Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)
The Teverun Blade Mini Ultra is the more complete scooter by a clear margin: it rides better, stops better, goes (much) harder, and feels like a serious vehicle rather than a cheap thrill. If you want a long-term daily machine with real performance, proper safety, and big-scooter tech squeezed into a compact chassis, go Teverun.
The Angwatt F1 New, on the other hand, is for riders whose budget is absolutely capped but who still want more speed and range than basic commuter toys can offer. It's a fun, rough-edged muscle scooter that delivers a lot of bang for very little buck, as long as you accept its compromises in refinement, water protection, and long-term support.
If money allows and you care about quality, choose the Blade Mini Ultra. If your wallet says "no way" but your right thumb still craves speed, the F1 New is the bargain back-door into real performance.
Stick around for the full breakdown-this match-up is a masterclass in "you get what you pay for".
Both of these scooters promise "big scooter energy" for people who don't want a 40-plus-kg monster blocking the hallway. On paper, they're chasing the same rider: someone bored of rental toys and underpowered commuters, now ready for real speed, real range, and real fun.
The Teverun Blade Mini Ultra comes from a collaboration with Minimotors and behaves like it: it feels engineered, deliberate, and unapologetically overqualified for urban commuting. The Angwatt F1 New is the classic budget hero-huge value, big numbers for small money, and just enough roughness around the edges to remind you what you paid.
Think of the Teverun as a compact sports bike that happens to fold, and the Angwatt as a tuned budget hatchback that punches well above its class. Both are fast; only one feels truly built to live at that pace. Let's dig in.
Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?
On the street, these two will often appeal to exactly the same rider: someone who's outgrown the typical 25 km/h city scooter and now wants something that can actually replace short car trips. Both carry heavier riders without complaint, both sit in the "serious performance but still vaguely portable" category, and both come with proper suspension and 10-inch tyres.
The key difference is philosophy. The Teverun Blade Mini Ultra sits in the mid-range performance bracket: solidly over the four-figure mark, dual motors, high-voltage system, and enough battery to make you wonder whether you or the scooter will give up first. It targets riders who want a "forever scooter" - something you buy once and ride for years.
The Angwatt F1 New lives in the aggressive budget segment: it costs well under half of the Teverun, with a single but strong motor and a battery that would have been considered huge a few years ago for this money. It's for riders who want to spend as little as possible to escape entry-level limbo, but still want proper speed and suspension.
They overlap in claimed top speed and similar maximum rider weight, so they sit in the same performance use case. But they get there in very different ways-and that's what makes this comparison interesting.
Design & Build Quality
Picking up the two scooters, the difference in design maturity is immediate. The Blade Mini Ultra feels like a shrunken high-end performance scooter: aerospace-grade aluminium frame, cleanly loomed wiring in thick sheaths, a stem that locks up with almost zero play, and a deck and swingarms that look like they were machined with long-term abuse in mind. It has that "solid block of metal" vibe when you bounce it on the ground.
The Angwatt F1 New goes for functional industrial. The iron-aluminium frame is chunky, the welds are honest rather than pretty, and the overall impression is "this will get the job done" more than "this was art-directed." The wide deck and big central display look impressive, but you can see the cost savings in things like fasteners, finishing, and general refinement. Out of the box, you absolutely want to do a full bolt-check on the Angwatt; with the Teverun, you do it because you're a responsible adult, not because the scooter demands it.
Ergonomically, the Blade Mini Ultra feels tighter and more compact, with a slightly shorter deck and a very deliberate "aggressive stance" geometry. Taller riders will often ride with one foot permanently on the rear kickplate. The Angwatt gives you more deck real estate and a laid-back stance; you can shuffle around more during long rides, which helps on longer commutes.
Detailing tells the story: the Teverun's integrated NFC reader in the TFT display, the tidy wiring, and high water-resistance rating make it feel like a cohesive product. On the Angwatt, the cool NFC ignition and big display are great touches, but they're bolted onto a platform where water sealing, manual quality, and long-term hardware refinement lag behind. One looks designed as a system; the other looks very much like "max spec for money".
Ride Comfort & Handling
On broken city asphalt, the Blade Mini Ultra is surprisingly forgiving for a compact rocket. Its encapsulated dual spring suspension front and rear has been tuned on the firmer side: you feel supported rather than wallowy, especially at higher speeds. Paired with wide, pneumatic 10 x 3 tyres, it takes the sharp edges off potholes and cobblestones; you still know the road is bad, but your knees don't file an official complaint after a few kilometres.
The Angwatt F1 New leans slightly more towards plushness, especially at the front. That oil (hydraulic) shock combined with a spring does a very good job of smoothing impacts-particularly the nasty, quick ones like drain covers and expansion joints. At moderate speeds, the F1 rides like a budget magic carpet; on repeated bumps, the front end feels more controlled than many scooters anywhere near its price.
Handling is where the Teverun pulls ahead. Its dual-motor layout, stiffer suspension and excellent chassis stiffness give it a planted, precise feel when you start riding like you mean it. You can dive into corners at car-like speeds and the scooter stays composed, provided you respect the tyre limits. The wide tyres and low stem flex make it feel smaller and more "surgical" than its weight suggests.
The Angwatt, with its single rear motor and more relaxed suspension, is extremely confidence-inspiring up to mid-40s km/h, especially for newer riders-wide handlebars, long wheelbase and big tubeless tyres all help. But push it near its top speed on dodgy surfaces and you start to feel that you're on a budget frame: minor creaks, slight flex, and a general sense that the scooter is happier at sensible fast, not silly fast.
For day-to-day urban gliding, both are comfortable. For carving aggressively, braking hard repeatedly, and hammering bad roads at pace, the Teverun's higher-end frame and components hold things together better.
Performance
This is where the Blade Mini Ultra stops pretending to be a "mini" anything. Dual high-power motors on a 60V system in a roughly 30-kg chassis produce a level of shove that most riders simply don't expect from something that fits in a lift. Pin the thumb throttle in the highest mode and the scooter will lunge forward hard enough to unweight the front wheel if you're lazy with your stance. Above typical urban speeds, it just keeps pulling; overtaking cyclists and mopeds becomes trivial, and steep hills feel like mild suggestions rather than obstacles.
Crucially, the sine-wave controllers mean this savagery is controllable. Low-speed throttle modulation is smooth and progressive-no jerky on/off nonsense-so you can creep in tight spaces without the scooter trying to escape. When you want to calm it down, single-motor and Eco modes genuinely turn it into a docile commuter.
The Angwatt F1 New, with its single strong rear motor and beefy controller, does a very respectable impression of a performance scooter in a straight line. Off the line, it feels meaningfully faster than typical commuters, surging smartly up to urban speeds. At full charge and with a reasonably light rider, it will happily sit in the mid-40s km/h on the flat. It won't punch like the Teverun, but it will absolutely embarrass anything in the 350-500 W mainstream crowd.
Hill performance divides them sharply. On the Teverun, you aim at ugly, long gradients and the scooter charges up them like there's a mild headwind, not a hill. Even with a heavier rider, it keeps very strong pace on climbs that reduce smaller scooters to wheezing. The Angwatt will get you up most city inclines, but on the nastier stuff you'll watch your speed bleed away; it's competent, not conquering.
Braking performance is similarly lopsided. The Teverun's in-house dual hydraulic discs with electronic assist feel powerful, progressive, and confidence-inducing. Repeated hard stops don't faze them, and lever feel is leagues better than the generic entry-level hydraulics you see on cheaper performance machines. The Angwatt's mechanical discs plus E-ABS are as good as budget mechanical systems get-if you take the time to tune them, they stop the scooter safely at its speeds-but compared back-to-back after a "fun" ride, the Teverun's brakes feel like sports-car hardware while the Angwatt's feel like a decent family hatch.
Battery & Range
Range is one of the Blade Mini Ultra's party tricks. Its big 60V battery gives it genuine endurance: ridden sensibly (mixed modes, not dragging full throttle everywhere), it will outlast most riders' legs and bladders on a single charge. Even when you behave badly-dual motors, high speed, lots of hills-it still delivers a real-world distance that many larger scooters struggle to match. And the good cells inside mean that performance stays punchy well past the halfway mark; you don't get that depressing "half battery, half power" feeling straight away.
The price you pay is charging time. Using the stock low-amp charger, filling that pack from nearly empty is an overnight affair and then some. If you're commuting daily at long distances or riding very hard, a higher-amp fast charger becomes less of a luxury and more of a sanity saver.
The Angwatt's 48V pack is much smaller, but for its price bracket it's still generous. In real life, ridden hard, you're looking at a decent multi-dozen-kilometre range; ridden in a more relaxed mode with lower speeds, it can stretch surprisingly far. For many urban commuters doing a return trip of 10-15 km a day, it's easily a "charge every couple of days" scooter. Charging time is shorter than the Teverun's, so topping up overnight is straightforward.
In simple emotional terms: on the Blade Mini Ultra, range anxiety just isn't part of your daily vocabulary unless you're doing marathon rides. On the Angwatt, you do start to plan a bit more if you're heavy on the throttle-especially if you live somewhere hilly-though for the price, it's still more liberating than most cheap commuters.
Portability & Practicality
Neither of these is a casual "one-hand on the train, coffee in the other" scooter. Both are proper vehicles with weights to match. The Teverun sits a few kilos heavier than the Angwatt depending on configuration, but in the arms they're both firmly in the "think before you carry" category.
The Blade Mini Ultra folds into a manageable footprint with a secure, well-engineered latch. The stem feels rock-solid when locked and reassuring even after plenty of folding cycles. The downside is that the handlebars don't fold, and there's no convenient rear carry handle, so manoeuvring it into car boots or up steps is slightly awkward. This is a scooter for lifts and ground-floor storage, not fifth-floor walk-ups.
The Angwatt F1 New folds into a similarly compact length and is a touch lighter, which you do feel when hoisting it into a car. Its kickstand is sturdy enough, though it needs occasional checking to stay that way. The cockpit is wider and a bit more awkward in tight hallways, but the extra bar width is welcome while riding. Practically, if you absolutely must carry your scooter frequently, the Angwatt is the lesser evil-but we're talking "less bad" rather than "good".
Day-to-day practicality tilts back to the Teverun. Higher water resistance means you're less stressed by unexpected showers. The app, NFC key, better wiring protection and stronger overall build make it feel like a tool you can rely on daily with minimal faff. The Angwatt, by contrast, rewards owners who are willing to tinker: tightening hardware, adding sealant, maybe upgrading a few bits over time. It works as a daily, but it likes attention.
Safety
The safety gap is mostly about how far beyond their price tags these scooters are being pushed. The Blade Mini Ultra is arguably slightly overbuilt for its category: serious hydraulic brakes, strong frame, generous lighting all around the deck and stem, and a stout, wobble-resistant folding system. At high speed it feels calm, not nervous. Add the wide contact patch from those fat 10-inch tyres and you get a stable platform that encourages proper safety gear and sensible riding, rather than sheer fear.
Lighting on the Teverun is not just decorative. The stem and deck illumination create a bright, easily visible "bubble" around you, so car drivers can't really claim they never saw you. And with that high water-resistance rating, you're far less worried about electrical gremlins if you get caught in serious rain.
The Angwatt F1 New does better than most budget rivals on paper: dual mechanical discs with E-ABS, a full lighting suite with front headlight, side strips, indicators and a reacting brake light. At the speeds it realistically holds, the brakes are up to the job-once bedded in and tuned-but you don't have the same reserve feeling you get from a good hydraulic setup. In repeated emergency stops, lever feel and performance remind you that this is a cost-optimised system.
Where the Angwatt loses ground is wet-weather confidence and general robustness. Officially it's "don't push your luck" in bad conditions. You can ride in a drizzle if you must, but heavy rain and puddles are asking for trouble unless you've done your own sealing. For a scooter capable of mid-40s km/h, that's a significant caveat for year-round commuters.
Community Feedback
| Teverun Blade Mini Ultra | Angwatt F1 New |
|---|---|
|
What riders love Explosive acceleration; rock-solid dual hydraulic brakes; huge real-world range; clean wiring and premium feel; strong lighting; NFC/app features; excellent hill-climbing; high water resistance; overall "big scooter in small body" vibe. |
What riders love Outstanding value; punchy acceleration for a single motor; very comfy suspension, especially front; tubeless tyres; wide deck; NFC start; good lighting including turn signals; decent real range; rugged looks; cheap and available parts. |
|
What riders complain about Heavy for a "mini"; long charging time; tubed tyres prone to flats; slightly stiff suspension for lighter riders; short deck for tall riders; small kickstand; flimsy charge-port cover; display angle not ideal with full-face helmet; indicator buttons hard to distinguish by feel. |
What riders complain about Display hard to read in sun; weight still high for carrying; optimistic speed/odometer; squeaky brakes out of the box; basic water protection; occasional loose bolts; kickstand needs attention; creaky stem over time; reliance on NFC card with no easy backup. |
Price & Value
This is where many riders' hearts and wallets start arguing. The Blade Mini Ultra sits in that mid-range performance band where you're making a real investment. For that, you get high-quality cells, serious controllers, hydraulic brakes, robust construction, and a feature set usually associated with scooters quite a bit more expensive. In terms of what you're paying per unit of capability, it's frankly a bargain in the performance-mini class.
The Angwatt F1 New, meanwhile, plays an entirely different game. It costs a fraction of the Teverun and delivers performance and comfort that, just a couple of years ago, you'd have expected from scooters at least half again as expensive. If your absolute budget ceiling sits in the low hundreds of euros, it's difficult to beat for raw spec-per-euro. But: you are buying into compromises-less water protection, less refined QC, less premium hardware and a more hands-on ownership experience.
If you can afford either, the Teverun offers much better long-term value: it's built to last, to be enjoyed daily, and to keep up with your skills as they grow. The Angwatt is fantastic short-to-medium-term bang for buck, but it doesn't quite feel like the scooter you'll still be happily riding several years later without some drama.
Service & Parts Availability
Teverun, thanks to its connection with Minimotors and cooperation with established distributors, already has a growing support network in Europe. Parts-consumables and key components-are increasingly easy to source through official channels and larger retailers, and there's a healthy ecosystem of shops familiar with similar hardware. Add a community that actually cares about the brand and you get a decent safety net should something go wrong.
Angwatt operates primarily as a house brand for big online retailers. That keeps prices low, but support is more transactional. Warranty usually means parts shipped to you, not a local workshop experience. The upside is that generic parts (discs, tyres, basic electrics) are very cheap and widely compatible, and the community is resourceful. The downside is that there's no long, established dealer network standing behind the badge, and support quality can vary with the retailer's mood and policies.
If you're not comfortable with a spanner and multimeter, Teverun's ecosystem and more "mainstream" positioning are decidedly less stressful.
Pros & Cons Summary
| Teverun Blade Mini Ultra | Angwatt F1 New |
|---|---|
Pros
|
Pros
|
Parameters Comparison
| Parameter | Teverun Blade Mini Ultra | Angwatt F1 New |
|---|---|---|
| Motor configuration & power (nominal) | Dual motors, 2 x 1.000 W | Single motor, 1.000 W peak |
| Top speed (realistic) | Well above 60 km/h (unlocked) | Around 45 km/h |
| Battery | 60 V 27 Ah (1.620 Wh) | 48 V 18,2 Ah (≈873 Wh) |
| Claimed range | Up to 100 km | Up to 70 km |
| Real-world range (mixed riding) | ≈70-80 km (average rider) | ≈35-45 km (average rider) |
| Weight (net) | ≈30-33 kg | 27 kg |
| Brakes | Dual hydraulic discs + EABS | Front & rear mechanical discs + E-ABS |
| Suspension | Dual spring, encapsulated front & rear | Front oil + spring, rear spring |
| Tyres | 10 x 3 inch pneumatic, tubed | 10-inch pneumatic, tubeless hybrid tread |
| Max rider load | 120 kg | 120 kg |
| Water resistance | IPX6 | Basic rain tolerance, no high IP rating |
| Charging time (stock charger) | ≈12-14 h | ≈8 h |
| Security / extras | NFC, app, TFT display, sine-wave controllers | NFC start, large central display, indicators |
| Approximate price | 1.130 € | 422 € |
Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?
If you strip away the price tags and just ride them back to back, the Teverun Blade Mini Ultra is clearly the more serious machine. It accelerates harder, cruises faster, stops more confidently, goes vastly further, shrugs off weather, and feels as if it was designed by people who expect you to do bad things to scooters and live to tell the tale. It's the kind of compact scooter you can genuinely build your daily transport routine around and not feel like you're compromising.
The Angwatt F1 New wins hearts in a different way. It's the gateway drug: for very little money, you get real speed, real suspension, and real range compared to entry-level toys. If your budget just can't stretch higher and you're happy to tinker, keep an eye on the weather, and accept some rough edges, it's a massively entertaining, capable upgrade from the commuter mainstream.
But if you can afford to choose with your head rather than just your wallet, the Blade Mini Ultra is the one that feels future-proof. It's the scooter you grow into, not out of: a compact rocket that behaves like a mature vehicle, not a cheap thrill. The Angwatt F1 New makes performance accessible; the Teverun makes it feel properly engineered.
Numbers Freaks Corner
| Metric | Teverun Blade Mini Ultra | Angwatt F1 New |
|---|---|---|
| Price per Wh (€/Wh) | ❌ 0,70 €/Wh | ✅ 0,48 €/Wh |
| Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) | ❌ 17,38 €/km/h | ✅ 9,38 €/km/h |
| Weight per Wh (g/Wh) | ✅ 19,44 g/Wh | ❌ 30,93 g/Wh |
| Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) | ✅ 0,48 kg/km/h | ❌ 0,60 kg/km/h |
| Price per km of real-world range (€/km) | ❌ 15,07 €/km | ✅ 10,55 €/km |
| Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) | ✅ 0,42 kg/km | ❌ 0,68 kg/km |
| Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) | ✅ 21,60 Wh/km | ❌ 21,83 Wh/km |
| Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) | ✅ 30,77 W/km/h | ❌ 22,22 W/km/h |
| Weight to power ratio (kg/W) | ✅ 0,0158 kg/W | ❌ 0,0270 kg/W |
| Average charging speed (W) | ✅ 124,6 W | ❌ 109,1 W |
These metrics show, in purely mathematical terms, where each scooter shines. Price-per-Wh and price-per-km/h expose how aggressively priced the Angwatt is. Weight-based metrics and power-to-speed ratios reveal how efficiently the Teverun turns mass and watts into speed and range. Efficiency (Wh/km) is very close, with a tiny edge to the Teverun, and average charging power mildly favours the bigger pack despite its longer charge time.
Author's Category Battle
| Category | Teverun Blade Mini Ultra | Angwatt F1 New |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | ❌ Heavier, harder to lug | ✅ Slightly lighter to carry |
| Range | ✅ Massive real-world distance | ❌ About half the range |
| Max Speed | ✅ Far higher top speed | ❌ Tops out mid-40s |
| Power | ✅ Dual motors, brutal torque | ❌ Single motor, decent pull |
| Battery Size | ✅ Much larger capacity | ❌ Smaller, budget-class pack |
| Suspension | ✅ More stable at speed | ❌ Plush but less controlled |
| Design | ✅ Premium, cohesive, refined | ❌ Rough, utilitarian styling |
| Safety | ✅ Better brakes, water rating | ❌ Basic protection, mech brakes |
| Practicality | ✅ Weatherproof, app, NFC | ❌ Needs tinkering, rain caution |
| Comfort | ✅ Stable, planted, composed | ✅ Very plush for the price |
| Features | ✅ TFT, app, sine-wave | ❌ Fewer advanced electronics |
| Serviceability | ✅ Better dealer ecosystem | ❌ Online, DIY-centric support |
| Customer Support | ✅ Stronger brand backing | ❌ Retailer-dependent quality |
| Fun Factor | ✅ Terrifyingly entertaining | ✅ Budget thrill machine |
| Build Quality | ✅ Tight, premium construction | ❌ QC variability, cheaper bits |
| Component Quality | ✅ Better cells, brakes, wiring | ❌ Clear cost-cut components |
| Brand Name | ✅ Backed by Minimotors legacy | ❌ New budget house brand |
| Community | ✅ Enthusiast, performance-focused | ✅ Active budget modding crowd |
| Lights (visibility) | ✅ Big visual footprint | ✅ Indicators, side strips |
| Lights (illumination) | ✅ Strong, integrated package | ❌ Adequate but more basic |
| Acceleration | ✅ Explosive off the line | ❌ Brisk, not brutal |
| Arrive with smile factor | ✅ Grin every single ride | ✅ Huge smile per euro |
| Arrive relaxed factor | ✅ Stable, effortless cruising | ❌ More nervous at limit |
| Charging speed (experience) | ❌ Long stock charge time | ✅ Faster full charge |
| Reliability | ✅ Better engineering, sealing | ❌ Depends on luck, upkeep |
| Folded practicality | ✅ Solid latch, compact length | ✅ Similar size, slightly lighter |
| Ease of transport | ❌ Heavier, no rear handle | ✅ Lighter, still hefty though |
| Handling | ✅ Sharper, more precise | ❌ Softer, less confidence flat-out |
| Braking performance | ✅ Strong hydraulic system | ❌ Mechanical, more fade-prone |
| Riding position | ❌ Short deck, tight stance | ✅ Spacious, wide deck |
| Handlebar quality | ✅ Solid, minimal flex | ❌ Decent, more basic |
| Throttle response | ✅ Smooth sine-wave control | ❌ Cruder but acceptable |
| Dashboard / Display | ✅ TFT, good information | ❌ Brightness issues in sun |
| Security (locking) | ✅ NFC + app options | ❌ NFC only, no backup |
| Weather protection | ✅ High water-resistance rating | ❌ Minimal sealing from factory |
| Resale value | ✅ Stronger brand desirability | ❌ Budget brand depreciation |
| Tuning potential | ✅ Enthusiast, app, P-settings | ✅ Mod-friendly budget platform |
| Ease of maintenance | ✅ Quality parts, clear layout | ✅ Generic parts, simple design |
| Value for Money | ✅ Incredible for performance tier | ✅ Insane for tight budgets |
Overall Winner Declaration
In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the TEVERUN BLADE MINI ULTRA scores 7 points against the ANGWATT F1 NEW's 3. In the Author's Category Battle, the TEVERUN BLADE MINI ULTRA gets 35 ✅ versus 13 ✅ for ANGWATT F1 NEW (with a few ties sprinkled in).
Totals: TEVERUN BLADE MINI ULTRA scores 42, ANGWATT F1 NEW scores 16.
Based on the scoring, the TEVERUN BLADE MINI ULTRA is our overall winner. As a rider, the Teverun Blade Mini Ultra is the scooter that keeps calling your name after you step off it: the way it surges up hills, the calm stability at speed, and the feeling of solid engineering under your feet make it genuinely addictive. The Angwatt F1 New is huge fun and a fantastic way to break into real performance on a tight budget, but it never quite shakes the sense that you're getting away with something. If you want a machine that feels like a proper, grown-up vehicle and will keep you smiling long after the honeymoon period, the Blade Mini Ultra is the one that truly delivers.
That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.