Xiaomi 4 Pro 2nd Gen vs Acer ES Series 3 - Sensible Commuter or Cheap Thrill?

XIAOMI Electric Scooter 4 Pro 2nd Gen 🏆 Winner
XIAOMI

Electric Scooter 4 Pro 2nd Gen

526 € View full specs →
VS
ACER ES Series 3
ACER

ES Series 3

221 € View full specs →
Parameter XIAOMI Electric Scooter 4 Pro 2nd Gen ACER ES Series 3
Price 526 € 221 €
🏎 Top Speed 25 km/h 20 km/h
🔋 Range 45 km 30 km
Weight 19.0 kg 16.0 kg
Power 1000 W 500 W
🔌 Voltage 48 V 36 V
🔋 Battery 468 Wh 270 Wh
Wheel Size 10 " 8.5 "
👤 Max Load 120 kg 100 kg
Speed Comparison

Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)

The Xiaomi Electric Scooter 4 Pro 2nd Gen is the overall better scooter: stronger motor, more real-world range, better stability, and a more confidence-inspiring ride for everyday commuting. It feels like a "real vehicle" rather than a tech gadget with wheels.

The Acer ES Series 3, however, makes sense if your budget is tight, your rides are short and flat, and you value low purchase price and puncture-proof simplicity over comfort and power. It's fine as a starter or occasional-use scooter, less so as a serious daily workhorse.

If you plan to ride regularly and rely on your scooter as transport rather than a toy, stretch to the Xiaomi. If you just want something cheap and cheerful for short hops on good tarmac, the Acer can still do the job.

Stick around for the full comparison - the devil (and the decision) is in the details.

Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?

XIAOMI Electric Scooter 4 Pro 2nd GenACER ES Series 3

On paper, these two don't look like obvious rivals: the Xiaomi 4 Pro 2nd Gen sits comfortably in the mid-range commuter class, while the Acer ES Series 3 is budget territory. In reality, they often end up on the same shortlist: people browse "proper" commuters like the Xiaomi, then spot a much cheaper Acer and start wondering if they can save a few hundred euros without regretting it every morning.

The Xiaomi targets riders who actually commute - several kilometres each way, mixed surfaces, sometimes with hills, sometimes in lousy weather. It's for people replacing buses and cars, not just "adding a fun gadget".

The Acer ES Series 3 is clearly pitched at lighter-duty users: students, last-mile hopers from station to office, or someone who wants a scooter "just in case" rather than as their main transport. It's the impulse-buy e-scooter; Xiaomi is the "I've thought this through" scooter.

So yes, they're in different classes - but they're exactly the kind of scooters people agonise over when trying to decide if they're serious riders or just experimenting.

Design & Build Quality

Specs Comparison

Side by side, the design philosophies could not be clearer.

The Xiaomi 4 Pro 2nd Gen looks and feels like an evolution of a proven platform. The familiar, understated frame is now in stiff carbon steel; in the hands it feels dense and solid, more like a small moped than a toy. No obvious flex, no cheap creaks when you rock the stem. The folding joint closes with that reassuring, heavy "clunk" you want from something that'll carry you at bike-lane speeds.

Acer goes for the "consumer electronics" vibe, which fits their brand. The ES Series 3 has a clean, matte aluminium frame with tidy internal cabling and tasteful green accents. On first contact it's surprisingly decent for the price - no catastrophic rattles, acceptable stem rigidity, and the finish doesn't scream "discount warehouse". But next to the Xiaomi, it does feel lighter and more hollow; think mid-range laptop chassis versus a solid workstation.

Decks tell you a lot about intent. Xiaomi's is long and reasonably wide with a tough rubber coating - not luxurious, but confidence-inspiring. Acer's deck is also decently sized, but the whole scooter has that slimmer, more minimal silhouette that whispers "I'm here to be carried as much as ridden".

In the hands, Xiaomi feels like a small vehicle. Acer feels like a nicely made gadget that happens to move you.

Ride Comfort & Handling

Neither scooter has mechanical suspension, so comfort comes down to tyres, geometry and how well the chassis deals with abuse.

The Xiaomi runs on big, tubeless, air-filled tyres with generous width. On real streets that matters. Over worn asphalt, patchy tarmac and the odd tram track, the Xiaomi softens the chatter surprisingly well for a rigid scooter. It's not magic - hit a deep pothole and you'll still know all about it - but on long commutes your knees don't file complaints quite as fast. The wider bars and long, stable wheelbase give it a planted, "grown-up" feel when carving bike lanes or dodging parked car doors.

The Acer goes in the opposite direction: smaller solid tyres, zero give. On clean, smooth paths, it rolls fine - predictable, nimble enough, easy to thread through pedestrians. The moment the surface turns ugly, you feel everything. Five kilometres of lumpy pavements on the ES Series 3 and you learn very quickly to ride like a mountain biker: knees bent, weight shifting, eyes hunting for smoother lines. Handling is agile at low speed but a bit skittish on rough ground; those hard tyres don't do you any favours when you clip a crack at full tilt.

In corners, the Xiaomi's rear-wheel drive and wide contact patch translate to quiet confidence. The Acer, with its front hub and hard rubber, is more sensitive to painted lines and wet patches; it's fine if you're gentle, less fun if you like leaning it in.

For comfort and composed handling beyond short, perfect-surface hops, the Xiaomi is clearly ahead.

Performance

The first time you launch off a light on the Xiaomi 4 Pro 2nd Gen, you instantly feel the class difference. The rear motor has a healthy punch; it doesn't snap your neck, but it gets you up to its software-limited speed briskly enough that you can merge into bike-lane traffic without feeling like an intruder. Hills that make typical rental scooters wheeze are dispatched at a steady, respectable pace, even with a heavier rider and a backpack.

Crucially, it keeps that pull even as the battery drains. The higher-voltage system helps it feel less "tired" at the end of the day, which you notice on long commutes when budget scooters usually start begging for mercy.

The Acer ES Series 3's front motor is... polite. In its fastest mode it eventually gets up to its regulated speed and holds it reasonably on flat ground, but there's no drama here - which beginners will like. It's predictable, linear, and not remotely intimidating. At lights, though, you're more spectator than sprinter; bicycles will often beat you off the line unless their riders are half asleep.

Point either scooter at a decent hill and the story writes itself. The Xiaomi digs in and grinds its way up, losing some speed but still behaving like a serious commuter. The Acer, by contrast, starts bargaining pretty quickly; on steeper ramps you'll end up adding some human power, and on long climbs you may resign yourself to walking. If your city has bridges, flyovers or hilly districts, that distinction matters a lot more than spec sheets suggest.

Braking is another part of the performance picture. Xiaomi's drum plus electronic setup gives smooth, low-maintenance deceleration with good modulation - plenty for the scooter's speed class, without the "grab and pray" feeling some cheap discs give. The Acer's rear disc combined with front electronic braking is actually a bright spot: for its weight and speed it stops confidently, though the cheaper hardware will likely need more fettling over time than Xiaomi's sealed drum.

Battery & Range

Manufacturers love optimistic range claims; riders love not pushing their scooter home. In practice, the Xiaomi's larger battery and more efficient system put it in a different league.

On the 4 Pro 2nd Gen, riding the way real people ride - mostly in the fastest mode, normal weight, some stops, some hills - you can reasonably expect several tens of kilometres before the battery gets grumpy. That means most people can do a typical there-and-back commute plus some errands without thinking about range every second. You do feel the limiter long before you feel range anxiety.

On the Acer ES Series 3, the story is shorter. Treat it as a last-mile tool, and its battery is fine: a few kilometres to the station, back home later, maybe a quick detour - no problem. Stretch it into full-commuter duty with aggressive riding and you start watching the battery indicator a lot sooner. Heavier riders and colder days shrink that reserve noticeably. It's "good enough" for casual urban hops, not a long-distance partner.

Charging flips the script slightly. The Acer's smaller battery refills in just a few hours; plug it in at work and it's full again before you've finished a long meeting. The Xiaomi wants an overnight session, which is normal for its size but less forgiving if you forget. Still, for genuine daily riders, having a comfortably larger energy tank is far more valuable than shaving a few hours off charging once in a while.

Portability & Practicality

This is the one area where the Acer genuinely punches back.

The Xiaomi 4 Pro 2nd Gen is on the heavy side for a "commuter" scooter. Carrying it up one short flight is fine; carry it up three or four regularly and you'll start counting it as strength training. Folded, it's reasonably compact, but there's simply a lot of mass there - the price you pay for a robust frame, big battery and meatier motor.

The Acer ES Series 3, by contrast, is noticeably easier to live with if you're constantly transitioning between riding and carrying. It's lighter, folds quickly into a compact package, and is far more manageable in overstuffed train corridors, office lifts, or narrow stairwells. This is the one you actually don't mind lugging up to a fifth-floor flat after a long day.

In terms of "everyday faff", both fold and unfold without drama, and both tuck under desks without making your boss nervous. The Xiaomi feels more like parking a small scooter; the Acer feels like stowing a slightly bulky briefcase on wheels.

If you rarely carry your scooter more than a few steps, the Xiaomi's weight is a tolerable compromise. If your life is one long staircase, the Acer suddenly makes a lot more sense - as long as you accept the other downsides.

Safety

Safety is where design choices start to show their long-term wisdom... or lack of it.

The Xiaomi's rear-wheel drive is already a big safety win: it pushes you forward with more predictable traction, especially in the wet, rather than yanking the front wheel around when it spins. Add in wide tubeless tyres with good grip and a traction control system, and you get a scooter that feels composed on dicey surfaces - wet markings, light gravel, autumn leaves. You still need to respect conditions, but the chassis helps rather than hinders.

Braking, as mentioned, is strong and progressive, and the drum's sealed nature means it keeps performing in rain without you constantly fiddling with adjustment. The lighting package is actually quite good for a commuter: bright headlight, auto-on logic, and integrated turn signals at the bar ends that you can actually see in traffic. Being able to indicate without taking a hand off the bars is a non-trivial upgrade.

The Acer does deserve credit for its safety feature set at the price. Most budget scooters do not bother with turn signals; the ES Series 3 does. Its brakes are adequate for its speed and weight, and the IPX5 rating means rain rides aren't a white-knuckle "will the electronics survive?" experiment. The solid tyres also remove the risk of sudden flats - a different kind of safety.

But solid tyres have limits: grip on sketchy or wet surfaces is just not on the same level as good pneumatic rubber, and the harsher ride can make you more hesitant when you should be concentrating on traffic. Front-wheel drive with a modest motor is manageable, but on slippery patches you feel that tug at the bars sooner than you'd like.

Both scooters meet their brief, but for riders who'll be out in varied conditions and proper traffic every day, the Xiaomi offers a noticeably safer overall platform.

Community Feedback

Xiaomi Electric Scooter 4 Pro 2nd Gen Acer ES Series 3
What riders love
  • Strong hill performance for a commuter
  • Rear-wheel drive traction and stability
  • Wide, tubeless tyres and solid, rattle-free build
  • Integrated turn signals and good lighting
  • Decent real-world range for daily use
What riders love
  • Very attractive price for a branded scooter
  • Puncture-proof solid tyres - zero flats
  • Light enough to carry regularly
  • Fast charging, handy for office top-ups
  • Clean design with internal cabling and signals
What riders complain about
  • Noticeable weight when carrying upstairs
  • Hard speed limit that's tough to bypass
  • No mechanical suspension for bad roads
  • Dashboard cover scratches too easily
  • Long charging time compared with some rivals
What riders complain about
  • Harsh, rattly ride on rough surfaces
  • Weak hill-climbing, struggles with heavier riders
  • Confusing or limited app support
  • Modest real-world range on full power
  • Fixed bar height not ideal for tall riders

Price & Value

This is where the heart and the wallet start arguing.

The Acer ES Series 3 is undeniably cheap for a branded scooter. For roughly what some people pay for a pair of trainers and a streaming subscription, you get an electric vehicle with brakes, lights, turn signals and a known logo on the stem. For short, flat, occasional rides, it offers a lot of utility per euro - as long as your expectations stay aligned with its limitations.

The Xiaomi costs well over twice as much, and no, it doesn't feel like the world's best bargain. What it does feel like is an actually competent transport tool that you can depend on daily. Better motor, bigger battery, grippier tyres, more robust frame, better support ecosystem - it all adds up. If you genuinely replace public transport or car trips with it, the extra up-front cost makes sense over time. If you don't, it's just an expensive scooter gathering dust in the hallway.

So the value question is simple: if this will be your main way of getting around town, the Xiaomi's extra spend is rational. If it'll be used sporadically, on short flat journeys, the Acer is the financially safer experiment - but it's not some hidden giant killer; you do feel where the corners were cut.

Service & Parts Availability

Here the difference in scooter experience between the brands really shows.

Xiaomi has been in this game for years. Parts - official and third-party - are everywhere: tyres, brakes, stems, dashboards, you name it. Every second independent repair shop in Europe has fixed a Xiaomi at some point; there are tutorials, spares and whole communities dedicated to keeping them rolling. Warranty tends to be handled via big retailers, which at least gives you someone to complain to.

Acer, meanwhile, is still a newcomer to scooters. They have global infrastructure from their PC business, which helps - you're not relying on a one-man shop in another time zone - but the depth of scooter-specific parts and know-how simply isn't at Xiaomi level yet. Finding a replacement controller or specific plastics in a few years may be a more "creative" exercise. The electronics pedigree is there, the mechanical ecosystem is... developing.

If you're the kind of rider who keeps a scooter for several years and expects to repair rather than replace, Xiaomi is the safer long-term bet.

Pros & Cons Summary

Xiaomi Electric Scooter 4 Pro 2nd Gen Acer ES Series 3
Pros
  • Strong, confident acceleration and hill ability
  • Wide tubeless tyres with good comfort for a rigid scooter
  • Rear-wheel drive and traction control for stability
  • Solid, rattle-free build that feels like a real vehicle
  • Good real-world range for daily commuting
  • Excellent parts availability and community support
  • Integrated turn signals and thoughtful lighting
Pros
  • Very affordable for a branded scooter
  • Light enough to carry regularly
  • Puncture-proof tyres - no flats, ever
  • Fast charging suitable for office top-ups
  • Clean, modern design with internal cabling
  • Turn signals and decent braking for the class
Cons
  • Heavy to carry up multiple flights
  • No mechanical suspension - harsh on truly bad roads
  • Speed strictly limited and difficult to unlock
  • Dashboard plastic scratches easily
  • Slow charging relative to battery size
Cons
  • Harsh ride on anything but smooth tarmac
  • Weak uphill performance, especially with heavier riders
  • Limited range for serious commuting
  • Solid tyres compromise grip and comfort
  • Less mature parts and service ecosystem

Parameters Comparison

Parameter Xiaomi Electric Scooter 4 Pro 2nd Gen Acer ES Series 3
Rated motor power 400 W (rear hub) 250 W (front hub)
Peak motor power 1.000 W (approx.)
  • (not specified, entry-level)
Top speed (software-limited) 25 km/h (region dependent) 20-25 km/h (region dependent)
Claimed range 60 km 25-30 km
Real-world range (typical) ~35-45 km ~18-22 km
Battery capacity 468 Wh (48 V / 10 Ah) 270 Wh (36 V / 7,5 Ah)
Charging time ~9 h ~4 h
Weight 19 kg 16 kg
Brakes Front drum + rear electronic (E-ABS) Front electronic + rear disc brake
Suspension None (pneumatic tyres only) None (solid tyres)
Tyres 10" tubeless, self-sealing, 60 mm wide 8,5" solid rubber
Max rider load 120 kg 100 kg
Water resistance IPX4 IPX5
Price (approx.) 526 € 221 €

Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?

If you judge purely on "how little can I spend to get an electric scooter with a logo I recognise", the Acer ES Series 3 is tempting. It's small, light, cheap to buy, and doesn't ask for much in return beyond smooth roads and modest expectations.

But if you're looking for something to ride day in, day out - through mixed weather, over less-than-perfect surfaces, possibly carrying a bit of weight and climbing the odd hill - the Xiaomi Electric Scooter 4 Pro 2nd Gen is simply in another category. It accelerates with more authority, climbs with far more confidence, rides more comfortably, and feels structurally more like a transport appliance than a tech accessory. Add the healthier range and a vastly stronger parts-and-community ecosystem, and it's the one I'd actually want to live with long term.

Choose the Acer if your rides are short, flat, and infrequent, your budget is tight, and you value easy carrying and puncture-proof simplicity over everything else. Choose the Xiaomi if you genuinely intend to replace regular car or bus trips and want something that won't feel like a compromise every time the road, the weather or your schedule gets a bit more demanding.

Numbers Freaks Corner

Metric Xiaomi Electric Scooter 4 Pro 2nd Gen Acer ES Series 3
Price per Wh (€/Wh) ❌ 1,12 €/Wh ✅ 0,82 €/Wh
Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) ❌ 21,04 €/km/h ✅ 8,84 €/km/h
Weight per Wh (g/Wh) ✅ 40,60 g/Wh ❌ 59,26 g/Wh
Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) ❌ 0,76 kg/km/h ✅ 0,64 kg/km/h
Price per km of real-world range (€/km) ❌ 13,15 €/km ✅ 11,05 €/km
Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) ✅ 0,48 kg/km ❌ 0,80 kg/km
Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) ✅ 11,70 Wh/km ❌ 13,50 Wh/km
Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) ✅ 16,00 W/km/h ❌ 10,00 W/km/h
Weight to power ratio (kg/W) ✅ 0,0475 kg/W ❌ 0,0640 kg/W
Average charging speed (W) ❌ 52,00 W ✅ 67,50 W

These metrics show how much you pay and carry per unit of energy, speed and range, plus how efficiently each scooter uses its battery. Price-oriented ratios naturally favour the cheaper Acer, while energy and performance efficiency strongly favour the Xiaomi. Charging speed simply reflects how aggressively each battery is replenished: the Acer fills a smaller tank faster; the Xiaomi refuels a larger tank more gently.

Author's Category Battle

Category Xiaomi Electric Scooter 4 Pro 2nd Gen Acer ES Series 3
Weight ❌ Noticeably heavier to haul ✅ Easier to carry upstairs
Range ✅ Comfortable daily commuting range ❌ Short, last-mile focused
Max Speed ✅ Holds limit more strongly ❌ Struggles to maintain pace
Power ✅ Strong, torquey commuter motor ❌ Entry-level, flat-only feel
Battery Size ✅ Much larger energy reserve ❌ Small pack, short reach
Suspension (overall comfort) ✅ Big pneumatics soften ride ❌ Solid tyres, harsh feel
Design ✅ Mature, transport-tool look ❌ More gadget than vehicle
Safety ✅ Better grip, rear drive ❌ Solid tyres, less traction
Practicality ✅ Better for real commuting ❌ Limited by power, range
Comfort ✅ Smoother on mixed surfaces ❌ Teeth-rattling on bad roads
Features ✅ Stronger package, app, TCS ❌ Basic, limited extras
Serviceability ✅ Huge parts, guides, shops ❌ New brand, fewer spares
Customer Support ✅ Wide retail support network ❌ Less scooter-specific depth
Fun Factor ✅ Torquey, stable, confidence ❌ Mild, more functional
Build Quality ✅ Feels tank-like, solid ❌ Decent, but more lightweight
Component Quality ✅ Stronger motor, tyres, brakes ❌ Budget-class hardware
Brand Name ✅ Established scooter reputation ❌ New to scooters
Community ✅ Huge, active user base ❌ Smaller, less resources
Lights (visibility) ✅ Bright, auto, good layout ❌ Adequate but more basic
Lights (illumination) ✅ Better real road lighting ❌ Sufficient for short hops
Acceleration ✅ Snappy for the class ❌ Gentle, unexciting
Arrive with smile factor ✅ Feels like a "proper" ride ❌ More relief than joy
Arrive relaxed factor ✅ Stable, less stressful ❌ Harsh ride, more tiring
Charging speed (experience) ❌ Long overnight sessions ✅ Quick office top-ups
Reliability (long term) ✅ Proven platform, strong record ❌ More question marks
Folded practicality ❌ Heavy, bulkier to stash ✅ Compact, easy to handle
Ease of transport ❌ Awkward on stairs, trains ✅ Comfortable to lug around
Handling ✅ Planted, confident at speed ❌ Nervous on rough patches
Braking performance ✅ Strong, predictable commuter stop ❌ Adequate, but less refined
Riding position ✅ Suits wide range of heights ❌ Tall riders feel cramped
Handlebar quality ✅ Wider, more confidence ❌ Narrower, more basic feel
Throttle response ✅ Strong yet controlled ❌ Soft, slightly anaemic
Dashboard/Display ✅ Clear, integrated, informative ❌ Simple, can wash out
Security (locking) ✅ Better app lock ecosystem ❌ Physical lock only, basic
Weather protection ✅ Proven in real wet use ✅ Solid rating, sealed tyres
Resale value ✅ Strong, high demand ❌ Lower, niche presence
Tuning potential ❌ Encrypted, hard to mod ❌ Limited, budget hardware
Ease of maintenance ✅ Common parts, known fixes ❌ Less documentation, support
Value for Money ✅ Worth it for real commuters ❌ Cheap, but many compromises

Overall Winner Declaration

Winner

In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the XIAOMI Electric Scooter 4 Pro 2nd Gen scores 5 points against the ACER ES Series 3's 5. In the Author's Category Battle, the XIAOMI Electric Scooter 4 Pro 2nd Gen gets 34 ✅ versus 5 ✅ for ACER ES Series 3.

Totals: XIAOMI Electric Scooter 4 Pro 2nd Gen scores 39, ACER ES Series 3 scores 10.

Based on the scoring, the XIAOMI Electric Scooter 4 Pro 2nd Gen is our overall winner. Riding both back-to-back, the Xiaomi 4 Pro 2nd Gen simply feels more like a trustworthy companion than a toy - it has the composure, range and solidity that make you actually want to use it every day, not just when the sun is out and the road is perfect. The Acer ES Series 3 is like a friendly introduction to e-scooters that keeps your wallet safe, but its limits show up quickly once you ask for more than short, easy hops. If you can stretch to it, the Xiaomi is the scooter you grow with; the Acer is the scooter you outgrow.

That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.