Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)
The NAMI Super Stellar is the overall winner here: it rides more cohesively as a compact performance machine, delivers wonderfully smooth power, strong safety fundamentals, and feels like a serious rider's tool rather than a tech demo. It's the better choice if you want a smaller-footprint dual-motor scooter with premium ride feel, excellent brakes, and genuinely confidence-inspiring build quality.
The APOLLO Phantom V4 makes sense if you value design flair, a huge deck, plush suspension and app-tuned behaviour over outright efficiency and weight. It's more of a futuristic touring tank: bigger, heavier, a bit more plush, and visually spectacular, but you pay more and haul more for relatively modest real-world gains.
If you want a compact urban weapon that still feels "NAMI serious", pick the Super Stellar. If your priority is comfort, style and dashboard envy, and you don't mind the extra bulk and price, the Phantom V4 will keep you happy.
Now, let's dig into how they actually feel on the road-and where each one quietly wins or loses once you've lived with it for a few hundred kilometres.
Modern dual-motor scooters have split into two tribes: the compact "pocket rockets" that still fit in real-life homes, and the big, imposing "half-motorbike" machines that eat tarmac for breakfast. The NAMI Super Stellar and the APOLLO Phantom V4 sit right on that border, but they approach the job with very different philosophies.
I've spent serious saddle time on both: city rush hour, late-night river paths, bad tarmac that clearly predates the internet, and the usual steep, hateful hills that separate spec sheets from reality. One is a compact street brawler with a surprisingly grown-up feel. The other is a larger, more theatrical cruiser that really wants you to notice it.
The Super Stellar is for the rider who wants a smaller chassis that still hits like a proper performance scooter. The Phantom V4 is for the rider who wants a plush, futuristic platform with a lot of presence and doesn't mind carrying a bit of extra scooter in exchange. Both are serious machines-but they shine in very different ways. Keep reading; the differences get more interesting the deeper you go.
Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?
These two live in the same broad neighbourhood: mid-to-upper range dual-motor performance scooters that are still vaguely "urban-life compatible". Not featherweight commuters, not full-fat 50 kg monsters-something in between.
The NAMI Super Stellar is the compact performance specialist. It's lighter, shorter, rolls on smaller wheels, and is clearly targeted at riders who want genuinely high performance but still need to get through doors, lifts, and car boots without turning it into a gym session every single time.
The APOLLO Phantom V4 is more of a "grand tourer": noticeably heavier, bigger deck, larger wheels, more suspension hardware, and that huge integrated display shouting, "Look at me, I'm expensive." It's for people who ride longer distances, love comfort and visual drama, and are fine treating the scooter more like a motorcycle than a folding toy.
They compete because their performance envelopes overlap heavily: both cruise happily at traffic speeds, both flatten hills, both offer serious suspension and real braking systems. Many riders will genuinely be choosing between "compact NAMI" and "big Apollo"-so it's worth dissecting where each shines, and where the marketing gloss wears off.
Design & Build Quality
Pick up the NAMI Super Stellar (carefully) and you immediately feel that welded tubular frame doing its thing. It's a proper one-piece structure, more "industrial equipment" than gadget. The stem-to-deck connection feels brutally solid; there's no mystery creak when you lean on the bars, no sense that a hinge is quietly negotiating with gravity behind your back.
The APOLLO Phantom V4 goes in the opposite direction stylistically: cast frame, sharp angles, and that iconic "skeleton" neck that looks like it escaped from a sci-fi prop department. In the flesh it's very impressive. The integrated hexagonal display, moulded cockpit and neat cable routing give it a highly polished, designed-in-a-studio feel.
Build philosophy, though, is different. NAMI's Super Stellar feels engineered first, styled second. Welds are obvious and unapologetic; it's more "race car undertray" than "showroom gloss". Apollo clearly chased aesthetics and user interface as headline features: the V4 looks and feels more like a finished consumer product, but under the surface you're still dealing with a more conventional bolted folding assembly and a heavier overall structure.
In the hands, the Super Stellar feels dense but purposeful, like all the kilos are exactly where they should be. The Phantom V4 feels more substantial and luxurious, but also undeniably bulky-especially when you try to manoeuvre it in a cramped hallway. If you care more about raw structural confidence than showroom drama, the NAMI has the edge; if you're a sucker for clean integration and pretty dashboards, Apollo will happily take your money.
Ride Comfort & Handling
This is where the character split really shows. On the NAMI Super Stellar, you stand on a compact deck over 9-inch tubeless tyres and adjustable suspension that's surprisingly sophisticated for the size. It rides like a tightly set-up sports hatchback: controlled, communicative, and just forgiving enough that you don't regret your life choices after a long ride.
Bumpy city streets, expansion joints, and general urban neglect: the Super Stellar shrugs most of it off. The hybrid spring-and-rubber setup filters the nasty high-frequency chatter while still giving you a direct read of the road. You feel engaged with the surface-especially on those smaller wheels-but not punished by it. On a 5 km stretch of broken city cycle lane, I arrived awake and energised, not hunting for ibuprofen.
Hop onto the Phantom V4 and the story changes. The larger 10-inch pneumatic tyres and quadruple spring suspension make everything feel softer and more floaty. You get more travel, more squish, and more forgiveness over potholes and cobbles. It's that "gliding" sensation owners rave about, and for long, straight-ish commutes, it's lovely.
In corners, the NAMI feels more agile and responsive-almost twitchy if you're coming from heavier scooters. It rewards active riding: weight shifts, countersteering, looking far ahead. The Phantom, with its extra heft and bigger wheelbase, feels more like a planted cruiser. You lean it in and it tracks predictably, but it's less eager to dart through tiny gaps or change direction aggressively. If your commute is tight twisty bike paths and urban slalom, the Super Stellar makes more sense. If it's long, fast stretches with bigger radius turns, the Phantom will feel more relaxed.
Performance
Both of these are firmly in "don't lend it to your inexperienced friend" territory. On paper they're not galactically far apart, but the way they deliver that power is noticeably different.
The NAMI Super Stellar's dual motors and sine wave controllers give it that classic NAMI trait: absurdly smooth, controllable shove. From a standstill it doesn't explode forward unless you ask it to; instead, it pours on torque in a very linear, confidence-inspiring way. But pin the throttle and it absolutely launches, especially in the mid-range. It feels like a compact scooter that thinks it's much bigger-and faster-than it looks.
The Phantom V4 hits harder off the line in its more aggressive modes. Throttle response, especially with "Ludo Mode" unlocked, is very immediate. It feels quick, urgent, and playful, like it always wants to surge ahead of traffic. Once rolling, both machines cruise at city traffic speeds easily, but the Phantom holds a slightly higher comfortable top end, and feels less strained doing it thanks to those larger wheels and longer chassis.
Hill climbing is largely a non-issue on both. On the steep sort of climbs that murder rental scooters, the Super Stellar just digs in and goes. The Phantom V4 does the same, with a tiny extra sense of effortlessness when you're a heavier rider or stacking a backpack and groceries on top. In real-world use, you'd be hard pressed to find a hill either of these actually fears.
Braking performance is a clear strength for the NAMI: the Logan hydraulic setup bites hard but progressively, with a lovely one-finger feel that makes emergency stops less dramatic than they ought to be. The Phantom's brakes-mechanical or hydraulic depending on trim, plus regen-are very good too, but don't feel quite as "pro grade" in hand. Stopping distances are solid on both, but the NAMI's hydraulic system and lighter mass give it a slightly calmer, more controlled feel when you really lean on the levers.
Battery & Range
On range, these two are closer than you might expect from the marketing blurbs. Both claim optimistic "eco-mode-on-a-sunny-day" figures, and both, in the real world, land in that same band many experienced riders recognise: roughly a week of mixed commuting for most people before you're forced back to the wall socket.
The Super Stellar's battery is slightly larger on paper than the Phantom's, and that shows when you ride them with similar enthusiasm. In mixed, real-world conditions-meaning you're not babying the throttle, you're climbing some hills, and you're absolutely using the dual motors-you can expect the NAMI to feel a touch less range-anxious over longer days. It's a little more efficient for its class and doesn't punish spirited riding quite as hard.
The Phantom V4 still offers very usable real-world range. For most riders doing commutes in the low tens of kilometres plus some detours, it's more than enough to avoid mid-week charging panic. But given its higher purchase price and extra weight, the fact that it doesn't clearly walk away from the Super Stellar on usable range is noticeable. You don't get a big "battery advantage" to justify lugging those extra kilos.
Charging times on both are comfortably "overnight". The NAMI tends to fill up slightly quicker relative to its capacity, while the Phantom feels a bit more leisurely, especially on the standard charger. Both can be sped up with higher-amp chargers, but out of the box the NAMI feels like it makes better use of every watt-hour you pay for.
Portability & Practicality
Let's be honest: both are heavy. We're not in "carry it one-handed onto the metro while sipping coffee" territory here. But there's heavy, and then there's heavier.
The NAMI Super Stellar sits right at that painful but still-manageable threshold. You can deadlift it into a car boot, wrestle it up a short flight of stairs, or haul it over a threshold without seeing your life flash before your eyes-assuming you have at least a passing relationship with a gym. The folded footprint is pleasantly compact; for something this capable, it disappears under a workbench or into a corner surprisingly well.
The Phantom V4 is in a different league of bulk. That extra weight and size are very obvious the moment you try to pivot it in a small hallway or lift it into a hatchback. It folds, yes, and the mechanism is robust, but the folded package is more "motorcycle you've halfway disassembled" than "large scooter". If you live in a flat with stairs or narrow doors, the Phantom quickly becomes a lifestyle commitment.
Water resistance is slightly in the NAMI's favour. Its rating is a notch higher, and the overall design feels more "weather workhorse" than "please avoid monsoon season." The Phantom will tolerate light rain and wet roads if you're sensible, but it doesn't encourage you to laugh in the face of bad weather quite as much.
For daily practicality-storage, moving it around a flat, stashing under a desk or in a normal car-the Super Stellar is simply easier to live with. The Phantom is happiest when it can live in a garage, shed, or bike room and roll straight out to the street like a small motorcycle.
Safety
Both manufacturers clearly understand that scooters at these speeds need real safety, not token tick-box features.
The NAMI Super Stellar leans on its stiffer frame, tidy weight distribution, and that excellent hydraulic braking to inspire confidence. The steering feels direct but not nervous, and-crucially-there's no hint of the dreaded high-speed wobble if you're riding with sensible bar input. The high-mounted headlight actually lights the road rather than just existing for the brochure, and the indicators and brake light give you a fighting chance of being noticed in city traffic.
The Phantom V4 focuses heavily on stability. The steering geometry and reinforced neck give it a self-centering feel at speed; you don't get that unsettling "floating front end" feeling some big scooters suffer from. Combined with a comprehensive lighting package that makes you highly visible from almost any angle, it feels safe belting along in the dark. Brakes are strong and predictable, aided by regenerative braking, though they vary a little by trim.
Tyre choice matters, too. NAMI's tubeless tyres reduce the risk of sudden pinch flats and generally feel more secure when hammering through city debris and potholes-provided you're not trying to plough over craters at full chat on those smaller wheels. The Phantom's tubed tyres ride beautifully, but they do introduce that faint underlying "flat anxiety" many owners talk about. A badly timed pothole at speed is not where you want to be thinking about inner tubes.
Overall, both are capable of safe, high-speed running in the right hands, but the Super Stellar's combination of frame solidity, hydraulic brakes and tubeless tyres nudges it ahead in the pure "I trust this thing" department.
Community Feedback
| NAMI Super Stellar | APOLLO Phantom V4 |
|---|---|
What riders love
|
What riders love
|
What riders complain about
|
What riders complain about
|
Price & Value
Value is where these two quietly diverge the most.
The NAMI Super Stellar sits at a price that's clearly above the flood of generic dual-motor scooters, but well below the big-name hypers. For that, you get a welded frame, proper hydraulics, sine wave controllers, tubeless tyres, serious lighting, and thoughtful weather protection. It feels like money spent on fundamentals rather than fireworks. For riders who actually rack up kilometres, the price starts to look very sensible.
The APOLLO Phantom V4 asks for a noticeably fatter slice of your bank account. Yes, you get a gorgeous frame, a unique cockpit, plush suspension, big deck, and an app experience that many competitors simply can't match. But if you strip it down to raw performance, range, and practicality, it doesn't crush the NAMI into the dirt. You're mostly paying extra for comfort, design integration, and brand ecosystem.
If you enjoy spreadsheets, the Super Stellar is the better "euros for what you actually use" deal. If emotional value-how it looks in your hallway, how that display greets you, how slick the app feels-matters as much as hard numbers, then the Phantom's premium may still feel justifiable. Just be aware that you're paying for the experience, not a massive leap in capability.
Service & Parts Availability
Both NAMI and Apollo have grown up a lot as brands, and it shows in their support ecosystems.
NAMI works largely through strong regional distributors, especially in Europe and North America. Parts like controllers, brakes, and suspension components are not unicorns; you can actually get them. The Super Stellar shares DNA with other NAMI models, which helps with parts compatibility and knowledge in the service community. They also have a reputation-earned, not claimed-for listening to rider feedback and iterating.
Apollo, being a Canadian brand with a big marketing footprint, has poured substantial effort into its after-sales system and app ecosystem. Parts for the Phantom series are generally available, and there's a robust online knowledge base plus an active community. That said, as with many fast-growing brands, rider experiences with response times and warranty handling can be a bit mixed, depending on where you live.
In Europe, NAMI often feels slightly more "mechanic friendly"-welded frame, standardised high-end components, fewer proprietary quirks-while Apollo leans harder into propriety: custom frame, custom display, custom electronics. Great when it all works; a bit more dependent on the brand when it doesn't.
Pros & Cons Summary
| NAMI Super Stellar | APOLLO Phantom V4 |
|---|---|
Pros
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
Cons
|
Parameters Comparison
| Parameter | NAMI Super Stellar | APOLLO Phantom V4 |
|---|---|---|
| Motor power (rated) | Dual 1.000 W | Dual 2.400 W (combined rated) |
| Top speed | Ca. 60 km/h | Ca. 66 km/h |
| Battery | 52 V 25 Ah (ca. 1.300 Wh) | 52 V 23,4 Ah (1.216 Wh) |
| Claimed range | Bis ca. 75 km | Ca. 72-80 km |
| Real-world range (mixed) | Ca. 45-55 km | Ca. 40-55 km |
| Weight | 30 kg | 34,9 kg |
| Brakes | Hydraulic disc (Logan, 2-Kolben) | Disc (mechanisch oder hydraulisch) + Rekuperation |
| Suspension | Einstellbare Feder/Rubber vorn & hinten | Vierfach-Federung vorn & hinten |
| Tyres | 9" tubeless | 10" pneumatic with inner tubes |
| Max load | Ca. 110-120 kg | Ca. 130 kg |
| IP rating | IP55 | IP54 |
| Charging time (standard) | Ca. 5-6 h | Ca. 6-9 h |
| Approx. price | Ca. 1.361 € | Ca. 1.779 € |
Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?
If you strip away the marketing and just look at how these scooters behave in real life, the NAMI Super Stellar comes out as the more coherent, better-balanced package for most riders. It's compact without feeling compromised, seriously quick without being sketchy, and built with a refreshing emphasis on substance-frame, brakes, controllers, tyres-rather than theatrics. You step off it feeling like you've ridden a "proper" machine, not a fashion object.
The APOLLO Phantom V4 absolutely has its appeal. If you prioritise all-day comfort, a big forgiving deck, a luxurious cockpit and app-tuned personality, it delivers. It's a brilliant choice for riders with the space to store it, the legs to move it, and the budget to pay for its looks and polish. For longer, straight-ish commutes where you're mostly rolling, it's an enjoyable, confidence-inspiring cruiser.
But for the majority of riders who want lively handling, strong safety fundamentals, a sensible footprint and genuinely good value in a serious performance scooter, the Super Stellar is simply the smarter buy. It feels like the scooter you grow into and keep, rather than the one you admire, enjoy for a while, and eventually realise is just more machine than you really wanted to wrestle with every day.
Numbers Freaks Corner
| Metric | NAMI Super Stellar | APOLLO Phantom V4 |
|---|---|---|
| Price per Wh (€/Wh) | ✅ 1,05 €/Wh | ❌ 1,46 €/Wh |
| Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) | ✅ 22,68 €/km/h | ❌ 26,95 €/km/h |
| Weight per Wh (g/Wh) | ✅ 23,08 g/Wh | ❌ 28,70 g/Wh |
| Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) | ✅ 0,50 kg/km/h | ❌ 0,53 kg/km/h |
| Price per km of real-world range (€/km) | ✅ 27,22 €/km | ❌ 37,45 €/km |
| Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) | ✅ 0,60 kg/km | ❌ 0,73 kg/km |
| Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) | ❌ 26,00 Wh/km | ✅ 25,60 Wh/km |
| Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) | ❌ 33,33 W/km/h | ✅ 36,36 W/km/h |
| Weight to power ratio (kg/W) | ❌ 0,0150 kg/W | ✅ 0,0145 kg/W |
| Average charging speed (W) | ✅ 236,36 W | ❌ 162,13 W |
These metrics boil each scooter down to cold efficiency: how much you pay per unit of energy, speed or range; how much weight you haul for that performance; and how quickly you can refill the battery. The Super Stellar wins clearly on cost and weight efficiency and charges faster for its size, while the Phantom V4 edges ahead on pure energy efficiency, power per unit of speed, and weight-to-power ratio. Think of the NAMI as the thriftier, more compact performer and the Apollo as the slightly more power-dense but costlier and heavier platform.
Author's Category Battle
| Category | NAMI Super Stellar | APOLLO Phantom V4 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | ✅ Noticeably lighter overall | ❌ Heavier, harder to lug |
| Range | ✅ Slightly better per charge | ❌ Similar, but less efficient use |
| Max Speed | ❌ Slightly lower peak | ✅ Higher comfortable top end |
| Power | ❌ Less total rated power | ✅ Stronger overall motor output |
| Battery Size | ✅ Slightly larger capacity | ❌ Marginally smaller pack |
| Suspension | ❌ Less plush, more direct | ✅ Softer, more travel |
| Design | ❌ Functional, industrial look | ✅ Futuristic, highly styled |
| Safety | ✅ Hydraulics, tubeless, IP55 | ❌ Tubes, slightly lower IP |
| Practicality | ✅ Smaller footprint, easier store | ❌ Bulkier, needs more space |
| Comfort | ❌ Sporty, less cushy | ✅ Very plush, roomy deck |
| Features | ❌ Fewer flashy extras | ✅ Display, app, extra niceties |
| Serviceability | ✅ Simpler, standard components | ❌ More proprietary hardware |
| Customer Support | ✅ Strong EU distributor network | ✅ Active brand, good resources |
| Fun Factor | ✅ Compact rocket, very playful | ❌ Fun, but heavier feel |
| Build Quality | ✅ Welded frame, very solid | ❌ Great, but more rattly |
| Component Quality | ✅ Brakes, controllers, hardware | ❌ Good, but more mixed |
| Brand Name | ✅ Enthusiast-respected performance brand | ✅ Strong mainstream recognition |
| Community | ✅ Very positive owner base | ✅ Large, active user group |
| Lights (visibility) | ✅ Bright, high-mounted, clear | ❌ Great, but rear signals weaker |
| Lights (illumination) | ✅ Excellent real road lighting | ✅ Very strong, wide coverage |
| Acceleration | ✅ Smooth, very strong punch | ✅ Hard-hitting, tunable modes |
| Arrive with smile factor | ✅ Big grin every ride | ✅ Grin plus cockpit theatre |
| Arrive relaxed factor | ❌ Slightly more demanding ride | ✅ Softer, less fatiguing |
| Charging speed | ✅ Faster fill for capacity | ❌ Slower standard charging |
| Reliability | ✅ Simple, robust architecture | ❌ More complex, more to tweak |
| Folded practicality | ✅ Shorter, easier to stash | ❌ Big, awkward folded package |
| Ease of transport | ✅ Manageable short lifts | ❌ Heavy, really for rolling only |
| Handling | ✅ Agile, precise, engaging | ❌ Stable but less nimble |
| Braking performance | ✅ Top-tier hydraulic feel | ❌ Strong, but less refined |
| Riding position | ❌ Compact stance, less room | ✅ Very spacious, adjustable |
| Handlebar quality | ✅ Wide, solid, purposeful | ✅ Wide, ergonomic, polished |
| Throttle response | ✅ Super smooth sine-wave feel | ✅ Tunable, instant in Ludo |
| Dashboard/Display | ❌ Functional, less flashy | ✅ Beautiful, data-rich cockpit |
| Security (locking) | ✅ NFC adds useful deterrent | ❌ Standard, no special features |
| Weather protection | ✅ Better IP, good sealing | ❌ Adequate, but less reassuring |
| Resale value | ✅ Enthusiast demand, holds well | ✅ Big name, strong resale |
| Tuning potential | ✅ Controller-friendly, enthusiast modding | ✅ App tuning, some hardware mods |
| Ease of maintenance | ✅ Straightforward, non-proprietary bits | ❌ More integrated, trickier repairs |
| Value for Money | ✅ Strong performance per euro | ❌ Pays extra for polish |
Overall Winner Declaration
In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the NAMI Super Stellar scores 7 points against the APOLLO Phantom V4's 3. In the Author's Category Battle, the NAMI Super Stellar gets 30 ✅ versus 19 ✅ for APOLLO Phantom V4 (with a few ties sprinkled in).
Totals: NAMI Super Stellar scores 37, APOLLO Phantom V4 scores 22.
Based on the scoring, the NAMI Super Stellar is our overall winner. Riding these back-to-back, the NAMI Super Stellar simply feels like the more honest, well-judged machine: it gives you serious performance and real-world usefulness without wasting your money or your back on unnecessary excess. The APOLLO Phantom V4 is undeniably impressive and lovely to look at, but in day-to-day life it feels more like a gorgeous, slightly overbuilt toy than a tightly focused tool. If you want something you'll keep reaching for, even on grim Monday mornings and in cramped city flats, the Super Stellar is the one that makes the most sense-and still leaves you grinning like an idiot when you open the throttle.
That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.

