pad cuts down on annoying play and rattles, but as luggage it's a big item. Great for loading into a car boot or storing in a hallway; less great for threading through narrow stairwells or crowded trains.
In everyday use, both are perfectly practical "park at the office / park at home" scooters rather than true multi-modal commuters. Think of them as car replacements or car companions, not folding Brompton analogues. The NAMI wins on compactness and refinement of the folding hardware; the CS1 counters with a deck and frame that suit bigger bodies and more cargo.
Safety
Safety isn't just "does it have lights and brakes" - it's how all the parts work together when something goes wrong.
The Super Stellar is built from the ground up like a small, fast vehicle. That welded frame means no scary stem flex when you brake hard. The hydraulic brakes give you precise, powerful control. The lighting is properly bright and well positioned: the headlight actually lights the road, not just your front tyre, and the rear light and indicators are easy to read from behind. Add tubeless tyres and decent water protection, and you get a scooter you actually trust when conditions turn ugly.
The ANGWATT CS1 2025 ticks more boxes than you'd expect at its price. Dual disc brakes plus an electronic brake, real turn signals, a proper taillight and side lighting - it's equipped like a far more expensive model. The 11-inch tubeless tyres add a big margin of safety over potholes, tracks and sudden holes in the tarmac. Stability at speed is good, which is reassuring if you're new to scooting above bicycle speeds.
But hardware quality still matters: mechanical discs need more maintenance and don't offer quite the same progressive feel as hydraulics, and the frame, while strong, doesn't have the same "unshakeable" impression as the NAMI under maximum load and emergency braking. For relaxed commuting, the CS1's safety package is more than adequate. For repeated high-speed runs and aggressive riding, the Super Stellar's premium components justify themselves very quickly.
Community Feedback
| NAMI Super Stellar | ANGWATT CS1 2025 |
|---|---|
What riders love
|
What riders love
|
What riders complain about
|
What riders complain about
|
Price & Value
This is the elephant in the room: the ANGWATT costs in the region of a third of the NAMI's price. On pure spreadsheet logic, the CS1 2025 is a slaughterhouse. Big battery, big wheels, decent speed, dual suspension, NFC, indicators, tank-like frame - all for money that usually buys you a flimsy city toy with solid tyres and a wheezing motor.
The NAMI Super Stellar, by contrast, asks you to pay a clear premium. You're not buying raw specifications as much as you're buying engineering: the frame, the controllers, the hydraulics, the tuning, the brand's experience with high-performance scooters. It's the difference between a budget gaming PC and a carefully curated workstation - both can run the same game, but one does it smoother, quieter, and for longer without melting.
If your budget is tight or you're simply unwilling to spend four-figure money on a scooter, the CS1 is unquestionably phenomenal value. If you want the "done with compromises" feeling, plan to ride a lot, and care about finesse, the Super Stellar earns its extra cost every time you hit a bump at speed, brake hard, or bomb down a hill.
Service & Parts Availability
NAMI has an established presence in Europe and a growing network of distributors and service partners. Parts for the Super Stellar - from brake components to controllers and even frame bits - are generally obtainable without heroic effort, and the brand has a track record of listening to rider feedback and supporting its products over time. That matters for a scooter you intend to keep for years rather than seasons.
ANGWATT is the classic fast-rising direct-to-consumer brand: strong on price, improving rapidly, but still building its ecosystem. European warehouses help a lot with shipping times and reduce the fear of "what if something breaks", and there are reports of local repair stations. But parts pipelines, documentation and long-term support are naturally less mature than those of entrenched premium brands. Consumables are standard enough; deeper repairs may require more patience and DIY willingness.
If you're mechanically inclined and happy to wrench, the CS1 is not a scary ownership proposition. If you prefer handing the scooter to a shop and getting it back fixed, the NAMI sits on much firmer ground.
Pros & Cons Summary
| NAMI Super Stellar | ANGWATT CS1 2025 |
|---|---|
Pros
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
Cons
|
Parameters Comparison
| Parameter | NAMI Super Stellar | ANGWATT CS1 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Motor configuration | Dual brushless motors | Single brushless Hall motor |
| Rated peak power | 2.000 W (dual 1.000 W) | 1.000 W (single) |
| Top speed (claimed) | Ca. 60 km/h | Ca. 45-55 km/h |
| Realistic range (mixed riding) | Ca. 45-55 km | Ca. 45-50 km |
| Battery | 52 V 25 Ah (ca. 1.300 Wh) | 48 V 21,3 Ah (ca. 1.022 Wh) |
| Weight | 30 kg | 30 kg |
| Brakes | Hydraulic disc (front & rear) | Mechanical disc + E-brake |
| Suspension | Front & rear adjustable spring + rubber | Front & rear spring shocks |
| Tyres | 9-inch tubeless | 11-inch tubeless |
| Max load | Ca. 110-120 kg | Up to 200 kg |
| Water resistance | IP55 | Improved sealing (not specified) |
| Charging time | Ca. 5-6 h | Ca. 8 h |
| Price (approx.) | 1.361 € | 496 € |
Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?
If we ignore price for a moment and just talk about the riding experience, the NAMI Super Stellar is the better scooter. It accelerates harder, brakes stronger, feels tighter, and gives you a sense of mechanical confidence that budget machines rarely manage. It's the compact scooter you buy when you're serious about performance but can't or won't step up to a full hyper-scooter.
But we don't live in a world where price doesn't matter. The ANGWATT CS1 2025 stuffs a huge amount of capability into a very affordable package. For heavier riders, for budget-conscious commuters, and for people who just want a tough, fast-ish, comfortable scooter without raiding the savings account, it's a genuinely brilliant option. You give up premium refinement and some safety margin at the limit; you gain enormous value.
My take: if you're already deep into the hobby, ride hard, or simply want to buy once and smile every time you twist the throttle, stretch for the NAMI Super Stellar - it feels like a "proper" machine in a way the price-tag justifies. If you're stepping up from entry-level scooters, watching your budget, or prioritise range and load capacity over thrills, the ANGWATT CS1 2025 will make you wonder why anyone pays more... until the day you try a NAMI and realise what you've been missing.
Numbers Freaks Corner
| Metric | NAMI Super Stellar | ANGWATT CS1 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Price per Wh (€/Wh) | ❌ 1,05 €/Wh | ✅ 0,49 €/Wh |
| Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) | ❌ 22,68 €/km/h | ✅ 9,02 €/km/h |
| Weight per Wh (g/Wh) | ✅ 23,08 g/Wh | ❌ 29,35 g/Wh |
| Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) | ✅ 0,50 kg/km/h | ❌ 0,55 kg/km/h |
| Price per km of real-world range (€/km) | ❌ 27,22 €/km | ✅ 10,45 €/km |
| Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) | ✅ 0,60 kg/km | ❌ 0,63 kg/km |
| Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) | ❌ 26,00 Wh/km | ✅ 21,51 Wh/km |
| Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) | ✅ 33,33 W/km/h | ❌ 18,18 W/km/h |
| Weight to power ratio (kg/W) | ✅ 0,015 kg/W | ❌ 0,030 kg/W |
| Average charging speed (W) | ✅ 236,36 W | ❌ 127,75 W |
These metrics put numbers on different efficiency angles: cost-efficiency (price per Wh, price per range or speed), energy-efficiency (Wh per km), and hardware intensity (weight per power or per Wh). They also highlight "feel" factors like power-to-speed ratio, which hints at how strong acceleration can be, and average charging speed, which tells you how quickly you're back on the road after a full charge. Low values usually mean more efficiency; high values in power-related rows mean stronger performance.
Author's Category Battle
| Category | NAMI Super Stellar | ANGWATT CS1 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | ✅ Same, more performance | ❌ Same, less performance |
| Range | ✅ Similar, feels stronger | ❌ Similar, but slower |
| Max Speed | ✅ Noticeably faster potential | ❌ Slightly lower ceiling |
| Power | ✅ Dual motors, brutal pull | ❌ Single motor only |
| Battery Size | ✅ Bigger usable capacity | ❌ Smaller energy pack |
| Suspension | ✅ More sophisticated, tunable | ❌ Simpler, less adjustable |
| Design | ✅ Premium industrial aesthetic | ❌ More utilitarian budget look |
| Safety | ✅ Hydraulics, stiffer chassis | ❌ Mechanical brakes, softer feel |
| Practicality | ✅ More compact when folded | ❌ Bulkier footprint folded |
| Comfort | ❌ Smaller wheels, sportier | ✅ Big tyres, plush ride |
| Features | ✅ Deep tuning, NFC, display | ❌ Fewer advanced settings |
| Serviceability | ✅ Better parts availability | ❌ Less established network |
| Customer Support | ✅ Stronger distributor backing | ❌ Improving, but thinner |
| Fun Factor | ✅ Addictive dual-motor grin | ❌ Fun, but less wild |
| Build Quality | ✅ Welded, rock-solid frame | ❌ Good, but not same |
| Component Quality | ✅ Brakes, controllers, hardware | ❌ More budget components |
| Brand Name | ✅ Strong enthusiast reputation | ❌ Newcomer, niche name |
| Community | ✅ Active, established groups | ❌ Smaller, still growing |
| Lights (visibility) | ✅ Bright, high-mounted setup | ❌ Good, but less premium |
| Lights (illumination) | ✅ Headlight truly lights road | ❌ Adequate, not outstanding |
| Acceleration | ✅ Explosive, controllable shove | ❌ Strong, but milder |
| Arrive with smile factor | ✅ Every ride feels special | ❌ Satisfying, less exhilarating |
| Arrive relaxed factor | ❌ Sporty, demands attention | ✅ Relaxed, stable cruiser |
| Charging speed | ✅ Noticeably faster turnaround | ❌ Slower to refill |
| Reliability | ✅ Proven platform, robust | ❌ Promising, less proven |
| Folded practicality | ✅ Shorter, easier to stash | ❌ Longer, more awkward |
| Ease of transport | ✅ Denser, slightly easier move | ❌ Bulkier to manoeuvre |
| Handling | ✅ Sharper, more precise | ❌ Slower, more lumbering |
| Braking performance | ✅ Hydraulics, stronger bite | ❌ Mechanical, needs tuning |
| Riding position | ✅ Sporty, commanding stance | ❌ Less refined ergonomics |
| Handlebar quality | ✅ Sturdy, well-finished | ❌ Functional, more basic |
| Throttle response | ✅ Sine-wave smooth, tunable | ❌ Good, less sophisticated |
| Dashboard/Display | ✅ Detailed, enthusiast-oriented | ❌ Nice, but simpler data |
| Security (locking) | ✅ NFC plus premium perception | ❌ NFC, but more generic |
| Weather protection | ✅ IP rating, proven sealing | ❌ Improved, less documented |
| Resale value | ✅ Holds value strongly | ❌ Budget brand depreciation |
| Tuning potential | ✅ Controllers highly tweakable | ❌ Limited tuning ecosystem |
| Ease of maintenance | ✅ Standard parts, known platform | ❌ Parts, documentation scarcer |
| Value for Money | ❌ Great, but expensive | ✅ Stellar performance per euro |
Overall Winner Declaration
In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the NAMI Super Stellar scores 6 points against the ANGWATT CS1 2025's 4. In the Author's Category Battle, the NAMI Super Stellar gets 36 ✅ versus 3 ✅ for ANGWATT CS1 2025.
Totals: NAMI Super Stellar scores 42, ANGWATT CS1 2025 scores 7.
Based on the scoring, the NAMI Super Stellar is our overall winner. Riding them back-to-back, the NAMI Super Stellar simply feels like the more complete, more grown-up machine - the one that turns every commute into a little event and never makes you second-guess its hardware. The ANGWATT CS1 2025, though, is the kind of gloriously honest workhorse that makes performance scooting accessible to far more people, especially heavier and budget-conscious riders. If your heart is set on the most rewarding, confidence-inspiring ride, the NAMI is worth the stretch. If your wallet calls the shots and you still want something capable enough to replace plenty of car journeys, the CS1 2025 will put a wide, slightly smug grin on your face every time you remember what you paid for it.
That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.

