NAMI Super Stellar vs Apollo Phantom V3 - Compact Brawler Takes On the Luxury Heavyweight

NAMI Super Stellar 🏆 Winner
NAMI

Super Stellar

1 361 € View full specs →
VS
APOLLO Phantom V3
APOLLO

Phantom V3

2 027 € View full specs →
Parameter NAMI Super Stellar APOLLO Phantom V3
Price 1 361 € 2 027 €
🏎 Top Speed 60 km/h 66 km/h
🔋 Range 55 km 64 km
Weight 30.0 kg 35.0 kg
Power 3400 W 3200 W
🔌 Voltage 52 V 52 V
🔋 Battery 1300 Wh 1217 Wh
Wheel Size 9 " 10 "
👤 Max Load 120 kg 136 kg
Speed Comparison

Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)

If you want the sharper, more agile and better value performance machine, the NAMI Super Stellar is the one to buy. It delivers serious dual-motor punch, excellent brakes, great lighting and a proper welded frame in a smaller, more affordable package that still feels enthusiast-grade. The Apollo Phantom V3, meanwhile, suits riders who prioritise a plush, techy, app-driven "luxury commuter" vibe and don't mind paying more or hauling extra kilos.

Choose the Super Stellar if you want maximum grin per Euro and a compact rocket that still feels like a real vehicle. Choose the Phantom V3 if you're heavier, love tuning everything via an app, and want a long, cushy platform for bigger daily mileage. Stick around - the nuances only really show once we dig into how these two behave on real roads.

Electric scooters used to be a choice between flimsy commuters and hulking hyper-scooters you needed a gym membership to move. This matchup sits right in the middle: NAMI's Super Stellar, the "pocket rocket" from a performance-first brand, against Apollo's Phantom V3, the polished Canadian all-rounder with a big brain and a bigger spec sheet.

I've put decent kilometres on both - enough night rides, bad-weather commutes and "just one more lap of the block" sessions to know exactly where each one shines and where the marketing gloss wears off. One is the lighter, welded little street fighter. The other is the heavier, tech-rich cruiser that wants to be your car substitute.

The interesting part? On paper they look like rivals, but on the street they solve your transport problem in very different ways. Let's break down where your money - and your back - are better spent.

Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?

NAMI Super StellarAPOLLO Phantom V3

Both scooters live in that "serious money, serious speed" category - far above rental toys, but below the absolutely bonkers, 11-inch, 70+ km/h monsters. They're aimed at riders who want real performance, proper suspension and brakes, and enough battery to do a full day's urban riding without nursing the throttle.

The NAMI Super Stellar is the compact dual-motor performance scooter for riders who think in terms of torque, chassis stiffness and controller feel, but still need to get the thing through doorways and into cars. It's for people who like a bit of rawness - in a good way - as long as the fundamentals are solid.

The Apollo Phantom V3 is more of a "luxury daily vehicle": broad deck, cushy suspension, big motors, big weight, big app ecosystem. It's what you buy when you want to replace bus tickets or short car trips and you like fiddling with settings on your phone almost as much as riding.

Price-wise, they overlap enough to make the comparison fair, but not equal: the Phantom asks a noticeable premium over the NAMI. So the question becomes: is that extra money buying better transport, or just nicer software and a bit more spec-sheet bravado?

Design & Build Quality

Specs Comparison

Stand them side by side and the design philosophies could not be clearer.

The Super Stellar is classic NAMI: open tubular frame, chunky welds you can actually see, and almost zero plastic pretending to be structure. It's more "industrial prototype" than fashion accessory. When you grab the stem and rock it, nothing moves that shouldn't. The one-piece welded frame feels like it was designed by someone who's seen too many folding stems fail and decided "never again".

The Phantom V3 goes the opposite route: cast aluminium chassis with sharp, sculpted lines, a big central display and lots of proprietary touch points - custom throttle, bespoke buttons, orange springs peeking out like design accents. In the hands it feels dense and monolithic, like a solid block of metal with wheels, which is reassuring at speed but also explains why your biceps protest every time you lift it.

On finish, Apollo wins the showroom walk-around: cleaner cable routing, a slicker cockpit, and that hexagonal display that looks like it escaped from a sci-fi film. The NAMI is more honest and tool-like - brushed metal and hardware you could actually replace without crying. If you care more about structural integrity than how Instagram-ready it looks, the Super Stellar's frame and welds are a big plus.

Ergonomically, both are good but different. The Phantom's bars, grips and switches feel purpose-designed and very comfortable for long, relaxed rides. The NAMI's cockpit is more utilitarian but functional, with a big readable display and wide bars that give you loads of leverage. The NFC lock on the Super Stellar also feels properly "premium" in a low-key, practical way.

Ride Comfort & Handling

Comfort is where their characters really separate.

The Super Stellar, on its smaller 9-inch tubeless tyres with adjustable suspension, feels like a compact sports scooter. The suspension is impressively effective for such a small-wheeled machine: it filters out harsh chatter, takes the sting out of expansion joints and kerb drops, and can be tuned firmer or softer to match your weight. On broken city tarmac, it stays composed; it's only when you dive into really big potholes or rough gravel that the smaller wheels remind you to pay attention.

Handling is sharp, almost kart-like. Lean it into a turn and it reacts immediately - great fun when you're alert, less forgiving if you ride one-handed while fiddling with your bag (don't). The deck is on the compact side, but stable; once you find your stance it feels planted, and the stiff frame gives very precise feedback about what the tyres are doing.

The Phantom V3 rolls on larger, wider 10-inch tube tyres suspended by a quadruple spring setup. This is a magic-carpet sort of ride most of the time: cobblestones, dodgy cycle paths and expansion joints get turned into a soft rocking motion rather than sharp hits. The longer deck lets you spread out, brace on the rear kickplate, and just cruise. After a long ride, your knees and lower back will definitely prefer the Apollo.

But that comfort comes with mass. The Phantom feels more like a small electric moped than a nimble scooter. In tight city traffic or narrow cycle lanes, you notice the extra length and weight when flicking it from side to side. It's stable and confidence-inspiring at speed, but not as eager to change direction as the NAMI; the Super Stellar dances, the Phantom glides.

Performance

Both scooters are properly quick. You are not going to feel short-changed by either when the light turns green - unless your idea of fun is drag-racing motorbikes.

The NAMI Super Stellar has slightly lower peak numbers on paper, but the dual motors and sine-wave controllers make the most of what it has. Throttle response is wonderfully progressive: gentle pull gets you silky, precise acceleration that's easy to modulate in tight spaces; full squeeze gives you that "freight train on a diet" surge that snaps you out of any morning lethargy. In real traffic, it lunges ahead of cars with ease up to sane urban speeds, and it does it without drama or wheelspin theatrics.

Top speed feels intense on those smaller wheels. Once you're pushing into the upper end of its capability, you're acutely aware of how quickly the world is zipping past your ankles. It's absolutely fast enough for city use - you're not left wishing for more unless you habitually ride ring roads.

The Phantom V3 has more brute force under the deck and a bit more headroom at the top. In its standard modes it's almost civilised - strong but not intimidating. Click into the full-power mode and it just keeps pulling and pulling until the wind noise and your survival instincts start a conversation. It's smoother than many high-powered scooters thanks to that Mach 1 controller, but you can still feel the extra shove over the NAMI once you're past medium speeds.

Where the Super Stellar surprises is in how immediate it feels in the city. On short sprints between lights, nipping past slow cars, sprinting out of corners - it punches well above its spec. The Phantom's extra pace only really shows on longer, open stretches where you can actually hold full throttle for more than a few seconds.

Hill climbing is a non-issue on both. The NAMI flattens nasty urban gradients without losing much pace; the Apollo does the same, just with a bit more overhead for heavier riders or steeper, longer climbs. If you're carrying serious weight or live somewhere with hills that make cyclists cry, the Phantom's torque reserve is reassuring. For typical European city inclines, the Super Stellar is already overkill in a very enjoyable way.

Battery & Range

Despite their different personalities, their real-world ranges overlap quite closely.

The Super Stellar packs a healthy battery for its size and weight. Ridden like it wants to be - plenty of dual-motor use, mixed speeds, some hills - you're looking at a solid half-day of active riding or a week of normal commuting for most people. Push hard all the time and you'll still get a decent city loop without needing to think about chargers. Importantly, its efficiency is good: the sine-wave setup sips rather than gulps, especially if you're not sitting at full tilt constantly.

The Phantom V3 has a slightly bigger battery, but also more weight to haul and more power available. The result: you again land in that "comfortably commute both ways and add the scenic route" territory when ridden enthusiastically. Ride like you're late for a flight, in the fastest mode all the time, and you can noticeably shorten that, but it remains perfectly adequate for urban life.

Charging is where the two drift apart. The NAMI's pack goes from empty to full in roughly a working day with a standard charger, less if you use a faster one. You can realistically top it up between morning and evening rides if needed. The Phantom's stock charge time is an overnight affair; using two chargers you can bring it down to something tolerable, but you really want to plan around plugging it in at the end of the day and forgetting about it until morning.

In daily use, the Super Stellar feels slightly less "range anxious" because it gives you very healthy distance for the battery size and weight you're hauling, and it's quicker to refuel. The Phantom offsets that with sheer capacity, but you do pay a penalty in how long you're tethered to the wall if you run it low.

Portability & Practicality

Neither of these is a "throw it over your shoulder and hop on a tram" scooter. They both sit firmly in the "I'm a vehicle, treat me like one" category. But one is definitely kinder to your spine.

The NAMI Super Stellar weighs in the low-thirties and folds down into a relatively compact footprint. You still feel every kilo when you lift it - up a flight of stairs it's a mini workout - but it's doable for most reasonably fit adults. Getting it into a car boot, through an office doorway, under a desk? Manageable. I've hauled it up awkward basement ramps and into lifts without needing a lie-down afterwards.

The Phantom V3 is in a different league. Mid-thirties kilos on paper doesn't sound catastrophic until you try deadlifting it in a narrow stairwell. The non-folding handlebars make it even more awkward: folded length is acceptable, folded width is not. Storing it in tight hallways or squeezing it into a small hatchback quickly becomes a game of scooter Tetris. If you have a garage or ground-floor storage, fine. If you're on the third floor without a lift? You'll hate it within a week.

For daily practicality in the city, the NAMI has the edge simply because it's the one you're actually willing to move. Its IP rating is slightly more reassuring too: rain and puddles are less of a stress event. The Phantom is splash-proof and copes with wet roads, but I'd be more cautious about repeated wet-weather abuse on it than on the NAMI.

Safety

Both scooters care about safety much more than your average budget dual-motor missile, but they focus on different tools.

The Super Stellar brings excellent hydraulic disc brakes to the party. Lever feel is light and progressive, and you get big-boy stopping power with one or two fingers. Modulation is lovely: easing gently to a stop sign or hauling it down from top speed, the chassis stays composed and straight. Combined with the stiff frame and tubeless tyres, it gives you a lot of confidence to use the performance you paid for.

Lighting on the NAMI is also genuinely functional. The high-mounted headlight throws a proper beam onto the road ahead instead of just glowing into space, and the integrated turn signals and brake light mean you can ride at night without strapping a Christmas tree to your helmet. It's very obviously designed by people who actually ride in winter.

The Phantom V3 counters with a different safety trick: that dedicated regenerative brake throttle. Once you get used to it, you can do most of your slowing with your left thumb, barely touching the mechanical discs unless you really need to stop hard. It feels incredibly smooth in traffic and extends pad life nicely. Mechanical discs themselves are decent, though lack the sharp bite of good hydraulics.

Lighting on the Apollo is also strong - bright headlight, wraparound indicators, pulsing brake light. Visibility from the side is especially good, which is great for multi-lane urban chaos. The long wheelbase and chunky frame make it very stable at speed; it feels calm where some scooters feel nervous.

Stability-wise, I'd happily take either to high speeds, but I marginally prefer the NAMI's combination of welded frame and hydraulic brakes when things get hairy. The Apollo's safety package is more about clever electronics and comfort; the NAMI's is more about mechanical grip and brute stopping force.

Community Feedback

NAMI Super Stellar APOLLO Phantom V3
What riders love
  • Incredible torque for the size
  • Very smooth sine-wave throttle
  • Strong hydraulic brakes
  • Welded, wobble-free frame
  • Surprisingly good suspension for 9-inch wheels
  • Bright, usable headlight
  • Tubeless tyres and IP rating
  • Compact footprint when folded
  • NFC lock and "serious" feel
What riders love
  • Mach 1 controller smoothness
  • Left-thumb regenerative brake
  • Plush quad-spring suspension
  • Stable, confidence-inspiring chassis
  • Big, informative display
  • App customisation for power and regen
  • Strong hill performance
  • Good lighting and visibility
  • Comfortable ergonomics for long rides
What riders complain about
  • Heavier than it looks
  • 9-inch wheels sensitive to big potholes
  • Price higher than budget rivals
  • Deck a bit short for big feet
  • Occasional bolt-tightening needed
  • Fenders could be better
  • Kickstand and display angle niggles
What riders complain about
  • Very heavy and awkward to carry
  • Tube tyres and flats anxiety
  • Display hard to read in bright sun
  • Long charge time with stock charger
  • Kickstand feels flimsy
  • Handlebar width when folded
  • App/setup quirks and occasional QC issues

Price & Value

This is where things get uncomfortable for the Phantom V3.

The NAMI Super Stellar sits significantly lower on the price ladder while still delivering dual motors, real suspension, hydraulic brakes, a big battery and a welded frame from a respected performance brand. In practice, you're getting near-hyper-scooter build philosophy in a shrunken, more affordable format. For riders coming from broken budget scooters, the step up in quality and safety genuinely justifies the spend.

The Apollo Phantom V3 charges a healthy premium for more power, more comfort, more app features and a bit more range. If you're the sort who will use the app, obsess over regen tuning, and ride long distances daily, you can justify it as your primary vehicle. But in simple Euro-per-smile terms, the Super Stellar hits harder. You give up some top-end performance and plushness, but you save a lot of cash and still get a thoroughly serious machine.

Put bluntly: if you're chasing "best riding experience money no object" in this class, the Phantom makes a good argument. If you're chasing "best riding experience per Euro", the NAMI is the smarter buy.

Service & Parts Availability

NAMI has built a strong reputation with enthusiast-focused distributors, particularly in Europe. Parts support for things like controllers, swingarms and brake components is generally good, and the bikes are built with relatively standard, easily sourced parts where it makes sense. The welded frame means fewer moving parts to go wrong, and community knowledge on tweaking and maintaining NAMIs is widespread.

Apollo, to its credit, has pushed hard on after-sales support in recent years. Their upgrade programmes and transparent communication have earned them a loyal fanbase. Parts for the Phantom V3 are widely available via Apollo directly, and the app ecosystem gets frequent updates. The flip side: lots of proprietary bits. That gorgeous display, the special throttle, unique buttons - all great when they work, but you're married to Apollo for replacements.

For DIY-inclined riders, the NAMI is slightly easier to live with long-term - more "standard scooter engineering" and fewer bespoke electronic doodads. For riders who want brand-managed support and don't mind shipping parts or relying on official channels, Apollo does fairly well.

Pros & Cons Summary

NAMI Super Stellar APOLLO Phantom V3
Pros
  • Explosive yet controllable acceleration
  • Hydraulic brakes with strong bite
  • Welded, wobble-free frame
  • Tubeless tyres and solid water resistance
  • Adjustable suspension that actually works
  • Compact footprint for storage
  • NFC lock and serious build feel
  • Excellent value relative to performance
Pros
  • Very smooth, tunable power delivery
  • Left-thumb regen brake is brilliant
  • Plush, long-distance-friendly suspension
  • Stable and confidence-inspiring at speed
  • Excellent app and display integration
  • Great lighting and visibility
  • Strong hill and load performance
  • Premium, cohesive design and cockpit
Cons
  • Still heavy for frequent carrying
  • 9-inch wheels demand more vigilance
  • Deck could be longer
  • Price above many budget dual-motors
  • Needs occasional bolt checks out of box
Cons
  • Very heavy and wide when folded
  • Tube tyres, higher flat risk
  • Long charge time without extra charger
  • Kickstand and display brightness quirks
  • High price for the class

Parameters Comparison

Parameter NAMI Super Stellar APOLLO Phantom V3
Motor power (rated) Dual 1.000 W (2.000 W total) Dual 1.200 W (2.400 W total)
Top speed Ca. 60 km/h Ca. 66 km/h
Battery 52 V 25 Ah (ca. 1.300 Wh) 52 V 23,4 Ah (ca. 1.217 Wh)
Claimed max range Ca. 75 km Ca. 64 km
Realistic range (mixed riding) Ca. 45-55 km Ca. 40-50 km
Weight 30 kg 35 kg
Brakes Hydraulic discs (front & rear) Mechanical discs + regen throttle
Suspension Adjustable spring + rubber (F/R) Adjustable quad spring
Tyres 9" x 2,5" tubeless 10" x 3" pneumatic with tubes
Max load Ca. 110-120 kg Ca. 136 kg
IP rating IP55 IP54
Approximate price Ca. 1.361 € Ca. 2.027 €

Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?

If I had to live with just one of these as my do-everything performance scooter, the NAMI Super Stellar would be parked by my door. It hits that rare sweet spot of real performance, proper engineering and everyday manageability without stepping into crazy money. It feels like a shrunken serious scooter, not a bloated commuter, and every ride reminds you why you spent the extra over generic dual-motors.

The Apollo Phantom V3 is, to be clear, a very competent, very pleasant scooter. Long rides on it are a joy, the regen throttle is genuinely addictive, and if you're a heavier rider or doing long daily distances on mixed surfaces, its comfort and torque are real assets. But you pay heavily in both Euros and kilograms for that extra plushness and app magic, and you have to truly use it as a car replacement to justify the trade-offs.

If your riding is mostly urban, with some hills, and you value agility, strong mechanical fundamentals and sensible value, get the NAMI. If you want a techy, cushy tank of a scooter as your main vehicle, have somewhere easy to store it, and don't flinch at the price, the Phantom V3 will make you very happy. For most enthusiast riders, though, the Super Stellar simply feels like the more complete - and more honest - package.

Numbers Freaks Corner

Metric NAMI Super Stellar APOLLO Phantom V3
Price per Wh (€/Wh) ✅ 1,05 €/Wh ❌ 1,67 €/Wh
Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) ✅ 22,68 €/km/h ❌ 30,71 €/km/h
Weight per Wh (g/Wh) ✅ 23,08 g/Wh ❌ 28,77 g/Wh
Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) ✅ 0,50 kg/km/h ❌ 0,53 kg/km/h
Price per km of real-world range (€/km) ✅ 27,22 €/km ❌ 45,04 €/km
Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) ✅ 0,60 kg/km ❌ 0,78 kg/km
Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) ✅ 26 Wh/km ❌ 27,04 Wh/km
Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) ❌ 33,33 W/km/h ✅ 36,36 W/km/h
Weight to power ratio (kg/W) ❌ 0,015 kg/W ✅ 0,0146 kg/W
Average charging speed (W) ✅ 236,36 W ❌ 101,42 W

These metrics boil your decision down to cold numbers. Price per Wh and price per km/h show what you pay for energy and speed. Weight-based metrics show how much mass you're lugging for that performance and range. Efficiency (Wh/km) tells you how gently each scooter sips its battery. Power-to-speed and weight-to-power ratios hint at how "over-powered" each scooter is for its top speed. Lastly, average charging speed simply describes how quickly each pack fills from the wall, which matters a lot if you regularly run them low.

Author's Category Battle

Category NAMI Super Stellar APOLLO Phantom V3
Weight ✅ Lighter, easier to wrestle ❌ Noticeably heavier overall
Range ✅ Slightly better efficiency ❌ Similar, but less efficient
Max Speed ❌ Respectably fast, slightly lower ✅ Higher top-end headroom
Power ❌ Less motor power overall ✅ Stronger dual-motor output
Battery Size ✅ Bigger pack on board ❌ Slightly smaller capacity
Suspension ❌ Good, but less plush ✅ Softer, more comfortable
Design ✅ Industrial, functional, honest ❌ Flashier, but less practical
Safety ✅ Hydraulics, tubeless, IP55 ❌ Tubes, weaker water rating
Practicality ✅ Easier to store and move ❌ Bulkier, harder indoors
Comfort ❌ Sporty, a bit firmer ✅ Extremely plush urban ride
Features ❌ Fewer software tricks ✅ App, regen throttle, display
Serviceability ✅ Simpler, more standard parts ❌ Many proprietary components
Customer Support ✅ Strong enthusiast dealer network ✅ Brand-driven, improving steadily
Fun Factor ✅ Lively, agile pocket rocket ❌ Fast, but more sensible
Build Quality ✅ Welded, rock-solid chassis ❌ Excellent, but more complex
Component Quality ✅ Hydraulics, sine-wave controllers ✅ Strong motors, good hardware
Brand Name ✅ Performance-focused reputation ✅ Widely known, design-led
Community ✅ Enthusiast, performance crowd ✅ Large, active owner base
Lights (visibility) ✅ Bright, high-mounted, clear ✅ Excellent, 360° indicators
Lights (illumination) ✅ Strong road illumination ✅ Also very capable beam
Acceleration ❌ Slightly less outright shove ✅ Stronger, especially loaded
Arrive with smile factor ✅ Punchy, playful, addictive ❌ More composed, less cheeky
Arrive relaxed factor ❌ Sporty stance, firmer feel ✅ Softer, moped-like calm
Charging speed ✅ Much quicker single-charger ❌ Slow unless dual-charging
Reliability ✅ Simple, proven layout ❌ More electronics to worry
Folded practicality ✅ Smaller footprint, folded bars ❌ Wide, awkward handlebars
Ease of transport ✅ Lighter, easier to lift ❌ Heavy, cumbersome to carry
Handling ✅ Sharp, agile, engaging ❌ Stable, but less nimble
Braking performance ✅ Strong hydraulics, great bite ❌ Mechanical, relies on regen
Riding position ❌ Compact, less room to move ✅ Spacious, relaxed stance
Handlebar quality ✅ Wide, confidence-inspiring ✅ Ergonomic, premium cockpit
Throttle response ✅ Smooth, sine-wave, predictable ✅ Mach 1, highly tunable
Dashboard/Display ❌ Functional, less flashy ✅ Big, feature-rich, modern
Security (locking) ✅ NFC keyless start ❌ No equivalent built-in
Weather protection ✅ Better IP, fewer gaps ❌ Lower rating, more concern
Resale value ✅ Desirable performance niche ✅ Strong brand recognition
Tuning potential ✅ Enthusiast mods widely known ❌ App-limited, more locked-down
Ease of maintenance ✅ Tubeless, simpler hardware ❌ Tube tyres, proprietary parts
Value for Money ✅ Excellent performance per Euro ❌ Good, but pricey class

Overall Winner Declaration

Winner

In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the NAMI Super Stellar scores 8 points against the APOLLO Phantom V3's 2. In the Author's Category Battle, the NAMI Super Stellar gets 30 ✅ versus 18 ✅ for APOLLO Phantom V3 (with a few ties sprinkled in).

Totals: NAMI Super Stellar scores 38, APOLLO Phantom V3 scores 20.

Based on the scoring, the NAMI Super Stellar is our overall winner. For me, the NAMI Super Stellar is the scooter that makes you look forward to every ride. It manages to feel serious and solid without losing that mischievous, eager character that makes performance scooters so addictive, and it does it without demanding a frightening budget or a gym membership. The Apollo Phantom V3 is a fine machine in its own right - refined, comfortable and undeniably capable - but it never quite escapes the sense that you're paying extra for polish more than for core riding joy. If you want a scooter that feels like a compact weapon, not a heavy gadget, the Super Stellar is simply the one that leaves the bigger grin when you step off.

That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.