Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)
The Xiaomi 1S edges out as the more rounded everyday choice: it gives you better real-world range, a proper display and app, stronger braking, and a more mature ecosystem, even if nothing about it feels particularly exciting. The Razor E Prime III is lighter and a bit faster on paper, but asks a higher price for less battery and a more bare-bones feature set, which makes its value proposition harder to swallow. Choose the Razor only if your absolute top priorities are minimal weight, slightly higher cruising speed, and you love the brand's styling. Everyone else who just wants a dependable, proven commuter will be happier on the Xiaomi.
Stick around for the full comparison - the devil, as always, is hiding in the details between those spec sheets.
Electric scooters have grown up. What started as kids terrorising pavements on rattly alloy toys has turned into a serious commuter category - and few match-ups illustrate that evolution better than the Xiaomi 1S and the Razor E Prime III. Both promise "proper transport" in a package light enough to haul up a staircase without seeing your life flash before your eyes.
On one side you have the Xiaomi 1S: the de-facto template for modern commuters, a scooter you now see more often than pigeons in big European cities. It's for riders who want something that just works, day in, day out, and don't particularly care if it ever sets their pulse racing. On the other side stands the Razor E Prime III: the grown-up cousin of your childhood Razor, now with a motor, a suit, and a LinkedIn profile, selling you on style, low weight and a surprisingly punchy top speed for such a skinny frame.
They cost similar money, they target the same urban commuter, and they both claim to be the answer to the "last-mile" problem. But when you actually live with them, the gaps open up quickly. Let's dig in.
Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?
Both scooters sit in the lower-mid price band: not supermarket toys, not "I need a second mortgage" performance machines. They're aimed squarely at city riders doing modest daily distances on more or less civilised tarmac - think students, office workers, and anyone tired of playing sardine on crowded buses.
The Xiaomi 1S is the archetypal first scooter: modest power, legal-friendly speed, light enough to carry, and a safety-first, nothing-flash design. It's clearly tuned for people who value predictability and proven reliability more than shaving a minute off their commute.
The Razor E Prime III is pitched as the stylish, ultra-portable alternative: a bit quicker off the mark, sleeker to look at, and even lighter in the hand. On paper it promises a racier commute in a package that's easier to live with physically - but it comes with a smaller battery and a slightly higher price tag. That's why this comparison matters: same idea, same user, slightly different compromises.
Design & Build Quality
Pick up the Xiaomi 1S and the first impression is... familiar. Matte dark frame, tidy cable routing, clean stem, minimal branding - this is the silhouette that launched half the rental fleets in Europe. The frame feels reassuringly solid, the folding joint clicks into place with that "done this a million times" confidence, and the overall vibe is utilitarian rather than premium. It's not jewellery, it's a tool - but a well-finished one. Paint holds up decently, plastics feel acceptable for the price, and nothing screams "corner cutting".
The Razor E Prime III tries a different angle: slim, gunmetal, more "industrial designer's portfolio" than "generic scooter". The aluminium frame looks sharp and grown-up, and the deck is nicely long and fully grip-taped. In the hand, it feels very light and quite stiff, and Razor's anti-rattle folding joint does a good job of keeping the stem from chattering. The downside is that some details feel a bit more cost-driven: non-folding bars, basic LED battery indicator, and a generally more "stripped" cockpit than the Xiaomi.
Build quality wise, both are decent, but the Xiaomi feels like a mature, iterated platform: fewer surprises, fewer odd decisions. The Razor feels more like "Razor's grown-up reboot" - slick in places, but slightly under-equipped for the money once you stop admiring the finish.
Ride Comfort & Handling
Neither of these is a magic carpet. There's no suspension on either; your legs are the shock absorbers. That said, they manage roughness quite differently.
The Xiaomi 1S rides on a pair of air-filled tyres. On smooth bike lanes it glides nicely, with just enough give in the tyres to take the buzz out of the surface. Hit paving slabs or mild cobbles and you feel it through your knees, but the scooter remains composed; the front and rear tyres share the punishment, and the deck sits at a sensible height so you feel stable even when the road gets a bit chaotic. The narrow deck does add a touch of "stand like a skateboarder and you'll be fine" to longer rides, but handling is predictable and confidence-inspiring.
The Razor E Prime III uses a split personality: air up front, solid at the rear. The front end soaks up small chatter better than you'd expect from such a light scooter, and your hands are spared most of the worst vibrations. Your heels, however, sit directly above that solid rear wheel, and on broken surfaces you're reminded of it with each crack in the tarmac. On good asphalt, the Razor feels supple enough; on neglected pavements it starts to feel like the rear is arguing with the front about what "comfort" means.
In terms of handling, the Razor's rear-wheel drive gives it a slightly more planted feel under throttle, and the low deck makes carving through city traffic quite enjoyable. The Xiaomi, with its slightly more neutral geometry and dual air tyres, feels a touch more forgiving when you're not paying full attention - it's the one I'd put a nervous first-time rider on.
Performance
Both scooters use motors in the same broad power class, but they deliver their performance with different personalities.
On the Xiaomi 1S, acceleration is gentle-to-brisk depending on which riding mode you pick. In the most energetic mode it pulls smartly away from lights, enough to keep up with cycle traffic without drama, but it never yanks your arms or feels unruly. Top speed is locked to the usual urban-legal ceiling, so once you're there, that's it - it just sits at that pace quietly, doing its job. On steeper climbs you quickly discover the limits of its modest motor: expect your speed to dip and, on nastier gradients, to contribute with a few kicks if you're heavier.
The Razor E Prime III feels more "keen teenager" out of the gate. Once you've given it the required push to start, the rear motor bites smoothly and builds speed with a bit more urgency. That slightly higher top speed is noticeable in mixed traffic: you sit closer to the flow of faster cyclists, and it genuinely shaves a bit of time on longer, open stretches. The catch is that this extra zip doesn't translate into heroic climbing. On anything beyond gentle urban slopes, the Razor runs out of breath quite quickly, especially with heavier riders, and you'll be nudging it along with your foot sooner than you might like.
Braking is a tale of two philosophies. Xiaomi combines a proper rear disc with electronic braking on the front wheel, giving you decent bite and a surprisingly controlled stop for such a light scooter. You can pull the lever hard without fearing an instant lock-up, and the regen adds a nice engine-braking feel in traffic. The Razor leans on an electronic thumb brake backed by the classic "step on the mudguard" manoeuvre. It works, but it's less confidence-inspiring at speed and demands more rider finesse. In emergency stops, I'd much rather be on the Xiaomi.
Battery & Range
This is where the spec sheets start to matter more than the marketing blurbs.
The Xiaomi 1S hides a noticeably larger battery pack in its deck, and you feel it in real life. If you're riding in the fastest mode at typical city speeds, you can realistically expect to complete a medium commute with a safe buffer left - the sort of distance that covers many people's daily office round trip without anxiety. Ride more gently and you can stretch it further, but the key point is this: the Xiaomi feels like a scooter you can commute on daily without constantly doing mental maths about whether you'll make it back.
The Razor E Prime III, with its smaller battery, simply doesn't go as far. Under similar riding conditions you're looking at a chunk less real-world range; fine for short, predictable journeys, more marginal if your route involves detours, headwinds, or a few hills. Towards the bottom of the battery gauge, the Razor also starts to soften its performance, so you notice the scooter getting lazier as the charge drops. It's not catastrophic, but it does remind you that this is primarily designed for shorter hops rather than epic cross-town adventures.
Charging times are in the same broad envelope, with the Razor having a mild edge thanks to the smaller pack. Practically, both fit easily into an overnight or work-day top-up, but only the Xiaomi gives you that peace-of-mind "I can skip charging tonight and still be OK tomorrow" feeling.
Portability & Practicality
Both brands know their audience: these are scooters you're supposed to carry, not just park outside the house.
The Xiaomi 1S is already considered a featherweight by commuter standards. The fold is classic Xiaomi: flip a latch, drop the stem, hook it onto the rear mudguard with the bell, and you're walking off in seconds. The balance point is good, so its roughly twelve-and-a-bit kilos feel manageable even up several flights of stairs. It slips under desks, into car boots, and onto luggage racks without a fight. The only quirk is the relatively fixed bar width - fine for most doors, but you're not slipping it through the tiniest gaps.
The Razor E Prime III goes even further on the scales, shaving off more than a kilo compared with the Xiaomi. You do notice that: sprinting for a departing train while carrying it is genuinely less of a workout. Its folding mechanism is quick and pleasantly solid, and once collapsed, the scooter is compact enough to disappear in most indoor corners. However, the handlebars don't fold, which limits how narrow you can make the package - something to keep in mind if you're trying to store it in crowded hallways or tiny lifts.
In day-to-day practicality, Xiaomi hits back with its app, lockable motor, and configurable regenerative braking, plus a much more informative display. Razor gives you a functional battery LED bar and that handy built-in lock point on the frame - genuinely useful - but otherwise feels slightly spartan. If your daily routine includes leaving the scooter chained outside a shop, the Razor's lock point is brilliant. If your life is a dance between public transport, offices and flats, the Xiaomi's richer feature set and better information make living with it easier.
Safety
Safety is where the Xiaomi feels like it was designed by cautious engineers and the Razor by people who trust their riders a bit more than they perhaps should.
On the Xiaomi 1S, the dual braking system, bright tail light with brake flash, and abundant reflectors all add layers of reassurance. The dual air tyres give good grip in wet or dirty conditions, and the way the electronic braking blends with the disc makes sudden stops surprisingly controlled for a small scooter. Stability at its modest top speed is fine, and the cockpit gives you a clear readout of speed and warnings - useful for not accidentally flying into legal trouble or appearing out of nowhere at unwise velocity on crowded paths.
The Razor E Prime III does cover the basics: LED headlight, brake-activated tail light, reflective accents, electronic front brake plus mechanical fender backup, and UL safety certification for the electrics. Rear-wheel drive helps traction when accelerating, especially on damp surfaces. But push it near its higher top speed on less-than-perfect tarmac and you start to feel the limits: that solid rear tyre skips more readily, and the braking layout asks a bit more skill from the rider to manage a hard stop without drama. Combine that with the lack of speed readout, and you're often guessing how fast you're actually going.
For an experienced rider, the Razor is manageable and fun. For someone new or cautious, the Xiaomi's slower, more transparent and better-equipped safety package feels the saner choice.
Community Feedback
| Xiaomi 1S | Razor E Prime III |
|---|---|
What riders love
|
What riders love
|
What riders complain about
|
What riders complain about
|
Price & Value
Now to the wallet. The Xiaomi 1S generally comes in noticeably cheaper than the Razor, despite carrying a significantly larger battery, a more sophisticated braking system, a proper display and app integration. You're essentially paying mid-range money for an entry-level workhorse, but at least you can see where the money went - the ecosystem, the refinement, the community, and the parts availability all add up.
The Razor E Prime III sits a step higher in price but brings a smaller battery, simpler interface and fewer features. You do get lower weight and a bit more top speed - two things you certainly feel - yet on a value per euro basis, the equation is harder to justify unless those specific advantages are absolutely critical to you. In a world where similarly priced competitors offer more battery or more equipment, the E Prime III starts to look a tad ambitious on pricing.
Service & Parts Availability
One of the Xiaomi 1S's biggest hidden strengths is how ubiquitous it is. Need a new tyre, tube, mudguard, or even a replacement control board? Every online marketplace and half the repair shops know this scooter inside out. There are guides, videos, forums, custom firmware, 3D-printed upgrades - it's practically an open-source hardware ecosystem at this point. Even if official Xiaomi service in your country is patchy, the community makes up a lot of that gap.
Razor, to its credit, is also a long-established brand with proper distribution and official parts. You're not betting on a no-name import that vanishes after a year. Chargers, wheels and other typical wear items are obtainable. Where it lags behind Xiaomi is simply scale: fewer third-party parts, fewer tutorials, less of that "everyone has one, so everyone knows how to fix it" advantage. For basic servicing you'll be fine, but modders and tinkerers will find the Xiaomi ecosystem far more accommodating.
Pros & Cons Summary
| Xiaomi 1S | Razor E Prime III |
|---|---|
Pros
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
Cons
|
Parameters Comparison
| Parameter | Xiaomi 1S | Razor E Prime III |
|---|---|---|
| Motor power (rated) | 250 W front hub | 250 W rear hub |
| Top speed | 25 km/h | 29 km/h |
| Claimed range | 30 km | 24 km |
| Real-world range (approx.) | 20 km | 16 km |
| Battery capacity | 275 Wh | 185 Wh |
| Weight | 12,5 kg | 11 kg |
| Brakes | Front electronic + rear disc | Electronic thumb + rear fender |
| Suspension | None (pneumatic tyres only) | None (front pneumatic, rear solid) |
| Tyres | 8,5" pneumatic front & rear | 8" pneumatic front, 8" solid rear |
| Max load | 100 kg | 100 kg |
| IP rating | IP54 | Not specified / basic splash |
| Price | 401 € | 461 € |
Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?
If you strip away the brand nostalgia and the clever marketing, this comes down to a straightforward trade-off: the Xiaomi 1S gives you more substance - more battery, more braking, more ecosystem, more information - for less money, while the Razor E Prime III gives you less weight and a bit more speed for more money.
For most riders in flat or moderately hilly cities who just want to get to work and back without worrying about range, spares, or surprise handling quirks, the Xiaomi 1S is the sensible pick. It may not be thrilling, but it's honest, well-sorted, and backed by an enormous community that has already discovered - and solved - most of its quirks.
The Razor E Prime III only really makes sense if your top priority is absolute lightness and you really, genuinely care about that extra burst of top speed in a very compact package. If you're hopping on and off trains all day, carry the scooter up multiple flights of stairs, and your rides are short and mostly flat, you'll appreciate how easy it is to live with physically. But you have to accept shorter range, a harsher rear ride, and fewer features for the privilege.
If I had to live with one as my only commuter, I'd take the Xiaomi 1S: it's the more complete, less compromised machine. The Razor is a stylish specialist tool; the Xiaomi is the slightly boring but trustworthy friend who always shows up on time - and in daily commuting, that matters more than a flash of speed.
Numbers Freaks Corner
| Metric | Xiaomi 1S | Razor E Prime III |
|---|---|---|
| Price per Wh (€/Wh) | ✅ 1,46 €/Wh | ❌ 2,49 €/Wh |
| Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) | ❌ 16,04 €/km/h | ✅ 15,90 €/km/h |
| Weight per Wh (g/Wh) | ✅ 45,45 g/Wh | ❌ 59,46 g/Wh |
| Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) | ❌ 0,50 kg/km/h | ✅ 0,38 kg/km/h |
| Price per km of real-world range (€/km) | ✅ 20,05 €/km | ❌ 28,81 €/km |
| Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) | ✅ 0,63 kg/km | ❌ 0,69 kg/km |
| Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) | ❌ 13,75 Wh/km | ✅ 11,56 Wh/km |
| Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) | ✅ 10,00 W/km/h | ❌ 8,62 W/km/h |
| Weight to power ratio (kg/W) | ❌ 0,05 kg/W | ✅ 0,04 kg/W |
| Average charging speed (W) | ✅ 50,00 W | ❌ 37,00 W |
These metrics isolate the cold maths behind ownership. Price-per-Wh and price-per-km show how much range you really buy for your money. Weight-normalised metrics tell you how much scooter you're lugging around for each unit of battery, speed or power. Efficiency (Wh/km) rewards scooters that sip energy gently, while power-to-speed and weight-to-power highlight how effectively the motor's output is used. Average charging speed simply reflects how quickly each scooter can refill its tank relative to the battery size.
Author's Category Battle
| Category | Xiaomi 1S | Razor E Prime III |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | ❌ Heavier to carry | ✅ Noticeably lighter in hand |
| Range | ✅ More usable daily range | ❌ Shorter, more limited range |
| Max Speed | ❌ Slower, more restrained | ✅ Higher cruising speed |
| Power | ✅ Feels adequate, predictable | ❌ Runs out on hills |
| Battery Size | ✅ Larger pack, more buffer | ❌ Smaller pack, less headroom |
| Suspension | ❌ No suspension at all | ❌ No suspension either |
| Design | ✅ Clean, proven commuter look | ❌ Stylish but under-equipped |
| Safety | ✅ Strong brakes, great visibility | ❌ Braking, feedback less reassuring |
| Practicality | ✅ App, display, easy ownership | ❌ Light, but less well equipped |
| Comfort | ✅ Dual air tyres help | ❌ Solid rear hurts comfort |
| Features | ✅ App, screen, regen tuning | ❌ Barebones LEDs, no app |
| Serviceability | ✅ Tons of guides, parts | ❌ Fewer third-party resources |
| Customer Support | ✅ Retailer network helps | ✅ Established brand support |
| Fun Factor | ❌ Sensible, slightly dull | ✅ Zippier, feels livelier |
| Build Quality | ✅ Mature, refined platform | ❌ Good, but more "thin" |
| Component Quality | ✅ Solid for price segment | ❌ Some compromises visible |
| Brand Name | ✅ Strong in e-scooters | ✅ Iconic, trusted Razor name |
| Community | ✅ Huge, active, mod-happy | ❌ Smaller, less scooter-focused |
| Lights (visibility) | ✅ Bright tail, many reflectors | ❌ Decent but not outstanding |
| Lights (illumination) | ✅ Headlight good for city | ❌ Serviceable but basic |
| Acceleration | ❌ Gentle, more relaxed | ✅ Sharper, feels quicker |
| Arrive with smile factor | ❌ Competent, not exciting | ✅ Faster, more playful |
| Arrive relaxed factor | ✅ Predictable, less stressful | ❌ Range, braking less calming |
| Charging speed | ✅ Faster per Wh | ❌ Slower per Wh |
| Reliability | ✅ Long, proven track record | ❌ Fewer long-term miles known |
| Folded practicality | ✅ Compact, well-latched fold | ❌ Bars don't fold narrower |
| Ease of transport | ❌ Slightly heavier to lug | ✅ Lighter, easier to haul |
| Handling | ✅ Forgiving, stable manners | ❌ Harsher rear, more edgy |
| Braking performance | ✅ Disc + regen works great | ❌ Thumb + fender less strong |
| Riding position | ❌ Narrow deck, cramped | ✅ Longer, roomier deck |
| Handlebar quality | ✅ Simple, functional layout | ❌ Non-folding, basic cockpit |
| Throttle response | ✅ Smooth, easy to modulate | ❌ Brake paddle needs learning |
| Dashboard/Display | ✅ Clear screen, useful info | ❌ Only LEDs, no speed |
| Security (locking) | ❌ No dedicated lock point | ✅ Integrated lock eyelet |
| Weather protection | ✅ IP54, splash-friendly | ❌ Less clearly specified |
| Resale value | ✅ Very strong second-hand | ❌ Less demand, more niche |
| Tuning potential | ✅ Huge firmware/mod scene | ❌ Limited tuning ecosystem |
| Ease of maintenance | ✅ Common, well-documented fixes | ❌ Fewer guides, parts options |
| Value for Money | ✅ More for less cash | ❌ Pay more, get less |
Overall Winner Declaration
In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the XIAOMI 1S scores 6 points against the RAZOR E Prime III's 4. In the Author's Category Battle, the XIAOMI 1S gets 30 ✅ versus 10 ✅ for RAZOR E Prime III.
Totals: XIAOMI 1S scores 36, RAZOR E Prime III scores 14.
Based on the scoring, the XIAOMI 1S is our overall winner. Between these two, the Xiaomi 1S simply feels like the more complete, less compromised companion for real-world commuting. It may not thrill you every time you press the throttle, but it quietly stacks the odds in your favour with range, safety, ecosystem and cost. The Razor E Prime III is fun and feather-light, but it behaves more like a stylish specialist than a dependable daily mule. If your heart says Razor, you'll enjoy it - but if your head is paying for the scooter, it's hard to look past the Xiaomi.
That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.

