Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)
The Xiaomi Electric Scooter 5 Max edges out overall thanks to its vastly superior comfort, more planted ride, and better all-weather confidence - it feels more like a small vehicle than a gadget. If your commute is longer, bumpier, and you don't have to drag the scooter up stairs daily, the 5 Max is the more future-proof choice.
The Xiaomi Electric Scooter 4 Pro 2nd Gen makes more sense if you want something a bit lighter, a bit cheaper, and you mainly ride on decent tarmac where suspension is "nice to have" rather than "my spine demands it". It's the safer bet for shorter, mostly smooth city hops and for people who still occasionally need to carry their scooter.
In short: 5 Max for comfort-first commuters, 4 Pro 2nd Gen for riders who care a little more about weight and price than plushness. Stick around - the real story is in the details.
Electric scooters have grown up. Xiaomi, the brand that put half of Europe on two tiny wheels, now sells machines that look less like toys and more like compact urban vehicles. The Electric Scooter 4 Pro 2nd Gen and the 5 Max sit right in that "serious commuter" space - not cheap entry-level toys, not monstrous dual-motor missiles, but the kind of scooters you actually live with day after day.
I've put proper city kilometres on both - including the usual diet of cracked pavements, wet leaves, impatient drivers and badly timed traffic lights. On paper they're suspiciously similar: rear-wheel drive, similar power, same legal top speed, similar claimed range. In practice, they ride very differently and suit different kinds of compromises.
If you're wondering whether to save a bit with the 4 Pro 2nd Gen or stretch to the cushier 5 Max, this comparison will walk you through how they really behave on the street - and which one you're more likely to still like after the honeymoon period.
Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?
Both scooters live in the upper mid-range commuter bracket - the "I'm actually replacing public transport or short car trips" category. Prices sit firmly above the cheap-and-cheerful stuff, but well below the wild high-performance monsters that need motorcycle armour and a therapist.
The 4 Pro 2nd Gen aims to be the "serious but still manageable" city scooter: a bit more power, more stability and more range than the classic Xiaomi commuters, but still just about portable and straightforward. Think of it as the pragmatic upgrade for M365 graduates who now have a longer commute but still occasionally meet stairs.
The 5 Max, on the other hand, is Xiaomi admitting that roads are terrible and people's backs don't like it. It's heavier, chunkier and more comfortable, with real suspension at both ends. It targets riders who care less about carrying the scooter and more about not arriving home feeling like they've spent the day in a paint shaker.
Why compare them? Because if you're shopping in this price and performance band, these are essentially siblings fighting for the same spot in your hallway. One sells itself on being more practical, the other on being more pleasant. Your choice is all about which compromises you're willing to live with.
Design & Build Quality
Visually, both scream "modern Xiaomi": minimalist, matte black, nothing flashy, cables tucked away, and a general air of "I commute, I don't cosplay Tron". Side by side, though, the 5 Max looks like the 4 Pro 2nd Gen after a winter bulk-up phase - thicker stem, more mass around the wheels, visible suspension hardware. You instantly sense which one took the salad and which one took seconds.
Both use carbon-steel frames, and both feel sturdier than their price suggests. Neither flexes or creaks when you load them up or brake hard. Stem wobble, the plague of early scooters, is refreshingly absent on both. The folding mechanisms snap shut with that reassuring "I'm not going to fold mid-ride" clack, and once locked, there's no noticeable play. From a structural point of view, they're equally grown-up.
The difference is how that structure is used. The 4 Pro 2nd Gen keeps things simple: rigid frame, no suspension, chunky tubeless tyres doing all the filtering. The 5 Max integrates its suspension neatly into the design; it still looks like a Xiaomi, just a slightly angrier one. Up close, the 5 Max feels a touch more "engineered" and a touch less "refined slab of metal", but both are comfortably above the plastic-fantastic budget crowd.
Dashboards are similar: clean, central displays with the usual speed/battery/mode information. Both screens have the same party trick: they look good out of the box and then slowly collect scratches like a badge collection if you're not careful. Fit a film protector on either from day one if you're the kind of person who notices hairline marks.
Overall build quality is honestly very comparable. If we're splitting hairs, the 5 Max feels more like a complete vehicle, while the 4 Pro 2nd Gen feels like a ruggedised evolution of the classic Xiaomi formula. Neither impresses like a luxury scooter, neither offends like a bargain-bin clone.
Ride Comfort & Handling
This is where the two go their separate ways very quickly.
On the 4 Pro 2nd Gen, comfort is outsourced almost entirely to the big, wide tubeless tyres. On smooth or mildly rough tarmac, they do a better job than you'd expect; the ride is surprisingly civilised for a rigid frame. But give it a patched-up bike lane or a stretch of cobbles and the scooter stops being shy about the lack of suspension. After several kilometres of broken pavement, your knees and ankles will be politely asking if you've considered alternative hobbies.
The pay-off is direct handling. With no suspension to squish under you, steering feels sharp and predictable. You lean, it obeys. Quick line changes, weaving around pedestrians, snapping through tight corners - the 4 Pro 2nd Gen is happy doing the city slalom routine. It's stable at its limited top speed, but you're always aware of the road texture underneath.
The 5 Max approaches the same roads like they're mildly annoying rather than offensive. The combination of front hydraulic-spring suspension and rear springs, plus the same wide tubeless tyres, turns nasty surfaces into background noise. Rattle strips, shallow potholes, expansion joints - stuff that makes the 4 Pro 2nd Gen feel busy becomes a muted thud at worst. On longer rides, especially over mixed surfaces, the difference in fatigue is not subtle. With the 5 Max, you step off thinking about dinner, not about your chiropractor.
There is a trade-off: handling feels a tad more relaxed. The 5 Max glides more than it darts. It stays planted in corners, but that last degree of razor-sharp directness is softened by the suspension travel. For commuting, that's usually a good thing - especially in the wet - but if you really enjoy that hyper-direct feel, the 4 Pro 2nd Gen has the edge.
Put simply: if your city has reasonably smooth lanes and short commutes, the 4 Pro 2nd Gen is "comfortable enough". If your daily route includes "historic charm" in the form of broken concrete and cobblestones, the 5 Max will feel like an act of mercy.
Performance
On paper, power levels and voltage are eerily similar. In practice, both scoots feel like they were tuned by the same engineer on the same day: strong initial shove, confident ramp-up to legal limit, and then a very clear "you shall not pass" at the speed cap.
Both use rear-wheel drive from a motor that can briefly deliver far more grunt than the modest rated figure suggests. Off the line in Sport mode, they pick up with enough urgency to leave most rental scooters looking hurt. Neither is going to rip your arms off, but for urban commuting, acceleration is absolutely adequate - you keep up with bike-lane traffic without feeling like you're wringing its neck.
The climb game is a draw on feel. Steeper city ramps and bridges that make cheaper 36V scooters gasp are handled with a steady, determined pull by both. Even with a heavier rider, you don't end up foot-kicking in embarrassment unless the gradient gets truly abusive. Xiaomi's rated incline figure is optimistic as always, but in real life they're both "hills? fine." rather than "oh no, here we go again."
Throttle mapping is civilised on both, though the 5 Max feels a hair smoother, especially with its more settled chassis. The quirk they share is the conservative speed limiter. You accelerate strongly up to the legal cap, then run face-first into a virtual wall. There's no gentle soft fade - the scooter just refuses to go any faster. It's tidy for legality, but mildly annoying if you know the motor still has a bit in hand.
Braking is where neither shines, but one worries you slightly less. Both rely on a front drum and rear motor braking. This setup is blissfully low-maintenance and weather-resistant, but it doesn't deliver the brutal bite of a well-tuned disc. On the 4 Pro 2nd Gen, with its slightly lower mass, braking feels acceptable: you plan your stops, squeeze firmly, and it hauls you down in a controlled, drama-free way.
On the heavier 5 Max, the same basic system has more work to do. The rear regen helps nicely, but if you're a heavier rider and really leaning on it, the front drum can feel a bit too soft for comfort. You're unlikely to run out of brakes entirely, but you do learn to look further ahead and brake earlier than you would on a dual-disc competitor. In wet conditions, both remain predictable and stable, which is the main argument in favour of this configuration.
Battery & Range
Both scoots share the same marketing fantasy: a headline range number that assumes a light rider creeping along at jogging pace on a perfect summer test track. In the real world - mixed speeds, some hills, normal body weight, urban stop-start - they behave very similarly.
On the 4 Pro 2nd Gen, you can expect solid medium-distance commuting without drama. Hard riding in Sport mode will eat into your total, but you're still looking at enough juice for a there-and-back office run for most people, as long as your commute isn't bordering on an endurance event. Range anxiety only really starts nibbling if you're stacking detours and headwinds on top of a long route.
The 5 Max, despite a slightly bigger pack, doesn't magically double anything. In comparable conditions, its real-world range is in the same ballpark - perhaps a shade more if you ride sanely. The limiting factor isn't the capacity so much as legal speed caps and the realities of urban riding. Both are "commute all week without thinking" only if your daily distance is modest. For medium-length city rides, they are comfortable one- or two-day-per-charge machines.
Charging is where they show their age a little: both need a good overnight stint to go from empty to full. With the supplied chargers, you'll be staring at that brick for roughly the same length of time on each. For most users with a normal daily range, that just means plug in when you get home and forget about it. If you're the type who drains the pack every single day, the lack of genuinely fast charging on either scooter is mildly disappointing, but not unusual in this price class.
Efficiency-wise, both are reasonably frugal for their weight and power. The 4 Pro 2nd Gen benefits slightly from being lighter and simpler; the 5 Max spends a bit more energy keeping that suspension and extra mass rolling smoothly. Don't expect a huge difference in actual kilometres, though - in practice, route and riding style matter more than the spec sheet here.
Portability & Practicality
Here the gap is clear, and it's measured in kilograms you feel in your arms, not in marketing bullets.
The 4 Pro 2nd Gen is already on the heavy side for something you might carry with any regularity. It's fine for getting it up a short flight of stairs, into a car boot, onto a train with level access. Do that a few times a week and you'll cope. Do it several times a day up narrow stairwells and you'll quickly start browsing folding bikes instead. It's right on the border between "portable commuter" and "just leave me in the garage, please".
The 5 Max crosses that border and keeps walking. Lifting it feels like you've committed to owning a small moped with the handlebars removed. One or two steps? Fine. An underground station with no lift? That's an unplanned workout. If your daily routine includes lots of carrying, this scooter will become the enemy very quickly, no matter how nice it rides.
Both fold down into a reasonably compact package and slide under desks or into car boots without drama. The folding systems are quick and confidence-inspiring, and both lock to the rear mudguard for easier handling. Here they're evenly matched.
Weather practicality tilts towards the 5 Max. Its higher water protection rating, especially around the battery, makes it a more convincing "all-weather" tool. The 4 Pro 2nd Gen will survive drizzle and splashes, but you're more cautious about deep puddles and sustained downpours. If you live somewhere it rains sideways eight months a year, the 5 Max carries that burden a bit better.
In daily grind terms: the 4 Pro 2nd Gen suits flat access commutes with the occasional set of stairs; the 5 Max suits ground-floor garages and lifts. Treat the 5 Max as a thing you roll, not a thing you regularly carry, and you'll get on fine.
Safety
Both scooters tick the key modern safety boxes: rear-wheel drive for better traction, traction control to tame slips, app integration for basic locking, and proper lights plus turn signals so you're not doing one-handed arm semaphore in traffic like it's 1993.
Lighting is strong on both. Auto-on headlights are bright enough for urban speeds, rear lights respond to braking, and the integrated bar-end indicators are frankly one of the best upgrades Xiaomi has given its commuters. Being able to signal confidently without sacrificing a hand on the bars is a meaningful safety boost, especially in busy bike lanes or filtering next to cars.
Stability is good on each, but for different reasons. The 4 Pro 2nd Gen feels taut and predictable; the wide tyres and rear drive keep it planted on dry roads, and the rigid frame communicates clearly what the surface is doing. The 5 Max, with its suspension, takes it further: over broken surfaces and in the wet it feels more composed, because the wheels are spending more time actually in contact with the ground instead of skipping.
Braking, as mentioned, is merely adequate on both. The 4 Pro 2nd Gen gets away with it better thanks to its lower mass; you can stop hard without leaning halfway over the bars. On the 5 Max, heavier riders will occasionally wish Xiaomi had swallowed the extra cost and gone for a proper front disc. It's not unsafe if ridden as intended, but it doesn't inspire the kind of "I can scrub speed whenever I want" confidence that some rivals manage.
In foul weather, the 5 Max's higher water resistance and suspension just make it feel more sure-footed and less twitchy. If you ride all year, in the dark and the wet, the 5 Max builds a slightly thicker safety cushion around your mistakes.
Community Feedback
| XIAOMI Electric Scooter 4 Pro 2nd Gen | XIAOMI Electric Scooter 5 Max |
|---|---|
What riders love
|
What riders love
|
What riders complain about
|
What riders complain about
|
Price & Value
Neither scooter is a bargain-bin steal, and neither is outrageously overpriced for what it offers. The 4 Pro 2nd Gen comes in noticeably cheaper, and for many riders that alone will be compelling: you get a robust, known-quantity commuter from a big brand, with decent comfort, for less money. It feels fairly priced rather than generous, but you do at least get what you paid for.
The 5 Max asks for a chunk more cash, and in exchange gives you comfort, better weather protection and a generally more "grown-up" road presence. Xiaomi isn't gifting you anything here either - you're paying for that suspension and extra refinement. Whether that's "worth it" depends entirely on how bad your roads are and how long your rides are. If your daily route is short and mostly smooth, the premium looks less tempting; if your city's infrastructure is a patchwork quilt, the price starts feeling more like a health investment than a luxury.
Against lesser-known brands touting flashy numbers, both Xiaomis justify their tags with build quality, strong resale value and an ecosystem of parts and support. They're not the cheap thrill option; they're the "I'd prefer not to be stranded with a dead display and no spares" option.
Service & Parts Availability
This is one area where the two are effectively identical: same brand, same ecosystem, same benefits. Xiaomi's ubiquity means parts, tyres, brake components and third-party accessories are everywhere. Any shop that's ever serviced a Xiaomi will be able to work on either of these without a learning curve.
Official service in Europe is handled through established retailers and authorised centres. It's not luxurious, but it exists - which is already more than can be said for some of the smaller import brands. Online communities, guides and tutorials are abundant for both, with the 4 Pro 2nd Gen having a slight head start simply because it's closer in spirit to previous Pro models.
In real terms: if something breaks that isn't catastrophic, you'll almost certainly be able to fix it without turning your garage into a parts graveyard.
Pros & Cons Summary
| XIAOMI Electric Scooter 4 Pro 2nd Gen | XIAOMI Electric Scooter 5 Max |
|---|---|
Pros
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
Cons
|
Parameters Comparison
| Parameter | XIAOMI Electric Scooter 4 Pro 2nd Gen | XIAOMI Electric Scooter 5 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Motor rated power | 400 W rear | 400 W rear |
| Motor peak power | 1.000 W | 1.000 W |
| Top speed (software limited) | 25 km/h | 25 km/h |
| Claimed max range | 60 km | 60 km |
| Real-world range (approx.) | 35-45 km | 35-45 km |
| Battery capacity | 468 Wh (48 V, 10 Ah) | 477 Wh (48 V, 10,2 Ah) |
| Weight | 19,0 kg | 22,3 kg |
| Brakes | Front drum + rear E-ABS | Front drum + rear E-ABS |
| Suspension | None (pneumatic tyres only) | Front dual hydraulic-spring + rear dual-spring |
| Tyres | 10" tubeless pneumatic, 60 mm wide | 10" tubeless pneumatic |
| Max load | 120 kg | 120 kg |
| IP rating | IPX4 | IPX5 body / IPX6 battery |
| Charging time | 9 h | 9 h |
| Price (approx.) | 526 € | 614 € |
Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?
Neither of these scooters is perfect, and neither is a bad choice. They sit in that slightly awkward but very real middle ground: honest commuters with a few annoyances, rather than halo products that wow you at every turn. Your decision rests almost entirely on two axes: comfort versus portability, and price versus refinement.
If your daily riding is mostly on half-decent asphalt, your commute distances are moderate, and you sometimes need to carry the scooter - up office stairs, onto a train, into a boot - the Xiaomi Electric Scooter 4 Pro 2nd Gen is the more sensible compromise. It's cheaper, noticeably lighter, and still powerful enough to handle hills and heavier riders without drama. You'll feel the lack of suspension on truly bad roads, but you won't be cursing its weight every time you meet a staircase.
If, however, your city infrastructure was clearly designed by someone who hates wheels, the Xiaomi Electric Scooter 5 Max is the better long-term partner. Its suspension and extra stability make daily riding simply less punishing, especially over rough surfaces and in foul weather. You give up portability and pay extra for the privilege, and the braking could be better for its mass, but as a rolling object - the thing you're actually on for many kilometres - it's the more pleasant place to live.
My call: for most commuters with ugly roads and fixed storage, the 5 Max justifies its extra weight and price. For mixed-mode commuters and those on tighter budgets, the 4 Pro 2nd Gen remains the more practical, if slightly less comfortable, option.
Numbers Freaks Corner
| Metric | Xiaomi Electric Scooter 4 Pro 2nd Gen | Xiaomi Electric Scooter 5 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Price per Wh (€/Wh) | ✅ 1,124 €/Wh | ❌ 1,287 €/Wh |
| Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) | ✅ 21,04 €/km/h | ❌ 24,56 €/km/h |
| Weight per Wh (g/Wh) | ✅ 40,60 g/Wh | ❌ 46,76 g/Wh |
| Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) | ✅ 0,76 kg/km/h | ❌ 0,89 kg/km/h |
| Price per km of real-world range (€/km) | ✅ 13,15 €/km | ❌ 15,35 €/km |
| Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) | ✅ 0,48 kg/km | ❌ 0,56 kg/km |
| Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) | ✅ 11,70 Wh/km | ❌ 11,93 Wh/km |
| Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) | ✅ 40,00 W/km/h | ✅ 40,00 W/km/h |
| Weight to power ratio (kg/W) | ✅ 0,0190 kg/W | ❌ 0,0223 kg/W |
| Average charging speed (W) | ❌ 52,00 W | ✅ 53,00 W |
These metrics put hard numbers on the trade-offs. Price per Wh and per kilometre show how much you pay for each unit of energy and real-world distance. Weight-related metrics tell you how much mass you're hauling around for the performance and range you get. Efficiency (Wh/km) indicates how gently they sip from the battery, while power-to-speed and weight-to-power show how "muscular" each scooter is relative to its output. Average charging speed is simply how quickly energy goes back into the pack - useful if you frequently recharge from low.
Author's Category Battle
| Category | Xiaomi Electric Scooter 4 Pro 2nd Gen | Xiaomi Electric Scooter 5 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | ✅ Noticeably lighter to lug | ❌ Heavy, awkward to carry |
| Range | ✅ Similar, slightly more efficient | ❌ No real-world advantage |
| Max Speed | ✅ Same cap, cheaper | ✅ Same cap, more stable |
| Power | ✅ Feels adequate, lighter load | ✅ Same grunt, copes with mass |
| Battery Size | ❌ Slightly smaller pack | ✅ Marginally bigger capacity |
| Suspension | ❌ None, tyres only | ✅ Real front and rear system |
| Design | ✅ Slimmer, classic Xiaomi look | ❌ Bulkier, less elegant |
| Safety | ❌ Less stable on rough, wet | ✅ Suspension and water rating |
| Practicality | ✅ Better for mixed-mode use | ❌ Weight limits flexibility |
| Comfort | ❌ Fine, but rigid on bumps | ✅ Clearly more plush ride |
| Features | ❌ Fewer comfort-focused extras | ✅ Suspension, better weatherproof |
| Serviceability | ✅ Simpler hardware, easier work | ❌ More parts, more faff |
| Customer Support | ✅ Same Xiaomi network | ✅ Same Xiaomi network |
| Fun Factor | ✅ Lighter, nimbler feel | ❌ More sensible than playful |
| Build Quality | ✅ Solid, no major flaws | ✅ Equally robust, refined |
| Component Quality | ✅ Decent, proven parts | ✅ Similar, plus suspension |
| Brand Name | ✅ Strong Xiaomi reputation | ✅ Same strong reputation |
| Community | ✅ Huge user base, mods | ✅ Growing, shared ecosystem |
| Lights (visibility) | ✅ Very good, indicators | ✅ Equally good setup |
| Lights (illumination) | ❌ Good but basic | ✅ Auto-bright, more polished |
| Acceleration | ✅ Punchy, benefits from weight | ✅ Strong, stable under power |
| Arrive with smile factor | ❌ Fine, not thrilling | ✅ Smoothness keeps you grinning |
| Arrive relaxed factor | ❌ Rough roads tire you | ✅ Suspension saves your body |
| Charging speed | ❌ Same time, less energy | ✅ Slightly more Wh per hour |
| Reliability | ✅ Fewer moving parts | ❌ More to eventually maintain |
| Folded practicality | ✅ Smaller, easier to stash | ❌ Bulkier footprint |
| Ease of transport | ✅ Manageable for most people | ❌ Painful beyond short carries |
| Handling | ✅ Sharper, more direct | ❌ Softer, more relaxed |
| Braking performance | ✅ Adequate for weight | ❌ Feels soft for its mass |
| Riding position | ✅ Comfortable commuter stance | ✅ Equally good, very similar |
| Handlebar quality | ✅ Wider, stable, comfortable | ✅ Similar, well executed |
| Throttle response | ✅ Smooth enough, predictable | ✅ Slightly smoother mapping |
| Dashboard/Display | ✅ Clean, legible, integrated | ✅ Same strengths, same flaws |
| Security (locking) | ✅ App lock, common hardware | ✅ Same, equally workable |
| Weather protection | ❌ Basic splash resistance | ✅ Better IP, happier in rain |
| Resale value | ✅ Strong, mainstream demand | ✅ Strong, comfort is desirable |
| Tuning potential | ❌ Locked ecosystem, hard to mod | ❌ Same story, limited tweaks |
| Ease of maintenance | ✅ Simple layout, fewer systems | ❌ Suspension adds complexity |
| Value for Money | ✅ Cheaper, strong overall package | ❌ Comfort premium not for everyone |
Overall Winner Declaration
In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the XIAOMI Electric Scooter 4 Pro 2nd Gen scores 9 points against the XIAOMI Electric Scooter 5 Max's 2. In the Author's Category Battle, the XIAOMI Electric Scooter 4 Pro 2nd Gen gets 28 ✅ versus 25 ✅ for XIAOMI Electric Scooter 5 Max (with a few ties sprinkled in).
Totals: XIAOMI Electric Scooter 4 Pro 2nd Gen scores 37, XIAOMI Electric Scooter 5 Max scores 27.
Based on the scoring, the XIAOMI Electric Scooter 4 Pro 2nd Gen is our overall winner. Between these two, the 5 Max is the scooter I'd rather stand on every morning - it irons out the city's nonsense and feels more like a small, steady companion than a gadget hanging on for dear life. The 4 Pro 2nd Gen fights back with a more sensible weight, a kinder price tag and a sharper, more agile character, but it never quite escapes the feeling of being "just enough" rather than genuinely special. If you can live with the heft and pay the extra, the 5 Max simply makes everyday riding calmer and less tiring; if carrying and cost are real concerns, the 4 Pro 2nd Gen will still do the job reliably - just with a bit less grace over the ugly bits of your city.
That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.

