Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)
Overall, the Xiaomi Pro 2 comes out ahead: it rides more naturally thanks to its air-filled tyres, feels lighter in daily use, and sits in a much stronger ecosystem of parts, mods and community support. It is the one that will annoy you the least over a couple of years of real commuting.
The Segway E45E still makes sense if you absolutely hate punctures, love flashy lights, and can live with a firmer ride and a front-heavy fold. Think of it as the "maintenance first, comfort second" option.
If you want a safer-feeling, more planted ride and easier life with repairs and upgrades, go Xiaomi; if your personal hell is changing inner tubes, the Segway offers a way out - at a price. Now, let's dig into how they really feel once the novelty wears off.
Electric scooters have matured from shaky toys into serious commuter tools, and both the Segway E45E and the Xiaomi Pro 2 sit right in that "grown-up, but not insane" middle class. I've put plenty of kilometres on both, including some days where the bike lane looked more like a war zone than infrastructure, and neither is perfect - but each has a very clear personality.
On paper they're similar: same legal top speed, similar quoted range, similar motor rating, mid-range prices. In practice, one is a puncture-proof light show with a stiff backbone, the other a more traditional commuter that trades maintenance headaches for ride comfort (and the occasional swear-filled tyre change in your hallway).
If you're choosing between them for your daily grind, the differences matter more than the spec sheets suggest. Let's break them down where it counts: under your feet, in your hands, and on your stairs at the end of a long day.
Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?
Both scooters live in that mid-range commuter bracket: not cheap supermarket toys, not 30-kg dual-motor monsters. They aim at riders doing anything from a couple to low double-digit kilometres per day, mostly on tarmac, often mixed with public transport and stairs.
The Segway E45E targets the "I never want a flat, ever" commuter who values polished design, strong lighting and the convenience of not thinking about maintenance. It's for people who like the idea of the classic Ninebot ES series but want noticeably more real-world range.
The Xiaomi Pro 2 is the sensible default choice in this segment: lighter, very widely used, and easy to service. It suits riders who want a "normal" scooter feel with air tyres, decent comfort and a huge ecosystem of spares and hacks.
Price-wise, they're close enough that you wouldn't choose one purely on cost. You choose based on what annoys you more: hard ride and front weight (Segway) or occasional punctures and zero suspension (Xiaomi).
Design & Build Quality
Pick up the E45E and you immediately feel Segway's industrial design pedigree. The stem is clean, almost cable-less, with that bolt-on second battery giving the scooter a "backpack" look. The under-deck lighting and integrated display make it feel like a consumer gadget rather than a small vehicle. Everything clicks and folds with the sort of confidence you expect from a brand that builds rental fleets.
The flip side: that stem battery adds bulk and makes the folded package thicker at the front. On the floor it looks sleek; in a crowded train corridor, less so. The materials feel solid, but the front suspension hardware can sound a bit clacky on repeated hits, which slightly undermines the otherwise premium first impression.
The Xiaomi Pro 2 is more understated. Matte dark frame, subtle red accents, a familiar silhouette you'll see cloned all over Europe. The folding joint is simpler and more compact than the Segway's front pedal affair, and the scooter feels more evenly balanced in the hand. Xiaomi has clearly iterated on weak points from the original M365 - reinforced fender, better lighting, stronger latch - and the whole thing feels like a well-worn template rather than a design experiment.
In the hands, the Xiaomi feels a touch more "tool", the Segway more "gadget". If you like clean lines and party lights, Segway tickles that nerve. If you care more about practical stiffness and easy-to-find spare parts, Xiaomi quietly wins the grown-up game.
Ride Comfort & Handling
This is where the philosophies really diverge. The E45E rolls on solid, foam-filled tyres with a small front spring. On fresh asphalt it glides almost silently and feels very composed; the larger wheel size helps roll over minor nonsense. The moment the surface deteriorates - patched tarmac, paving stones, expansion joints - the scooter starts transmitting reality up your legs in glorious HD. The front shock takes the edge off, but it can also clack loudly on bigger hits, which doesn't exactly scream refinement.
After several kilometres on bad sidewalks, the Segway gives your ankles and knees a clear reminder that "maintenance-free" comes with a price. Handling is stable, though: the dual-battery layout shifts some weight up the stem, which makes steering feel a bit heavier but also quite planted at its limited top speed. It never feels twitchy, just firm.
The Xiaomi Pro 2, by contrast, relies entirely on its air-filled tyres and your joints. No suspension at all. On decent bike lanes the ride is noticeably softer than the Segway, with that gentle "float" that only air can give. It deals better with repetitive small bumps and rough patches, and your hands and feet complain less over distance.
Hit truly broken surfaces and both scooters suffer, but the Xiaomi does it with more grip and less harshness, while the Segway does it with more noise and vibration but zero fear of punctures. In tight manoeuvres and low-speed weaving, the Pro 2 feels a bit more natural and nimble; the E45E feels more rigid and "stem heavy", especially when you have to lift the front slightly over curbs.
Performance
On paper the motors are very similar. In practice, the E45E feels just a hair more eager for a bit longer into the discharge curve, thanks to that dual-battery setup. Off the line, acceleration in Sport mode is brisk enough to keep up with city cyclists without drama, and the scooter holds its legal top speed reasonably consistently until you're fairly low on charge. It doesn't shove, but it doesn't feel anaemic either.
Hill performance on the Segway is... fine. It will crest typical city bridges and modest hills without you having to push, especially if you're not right on the weight limit. On steeper ramps, heavier riders will watch speed bleed away steadily, but at least the scooter keeps moving rather than giving up completely.
The Xiaomi Pro 2 is in the same ballpark for grunt. From standstill to about city cycling pace, the response is pleasantly smooth and predictable, with a linear throttle that beginners appreciate. On flat ground in Sport mode it feels lively enough, and for most urban use you won't perceive a huge difference versus the Segway. Put both side by side and drag race them and you'll notice nuances; use them as commuters and you'll just call both "fast enough".
Where the Xiaomi shows its limits is on steeper hills with heavier riders: it will go up, but you'll be questioning your life choices halfway if you sit near the top of the weight rating. That said, braking performance is more confidence-inspiring: the mix of electronic front braking and a real rear disc gives a more familiar, controllable stop than the Segway's regen + magnetic + foot-brake cocktail, which is smooth but not exactly fierce.
Battery & Range
Both scooters shout similar theoretical range numbers, and both behave roughly as you'd expect once rubber meets road: remove the marketing, factor in proper human weight and normal riding speeds, and you end up in that "comfortable there-and-back daily commute with some buffer" territory.
The E45E earns its badge by simply having more battery than the typical slim commuter frame suggests. Dual packs let it hold top performance for longer into the discharge, and you can often skip a charge or two if your daily mileage is modest. Range anxiety is notably lower: you start a day, glance at the bars, and rarely worry about whether you'll make it home unless you've been particularly throttle-happy.
The downside is charging time: filling two packs through one modest charger is not a quick affair. This is very much an overnight-charge scooter; lunchtime top-ups barely move the needle.
The Xiaomi Pro 2 hides a decently sized pack in the deck and offers real-world range that is surprisingly close to its theoretical boast if you ride sanely. In continuous Sport mode with stop-start city use, you're still in very usable territory. It doesn't keep its "fresh off the charger" punch quite as flat across the battery as the dual-battery Segway, but most people won't notice the sag unless they're paying attention.
Charging is similarly an overnight project, and neither scooter is particularly impressive in this respect. Between the two, the Xiaomi squeezes a bit more from each watt-hour in most riding scenarios, but the Segway compensates somewhat simply by having enough juice not to care.
Portability & Practicality
On paper the weight difference between them isn't dramatic; in the real world, it is. The Pro 2 is light enough that carrying it up one or two flights isn't a life event. The balance with the battery under the deck and motor in the front is predictable: grab the stem, lift, done. The folded package is slim, though the fixed-width handlebar means it still occupies a full shoulder width in a crowded tram.
The E45E pushes toward the upper edge of what feels "portable" in this class. The dual-battery stem makes it heavily front-biased when you carry it, and that gets old fast in stairwells and when lifting into a car boot. The folding pedal is very convenient on the ground - quick, almost hands-free - but the final folded shape is fatter at the front, which you'll definitely notice if you store it under a desk or squeeze past people on a corridor.
For genuine multi-modal commuting, where you regularly carry the scooter, the Xiaomi is simply easier to live with. If your typical "carrying" is lifting it over a doorstep and into a hallway, the Segway's extra kilos and front heft are less of a drama.
Safety
Both brands take lighting and visibility seriously, and both pass the basic "I'm not invisible at night" test. The E45E goes harder on the theatrics: strong front light, good reflectors and that under-deck RGB glow that makes you very visible from the side. It's not just for show; in urban traffic it genuinely helps cars and cyclists notice you in their peripheral vision.
Braking on the Segway is heavily electronic. The regen + magnetic system creates a smooth, progressive deceleration, and the added foot brake is more psychological comfort than a serious tool for most people. For new riders, this smoothness and resistance to wheel lock-up is reassuring. For experienced riders used to disc brakes, it feels a bit too soft for emergency situations and encourages you to plan ahead more.
The Pro 2 combines front electronic braking with a mechanical rear disc, and that hybrid setup just feels more controllable when you really need to stop. Once properly adjusted, you can easily modulate braking force and get a shorter, more predictable stopping distance, especially on dry surfaces.
Tyres are another key safety piece. Solid foam on the Segway means no sudden losses from blowouts, but less mechanical grip on wet patches and paint. The Xiaomi's air tyres, while puncture-prone, give clearly better traction in the wet and over irregular surfaces. In sketchy weather, the Pro 2 inspires more trust as long as your tyres are in good shape.
Community Feedback
| Segway E45E | Xiaomi Pro 2 |
|---|---|
| What riders love Maintenance-free tyres, strong and customisable lighting, solid build feel, easy folding pedal, consistent power even at lower battery, good hill performance for a commuter. |
What riders love Proven reliability, light but sturdy chassis, huge parts and mod ecosystem, good real-world range, grippy pneumatic tyres, strong brakes, excellent value perception. |
| What riders complain about Harsh ride on rough surfaces, clacky front suspension, front-heavy carry, longer stopping distances than disc-brake rivals, slow charging, slippery feel on very wet or painted surfaces. |
What riders complain about Awful tyre changes, no suspension at all, occasional stem wobble if hinge isn't maintained, limited hill performance for heavy riders, slow charging, warranty dislike of water. |
Price & Value
Both scooters sit in that awkward middle ground where the cheap stuff starts to look flimsy and the expensive stuff starts to look like overkill. The Pro 2 often costs a bit more at retail, but makes a very strong case in terms of total ownership: good range, good comfort, and a parts ecosystem so large that almost nothing is terminal. If you plan to actually use the scooter for a few years, that matters more than saving a small amount up front.
The E45E counters with dual-battery peace of mind and zero-puncture tyres. If you've already spent evenings wrestling inner tubes, that might be worth paying for. However, you are giving up some comfort and braking bite while paying a price that isn't dramatically below the Xiaomi in many markets. In terms of "euro per grin", the Segway feels fair but not exceptional; the Xiaomi feels like a safer bet for most commuters.
Service & Parts Availability
Neither brand is obscure, but their ecosystems are very different. Xiaomi plays the "every corner shop has our bits" card. From brake pads to dash covers to replacement controllers, the aftermarket is overflowing. There are YouTube tutorials for every imaginable repair, and independent scooter shops know the platform inside out.
Segway/Ninebot has strong official presence and a lot of rental-fleet experience, which translates into decent access to OEM parts and formal service centres, especially in larger European cities. However, the user-replaceable/modding scene is smaller and the scooter is less often treated as a tinker platform. You can get it fixed; you just won't be elbow-deep in third-party hop-ups to the same extent.
If you want the security of being able to patch up almost anything with cheap parts and a free Sunday, the Xiaomi ecosystem is simply hard to beat.
Pros & Cons Summary
| Segway E45E | Xiaomi Pro 2 |
|---|---|
Pros
|
Pros
|
Parameters Comparison
| Parameter | Segway E45E | Xiaomi Pro 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Motor power (nominal) | 300 W front hub | 300 W front hub |
| Top speed | 25 km/h (limited) | 25 km/h (limited) |
| Theoretical range | 45 km | 45 km |
| Realistic range (approx.) | 25-30 km | 25-35 km |
| Battery capacity | 368 Wh | 446 Wh |
| Weight | 16,4 kg | 14,2 kg |
| Brakes | Front electronic, rear magnetic + foot | Front E-ABS regen, rear disc |
| Suspension | Front spring | None |
| Tyres | 9" foam-filled solid | 8,5" pneumatic, with tube |
| Max rider load | 100 kg | 100 kg |
| Water resistance | IPX4 | IP54 |
| Charging time | 7,5 h | 8-9 h |
| Approx. price | 570 € | 642 € |
Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?
After living with both, the Xiaomi Pro 2 is the safer overall recommendation for most riders. It rides more naturally, grips better in mixed conditions, and is easier to carry and maintain. The ecosystem around it means nearly any problem is fixable cheaply, and the real-world balance of range, comfort and practicality is just more convincing as a daily commuter package.
The Segway E45E is not a bad scooter - it simply leans hard into a particular set of priorities. If your number one fear is punctures and you mostly ride on decent surfaces, its foam tyres and longish real-world range make it a low-fuss, turn-key tool. You'll tolerate the harsher ride, slightly softer braking and front-heavy feel in return for never wrestling a tyre lever in your hallway.
If you want a scooter that will simply disappear into your routine with the least compromise - and you're prepared to occasionally swear at a puncture - the Xiaomi Pro 2 edges it. If you'd gladly trade some comfort, braking bite and portability to avoid tyres and enjoy Segway's glossy design and lighting, the E45E still earns its place on the shortlist.
Numbers Freaks Corner
| Metric | Segway E45E | Xiaomi Pro 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Price per Wh (€/Wh) | ❌ 1,55 €/Wh | ✅ 1,44 €/Wh |
| Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) | ✅ 22,8 €/km/h | ❌ 25,68 €/km/h |
| Weight per Wh (g/Wh) | ❌ 44,6 g/Wh | ✅ 31,8 g/Wh |
| Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) | ❌ 0,656 kg/km/h | ✅ 0,568 kg/km/h |
| Price per km of real-world range (€/km) | ✅ 20,7 €/km | ❌ 21,4 €/km |
| Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) | ❌ 0,60 kg/km | ✅ 0,47 kg/km |
| Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) | ✅ 13,4 Wh/km | ❌ 14,9 Wh/km |
| Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) | ✅ 12 W/km/h | ✅ 12 W/km/h |
| Weight to power ratio (kg/W) | ❌ 0,0547 kg/W | ✅ 0,0473 kg/W |
| Average charging speed (W) | ❌ 49,1 W | ✅ 52,5 W |
These metrics look at how efficiently each scooter turns money, weight and electricity into speed and distance. Price per Wh and per km/h show what you pay for each chunk of battery and performance; weight-related figures matter if you carry the scooter a lot. Wh per km reflects pure energy efficiency, while price and weight per km of real-world range tell you how costly and heavy each kilometre of commuting is. Power-to-speed and weight-to-power hint at how "loaded" the motor is, and average charging speed shows how quickly you fill the tank in electrical terms.
Author's Category Battle
| Category | Segway E45E | Xiaomi Pro 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | ❌ Heavier, front-biased | ✅ Noticeably lighter to carry |
| Range | ❌ Slightly less real buffer | ✅ Goes a bit further |
| Max Speed | ✅ Same legal limit | ✅ Same legal limit |
| Power | ✅ Holds punch longer | ❌ Slightly more sag |
| Battery Size | ❌ Smaller overall pack | ✅ Bigger deck battery |
| Suspension | ✅ Has front spring | ❌ No suspension at all |
| Design | ✅ Cleaner, more futuristic | ❌ Plainer, utilitarian look |
| Safety | ❌ Softer braking, solid tyres | ✅ Better brakes, more grip |
| Practicality | ❌ Front-heavy, bulkier folded | ✅ Easier stairs and storage |
| Comfort | ❌ Harsh on rough surfaces | ✅ Softer thanks to air tyres |
| Features | ✅ Deck lights, triple brake | ❌ Plainer, fewer party tricks |
| Serviceability | ❌ Less DIY ecosystem | ✅ Huge DIY community |
| Customer Support | ✅ Solid Segway network | ❌ More retailer-dependent |
| Fun Factor | ❌ Feels a bit stiff | ✅ Livelier, more playful |
| Build Quality | ✅ Very solid chassis | ✅ Also robust overall |
| Component Quality | ✅ Polished finishing touches | ❌ More basic hardware |
| Brand Name | ✅ Segway pedigree | ✅ Xiaomi household name |
| Community | ❌ Smaller, less mod-oriented | ✅ Massive global community |
| Lights (visibility) | ✅ Under-deck, strong presence | ❌ Good but less dramatic |
| Lights (illumination) | ✅ Bright headlight, side glow | ❌ Functional but more basic |
| Acceleration | ✅ Feels punchy, consistent | ❌ Slightly softer overall |
| Arrive with smile factor | ❌ Ride harsh, less playful | ✅ Nicer feel, more grin |
| Arrive relaxed factor | ❌ More vibration fatigue | ✅ Smoother, less tiring |
| Charging speed | ❌ Slower per Wh | ✅ Slightly quicker per Wh |
| Reliability | ✅ Solid, few big issues | ✅ Proven long-term workhorse |
| Folded practicality | ❌ Thick front, awkward | ✅ Slimmer, easier to stash |
| Ease of transport | ❌ Heavy, front-loaded | ✅ Manageable for most people |
| Handling | ❌ Heavier steering feel | ✅ More natural, nimble |
| Braking performance | ❌ Longer, softer stops | ✅ Strong disc + regen |
| Riding position | ✅ Comfortable commuter stance | ✅ Also comfortable stance |
| Handlebar quality | ✅ Nice grips, tidy cockpit | ❌ Plainer, less refined |
| Throttle response | ✅ Smooth, consistent pull | ✅ Smooth, predictable too |
| Dashboard/Display | ✅ Sleek, integrated display | ❌ Functional, less stylish |
| Security (locking) | ❌ No real advantage | ✅ Motor lock, huge accessory |
| Weather protection | ❌ Lower rating, solid tyre slip | ✅ Better rating, more grip |
| Resale value | ❌ Less demand second-hand | ✅ Very strong used market |
| Tuning potential | ❌ Limited mod scene | ✅ Huge firmware, hardware mods |
| Ease of maintenance | ✅ No flats, fewer fiddles | ❌ Tyres a pain to service |
| Value for Money | ❌ Fair but not standout | ✅ Strong overall proposition |
Overall Winner Declaration
In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the SEGWAY E45E scores 4 points against the XIAOMI Pro 2's 7. In the Author's Category Battle, the SEGWAY E45E gets 18 ✅ versus 27 ✅ for XIAOMI Pro 2 (with a few ties sprinkled in).
Totals: SEGWAY E45E scores 22, XIAOMI Pro 2 scores 34.
Based on the scoring, the XIAOMI Pro 2 is our overall winner. When you step back from the tables and mental arithmetic, the Xiaomi Pro 2 simply feels like the more complete everyday companion: easier to carry, nicer to ride, and backed by an ecosystem that keeps it alive and relevant for years. The Segway E45E has its charms - especially if you dread punctures and love big, confident lighting - but it never quite shakes the impression of being a slightly compromised evolution of an older concept. If I had to live with one of them as my only scooter, day in, day out, I'd take the Pro 2 and accept the occasional tyre tantrum; it just gets more of the daily basics right, and that matters more than clever lights or theoretical range once the honeymoon period is over.
That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.