Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)
The Xiaomi 4 Pro is the clear overall winner: it rides better, feels more planted, has far more usable power and range, and is simply the more complete daily commuter if you rely on a scooter, not just flirt with the idea. The Acer ES Series 3 only really fights back on price, weight, and "zero-fuss" maintenance thanks to its solid tyres and smaller battery.
Choose the Xiaomi if you actually want to replace a good chunk of your commuting with a scooter and care about comfort, safety margin and long-term durability. Choose the Acer if your budget is tight, your rides are short, your roads are smooth, and you're more "try it and see" than "this is my primary transport".
Both can make sense in the right context, but they don't belong in the same league - keep reading to see where the cheap shortcut starts to feel like... a shortcut.
Stick around for the full breakdown before you put your money where your feet will stand every day.
Electric scooters have matured from quirky toys into serious transport, and nowhere is that clearer than when you put a grown-up commuter like the Xiaomi 4 Pro next to a budget freshman like the Acer ES Series 3. On paper they both move you at roughly bicycle speeds; in practice they feel like two very different answers to "how much do I actually care about my daily ride?"
I've spent proper time with both: commuting, dodging potholes, abusing them on broken pavements, and lugging them up too many staircases. One of them behaves like a refined, slightly sober city vehicle; the other like a tech-branded starter pack that's fine as long as you don't ask too much of it.
If the Xiaomi 4 Pro is the scooter for people who genuinely depend on it, the Acer ES Series 3 is for people who mostly depend on the bus and want something extra for the last bit. Same idea, very different level of commitment. Let's unpack that.
Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?
These two technically live in different price brackets: the Xiaomi 4 Pro sits solidly in the mid-range commuter class, while the Acer ES Series 3 is very much "entry ticket to e-scooters". Yet people constantly cross-shop them because the promise is similar: compact scooter, modest top speed, urban use, respectable brand name, and the seductive idea that you can ditch a few car or bus trips.
Both target riders who mostly stay on tarmac, ride within legal limits and don't need roaring dual motors. The Xiaomi goes after daily commuters, heavier and taller riders, and anyone doing a proper A-to-B twice a day in all seasons. The Acer goes after students, first-timers and budget-conscious commuters with short, mostly flat trips who want a familiar tech brand on the box more than they want high-end components.
So yes, they compete in the real world: the question is whether you spend more once for a "real" commuter, or spend less now and accept a shorter, harsher, more limited ride.
Design & Build Quality
Side by side, the Xiaomi 4 Pro looks and feels like a grown-up machine; the Acer looks like what it is: a competent, but clearly budget, scooter with a nice coat of paint. Xiaomi's frame is visibly beefier, the welds are smoother, the stem feels like it could double as a jack handle, and there's that familiar Xiaomi minimalism - matte black, restrained accents, and a cockpit that doesn't look like an afterthought.
The Acer has decent aluminium construction and surprisingly clean internal cable routing for its price, which does give it a tidy, techy aesthetic. It's not junk by any stretch - there are no comedy rattles out of the box - but you can feel that metal thickness, hinges and deck structure are tuned for "light duty". The folding latch is fine, but it doesn't give you that same reassuring clunk of over-engineering the Xiaomi does.
In the hands, the difference is obvious. Fold both, lift them by the stem, and the Xiaomi feels dense and monolithic, while the Acer feels more hollow and "appliance-like". One is something you'd happily run for a few years and several thousand kilometres; the other feels more like a seasonal gadget that you'll reassess after a year of use.
Ride Comfort & Handling
Neither scooter has actual suspension, which is already a compromise for European cities with their enthusiasm for cobblestones and creative road repairs. The Xiaomi 4 Pro tries to compensate with large, air-filled tyres; the Acer goes the opposite way with smaller, solid rubber.
On smooth bike lanes, both glide acceptably. But the first time you hit a patchwork of cracked tarmac, the contrast is brutal. The Xiaomi's bigger, tubeless tyres and longer, wider deck let you float over nastiness with a bit of knee flex; it still thumps on sharp edges, but your joints don't send hate mail after a few kilometres. The wide bars give calm steering and stability when dodging potholes or weaving around traffic.
The Acer, with its hard, smaller solids, translates every ridge, manhole and paving joint straight into your palms and ankles. After just a few kilometres on rough city streets, your knees start negotiating for a different hobby. You have to ride very actively, constantly unweighting over bad patches, and even then the scooter just never relaxes underneath you. Handling is nimble enough at low speed, but at max speed on bumpy ground it feels more twitchy and less planted than I'd like.
If your riding environment is mostly fresh asphalt or smooth campus paths, the Acer's harshness stays tolerable. If you've got old town paving stones or broken curb cuts on your route, the Xiaomi is on a different planet.
Performance
The Xiaomi 4 Pro is not a rocket by enthusiast standards, but coming from the Acer it feels positively muscular. Its motor pulls with a confident, smooth shove that gets you off the line quicker than cyclists and keeps you cruising at the legal limit without feeling like you're wringing its neck. Even with a heavier rider, it holds its speed respectably and still has enough torque in reserve to climb proper city hills without resorting to the humiliating kick-assist routine.
The Acer ES Series 3, with its modest front motor, accelerates more like a polite rental city bike. It's gentle, predictable and beginner-friendly - which is great until you find yourself at a busy junction trying to clear traffic briskly. On flat ground it eventually reaches its capped speed and potters along fine. But introduce a hill and you instantly discover the boundaries of "budget legal limit". Mild grades, it copes; steeper ones, it wheezes, slows and eventually encourages you to get involved with your legs.
Braking performance mirrors this pattern. Xiaomi's combination of larger mechanical rear disc and well-tuned electronic front brake gives strong, controlled deceleration. You can brake hard in the wet without feeling like you're about to author a crash compilation. Acer's setup of front electronic plus small rear disc is decent for its top speed and weight, but you don't have the same surplus of stopping confidence - especially when the solid front tyre starts skipping over bumps under heavy braking.
In daily use, the Xiaomi feels like it always has a little in reserve - uphill, downhill, fully loaded. The Acer feels fine right up until the point you ask it for just a bit more than "flat, empty bike path", and then you quickly find the ceiling.
Battery & Range
Battery is where the philosophy diverges most clearly. Xiaomi gives you a proper commuter-grade pack that can cover a healthy city round trip at full legal speed without having to baby the throttle. Ride in its faster mode, with normal traffic stops and a typical adult on board, and you can realistically tick off several tens of kilometres before you start nervously watching the last bar. Ride more gently, and it stretches impressively far for a single-motor scooter in this class.
The Acer's smaller battery is tuned for short hops. In the real world, flat city, full-speed riding, expect a modest handful of kilometres in each direction before you're in "let's not push this" territory. For station-to-office, campus, or errands around the neighbourhood, it's OK. For a long cross-town commute twice a day, you're either charging at both ends or rolling the dice more often than is comfortable.
Charging times make the difference more tactical than absolute. The Xiaomi is very much an overnight or full-workday charge - plug it in, forget about it. The Acer, with its smaller pack, refills in roughly a long lunch break, which is genuinely convenient: ride in, charge while you work or study, ride out. As long as your daily distance fits inside its limited tank, that fast turnaround mitigates the raw capacity disadvantage.
Portability & Practicality
Neither scooter is featherweight, but they sit in that "you can carry me, you just won't enjoy it for long" zone. The Acer is noticeably lighter and slightly more compact when folded, which matters if you regularly haul it up several flights of stairs or squeeze it into tight train vestibules. Folding is quick and intuitive on both, but the Acer's smaller size makes it less of a social event when manoeuvring on a crowded bus.
The Xiaomi's extra bulk pays you back when actually rolling: wider deck, taller stem, bigger wheels, more mass to smooth out the nonsense that streets throw at you. Car boots? Both fit into typical hatchbacks without drama, but the Xiaomi takes more space and requires a bit more Tetris if you've also got luggage or kids' kit back there.
In an office or flat, the Acer tucks away more easily under a desk or in a corner; the Xiaomi is still manageable, but it's definitely "a thing" in the room. If your life involves constant carrying and only short riding, the Acer's practicality wins. If you ride more than you lift, the Xiaomi's on-road benefits quickly justify the extra kilos.
Safety
Safety is a mix of hardware and how the scooter behaves when things go wrong. Xiaomi's larger, grippier tubeless tyres, longer wheelbase and sturdier chassis give it a noticeably more stable, confidence-inspiring character at its top speed. You can hit a small pothole or a patch of gravel without feeling the entire scooter flinch underneath you. The dual-brake setup offers solid, progressive power, and the lighting package - especially on versions with integrated indicators - is very well sorted for urban traffic.
The Acer scores points for including turn signals at this price, and its IP rating means it copes well enough with typical drizzle. Its braking is adequate for its lower weight and power, and the simplicity of solid tyres does remove the spectre of sudden deflation mid-corner. The flip side is brutal: those same tyres offer less grip on uneven or wet surfaces and bounce rather than deform, which can extend your stopping distance and make the front more skittish when heavily loaded or braking hard on rough tarmac.
In short, the Acer keeps you safe as long as you keep the conditions in its comfort zone. The Xiaomi gives you a bigger safety margin for the days the city doesn't cooperate - emergency stops, surprise potholes, wet zebra crossings and the usual urban circus.
Community Feedback
| Xiaomi 4 Pro | Acer ES Series 3 |
|---|---|
| What riders love | What riders love |
| Refined build, stable chassis, self-sealing tubeless tyres, strong braking, surprisingly good hill performance, comfortable size for taller riders, polished app, and the feeling that it "just works" day after day. | Low price, solid "no-flat" tyres, quick charging, light weight, clean design, turn signals, and the fact it comes from a recognisable PC brand rather than an anonymous marketplace seller. |
| What riders complain about | What riders complain about |
| No suspension, noticeable heft when carried regularly, conservative speed cap, somewhat optimistic claimed range for heavier riders, and a display cover that scratches more easily than you'd expect. | Very harsh ride on rough surfaces, weak hill climbing, modest real-world range, confusion about app support, fixed bar height that can feel low, and a display that can be hard to read in very bright sun. |
Price & Value
The Acer ES Series 3 is undeniably cheap for a branded lithium scooter. For a bit over a couple of hundred euro, you get a functional commuter with real brakes, real lights, and a household-name logo. Viewed purely through the "is this better than walking that last couple of kilometres?" lens, the value is excellent. You're not paying for luxuries, you're paying for motion.
The Xiaomi 4 Pro asks for a solid step up in price and doesn't try to compete on sticker shock. Its value sits in how much scooter you get per day of actual use: you gain proper range, real climbing ability, vastly better ride quality, stronger safety margin and a more robust platform that's far less likely to annoy you after the honeymoon phase. If you amortise it over years of daily commuting, the extra outlay starts to look more like an investment than indulgence.
Where the Acer's value proposition weakens is if you try to make it do a Xiaomi's job. Stretch the distances, add hills, throw in bad pavement, and its bargain price starts to show its edges. As long as you keep expectations aligned with its budget brief, it's good value. The Xiaomi, meanwhile, sits closer to that sweet spot where spending more again yields diminishing returns.
Service & Parts Availability
Xiaomi has a huge installed base and years of scooter history. That translates into something very practical: when something eventually wears out or breaks, there's a good chance your local repair shop has seen it before and either has the part or knows exactly where to get it. Online, there's an entire ecosystem of spares, upgrades and tutorials for every conceivable fix, from tyres to control boards.
Acer, while a giant in PCs, is still relatively new to scooters. You do get the reassurance of a big brand with established service channels, but parts availability for specific scooter components is not yet at Xiaomi levels. You're less likely to find a third-party compatible part on every corner of the internet, and fewer independent scooter techs have hands-on experience with this exact model. It doesn't mean it's unserviceable, just that you're more tied to official channels and a bit more at the mercy of their parts pipeline.
Pros & Cons Summary
| Xiaomi 4 Pro | Acer ES Series 3 |
|---|---|
Pros
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
Cons
|
Parameters Comparison
| Parameter | Xiaomi 4 Pro | Acer ES Series 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Motor power (rated) | 350-400 W front hub | 250 W front hub |
| Top speed | 25 km/h (limited) | 20-25 km/h (region-dependent) |
| Battery capacity | ≈468 Wh | ≈270 Wh (36 V / 7,5 Ah) |
| Claimed range | 45-55 km | 25-30 km |
| Real-world range (typical) | 30-40 km | 18-22 km |
| Weight | ≈17,0 kg | ≈16,0 kg |
| Brakes | Front e-ABS + rear disc | Front electronic + rear disc |
| Suspension | None | None |
| Tyres | 10-inch tubeless, self-sealing | 8,5-inch solid rubber |
| Max load | 120 kg | 100 kg |
| Water resistance | IPX4 | IPX5 |
| Approx. price | ≈799 € | ≈221 € |
Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?
In real daily use, these scooters are playing different games. The Xiaomi 4 Pro is the scooter you buy when you've decided this is your main way of crossing the city: you want something that will carry you, your backpack and your bad decisions over questionable road surfaces in all seasons without constantly reminding you of its compromises. It's stable, reasonably powerful, and feels engineered for long-term service rather than just first impressions.
The Acer ES Series 3 is the scooter you buy when you want to spend as little as possible to see if scooting fits your life at all - or when your needs are strictly modest: short, flat hops on smooth ground, lots of folding and carrying, and an absolute hatred of punctures. Stay inside that envelope and it's fine; step outside it and its limitations show up quickly.
If your commute is more than a few kilometres, involves hills, or runs over less-than-perfect roads, I'd unequivocally steer you toward the Xiaomi, even if you have to save a bit longer. If your rides are genuinely short and simple and your budget is immovable, the Acer can still make sense - just go in with your eyes open about what you're not getting.
Numbers Freaks Corner
| Metric | Xiaomi 4 Pro | Acer ES Series 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Price per Wh (€/Wh) | ❌ 1,71 €/Wh | ✅ 0,82 €/Wh |
| Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) | ❌ 31,96 €/km/h | ✅ 8,84 €/km/h |
| Weight per Wh (g/Wh) | ✅ 36,32 g/Wh | ❌ 59,26 g/Wh |
| Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) | ❌ 0,68 kg/km/h | ✅ 0,64 kg/km/h |
| Price per km of real-world range (€/km) | ❌ 22,83 €/km | ✅ 11,05 €/km |
| Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) | ✅ 0,49 kg/km | ❌ 0,80 kg/km |
| Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) | ✅ 13,37 Wh/km | ❌ 13,50 Wh/km |
| Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) | ✅ 14,0 W/km/h | ❌ 10,0 W/km/h |
| Weight to power ratio (kg/W) | ✅ 0,0486 kg/W | ❌ 0,0640 kg/W |
| Average charging speed (W) | ❌ 55,06 W | ✅ 67,50 W |
These metrics quantify different aspects of efficiency: cost per battery capacity and per speed, how much scooter mass you carry per unit of energy or performance, how far each watt-hour takes you, how much power you get relative to top speed, and how quickly each scooter refills its battery. Lower values generally mean better efficiency or lighter hardware for the same outcome, while higher values are better where you want more power or faster charging.
Author's Category Battle
| Category | Xiaomi 4 Pro | Acer ES Series 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | ❌ Heavier to haul | ✅ Slightly lighter, easier |
| Range | ✅ Comfortable daily commuting | ❌ Short hops only |
| Max Speed | ✅ Holds limit confidently | ❌ Feels strained at cap |
| Power | ✅ Real torque, climbs hills | ❌ Struggles on inclines |
| Battery Size | ✅ Commuter-grade capacity | ❌ Small, range-limited pack |
| Suspension | ❌ No suspension present | ❌ No suspension present |
| Design | ✅ Refined, mature aesthetic | ❌ Looks cheaper up close |
| Safety | ✅ Stable, strong braking | ❌ Skittish solids, basic feel |
| Practicality | ✅ Better for real commuting | ❌ Limited by range, comfort |
| Comfort | ✅ Big tyres, roomy deck | ❌ Harsh, fatiguing ride |
| Features | ✅ App, self-sealing tyres | ❌ Basic, fewer smart tricks |
| Serviceability | ✅ Huge parts ecosystem | ❌ Limited third-party support |
| Customer Support | ✅ Wide retail backing | ✅ Established Acer networks |
| Fun Factor | ✅ Zippy, confidence inspiring | ❌ Sensible, slightly dull |
| Build Quality | ✅ Solid, low rattles | ❌ More "appliance-grade" |
| Component Quality | ✅ Better tyres, brakes, deck | ❌ Clearly cost-cut parts |
| Brand Name | ✅ Proven scooter reputation | ❌ New to scooters |
| Community | ✅ Huge user base, mods | ❌ Small, fewer resources |
| Lights (visibility) | ✅ Strong presence in traffic | ✅ Indicators, decent package |
| Lights (illumination) | ✅ Brighter, better throw | ❌ Adequate but modest |
| Acceleration | ✅ Brisk for a commuter | ❌ Gentle, often sluggish |
| Arrive with smile factor | ✅ Feels like a real vehicle | ❌ Feels like a gadget |
| Arrive relaxed factor | ✅ Less fatigue, more stable | ❌ Vibrations, more tiring |
| Charging speed | ❌ Long overnight charge | ✅ Quick office top-up |
| Reliability | ✅ Proven platform, robust | ❌ More unknown long-term |
| Folded practicality | ❌ Bulkier when folded | ✅ Smaller footprint folded |
| Ease of transport | ❌ Heavier, awkward stairs | ✅ Easier carry, compact |
| Handling | ✅ Stable, predictable | ❌ Nervous on rough ground |
| Braking performance | ✅ Stronger, more controlled | ❌ Adequate, less reassuring |
| Riding position | ✅ Better for taller riders | ❌ Fixed, lowish bars |
| Handlebar quality | ✅ Sturdy, low flex | ❌ More basic feel |
| Throttle response | ✅ Smooth, strong modes | ❌ Mild, slightly anaemic |
| Dashboard/Display | ✅ Clear, integrated well | ❌ Harder to read in sun |
| Security (locking) | ✅ App lock, easy hardware | ❌ Fewer locking points |
| Weather protection | ❌ Slightly lower rating | ✅ Better splash tolerance |
| Resale value | ✅ Strong second-hand demand | ❌ Likely weaker resale |
| Tuning potential | ✅ Huge modding community | ❌ Very limited options |
| Ease of maintenance | ✅ Parts, guides everywhere | ✅ Solids, simple hardware |
| Value for Money | ✅ For serious daily commuters | ✅ For tight-budget beginners |
Overall Winner Declaration
In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the XIAOMI 4 Pro scores 5 points against the ACER ES Series 3's 5. In the Author's Category Battle, the XIAOMI 4 Pro gets 33 ✅ versus 9 ✅ for ACER ES Series 3 (with a few ties sprinkled in).
Totals: XIAOMI 4 Pro scores 38, ACER ES Series 3 scores 14.
Based on the scoring, the XIAOMI 4 Pro is our overall winner. When you live with both, the Xiaomi 4 Pro simply feels more like a trustworthy partner and less like a compromise; it shrinks the city in a way you can rely on, not just occasionally enjoy. The Acer ES Series 3 has its charm as a cheap, low-commitment way into scooting, but you're constantly reminded of what you gave up to hit that price. If you care about how every ride feels - not just that it technically happens - the Xiaomi is the scooter that will keep you happier, longer, and much less tempted to upgrade six months down the line.
That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.

