Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)
The TEVERUN SPACE is the better overall choice for most riders: it delivers genuinely exciting dual-motor performance, excellent comfort, serious safety hardware and standout design at a price that still lives somewhere on planet Earth. The APOLLO Pro is the more extreme machine with more power, more range, bigger wheels and deeper software integration - but you pay heavily for the privilege.
Pick the SPACE if you want a fast, refined, beautifully built daily scooter that won't obliterate your savings, and you care as much about ride quality and looks as you do about raw numbers. Choose the Pro if budget is secondary, you want maximum range and comfort, ride in all weather, and love living inside an app ecosystem.
Both are serious vehicles, not toys - but they solve the same problem with very different philosophies. Stick around; the interesting part is how they differ in the real world.
There's a fascinating clash here: the TEVERUN SPACE aims to be a "hyper-scooter for grown-ups" - proper dual motors, hydraulic brakes, serious suspension - wrapped in cyber-minimalist industrial art that wouldn't look out of place in a design museum. The APOLLO Pro, on the other hand, wants to be the Cybertruck of scooters: enormous power, huge battery, big wheels, deep software and IoT sprinkled over everything.
On paper, the Apollo Pro wins the "mine is bigger" contest: more power, more range, bigger wheels, higher water resistance. But paper doesn't commute to work. Once you start living with these two, the trade-offs become very obvious - especially when you factor in price, weight, and how often you actually ride flat out in Ludo mode.
If you're trying to decide where to put a serious chunk of money, this comparison will tell you not just which spec sheet looks nicer, but which scooter you'll still be happy to step on after a long, rainy Thursday in November.
Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?
Both scooters live in the "serious adult toy / car replacement" segment: powerful dual-motor machines, real suspensions, real brakes, real money. They're what people buy when they've had enough of flimsy commuters and want something that can handle hills, distance, and bad tarmac without feeling like punishment.
The TEVERUN SPACE sits at the upper mid-range price bracket - a sweet spot where you get proper performance and features without venturing into "I could've bought a used car" territory. The APOLLO Pro lives firmly in the premium class, priced more like a small motorcycle. You don't buy it to save money; you buy it because you want the flagship experience.
They make sense to compare because they target a similar rider profile - confident, tech-friendly, commuting and fun mixed together - but with two very different philosophies: the SPACE as the value-packed, design-driven all-rounder; the Pro as the oversized, app-heavy luxury cruiser.
Design & Build Quality
Both scooters ditch the "metal pipe with wires" look, but they do it in very different ways.
The SPACE feels like it was milled from one solid, angular block of metal. Almost all cables disappear into the frame, the folding hinge is visually neat and physically satisfying, and the whole thing screams "industrial design project where the engineers and designers actually spoke to each other". The integrated LUMINA lighting system isn't just slapped on - it's baked into the frame, stem and controls. In the flesh it gives a very cohesive, almost automotive vibe.
The APOLLO Pro goes for a bulkier, more monolithic look. The unibody aerospace-grade aluminium frame is impressive: smooth, muscular surfaces, no visible wiring, professional finish. It looks expensive, because it is. Where the SPACE looks like cyberpunk minimalism, the Pro looks like a premium electric moped that happens to be missing the seat.
In the hands, the difference is clear. The SPACE feels dense but tidy - everything you touch (deck rubber, levers, latch) has that reassuring "click" and no loose bits. The Pro feels even more overbuilt: big, wide bars, thick stem, everything oversized to match the speed and weight. Neither feels cheap; the question is whether you want "sleek and clever" (SPACE) or "built like a tank" (Pro).
Ride Comfort & Handling
Comfort is where the SPACE quietly punches above its price, and where the Pro leans on its sheer size advantage.
The SPACE's precision-tuned spring suspension front and rear is honestly impressive for this class. It's not some vague pogo setup; it's firm enough not to wallow at speed, yet it takes the sharp edges off cobblestones, broken bike lanes and expansion joints. Combined with its wide 10-inch tubeless tyres, you get a "hoverboard over potholes" feel up to urban speeds. After a good chunk of rough city riding, your knees and wrists still feel civil.
The Apollo Pro plays a different game: bigger 12-inch self-healing tyres and a more complex suspension mix - adjustable hydraulic fork up front, rubber block at the rear. Those larger wheels smooth out nasty surfaces before the suspension even has to work. You notice it when you hit tram tracks or deep cracks; the Pro just rolls over stuff that would make smaller wheels flinch. With the fork dialled in, long rides feel almost lazy - in a good way.
Handling-wise, the SPACE is the more playful scooter. Shorter, lighter, and sitting a little lower, it dives into corners happily and feels eager in city slalom between cars and posts. The Pro, by contrast, feels like a fast, stable barge: wonderfully planted in a straight line, very confidence-inspiring at higher speeds, but you're aware you're manoeuvring a big piece of hardware. Tight u-turns and narrow bike paths remind you just how much scooter you brought.
If your riding is mostly urban gymnastics and 30-40 km/h blasts, the SPACE feels nimble and alive. If you regularly cruise longer distances or push near top speed, the Pro's extra wheel size and stability start to earn their keep.
Performance
Both scooters are fast enough to get you into trouble. They just do it with different levels of excess.
The TEVERUN SPACE, with its dual motors, offers that familiar "freight train shove" you expect from proper all-wheel-drive scooters. From a standstill, it surges to city speeds briskly enough that you will happily back off in traffic. There's plenty of torque for real-world hills - the kind that make single-motor commuters wheeze down to jogging pace. Power delivery feels nicely controlled: strong, but not the crazy on/off nonsense some older controllers were guilty of. You feel like you're commanding the speed, not riding a barely tamed animal.
The APOLLO Pro takes that and says, "hold my drink". Its dual motors and MACH 2 controller produce acceleration that is more "silent shove in the back" than "violent snap", but the end result is the same: you're doing moped speeds frighteningly quickly. In its wilder modes - especially Ludo - the Pro simply walks away from the SPACE and from most cars off the line. Hills, even the cruel ones, become non-events. It will happily sit in traffic lanes where the SPACE still prefers the bike lane.
Braking is where their philosophies really split. The SPACE goes with fully hydraulic disc brakes - proper lever feel, strong initial bite once bedded in, and a clear sense of "I pull, it stops now". There's regen via the controller, but it's not the star of the show; your hands still instinctively trust the calipers.
The Pro flips that dynamic completely. Its primary brake is the regenerative Power RBS - roll off, squeeze lightly, and you decelerate hard without even touching the drums. Once you get used to it, it feels very futuristic and hugely reduces mechanical wear. The sealed drum brakes are there mainly as backup and low-maintenance insurance. Performance junkies will still miss the sharp bite of hydraulic discs, but for daily commuting, the setup makes a certain kind of sense - you brake a lot, but adjust almost nothing.
In pure shove and top-speed bragging rights, the Apollo Pro is undeniably the stronger performer. In the real world, the SPACE is already more than enough scooter for sane riders, and it feels satisfyingly quick without constantly tempting you into speeds that make insurance adjusters nervous.
Battery & Range
Here the gap is more straightforward: the Apollo Pro simply carries a lot more energy on board.
The SPACE's battery is solidly sized for serious commuting. For typical mixed use - some full-throttle bursts, some cruising, a few hills - you're realistically looking at multiple days of urban riding on a single charge if your daily loop isn't outrageous. It's the kind of battery that kills range anxiety for most people: you plan your week, not your hour. Efficiency is good; even when you ride with enthusiasm, you don't watch the percentage plummet in panic.
The Pro, meanwhile, is built around long days in the saddle. Its pack is substantially larger, and thanks to very efficient controllers and strong regen, it stretches that capacity well. Ride gently and the distances get silly. Even riding fast and hard, it outlasts the SPACE by a comfortable margin. It's one of those scooters you can take for a big weekend loop, detour twice, then still comfortably get home without praying for downhill.
Charging is surprisingly competitive. The SPACE, with a beefy external fast charger, goes from empty to full in roughly an average sleep if you spring for the quick brick; with the standard charger, it's more of an overnight-plus affair. The Pro comes with a fast charger as standard and, given the battery size, does an impressively tidy job of turning mains power into range before your shift ends.
In short: if you're commuting 10-20 km a day, both are overkill and the SPACE is already ample. If you're regularly stacking long rides or replacing substantial car mileage, the Pro's extra capacity is noticeable and useful.
Portability & Practicality
Neither of these is a "hop on the tram, fold with one finger, sling over your shoulder" scooter. They're both heavy, and they both feel it.
The TEVERUN SPACE sits in that "I can move it; I don't want to" category. The one-click folding mechanism is slick and confidence-inspiring, and once folded, the package is relatively tidy for a dual-motor machine. Getting it into a medium car boot or an elevator is feasible without creative yoga. Carrying it up multiple flights of stairs, though, will quickly have you considering gym membership as "training for scooter ownership".
The Apollo Pro goes a step further into "you really should have a lift or a garage". It's heavier, physically larger, and the tall, wide cockpit makes it more awkward to manhandle in tight spaces. The folding mechanism itself is solid and eliminates stem wobble nicely, but the resulting package is big. Think "electric moped without a seat that happens to fold a bit", not "folding scooter". Rolling it into a bike room? Fine. Dragging it through a crowded hallway or wrestling it into a tiny hatchback? Less fine.
On daily practicality, the SPACE wins if you need to combine riding with any regular lifting, tight storage, or car transport. The Pro is brilliant if your life is simple: ground floor, decent hallway or garage, ride in, plug in, done.
Safety
Safety isn't just about brakes and helmets; it's about how confident you feel at the speeds these things are capable of.
The SPACE does the fundamentals very well. Fully hydraulic discs give excellent control and strong stopping power; you always feel like you have spare braking in the pocket. The chassis feels rigid, the folding joint locks with a reassuring clunk, and there's essentially no stem wobble when set up correctly. Add in wide tubeless tyres and you get solid grip, even in less-than-ideal conditions. The LUMINA lighting system is not just pretty - it makes you visually "loud" in traffic from various angles, which is priceless in city chaos.
The Apollo Pro turns up both the speed and the safety tech. Larger tyres bring innate stability, especially at higher speeds - you're less likely to be deflected by ruts or tracks. The self-centring steering geometry further calms down any hint of wobble. Its 360-degree lighting makes you look like a rolling UFO; car drivers have a hard time claiming they "didn't see" you. The IP66 rating means you can ride in rain with far more peace of mind than on most performance scooters - water ingress is one of the main long-term killers in this segment.
Braking philosophies differ, as mentioned. The SPACE's hydraulics feel more traditional and familiar to anyone coming from bikes or motorcycles. The Pro's regen-first approach takes a couple of days for your muscle memory to adapt, but being able to slow strongly with almost no mechanical wear is a genuine safety benefit over time - consistent braking performance, ride after ride, with almost no tuning needed.
In raw safety potential at its extreme speeds, the Pro has the edge thanks to bigger wheels, higher water protection and more stability. At the more sensible pace where most people ride most of the time, the SPACE already feels extremely secure - and with more immediately reassuring brake feel for many riders.
Community Feedback
| TEVERUN SPACE | APOLLO Pro |
|---|---|
| What riders love | What riders love |
|
|
| What riders complain about | What riders complain about |
|
|
Price & Value
This is where things get... interesting.
The TEVERUN SPACE sits at a price where you still feel like you've bought something special, but not like you need to hide the bank statement. You get dual motors, full hydraulic brakes, quality suspension, app features and that whole "industrial art" design language for what many brands would happily charge for a warmed-over single-motor commuter. In terms of "smiles per euro", it's frankly very hard to beat in this class.
The Apollo Pro operates on a completely different budget. It offers more range, more power, bigger wheels, much stronger water resistance, a very polished app ecosystem and a carefully engineered frame. You are absolutely getting a lot of machine and a well-thought-out ownership experience. But you pay a significant premium for all of that, and if you're rarely using its extra range and performance, large chunks of that spend simply sit there as theoretical capability.
Viewed purely through the lens of value, the SPACE is the obvious winner: you get a serious, properly fast, beautifully engineered scooter for less than half the money. The Pro only starts to make financial sense if you
Service & Parts Availability
TEVERUN is still building out its support ecosystem. The underlying hardware quality of the SPACE is strong, but experiences with after-sales service vary depending on the importer or retailer. Parts availability is improving as the brand grows, but you're not dealing with a decades-old dealer network. DIY-wise, hydraulics and a relatively conventional drivetrain mean most competent scooter shops can work on it, though the tidy internal wiring makes deep surgery a bit more involved.
Apollo, by contrast, has put a lot of emphasis on support, especially in North America. The Pro benefits from that: structured warranties, documentation, and an app-centred diagnostic environment. On the flip side, it's a more proprietary, closed system - not the ideal playground for tinkerers. Simple things are easy; bespoke electronics and controller issues generally mean you're dealing with Apollo or a specialist partner rather than your friendly local e-bike guy.
In Europe, both brands are present but not ubiquitous; availability of fast, local service will depend heavily on your specific city. As a rule of thumb: the SPACE is slightly easier to treat like a "normal high-end scooter", the Pro behaves more like a connected vehicle that prefers official attention.
Pros & Cons Summary
| TEVERUN SPACE | APOLLO Pro |
|---|---|
Pros
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
Cons
|
Parameters Comparison
| Parameter | TEVERUN SPACE | APOLLO Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Motor power (nominal) | 2 x 800 W (1.600 W total) | 2 x 1.200 W (2.400 W total) |
| Motor power (peak) | 3.200 W | 6.000 W |
| Top speed (unrestricted) | ca. 55 km/h | ca. 70 km/h |
| Battery capacity | 936 Wh (52 V 18 Ah) | 1.560 Wh (52 V 30 Ah) |
| Claimed range | ca. 60 km | ca. 50-100 km |
| Realistic mixed-use range | ca. 35-50 km | ca. 50-70 km |
| Weight | 30 kg | 34 kg |
| Brakes | Dual hydraulic discs + regen | Power RBS regen + dual drums |
| Suspension | Dual spring (front & rear) | Front hydraulic fork + rear rubber |
| Tyres | 10-inch tubeless, anti-puncture | 12-inch self-healing tubeless |
| Max load | 120 kg | 150 kg |
| Water resistance | IPX4 | IP66 |
| Charging time (fast) | ca. 5 h (fast) / 10-12 h (standard) | ca. 6 h (fast, included) |
| Price (indicative) | ca. 1.099 € | ca. 2.822 € |
Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?
If we strip away the marketing, the TEVERUN SPACE is the scooter that makes sense for the largest number of riders. It's fast enough to be thrilling, comfortable enough for rough cities, safe enough to trust, and priced where you don't feel like you've just financed a small yacht. It nails that tricky balance of power, design, comfort and cost in a way many competitors simply don't. For most people upgrading from a basic commuter or rentals, it will feel like an enormous step up without turning into a burden.
The APOLLO Pro is a fantastic machine, but it is unapologetically a luxury item. You really start to justify it if: you ride long distances frequently, you want true all-weather capability, you weigh more or live somewhere brutally hilly, and you really enjoy living inside a polished app ecosystem. Then, the extra power, range, wheel size and waterproofing are not just nice-to-haves - they become daily benefits. If that's you and the price doesn't sting, you'll love it.
For everyone else, the SPACE is the smarter, more balanced buy: less dramatic on paper, but more than dramatic enough on the road, and a lot kinder to your wallet. The Apollo Pro wins the arms race; the TEVERUN SPACE wins the "what should I actually ride every day?" contest.
Numbers Freaks Corner
| Metric | TEVERUN SPACE | APOLLO Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Price per Wh (€/Wh) | ✅ 1,17 €/Wh | ❌ 1,81 €/Wh |
| Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) | ✅ 19,98 €/km/h | ❌ 40,31 €/km/h |
| Weight per Wh (g/Wh) | ❌ 32,05 g/Wh | ✅ 21,80 g/Wh |
| Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) | ❌ 0,55 kg/km/h | ✅ 0,49 kg/km/h |
| Price per km of real-world range (€/km) | ✅ 27,48 €/km | ❌ 47,03 €/km |
| Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) | ❌ 0,75 kg/km | ✅ 0,57 kg/km |
| Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) | ✅ 23,4 Wh/km | ❌ 26,0 Wh/km |
| Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) | ❌ 58,18 W/km/h | ✅ 85,71 W/km/h |
| Weight to power ratio (kg/W) | ❌ 0,0094 kg/W | ✅ 0,0057 kg/W |
| Average charging speed (W) | ❌ 187,2 W | ✅ 260,0 W |
These metrics strip away emotion and look purely at how efficiently each scooter turns euros, kilograms and watt-hours into speed and range. Price-per-Wh and price-per-km/h show how much "spec" you get for your money, while weight-based metrics reveal how much scooter you haul around for each unit of performance or distance. Wh per km is a straight efficiency measure, and the power and charging metrics highlight which scooter has more shove per unit of speed and which one tops up its battery faster.
Author's Category Battle
| Category | TEVERUN SPACE | APOLLO Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | ✅ Lighter, easier to handle | ❌ Heavier, bulkier overall |
| Range | ❌ Adequate but smaller pack | ✅ Significantly longer real range |
| Max Speed | ❌ Fast, but less ultimate | ✅ Higher top-end cruising |
| Power | ❌ Strong, mid-tier punch | ✅ Considerably more peak shove |
| Battery Size | ❌ Smaller capacity overall | ✅ Much larger battery pack |
| Suspension | ✅ Very composed spring setup | ❌ Good, but rear less plush |
| Design | ✅ Sleek cyber-minimalist art | ❌ Bulky, more utilitarian vibe |
| Safety | ❌ Very safe for its speed | ✅ Bigger wheels, better weather |
| Practicality | ✅ Easier to store and move | ❌ Size and weight limit practicality |
| Comfort | ❌ Very good for class | ✅ Class-leading long-ride comfort |
| Features | ❌ Strong, but simpler suite | ✅ Rich app, IoT, phone dash |
| Serviceability | ✅ More conventional components | ❌ Proprietary, closed ecosystem |
| Customer Support | ❌ Dealer-dependent, inconsistent | ✅ Strong structured brand support |
| Fun Factor | ✅ Playful, engaging, lively | ❌ Fast but more "serious" |
| Build Quality | ✅ Excellent, cohesive feel | ✅ Tank-like, very refined |
| Component Quality | ✅ Great for price bracket | ✅ Premium, top-tier parts |
| Brand Name | ❌ Newer, growing reputation | ✅ Established, widely recognised |
| Community | ❌ Smaller, still emerging | ✅ Larger, very active |
| Lights (visibility) | ✅ LUMINA very eye-catching | ✅ 360° halo style coverage |
| Lights (illumination) | ❌ Good, but more stylistic | ✅ Strong, practical headlight |
| Acceleration | ❌ Quick, plenty for cities | ✅ Much harder initial shove |
| Arrive with smile factor | ✅ Big grins every ride | ✅ Grins for speed lovers |
| Arrive relaxed factor | ❌ Slightly more "on edge" | ✅ Very calm, planted feel |
| Charging speed | ❌ Needs aftermarket fast charger | ✅ Strong fast charger stock |
| Reliability | ✅ Solid hardware, minor quirks | ✅ Mature design, robust overall |
| Folded practicality | ✅ Manageable footprint folded | ❌ Large, awkward folded size |
| Ease of transport | ✅ Easier into cars, elevators | ❌ Heavy, wide, cumbersome |
| Handling | ✅ Nimble, playful city manners | ❌ Stable but less flickable |
| Braking performance | ✅ Strong hydraulic disc bite | ❌ Good, but softer drum feel |
| Riding position | ✅ Comfortable, natural stance | ✅ Spacious, relaxed cockpit |
| Handlebar quality | ✅ Solid, confidence-inspiring | ✅ Wide, very sturdy |
| Throttle response | ❌ Strong but less sophisticated | ✅ Extremely smooth, precise |
| Dashboard/Display | ❌ Good, conventional display | ✅ Phone dash, detailed data |
| Security (locking) | ✅ NFC and GPS options | ✅ IoT, GPS, app-based lock |
| Weather protection | ❌ Light rain capable only | ✅ All-weather commuting capable |
| Resale value | ❌ Smaller market recognition | ✅ Stronger demand used |
| Tuning potential | ✅ More open to modding | ❌ Closed, integrated ecosystem |
| Ease of maintenance | ✅ Standard parts, easier service | ❌ Some parts brand-dependent |
| Value for Money | ✅ Outstanding spec for price | ❌ Great, but very expensive |
Overall Winner Declaration
In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the TEVERUN SPACE scores 4 points against the APOLLO Pro's 6. In the Author's Category Battle, the TEVERUN SPACE gets 21 ✅ versus 26 ✅ for APOLLO Pro (with a few ties sprinkled in).
Totals: TEVERUN SPACE scores 25, APOLLO Pro scores 32.
Based on the scoring, the APOLLO Pro is our overall winner. Riding both back to back, the TEVERUN SPACE feels like the scooter that "gets it" - fast enough to be exciting, refined enough to be comfortable, and priced so you don't spend every ride calculating amortisation. The Apollo Pro is impressive, even intoxicating in its way, but it's also a bit like bringing a sledgehammer to hang a picture frame for most everyday riders. If you want a scooter that you'll actually enjoy living with day in, day out, the SPACE is the one that keeps calling your name from the hallway. The Pro will absolutely thrill the right owner, but the TEVERUN is the one that makes the whole equation of performance, comfort and cost feel genuinely satisfying.
That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.

