Xiaomi 1S vs Razor Raven: Two Lightweight Scooters, Two Very Different Realities

Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)

The Xiaomi 1S is the overall winner here: as an everyday urban vehicle it is simply more complete, more capable, and better suited to real-world commuting than the Razor Raven. It goes faster, carries heavier riders, climbs better, and has braking and safety features that feel properly adult rather than "big kid toy".

The Razor Raven only really makes sense for lighter teenagers or very light adults who want an inexpensive, fun campus or neighbourhood scooter and are willing to accept weaker performance and tighter weight limits in exchange for a lower purchase price and a cushy front wheel.

If you're planning to commute, mix in public transport, or you just want something that will scale with your needs rather than be outgrown in a season, the Xiaomi 1S is the safer bet. The Raven can be fun in the right hands and on the right terrain, but the 1S is the scooter you can actually build a routine around.

Stick around for the full comparison before you spend your money-there are a few important "gotchas" on both sides that the spec sheets won't tell you.

Electric scooters in this price bracket are a bit like budget airlines: on paper they'll all get you there, but the experience can range from "pleasantly surprised" to "never again". The Xiaomi 1S and the Razor Raven sit close in weight and headline price, yet they target very different riders and expectations.

I've put real kilometres on both: weaving through city bike lanes on the Xiaomi, and doing repeated "just one more lap" loops of suburban paths with the Raven. One is a tool that occasionally feels fun; the other is a toy that occasionally pretends to be a tool.

If you're wondering which one should carry you to work and which one should carry your teenager to the skate park, read on.

Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?

On the shop shelf they look like direct competitors: slim stems, similar weight, similar sticker shock (or lack of it). Both live in the "lightweight, affordable" segment and both are pitched as approachable ways into electric mobility.

The Xiaomi 1S is aimed squarely at adults: urban commuters, students, and anyone who needs a genuinely practical last-mile machine. It will sit happily in a bike lane among "serious" scooters and not feel out of its depth.

The Razor Raven is really a crossover: a step up from kids' electrics, a step below true commuter machines. It's tuned for younger or lighter riders, flat terrain, and short fun runs rather than daily obligation miles.

They're worth comparing because a lot of buyers see only weight and price and assume they're interchangeable. They're not-and picking the wrong one for your use case will either bore you or punish you.

Design & Build Quality

In the hand, the design philosophies couldn't be clearer. The Xiaomi 1S feels like a mass-produced but mature consumer product: clean matte aluminium frame, cables mostly tucked away, well-integrated display. Nothing screams luxury, but nothing screams "toy aisle" either.

The folding latch on the Xiaomi has that slightly agricultural, mechanical feel that inspires confidence: you can feel it clamp, hear it lock, and the bell hooking into the rear mudguard is a small stroke of practical genius. It's not pretty, but it works, and it's been refined over years of abuse by the rental fleets of the world.

The Raven, by contrast, looks surprisingly grown-up for a Razor, all black and steel with a purposeful stance. Up close, you notice more plastic in non-critical areas and a bit less finesse in cable routing, but the steel frame itself feels stout. The deck's 3D polymer grip is genuinely good underfoot and the large fork around that big front tyre gives it a "mini moto" vibe.

However, the Raven still carries its heritage: tolerances and finishes are fine for its price, not impressive. The folding T-tube latch works and locks, but lacks the crisp, "I'll survive a decade of commuting" reassurance the Xiaomi gives. One feels like a product refined by millions of adult riders; the other, like a good first attempt at a teen-friendly e-toy with aspirations.

Ride Comfort & Handling

This is where things get interesting. On a smooth city bike lane, the Xiaomi 1S glides along pleasantly. The air-filled tyres take the sting out of small imperfections, and the scooter's low weight and narrow deck make it flickable and nimble. It's easy to slot between parked cars and cyclists with small, precise steering inputs.

Hit rougher surfaces, though-old cobblestones, badly patched tarmac, those brick pavements someone thought were a good idea-and the lack of any suspension quickly reminds you that your knees are the shock absorbers. After a few kilometres of broken pavement, you start subconsciously scanning for smoother routes and your ankles file an official complaint.

The Raven counters with that big pneumatic front wheel and a steel frame. The front end genuinely floats over the kind of cracks and gaps that would have the Xiaomi chattering. Your hands feel less buzz, and the scooter tracks straight and calm over shallow potholes. It's a noticeable step up at the handlebar.

But then the solid rear wheel rolls through and sends a reminder shot to your heels. Over repeated bumps, you end up in this odd split comfort state: hands happy, feet less so. On reasonable pavement, the Raven does feel a touch more forgiving than the Xiaomi; on sustained rough surfaces, both will have you practising the art of bending your knees and lifting your heels at the right moment.

In tight handling, the Xiaomi still wins for adult riders. Its geometry and both-air tyres give a more balanced, predictable lean into corners. The Raven's tall front wheel and smaller rear give it a slightly "see-saw" feel when you start pushing harder in turns-not unsafe, just reminding you that its natural habitat is the park, not carving downhill bike lanes at full tilt.

Performance

Let's be blunt: neither of these is a rocket ship-and that's fine-but they live in very different power worlds.

The Xiaomi's front motor is modest by enthusiast standards, yet in a scooter this light it feels perfectly adequate in the city. It pulls away from lights briskly enough that you don't feel like a traffic cone, and it will sit happily at its legal top speed without sounding strained. On flat ground with an average adult aboard, it gives that "this is fine" level of pace that quickly becomes your new normal.

Push it onto steeper hills and the façade cracks. You feel the motor dig in and your speed tumble. It will climb short, punchy slopes if you give it a running start, but long or very steep inclines turn into a slow-motion negotiation between gravity and electronics. Heavier riders will definitely notice this sooner.

The Raven, on the other hand, feels eager off the line for lighter riders, especially in its fastest mode. For a teenager or a light adult rolling around suburbia, it has enough snap to feel fun. But its top speed ceiling is clearly lower, and you notice that quickly if you've spent time on "proper" commuters. It tops out at a pace that feels more like "enthusiastic jogging" than true transport speed.

On hills the Raven simply runs out of arguments much sooner than the Xiaomi. Anything more than a gentle incline, especially with a rider near its weight limit, and you're back to kick-assist. It's not pretending to be a climber, and it shows.

Braking is another big separator. The Xiaomi's combo of rear disc and front electronic braking is one of the few parts of the scooter that punches above its pay grade. You can pull the lever hard and get a firm, predictable deceleration without drama, and the electronic front assist helps prevent that "front wheel lock, rider fly" scenario.

The Raven's mix of electronic brake and old-school rear fender stomp is better than a single weak drum, but it doesn't inspire the same grown-up confidence. The electronic brake is smooth but not fierce; the fender is there as a safety net rather than a primary stopper. For a 50-kg teenager this is perfectly adequate. For an adult weaving through mixed traffic, less so.

Battery & Range

Manufacturers' range claims live in a magical universe of featherweight riders, perfect asphalt and permanent tailwinds. In the real world, both scooters land noticeably shorter than their brochures suggest.

On the Xiaomi 1S, ridden like most people ride-full-speed mode, stop-start traffic, some wind, some mild inclines-you're looking at a comfortable mid-teens of kilometres, maybe nudging into the low twenties if you're lighter or conservative with speed. Enough for most daily there-and-back commutes in a European city, as long as your "there" isn't on the far side of the ring road.

The Raven's battery is smaller and slower, and you feel that in distance. Used in its fastest, most enjoyable mode with a lightweight rider, expect roughly half a small city's worth of riding before it starts to lose enthusiasm. It's perfectly fine for campus life, evening loops around the neighbourhood, or the "last couple of kilometres from the tram stop"-but it is not your friend for long round trips unless you have a charger waiting at the other end.

Both take the better part of an evening to charge fully. The Xiaomi's pack is bigger, so the wait is a bit longer, but you get proportionally more real-world distance in return. On the Raven you reach full charge faster, but you'll use that full charge up faster too. Range anxiety is much rarer on the Xiaomi: you can abuse it a bit and still limp home. On the Raven, if you've been caning it all afternoon, you'll start watching that battery indicator like a hawk.

Portability & Practicality

On paper, the two are almost twins on weight. In practice, the Xiaomi 1S still feels slightly more grown-up about it. The folding process is very quick and very one-hand-friendly once you've done it a few times, and the way the stem locks onto the rear mudguard makes carrying feel surprisingly natural. You can haul it up two or three flights of stairs without arriving looking like you've just done a gym session.

The Raven is also easy to carry, especially for its younger target riders. Its folding T-tube reduces the footprint nicely, and the weight is manageable for most teenagers and light adults. Stowing it in a car boot or under a desk is no problem. But the ergonomics of carrying aren't quite as polished; it's more "sling this thing under your arm" than "this was clearly designed for multi-modal commuting."

Daily practicality also extends to rider and cargo limits. The Xiaomi feels and behaves like an adult scooter with a bit of leeway: it will tolerate a wider range of rider weights without protesting immediately, even if performance tails off. You can throw a backpack over your shoulder, maybe a small bag on the hook, and it still rides like itself.

The Raven's tighter weight ceiling means it really doesn't like being overloaded. Put a heavy adult plus a massive rucksack on it and it protests in every measurable way: acceleration, hill performance, and even range suffer dramatically. For a teen with a school bag, no issue; for a sturdier adult commuter with a laptop and lunch, you're pushing it past its design brief.

Safety

Safety on small wheels is non-negotiable, and here the Xiaomi 1S clearly plays in the "serious" league. Dual-action braking, bright front light, effective tail light with brake signalling, and a generous scattering of reflectors make you properly visible and give you a lot of control when things go wrong-because in urban traffic, things do go wrong.

The 1S's tyres also play a key role: two air-filled contact patches give you real grip in the wet, on paint, and over slippery cobbles. Combine that with a stable, predictable frame and you end up with a scooter that feels reassuringly planted even at its top speed.

The Raven does a couple of things nicely: the integrated headlight is decent for its class, and the kick-to-start system is genuinely useful for preventing accidental launches. Its big front tyre and geometry mean straight-line stability is good-especially at the lower speeds it operates at. Razor's focus on electrical safety certifications is also a plus from a "will this catch fire while charging in the hallway" perspective.

But the fundamentals are more limited. Braking, as mentioned, is fine for its intended lighter riders, less so if you stretch beyond that. The solid rear tyre offers less grip on sketchy surfaces than a pneumatic one, and the overall safety envelope relies a lot on you staying within its narrow comfort band: light rider, dry ground, modest speeds.

Community Feedback

Price & Value

Pure sticker price favours the Raven: you hand over noticeably less cash at the till, and for a parent buying a scooter that might be ridden hard for a year and then abandoned for the next shiny thing, that matters.

However, value isn't just what you pay, it's what you get per year of genuinely useful service. The Xiaomi 1S, while more expensive, gives you an actual adult-grade transport tool that can credibly replace a chunk of public transport or car trips. Its resale value is strong, parts and repairs are cheap and ubiquitous, and you're far less likely to outgrow it quickly.

The Raven's value proposition relies heavily on staying inside its niche. For a 14-year-old rolling to school in a flat town, it's sensible money: tough frame, recognisable brand, not too fast. For a 30-year-old trying to commute across a hilly city, that "cheap" price starts to look expensive very quickly when you find yourself walking beside it.

Service & Parts Availability

This is where the Xiaomi 1S quietly wipes the floor with most competitors. Because it shares its DNA with one of the most widely sold scooters ever, you can find everything from brake pads to replacement controllers, third-party mudguards, solid and semi-solid tyres, even upgraded batteries, all over Europe. Need a tutorial? There's almost certainly a step-by-step video for your exact issue.

Razor, to its credit, is a long-standing brand with decent distribution, and basic spares like chargers and some structural parts are usually obtainable via retailers or Razor's own channels. But the depth of third-party support and tinkering culture just isn't on the same level. If something non-standard fails on the Raven a few years down the line, you'll be working harder to keep it rolling.

For someone who wants a scooter they can keep alive well past the warranty period, the Xiaomi ecosystem is a major asset. The Raven feels more like a fixed-term tool: enjoy it, then replace rather than rebuild.

Pros & Cons Summary

Parameters Comparison

Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?

If you strip away the marketing gloss and just look at how they behave in the wild, the Xiaomi 1S is the more capable, more rounded scooter. It's not thrilling, but it is grown-up: it can get a normal-sized adult across a city at a sensible pace, stop reliably, fold neatly, and be revived easily when something eventually wears out. As a day-to-day tool, it makes sense.

The Razor Raven, in contrast, is delightful when used inside its narrow comfort zone: light rider, short trips, largely flat ground. As a teenager's independence machine or a campus runabout, it does its job with a bit of style and more comfort than many cheap rivals. But try to promote it to full-time commuter duty and its limitations arrive faster than its top speed.

If you're an adult buying your first scooter and you care about getting to work more than impressing your nephew, choose the Xiaomi 1S. If you're a parent shopping for a safe, not-too-fast electric toy that feels a notch above the usual plastic sleds, the Razor Raven is a reasonable pick-as long as you're not secretly planning to steal it for your own commute.

Numbers Freaks Corner

These metrics look past the marketing and measure hard efficiency and value. Price-per-Wh and price-per-km/h tell you how much energy and speed you're actually buying for each euro. Weight-related metrics show how much scooter you're hauling around for the performance and range you get. Wh-per-km reflects how efficiently each scooter uses its battery. Power-to-speed and weight-to-power hint at how lively they feel, while average charging power is a good shorthand for how quickly you get meaningful range back into the battery.

Author's Category Battle

Overall Winner Declaration

In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the XIAOMI 1S scores 8 points against the RAZOR Raven's 2. In the Author's Category Battle, the XIAOMI 1S gets 36 ✅ versus 9 ✅ for RAZOR Raven (with a few ties sprinkled in).

Totals: XIAOMI 1S scores 44, RAZOR Raven scores 11.

Based on the scoring, the XIAOMI 1S is our overall winner. Between these two, the Xiaomi 1S feels like the scooter that quietly gets on with the job: not spectacular, but solid, predictable and grown-up enough that you stop thinking about it and just ride. The Razor Raven does have its charms, especially for lighter, younger riders who value fun over function, but it never quite shakes the sense that you'll outgrow it sooner rather than later. If you want a machine that can carry you through real commutes, changing seasons and a few life phases, the 1S is the one that makes more sense to live with. The Raven is a nice fling; the Xiaomi is the relationship you can actually rely on.

That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.