Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)
If you care most about stability, safety and long-term robustness, the ZOSH Allroad is the stronger overall package, even if it makes your wallet cry and your staircase deeply unhappy. The SMARTGYRO CROSSOVER DUAL MAX 2 fights back hard on price and hill-climbing fun, but cuts corners in refinement, component quality and long-term serenity.
Choose the ZOSH if you want something that feels closer to a small electric vehicle than a toy, and you plan to keep it for years. Go for the SMARTGYRO if your budget is tight, you live in a hilly city, and you're willing to accept a rougher, more maintenance-hungry experience in exchange for strong punch-per-euro.
If you want to know where each one shines - and where the marketing gloss wears off - keep reading; the differences get more interesting the deeper you go.
There's a particular kind of rider who looks at standard 10-inch scooters and thinks, "Cute, but I'd like something that doesn't die at the first pothole." The ZOSH Allroad is very clearly built for that person: massive bicycle-sized tyres, steel frame, French manufacturing, and the general charisma of a compact agricultural implement. It's a scooter for people who like the idea of riding over pretty much anything and not worrying whether the chassis will survive.
On the other side stands the SMARTGYRO CROSSOVER DUAL MAX 2, the Spanish answer to "I want dual motors and full suspension, but I refuse to sell a kidney." It packs strong power, dual suspension, NFC locking and a proper lighting package into a price bracket where most brands are still debating whether you deserve a rear light at all.
Both weigh about as much as a small washing machine, both claim serious off-road or "all road" credentials, and both target riders who want more than a flimsy commuter. But they get there with very different philosophies - and compromises. Let's dig in.
Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?
In raw positioning, the two scooters live in different financial galaxies: the ZOSH is premium European, priced like a serious hobby or a professional tool; the SMARTGYRO is a value-driven workhorse aiming to deliver as much wattage and suspension as possible for under the psychological four-figure barrier.
Yet in usage, they overlap surprisingly often. Both are aimed at riders who:
- want more power and comfort than a typical rental-style scooter,
- are willing to put up with heavy weight in exchange for stability,
- ride on mixed terrain: broken tarmac, cobbles, dirt paths, mild off-road.
The ZOSH Allroad is best seen as an "electric ATV on a scooter deck" - something you could take from a rural driveway onto forest tracks and then roll straight into town. The SMARTGYRO CROSSOVER DUAL MAX 2 is more of a beefed-up urban commuter: still game for gravel and bad roads, but ultimately built around 10-inch scooter geometry and a value-focused component set.
If your question is, "Which one should be my daily vehicle?" they are absolutely direct competitors - you're just choosing between paying more upfront for refinement and durability, or spending less and accepting a bit more roughness around the edges.
Design & Build Quality
Pick up the ZOSH Allroad (or more realistically, try to tilt it) and it feels like industrial equipment. The twin oversized steel tubes that form the frame don't just look dramatic; they give it the reassuring density of something that expects to live outdoors for a decade. Welds are clean, the paint feels thick, and the whole chassis gives off a "lifetime warranty? yeah, that tracks" vibe.
The SMARTGYRO, by contrast, is very much in the classic aluminium-frame, box-deck, single-mast scooter school. It looks aggressive enough - black with blue accents, plenty of visual muscle - but when you've spent time on both, the difference in chassis intent is obvious. The ZOSH feels like a platform you could modify and rebuild forever; the SMARTGYRO feels like a decently robust consumer product you'll maintain until the economics of repair stop making sense.
Ergonomically, ZOSH wins on sheer deck freedom. That open, wide platform with no mid-leg bar lets you adopt a proper athletic stance: sideways, surf-like, braced for rough ground. On the SMARTGYRO you're more in standard scooter posture: still comfortable, but with less room to really move around and load the chassis with your body weight on technical sections.
Component choice underlines the difference in philosophy. Hydraulic brakes from serious bicycle brands, Kevlar-reinforced tyres, French-assembled battery on the ZOSH - you can feel where the money went. On the SMARTGYRO, mechanical discs, long cable runs and mid-range fittings remind you where costs have been trimmed. Not disastrously so, but if you're used to higher-end kit, you'll spot it.
Design verdict: the SMARTGYRO looks the part and is solid enough for its price. The ZOSH feels overbuilt in a way that's frankly refreshing - even if it sometimes borders on "a bit much" for simple urban use.
Ride Comfort & Handling
Here the wheel size war begins. After a day switching between the two, stepping back onto 10-inch tyres from the ZOSH's fat 20-inchers feels like you've suddenly shrunk. The Allroad just steamrolls surface imperfections. Expansion joints, cobbles, small curbs - they become mild suggestions rather than events. Drop the tyre pressure a little and the combination of big air volume and front fork gives you that gently floating, "why are my knees not complaining?" feeling even over nasty surfaces.
The SMARTGYRO counters with proper suspension at both ends. Over typical city scars - potholes, broken edges, recessed manhole covers - the dual suspension does a surprisingly good job of protecting your joints. You do feel the smaller wheel diameter, though: sharp edges and larger obstacles are more abrupt, and you need better line choice and a bit more respect for deep ruts or loose rocks.
In tight urban corners, the SMARTGYRO actually feels more nimble. Shorter wheelbase, smaller tyres, and that classic scooter stance make it eager to flick between gaps in traffic. The ZOSH, by contrast, behaves like a long-wheelbase bike: ultra stable in sweepers, reassuring at speed, but not really interested in slaloming around every lamp post just to prove a point.
After several long rides, the comfort pattern becomes clear: if you're spending serious time on rough ground or broken country lanes, the ZOSH's big-wheel calm is in another league. In dense city riding with constant stops, turns and tight manoeuvres, the SMARTGYRO feels lighter on its feet... at least until you need to carry it.
Performance
Both scooters are legally capped at typical European city speeds, but how they get there - and what happens on private land - is where the fun lives.
The SMARTGYRO comes alive the moment you enable both motors. From a standstill in dual-motor mode, it picks up with an enthusiastic shove that will surprise anyone coming from a rental or Xiaomi-class scooter. It doesn't just reach its limited top speed; it rushes there, and crucially, it holds speed on inclines where cheaper single-motor scooters fade to an undignified crawl. In hilly cities, it feels like cheating.
The ZOSH's power delivery is more grown-up. There's still dual-motor traction, but the kick is broader and smoother rather than a single punchy hit. On steeper climbs, it just keeps pulling with an almost tractor-like determination, particularly once you're moving. It feels less "wow, that launch" and more "I'll drag you and your backpack up this hill whether you like it or not." Unlock the speed limiter on private ground and the chassis suddenly makes sense: it stays remarkably composed at frankly silly velocities for something with a deck.
Braking is where the gap in component quality really shows. The ZOSH's hydraulic system, with proper mountain-bike-grade calipers, lets you scrub off speed with one finger and real finesse. Emergency stops feel controlled rather than panicked. On the SMARTGYRO, the mechanical discs can be strong once dialled in, but they require more lever force and more frequent fiddling. Out of the box, I've yet to ride one that didn't benefit from a proper setup session.
In pure "seat of the pants" terms: SMARTGYRO gives you the more dramatic low-speed excitement and hill-climb fireworks per euro. The ZOSH delivers a calmer, heavier-duty performance that inspires more trust when things get fast, steep or rough.
Battery & Range
Battery stories on spec sheets are always optimistic; real roads and real riders are much less kind.
On the SMARTGYRO, riding with both motors active, mixed urban terrain, and a normal adult rider, you're typically looking at a comfortable daily loop of medium length with some margin - enough for a solid commute plus errands. Switch to single-motor mode and take it easy, and you can stretch that nicely, but when you lean on the power, the gauge does drop at a noticeable pace. It's fine, just not miraculous.
The ZOSH's pack is in a different size class. In civilised riding modes on mixed terrain, range anxiety simply... evaporates. You start to plan rides based on your own stamina rather than the battery. Even when you abuse the dual motors off-road or unlock higher speeds, it still gives you genuinely useful distance rather than a brief party followed by an anxious limp home.
Then there's charging. The SMARTGYRO is very much an overnight proposition; plug it in when you get home and don't expect miracles before breakfast. The ZOSH, with its high-amp fast charger, goes from low to full in a ridiculously short time for a battery of that size. For professional users or anyone doing multiple rides in a day, that alone is a game-changer.
Overall efficiency is what you'd expect: the lighter-duty SMARTGYRO sips less at modest speeds, the heavier, more capable ZOSH spends more but carries such a large energy reserve that in real use, it still wins decisively on usable range.
Portability & Practicality
Let's not sugar-coat this: neither of these scooters is "portable" in the way marketing departments love to pretend. Both hover around the same weight as a sizeable suitcase, and both are absolutely not something you want to carry up several flights of stairs on a daily basis unless you're also training for a strongman competition.
The SMARTGYRO folds into a fairly standard chunky-scooter package: shorter, reasonably flat, with a folding stem and a deck that will just about slot into the boot of most cars. For people who occasionally need to stash it in a corner or throw it in the car, it's workable, if not exactly elegant. The Generation 2 folding mechanism feels decently secure and, importantly, doesn't wobble like some cheaper clones after a few months.
The ZOSH takes a different route: only the handlebar folds, the main chassis stays long and unapologetically big-wheeled. It's far better suited to garages, sheds, and the backs of estate cars or vans than to narrow hallways or city flats. You can move it around, but you roll it rather than lift it - think "bicycle you don't sit on" rather than "commuter toy you tuck under a café table."
Daily practicality therefore depends entirely on your storage situation. Ground-floor or garage? Both are viable. Fourth-floor walk-up? Neither is a good idea, but the SMARTGYRO at least folds more compactly. ZOSH wins once it's rolling; SMARTGYRO wins if you really must do the occasional human-powered heave.
Safety
Safety is where the ZOSH's big-wheel, heavy-frame philosophy earns its keep. The combination of large-diameter tyres, low-mounted battery, and long wheelbase gives it extremely reassuring straight-line stability. Speed wobble is basically a non-issue unless you go actively hunting for trouble, and rough surfaces that would unsettle typical scooters barely register. Add in those high-grade hydraulic brakes and heavily puncture-resistant tyres, and it feels very much like a vehicle designed by people who actually ride hard themselves.
The SMARTGYRO leans more on active safety features and electronics. The lighting and signalling package is excellent for the class: a proper headlight that actually throws light down the road, decent rear light, and handlebar-controlled turn signals that let you communicate with traffic without letting go. Regenerative braking adds an extra layer of speed control on downhills and helps save your pads a little.
Where the SMARTGYRO falls short of the ZOSH is passive stability. Ten-inch tyres can only do so much over truly bad surfaces, and at the same speed, you feel more vulnerable to sudden holes, tracks and loose gravel. The suspension helps a lot, but physics is physics. Braking, too, is fine once properly adjusted, but it never quite has that "one finger, full trust" quality of good hydraulics.
In city traffic, the SMARTGYRO's exceptional visibility and indicators are a real advantage. On mixed or rough terrain, or at higher unlocked speeds away from traffic, the ZOSH is simply in another safety league.
Community Feedback
| ZOSH Allroad | SMARTGYRO CROSSOVER DUAL MAX 2 |
|---|---|
What riders love
|
What riders love
|
What riders complain about
|
What riders complain about
|
Price & Value
This is where the argument gets heated in forums. The SMARTGYRO lands in that dangerously tempting slot where you get "big scooter" experience for what many people would mentally budget for a mid-range toy. For the price, the list of features - dual motors, dual suspension, tubeless tyres, NFC security, decent battery - is undeniably impressive. If your priority is "maximum grin per euro spent" in the short term, it makes a very compelling case.
The ZOSH, meanwhile, asks several times the money and then calmly points at its frame, its brakes, its huge battery, its charging speed, its tyres and its local manufacturing. It's not trying to win the spec-sheet arms race by undercutting; it's playing the longevity and trust game. You are essentially buying into a thick-metal, repairable platform with high-end bicycle components and a battery that feels engineered rather than just assembled.
Viewed over many years of ownership, the ZOSH can start to look less outrageous: fewer flat tyres, less fear about frame fatigue, easier support and a pack that doesn't need replacing early. But you have to be the kind of rider who actually keeps a scooter long enough for that maths to pay off, and who genuinely uses its capabilities.
In blunt terms: SMARTGYRO wins pure sticker-price value; ZOSH wins value as a serious, long-term vehicle. Which matters more depends entirely on your horizon and how hard you ride.
Service & Parts Availability
For European riders, especially in Spain, SMARTGYRO's service network and parts supply are a major asset. Need a fender, a controller, or a new tyre? There are distributors, workshops, and a decent amount of informal know-how floating around. It's very much a mass-market brand with infrastructure to match.
ZOSH plays a different game: smaller volume, but much more tightly controlled manufacturing and assembly in France. For EU customers, that means direct access to the people who actually build the thing, and a frame that's explicitly designed to be repairable rather than disposable. Components like Magura or Shimano brakes are also easy to service at any decent bike shop across the continent.
SmartGyro feels easier and cheaper to patch up if you knock it about and don't mind some DIY. ZOSH feels like a machine you'll actually want to keep in good condition because the underlying platform deserves it - and because the brand clearly expects you to keep it for the long haul.
Pros & Cons Summary
| ZOSH Allroad | SMARTGYRO CROSSOVER DUAL MAX 2 |
|---|---|
Pros
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
Cons
|
Parameters Comparison
| Parameter | ZOSH Allroad | SMARTGYRO CROSSOVER DUAL MAX 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Motor power (nominal) | 2 x 500 W (1.000 W total) | 2 x 500 W (1.000 W total) |
| Motor power (peak) | ca. 1.200 W peak (per system, claimed) | 2.800 W peak |
| Top speed (unlocked, private) | Up to 80 km/h | 25 km/h (limited; no higher spec given) |
| Battery capacity | 1.152 Wh | ca. 720 Wh (48 V, 15 Ah) |
| Claimed range | Up to 70 km city, 40-60 km off-road | Up to 60 km (realistic 35-45 km) |
| Realistic mixed range (approx.) | ca. 55 km | ca. 40 km |
| Weight | 30 kg | 30 kg |
| Max rider load | 150 kg | 120 kg |
| Brakes | Hydraulic discs, 180 mm | Mechanical discs + regen |
| Suspension | Front fork, big pneumatic tyres | Dual front and rear suspension |
| Tyres | 20" FAT, ca. 4" wide, Kevlar-reinforced | 10" pneumatic tubeless "All Road" |
| Water resistance / IP | Not specified, designed for all-weather use | IPX4 |
| Charging time | < 2 h with fast charger | ca. 8 h |
| Price (approx.) | 3.700 € | 783 € |
Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?
After living with both, the pattern is clear: the ZOSH Allroad feels like a small electric vehicle that happens to have a scooter deck, while the SMARTGYRO CROSSOVER DUAL MAX 2 feels like a powerful scooter that's doing its best impression of a small vehicle. If your roads are bad, your rides are long, and you care about feeling rock-solid and safe rather than just excited, the ZOSH simply does the job better. It's calmer, more planted, more confidence-inspiring - and built in a way that makes you believe it'll still be around many winters from now.
The SMARTGYRO, however, absolutely has its place. If your budget sits firmly under the four-figure mark and you still want dual motors, real suspension and proper lights, it delivers a lot of scooter. It's a fantastic "step up" from commuter toys and a genuine hill-conquering upgrade for bigger riders in hilly cities. You just have to accept that it lives in the mid-range universe: more maintenance tinkering, more compromises in refinement, and a fundamentally less bomb-proof platform.
If money and storage space aren't your main constraints and you're thinking long-term, the ZOSH Allroad is the more complete, grown-up choice. If price is decisive and you mainly blast up urban hills rather than exploring gnarly backroads, the SMARTGYRO will still put a big grin on your face - just don't expect it to feel like a lifetime machine.
Numbers Freaks Corner
| Metric | ZOSH Allroad | SMARTGYRO CROSSOVER DUAL MAX 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Price per Wh (€/Wh) | ❌ 3,21 €/Wh | ✅ 1,09 €/Wh |
| Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) | ❌ 46,25 €/km/h | ✅ 31,32 €/km/h |
| Weight per Wh (g/Wh) | ✅ 26,04 g/Wh | ❌ 41,67 g/Wh |
| Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) | ✅ 0,375 kg/km/h | ❌ 1,20 kg/km/h |
| Price per km of real-world range (€/km) | ❌ 67,27 €/km | ✅ 19,58 €/km |
| Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) | ✅ 0,55 kg/km | ❌ 0,75 kg/km |
| Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) | ❌ 20,95 Wh/km | ✅ 18,00 Wh/km |
| Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) | ❌ 12,50 W/km/h | ✅ 40,00 W/km/h |
| Weight to power ratio (kg/W) | ✅ 0,03 kg/W | ✅ 0,03 kg/W |
| Average charging speed (W) | ✅ 576 W | ❌ 90 W |
These metrics help quantify different aspects of efficiency and value: cost per unit of energy and per unit of speed, how much weight and money you carry for each kilometre of real range, how energy-efficient each scooter is, how aggressively power is used relative to top speed, how heavy the scooter is for its power, and how quickly each battery can realistically be refilled from the wall. They're not a verdict on quality or feel, but a useful way to understand what you're getting in purely mathematical terms.
Author's Category Battle
| Category | ZOSH Allroad | SMARTGYRO CROSSOVER DUAL MAX 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | ❌ Same mass, bulkier form | ✅ Same mass, folds neater |
| Range | ✅ Much longer real range | ❌ Shorter daily distance |
| Max Speed (unlocked) | ✅ Serious high-speed potential | ❌ Limited, no extra headroom |
| Power | ❌ Less peak punch | ✅ Stronger peak surge |
| Battery Size | ✅ Far larger battery pack | ❌ Smaller capacity overall |
| Suspension | ❌ Only front, tyre flex | ✅ Dual front and rear |
| Design | ✅ Distinctive, purposeful, modular | ❌ Generic aggressive scooter look |
| Safety | ✅ Big wheels, strong brakes | ❌ Smaller wheels, weaker brakes |
| Practicality | ❌ Huge footprint, garage-oriented | ✅ Easier to store and fold |
| Comfort | ✅ Big-wheel plush stability | ❌ Good, but more nervous |
| Features | ❌ Basic display, few smarts | ✅ NFC, app, indicators |
| Serviceability | ✅ Standard bike parts, steel | ❌ More proprietary scooter bits |
| Customer Support | ✅ Direct European manufacturer | ✅ Strong Spanish support network |
| Fun Factor | ✅ Big-wheel "mini-ATV" feel | ❌ Fun, but more generic |
| Build Quality | ✅ Overbuilt, lifetime-oriented | ❌ Solid mid-range, not premium |
| Component Quality | ✅ Brakes, tyres, battery top | ❌ Mechanical brakes, cheaper bits |
| Brand Name | ✅ Niche high-end European | ✅ Popular, established Iberian |
| Community | ✅ Passionate, but smaller | ✅ Larger, very active |
| Lights (visibility) | ❌ Decent, but basic | ✅ Strong, with indicators |
| Lights (illumination) | ❌ Adequate, not standout | ✅ Better headlight throw |
| Acceleration | ❌ Smoother, less dramatic | ✅ Punchier from standstill |
| Arrive with smile factor | ✅ Big-wheel grin every time | ✅ Dual-motor torque buzz |
| Arrive relaxed factor | ✅ Very calm, low stress | ❌ More jittery, more effort |
| Charging speed | ✅ Incredibly fast turnaround | ❌ Slow, overnight only |
| Reliability | ✅ Simpler, higher-grade parts | ❌ More to adjust and rattle |
| Folded practicality | ❌ Long, awkward shape | ✅ Compact enough car-friendly |
| Ease of transport | ❌ Awkward to lift, manoeuvre | ✅ Still heavy, but simpler |
| Handling | ✅ Stable, confident, bike-like | ❌ Nimbler, but less planted |
| Braking performance | ✅ Hydraulic, powerful, precise | ❌ Mechanical, needs tuning |
| Riding position | ✅ Wide, natural, adjustable | ❌ Standard, less room |
| Handlebar quality | ✅ Sturdy, bike-grade feel | ❌ Functional, but basic |
| Throttle response | ✅ Smooth, controllable ramp | ❌ Harsher, more on/off feel |
| Dashboard/Display | ❌ Simple, minimal info | ✅ Richer data, integrated NFC |
| Security (locking) | ❌ Standard external lock needed | ✅ NFC "key" functionality |
| Weather protection | ✅ Big tyres, solid chassis | ✅ IP rating, decent sealing |
| Resale value | ✅ Niche, premium retention | ❌ Mass-market, depreciates faster |
| Tuning potential | ✅ Strong platform for mods | ❌ Controller-limited, mid-range parts |
| Ease of maintenance | ✅ Bike-shop friendly components | ❌ More small scooter quirks |
| Value for Money | ❌ Very pricey entry ticket | ✅ Huge spec for the price |
Overall Winner Declaration
In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the ZOSH Allroad scores 5 points against the SMARTGYRO CROSSOVER DUAL MAX 2's 6. In the Author's Category Battle, the ZOSH Allroad gets 26 ✅ versus 18 ✅ for SMARTGYRO CROSSOVER DUAL MAX 2 (with a few ties sprinkled in).
Totals: ZOSH Allroad scores 31, SMARTGYRO CROSSOVER DUAL MAX 2 scores 24.
Based on the scoring, the ZOSH Allroad is our overall winner. Riding both back-to-back, the ZOSH Allroad simply feels like the more serious, confidence-inspiring machine - the one you instinctively trust when the road gets ugly or the speeds creep higher than they probably should. It may sting financially, and it's far from perfect, but it carries itself with a solidity and calm that cheaper scooters rarely match. The SMARTGYRO CROSSOVER DUAL MAX 2 brings a lot of fun and capability to a very reachable price, and if your riding is mostly urban and budget-sensitive, it absolutely earns its place. But if you're chasing that "this is my vehicle, not my gadget" feeling, the French big-wheel brute walks away with the emotional win.
That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.

